|
|
|
| FROM ATRADITIONAL RURAL VILLAGE TO THE MODERN COASTAL RESORT: LAND USE CHANGE IN THE PAST 20 YEARS IN JINSHITAN AND ITS POLICY IMPLICATION |
| XI Jian-chao1,2, WANG Xin-ge1,2,3, KONG Qin-qin1,2,3, WANG Shou-kun1,2,3 |
1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Integrating participatory rural appraisal methods (PRA), GIS spatial analysis technology and remote sensing (RS), we explored the spatial dynamics of Jinshitan coastal resort of northeast China from 1992 to 2012. It was found that Jinshitan experienced a dramatic change from a traditional rural settlement to the modern resort. During the process, traditional agricultural land was gradually taken up by tourism land (main occupied by real estate and the second home), accompanied by the transportation land, public construction land and residential land. Furthermore, study on the driving force indicated that the dramatic land use transformation was enhanced by the multi-stakeholder' participation, the benefit through the tourism industry upgrading and land capitalization and the related formal or informal regulations by the government. However, compared to the general urbanization, the urbanization in the "enclave" coastal resort was unsustainable due to 1) the limited amount of land. Currently, the expansion of the land mainly relys on the supply of the land continuously and the land capitalization. However, in the future, when there is not enough land to development, the development will be not sustainable; 2) the irrational land use type. In Jinshitan, the tourism "real estate" land supply was excess, which made a lack of other tourism development land supply; 3) the weakening "resort function". The accentuating of the "real estate", the make the increase of the price of the rates make vresort function" weakening relatively, together with the regional social isolation and local unemployment.
|
|
Received: 10 September 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016, Vol. 31 
