跨国地区的空间经济联系与格局特征研究——以中国东北三省与俄罗斯远东联邦区为例

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.015

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (4408 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要以中国东北三省和俄罗斯远东联邦区为研究对象，运用区域经济等级、经济联系强度、地缘经济匹配等研究中俄跨国地区空间经济联系与格局特征，研究表明：2010—2019年，①俄远东繁荣的经济区与停滞的落后区两极分化现象显著。一级经济区位于滨海边疆区、哈巴罗夫斯克（伯力）边疆区、萨哈（雅库特）共和国、萨哈林（库页）州，二级经济区分布在阿穆尔州、外贝加尔边疆区、布里亚特共和国，三级经济区包含堪察加边疆区、马加丹州、犹太自治州、楚科奇自治区。②中国东北三省与俄远东区的经济联系强度不断增强，同其毗邻东向的滨海边疆区，北向的阿穆尔州和哈巴罗夫斯克（伯力）边疆区的经济联系量最多。空间上，中国东北三省与俄远东不同地区（南部>西部>东北部）经济联系差异较大，呈“南高北低、西高东低”的格局特征。③中国东北三省与俄远东多数联邦主体隶属于地缘经济互补型，表现出距离越近的联邦主体、竞争关系较强，距离越远的联邦主体、互补关系较强的态势。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	初楠臣
	吴相利
	张平宇
	张鹏
	王颖
	徐爽

关键词 ：地区经济等级, 经济联系强度, 地缘经济关系, 中国东北三省, 俄罗斯远东区

Abstract：This paper studied the spatial economic linkage and pattern characteristics between Chinese northeast provinces and Russian Far East federal district during 2010—2019. Firstly, the regional economic grade of Russian Far East federal subjects was evaluated by the economic grade index. Then based on the economic linkage intensity, this paper analyzed the economic interaction between Chinese northeast provinces and Russian Far East federal subjects. Finally, geo- economic matching model was studied between Chinese northeast provinces and Russian Far East federal subjects. The results are as following. First, the polarization is obvious between the prosperous developed federal subjects and the stagnant faraway federal subjects. Second, the economic linkage intensity between Chinese northeast provinces and Russian Far East federal subjects has been increasing from 2010 to 2019. Finally, most of the Far East federal subjects and Chinese northeast provinces belong to the geo-economic complementary type.

Key words： regional economic grade economic linkage intensity geo- economic relations Chinese north east provinces Russian Far East federal district

收稿日期: 2021-07-26

PACS:

F119.9

基金资助:黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目(21JLC201);国家自然科学基金项目(42101165);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2021M693817)

通讯作者: 吴相利(1964-),男,黑龙江庆安人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为区域开发与空间规划。E-mail:jndxwxl@163.com。 E-mail: jndxwxl@163.com。

作者简介: 初楠臣(1992-),男,黑龙江佳木斯人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为城市地理与区域发展。E-mail:chunanchen_1992@163.com。

引用本文:

初楠臣, 吴相利, 张平宇, 张鹏, 王颖, 徐爽. 跨国地区的空间经济联系与格局特征研究——以中国东北三省与俄罗斯远东联邦区为例[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(4): 132-140. CHU Nan-chen, WU Xiang-li, ZHANG Ping-yu, ZHANG Peng, WANG Ying, XU Shuang. SPATIAL ECONOMIC LINKAGE AND PATTERN CHARACTERISTICS OF TRANSNATIONAL DISTRICTS:A CASE STUDY OF CHINESE NORTHEAST PROVINCES AND RUSSIAN FAR EAST FEDERAL DISTRICT. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 37(4): 132-140.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.015 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V37/I4/132

[1]	Friedmann J. The world city hypothesis[J]. Development and Change, 1995,17(1):69-83.
[2]	Johnson C M. Cross- border regions and territorial restructuring in central Europe: Room for more transboundary space[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2009,16(2):191-206.
[3]	Klatt M, Herrmann H. Half empty or half full? Over 30 years of regional cross- border cooperation within the EU: Experiences at the Dutch- German and Danish- German border[J]. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 2011,26(1):65-87.
[4]	Акиндинова Н, Ясин Е. Новый этап развития экономики в пост советской России[J]. Вопросы экономики, 2015,5:5-27.
[5]	Ассекритов С, Широбокова В. Межбюджетные отношенения: Проблемы и подходы к их решению[J]. Экономист, 2001(1):67- 70.
[6]	Buch T, Schmidt T D, Niebuhr A. Cross-border commuting in the Danish- German border region- integration, institutions and crossborder interaction[J]. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 2009,24(2): 38-54.
[7]	Мачерет Д А, Епишкин И А. Взаимное влияние институцио нальных и транспортных факторов экономического развития: Pетроспективный анализ[J]. Журнал институциональных исследований, 2017,9(4):80-100.
[8]	Иванова В, Крепышева Н. Финансово-кредитные организации в системе регионального управлениясоциально- кономическимра звитием[J]. Экономист, 2003(7):27-32.
[9]	Баранов С, Скуфьина Т. Анализ межрегиональной дифференциации и построение рейтингов субъектов российской федер фциии[J]. Экономист, 2005(8):54-75.
[10]	Caliendo L, Parro F. Estimates of the trade and welfare effects of NAFTA[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2015,82(1):1-44.
[11]	王昆.跨国境地区合作机制研究[J].国际城市规划,2016,31(3):35- 39. [Wang Kun. A study on the mechanism of cross-border cooperation[J]. Urban Planning International, 2016,31(3):35-39.]
[12]	公丕萍,宋周莺,刘卫东.中国与俄罗斯及中亚地区的贸易格局分析[J].地理研究,2015,34(5):812-824. [Gong Peiping, Song Zhouying, Liu Weidong. A study on trade pattern of China with Russia and Central Asia[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(5):812-824.]
[13]	邹嘉龄,刘卫东.2001—2013年中国与“一带一路” 沿线国家贸易网络分析[J].地理科学,2016,36(11):1629-1636. [Zou Jialing, Liu Weidong. Trade network of China and countries along "Belt and Road Initiative" areas from 2001 to 2013[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016,36(11):1629-1636.]
[14]	曹小曙,李涛,杨文越,等.基于陆路交通的丝绸之路经济带可达性与城市空间联系[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(6):657- 664. [Cao Xiaoshu, Li Tao, Yang Wenyue, et al. Accessibility and urban spatial connections of cities in the Silk Road Economic Belt based on land transportation[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(6):657-664.]
[15]	初楠臣,张平宇.基于可达性的中俄跨国班列沿线城市经济联系——以中俄K19/K20班列为例[J].经济地理,2018,38(6):10-18. [Chu Nanchen, Zhang Pingyu. Transnational urban economic connection based on railway accessibility: Taking Sino- Russian K19/ K20 class train as an example[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(6): 10-18.]
[16]	宗会明,杜瑜,黄言.中国西南地区—东南亚国家陆路交通可达性与城市空间联系格局[J].经济地理,2020,40(5):90-98. [Zong Huiming, Du Yu, Huang Yan. Accessibility and spatial linkage of cities between southwest China and SEA countries based on land transportation[J]. Economic Geography, 2020,40(5):90-98.]
[17]	王成金,金凤君.从航空国际网络看我国对外联系的空间演变[J]. 经济地理,2005,25(5):667-672. [Wang Chengjin, Jin Fengjun. Spatial evolvement of China international relation through analyzing aviation international networks[J]. Economic Geography, 2005,25(5):667-672.]
[18]	王姣娥,王涵,焦敬娟“ . 一带一路” 与中国对外航空运输联系[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(5):554- 562. [Wang Jiaoe, Wang Han, Jiao Jingjuan. China's international aviation transport to "the Belt and Road Initiative" area[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(5):554- 562.]
[19]	李恩康,陆玉麒,杨星,等.全球城市网络联系强度的时空演化研究——基于2014—2018年航空客运数据[J].地理科学,2020,40(1): 32-39. [Li Enkang, Lu Yuqi, Yang Xing, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution on connection strength of global city network based on passenger flight data from 2014 to 2018[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(1):32-39.]
[20]	郭建科,侯雅洁,何瑶“ . 一带一路” 背景下中欧港口航运网络的演化特征[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(5):716-726. [Guo Jianke, Hou Yajie, He Yao. Characteristics of change of the China-Europe port shipping network under "the Belt and Road Initiative"[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(5):716-726.]
[21]	王成金.全球集装箱航运的空间组织网络[J].地理研究,2008, 27(3):636- 648. [Wang Chengjin. Spatial organization networks of world marine container transportation[J]. Geographical Research, 2008,27(3):636-648.]
[22]	李艳,孙阳,姚士谋.一国两制背景下跨境口岸与中国全球城市区域空间联系——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J].地理研究,2020,39(9): 2109- 2129. [Li Yan, Sun Yang, Yao Shimou. Cross- border ports and the spatial linkages of China's global city regions in the context of "one country, two systems": Taking the Guangdong-Hong KongMacao Greater Bay Area as an example[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(9):2109-2129.]
[23]	初楠臣,姜博.哈大齐城市密集区空间联系演变特征——基于东北振兴战略实施前后的视角[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):66-72. [Chu Nanchen, Jiang Bo. Evolution characteristics of spatial linkages in Ha-Da-Qi city concentrated area before and after the implementation of strategy of Northeast revitalization[J]. Economic Geography, 2015,35(3):66-72.]
[24]	江进德,赵雪雁,张方圆.安徽省合肥和芜湖市对外经济联系量与地缘经济关系匹配分析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(2):137- 144. [Jiang Jinde, Zhao Xueyan, Zhang Fangyuan. Analysis of the match between the inter-city economic contact and geo-economics relationship: Take Hefei and Wuhu for example[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012,21(2):137-144.]
[25]	邓春玉.珠三角经济圈对外经济联系与地缘经济关系匹配分析[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(2):208-216. [Deng Chunyu. A matching analysis on the foreign economic contact and geo- economic relationship of the economic circle PRD[J]. Progress in Geography, 2010,29(2):208-216.]