ACADEMIC DIALOGUE AND PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY

TANG Mao-lin

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.04.001

PDF(1558 KB)

HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2024, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4) : 1-8. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.04.001

THEORY DEVELOPMENT

ACADEMIC DIALOGUE AND PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY

TANG Mao-lin^1,2

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Academic dialogue is one of the preconditions and guarantees for the healthy development of academics. Academic translation and taking part in international conferences are important ways for Chinese scholars to talk with the world academic. Although this kind of dialogue with international academic circles is important, the interaction and dialogue between domestic disciplines and sub-disciplines or research approaches are more important and often ignored by Chinese scholars. Dialogue between disciplines is an important mechanism to ensure the healthy development of science, and this kind of dialogue is particularly important for geography (geography is positioned as a bridge discipline), and helps to improve the social identity and discipline status of human geography. The basic forms of academic dialogues include academic seminars, literature reviews in papers, theses and monogoraphes, review papers, project proposals, and debate between journal author(s) and peer experts. The communication and dialogues within a discipline are equally important, involving strengthening the dialogue and confrontation between different research approaches, improving the discussion links of academic seminars, and strengthening academic book reviews. In order to fulfill the mission of human geography, we need to pay close attention to various forms of academic dialogue, to eliminate misunderstandings, to enhance the consensus among scholars, to make more efforts in explanatory progress and conceptual progress, to tolerate academic criticism, and seriously to absorb the beneficial components of academic criticism, and to promote the knowledge production and disciplinary progress.

Key words

academic translation / dialogue between disciplines / seminar / papers and works / project proposal

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

TANG Mao-lin. ACADEMIC DIALOGUE AND PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2024, 39(4): 1-8 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.04.001

References

[1] Rose-Redwood R, Kitchin R, Rickards L, et al. The possibilities and limits to dialogue[J]. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2018, 8(2):109-123.
[2] 李旭旦.李旭旦地理文选[M]. 杭州:浙江教育出版社, 1991:290-291. [Li Xudan. Li Xudan's Selected Geographical Papers[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press, 1991:290-291.]
[3] 姜道章“. 姚译方校中国地图学史”纠谬——兼论学术著作的翻译[J]. 地理研究(台北), 1999, 30:101-123. [Chiang Tao-Chang. A critique of Dongfang Yu Xifang de Dingliang Zhitu Xue(translated by Yao Guo-Shui and corrected by Fang Hao) with a discussion on the translation of academic works[J]. Geographical Research(Taibei), 1999, 30:101-123.]
[4] 周素卿.台湾人文地理学的研究进程：知识生产特性与学科进步性之探讨[J]. 都市与计划(台北), 2002, 29(2):265-289. [Jou Sueching. The anatomy of recent human geography studies in Taiwan, China: Characteristics and progressiveness of geographical knowledge production[J]. Journal of City and Planning(Taibei), 2002, 29(2):265-289.]
[5] 汤茂林.我国人文地理学研究方法多样化问题[J]. 地理研究, 2009, 28(4): 865-882. [Tang Maolin. The diversification of research approaches in human geography in Chinese Mainland[J]. Geographical Research, 2009, 28(4):865-882.]
[6] 李旭旦. 人地关系的回顾与瞻望——兼论人文地理学的创新[J]. 世界地理集刊, 1981(2):3-7.[Li Xudan. Review of the relationship between man and land: With the innovation of human geography [J]. The World Geographic Collection, 1981(2):3-7.]
[7] 何金廖, 黄贤金.21世纪中国人文地理学研究的国际影响定量分析与挑战[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(1): 112-124. [He Jinliao, Huang Xianjin. Quantitative analysis and challenges of Chinese human geography in the international academia since 2000[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(1):112-124.]
[8] Landes D S.为什么是欧洲和西方，而不是中国?[J]. 舒萍, 译.开放时代, 2008(3):36-50. [Landes D S. Why Europe and the Western, not China?[J]. Shu Ping, trans. The Open Times, 2008(3):36-50.]
[9] 海伦·朗基诺.知识的命运[M]. 成素梅, 王不凡, 译.上海:上海译文出版社, 2016:168. [Helen Longino. The Fate of Knowledge[M]. Cheng Sumei, Wang Bufan, trans. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2016:168.]
[10] 王笛.学术规范与学术批评——谈中国问题与西方经验[J]. 开放时代, 2001(12): 56-65. [Wang Di. Academic norms and academic criticism: On China issues and Western experience[J]. The Open Times, 2001(12):56-65.]
[11] 汤茂林. 学术史意识、引证行为与我国学术积累问题——基于人文地理学研究和阅读的个人感知[J]. 地理研究, 2021, 40(9):2695-2703. [Tang Maolin. Sense of academic history, citation and academic accumulation in China:A personal perception based on human geography research and reading experience[J]. Geographical Research, 2021, 40(9):2695-2703.]
[12] 汤茂林.中外人文地理学论文写作之差别[J]. 人文地理, 2018, 33(1): 152-158. [Tang Maolin. The writing difference of human geography papers between mainl and China and Western Europe and North America[J]. Human Geography, 2018, 33(1):152-158.]
[13] 金其铭. 我国农村聚落地理研究历史及近今趋向[J]. 地理学报, 1988, 43(4):311-317. [Jin Qiming. The history and current trends of research on rural settlement geography in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1988, 43(4):311-317.]
[14] 阎小培.近年来我国城市地理学主要研究领域的新进展[J]. 地理学报, 1994, 49(6):533-542. [Yan Xiaopei. New progress in China's urban geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1994, 49(6):533-542.]
[15] 周一星, 曹广忠. 改革开放20年来的中国城市化进程[J]. 城市规划, 1999, 23(12):8-13, 60.[Zhou Yixing, Cao Guangzhong. The urbanization processin China in the last twenty years[J]. City Planning Review, 1999, 23(12):8-13, 60.]
[16] 陆大道.人文—经济地理学的方法论及其特点[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(3):387-396. [Lu Dadao. The methodology of human-economic geography and its characteristics[J]. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(3):387-396.]
[17] 周尚意.文化地理学研究方法及学科影响[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2011, 26(4):415-422. [Zhou Shangyi. On the research framework and methodologies of cultural eography[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2011, 26(4):415-422.]
[18] 贺灿飞, 郭琪, 马妍, 等. 西方经济地理学研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1207-1223. [He Canfei, Guo Qi, Ma Yan, et al. Progress of economic geography in the West: A literature review[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8):1207-1223.]
[19] 刘云刚, 李志刚, 黎斌.西方人文地理学研究评述与借鉴——面向知行合一的中国人文地理学[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1224-1233. [Liu Yungang, Li Zhigang, Li Bin. A critical review of research methods of Western human geography: A combination of knowing and doing for Chinese human geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8):1224-1233.]
[20] 钱俊希, 朱竑.新文化地理学的理论统一性与话题多样性[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(3):422-436. [Qian Junxi, Zhu Hong. Theoretical unity and thematic diversity in new cultural geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(3):422-436.]
[21] 安宁, 钱俊希, 陈晓亮, 等. 国际上的政治地理学研究进展与启示——对《Political Geography》杂志2005—2015年载文的分析[J]. 地理学报, 2016, 71(2):217-235. [An Ning, Qian Junxi, Chen Xiaoliang, et al. Progress in recent international political geography research: Towards an analysis of journal papers in Political Geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2016, 71(2):217-235.]
[22] 胡志丁, 李钰华, 王学文, 等.西方流行地缘政治研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(7): 1463-1477. [Hu Zhiding, Li Yuhua, Wang Xuewen, et al. The research progress and prospect of popular geopolitics in the West[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(7):1463-1477.]
[23] 刘卫东, 郑智.中国经济地理学的国际化[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(10): 24-32. [Liu Weidong, Zheng Zhi. Internationalization of Chinese economic geography[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(10):24-32.]
[24] 陆玉麒.中国空间格局的规律认知与理论提炼[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(12):2885-2897. [Lu Yuqi. The rule cognition and theoretical construction of spatial pattern in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(12):2885-2897.]
[25] 刘云刚, 王韬.中国政治地理学研究进展评述[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(6):1506-1517. [Liu Yungang, Wang Tao. Review and prospects of political geography in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(6):1506-1517.]
[26] 李小建. 国际经济地理学四大学派的特点及交叉[J]. 地理科学, 2023, 43(5):816-827. [Li Xiaojian. Intersections and key features of the four major schools in the international Economic Geography[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2023, 43(5):816-827.]
[27] Johnston R, Williams M. A Century of British Geography[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003:1-641.
[28] Gaile G L, Willmott C J, Geography in America at the Dawn of the 21st Century[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004:1-767.
[29] Qian Junxi. The possibilities of cosmopolitan dialogue[J]. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2018, 8(2):138-142.
[30] 埃里克·谢泼德, 特雷弗·J.巴恩斯.中文版序[M] //埃里克·谢泼德, 特雷弗·J. 巴恩斯. 经济地理学指南. 汤茂林, 谈静华, 李江涛, 等译.北京:商务印书馆, 2008:ix-xii. [Sheppard E, Barnes T J. Preface to Chinese edition[M] // Sheppard E, Barnes T J. A Companion of Economic Geography. Tang Maolin, Tan Jinghua, Li Jiangtao, trans. Beijing: The Commerical Press, 2008:ix-xii.]
[31] Sauer C O. The education of a geographer[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geogrpahers, 1956, 46(3):287-299.
[32] 蔡运龙, 陆大道, 周一星, 等.地理科学的中国进展与国际趋势[J]. 地理学报, 2004, 59(6):803-810. [Cai Yunlong, Lu Dadao, Zhou Yixing, et al. The Chinese progress and international trends of geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2004, 59(6):803-810.]
[33] James P E, Martin G J. All Possible Worlds: A History of Geogrpahical Ideas[M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1981:424.
[34] 普雷斯顿·詹姆斯, 杰弗雷·马丁. 地理学思想史[M]. 李旭旦, 译. 北京：商务印书馆, 1989. [James P E, Martin G J. A History of Geographical Ideas[M]. Li Xudan, trans. Beijing: The Commerical Press, 1989.]
[35] Martin G J. All Possible Worlds: A History of Geogrpahical Ideas [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2005:525.
[36] Barnes T J, Sheppard E. 'Nothing includes everything': Towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010, 34(2):193-214.
[37] 汤茂林.政治地理学教材写作的创新与接力——商务版刘云刚译《政治地理学》述评[J]. 地理研究, 2018, 38(9):1673-1682. [Tang Maolin. The inovation and inheritance of writing the college human geography textbooks: A review of the Chinese edition of Political Geography by The Commercial Press[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(9):1673-1682.]
[38] Bassett K. Is there progress in human geography? The problem of progress in the light of recent work in the philosophy and sociology of science[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1999, 23(1):27-47.
[39] Markusen A. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies[J]. Regional Studies, 1999, 33(9):869-884.
[40] Jamie P. Fuzzy old world: A response to Markusen[J]. Regional Studies, 2003, 37(6/7):729-740.
[41] 埃里克·谢泼德, 特雷弗·J.巴恩斯.导言:经济地理学的艺术[M] //埃里克·谢泼德, 特雷弗·J.巴恩斯.经济地理学指南.汤茂林, 谈静华, 李江涛, 等译.北京:商务印书馆, 2008:1-10. [Barnes T J, Sheppard E. Introduction: The art of economic geography[M] //Sheppard E, Barnes T J. A Companion of Economic Geography. Tang Maolin, Tan Jinghua, Li Jiangtao, trans. Beijing: The Commerical Press, 2008:1-10.]
[42] 亨利·列斐伏尔. 空间的生产[M]. 刘怀玉, 译. 北京:商务印书馆, 2021:56-70. [Lefervre H. The Production of Space[M]. Liu Huaiyu, trans. Beijing: The Commerical Press, 2021:56-70.]
[43] 汤茂林, 黄展. Empirical Research到底是实证研究还是经验研究? ——兼论学术研究的分类[J]. 地理研究, 2020, 39(12):2855-2860. [Tang Maolin, Huang Zhan. Can Empirical Research be translated into Chinese Shizheng Yanjiu? With a classification of academic research[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(12):2855-2860.]
[44] 资中筠.外国问题和国际问题研究的困惑[J]. 美国研究, 1997(1):147-152. [Zi Zhongyun. Confusion in the study of foreign and international issues[J]. The Chinese Journal of American Studies, 1997(1):147-152.]
[45] An N, Sharp J, Shaw I. Towards a Confucian geopolitics[J]. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2021, 11(2):218-235.
[46] Schaefer F K. Exceptionalism in geography: A methodological examination[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1953, 43(3):226-249.
[47] Purcell M. Islands of practice and the Marston/Brenner debate: Toward a more synthetic critical human geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2003, 27(3):317-332.
[48] 查尔斯·泰勒, 邓正来.各说各话：自由主义与社群主义之争[J]. 复旦政治哲学评论, 2011:151-171. [Charles Taylor, Deng Zhenglai. Cross-purpose: The liberal-communitarian debate[J]. Fudan Political Philosophy Review, 2011:151-171.]
[49] Yeung H W C. Troubling economic geography: New directions in the post-pandemic world[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2023, 48(4):672-680.