人文地理
   
文章快速检索 高级检索
Quick Search Adv Search
  Apr. 4, 2025 Home  About Journal  Editorial Board  Instruction  Subscription  Message  Download  Contact Us
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY  2020, Vol. 35 Issue (4): 56-63,120    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.04.008
RURAL Current Issue| Next Issue| Archive| Adv Search |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON VULNERABILITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TRADITIONAL VILLAGES
ZOU Jun1,2, LIU Yuan1,3, LIU Pei-lin1
1. National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory on Digital Preservation and Innovative Technologies for the Culture of Traditional Villages and Towns, Hengyang 421008, China;
2. The department of city and tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421008, China;
3. College of Geography Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China

Download: PDF (4341 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  The quantitative evaluation index system of landscape vulnerability of traditional village was constructed by using the framework of ‘sensitive exposure adaptability’. According to the difference of industry and income, the traditional villages are divided into three types: Tourism type, industry and trade type and migrant type, with Hunan Province as the research area, and 2 villages are selected as case villages for each type. The data were obtained from field surveys, literature reviews, questionnaires and interviews, and village vulnerability was calculated by a mathematical model method. The results show that: 1) From perspective of the degree of vulnerability, the migrant type presents the strong vulnerability, the industry and trade type presents the medium vulnerability, and the tourism type presents the micro-vulnerability; 2) From the perspective of system layer's brittle structure, tourism type, industry and trade type belong to compound fragile E-A type, and migrant type belongs to balanced E ≤ A-S type; 3) In terms of sensitivity, the sensitivity of migrant type is much higher than that of the other two types. 4) In terms of exposure, tourism type is the strong exposure, industry and trade type is the medium exposure and migrant type is the micro exposure. 5) In terms of adaptability, the tourism type is the highest, the industry and trade type is the second, and the migrant type is the worst. The main contributing factors of tourist villages are maintenance ability (O) and ideology (C). 6) There are also some differences among different types of villages in terms of brittle short plates.
Key wordstraditional villages      vulnerability      classification      quantitative evaluation      triangulation     
Received: 13 August 2019     
PACS: K901  
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZOU Jun
LIU Yuan
LIU Pei-lin
Cite this article:   
ZOU Jun,LIU Yuan,LIU Pei-lin. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON VULNERABILITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TRADITIONAL VILLAGES[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 35(4): 56-63,120.
URL:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.04.008      OR     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V35/I4/56
Copyright © 2010  Editorial Board of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and the Peking Union Medical College (PUMC)
Add:Editorial office of Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae , No.9 Dongdansantiao, Beijing PRC(100730)
Fax:010-65133074 E-mail:actacams@263.net.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech