人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年4月8日 星期二  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2008, Vol. 23 Issue (1): 48-51    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2008.01.011
城市 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
城镇化水平差异的模糊综合评价——以西安市临潼区为例
王文博, 蔡运龙
北京大学 城市与环境学院资源与环境地理系, 北京 100871
FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENCES IN URBANIZATION LEVELS——A Case Study of Lintong District, Xi'an
WANG Wen-bo, CAI Yun-long
Department of Geography, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

全文: PDF (1154 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 在制定城乡发展规划时需评估区域内不同乡镇城镇化水平差异,而单一人口城镇化指标不能满足城镇化水平差异分析的要求,特别难于评价农业人口比重较大的小城镇之间城镇化水平的真实差异。采用模糊综合评价的方法,针对人口、产值、产业发展和交通设施等指标及其相应的二级指标进行城镇化水平差异综合评价。在评价过程中,利用相关统计数据,来比较西安市临潼区内各乡镇城镇化水平的差异。通过结果划分得到具有相对比较意义的核心城区、中心城镇、重点乡镇和一般乡镇四级的城镇体系。为临潼区城镇体系发展规划等工作提供一定的依据。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 城镇化水平模糊综合评价临潼区    
Abstract:A single urbanized population index does not accurately represent the differences in urbanization levels of small towns. This paper seeks to suggest a more comprehensive urbanization evaluation method that uses instead a two-level indicator variable system. This method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation utilizes the summarized statistical data to compare and analyze the different levels of urbanization in towns of Lintong district.
This process of comprehensive evaluation relies on two layers of detail. The base layer uses data on population, production value, industrial development, and transportation infrastructure as indicators of urbanization level. This combination provides a much more robust evaluation of urbanization differences than the single urbanized population ratio. Each of these base indexes can be further divided into related secondary indicators to give a more comprehensive measure of urbanization level: 1) The population index can be subdivided into non-agricultural population and density of population figures for each town. The comprehensive evaluation method can then be applied to these secondary indicators and an overall population index value can be calculated. 2) The production value index reflects the production output values in each town. This indicator can be subdivided into industrial output and the ration of agricultural output to industrial output; each of these sub-indicators can be further normalized and classified. Using these secondary indicator values, the comprehensive evaluation method can be applied to calculate an overall production value. 3) The industrial development index represents the layout of industries and enterprises. It can be calculated from the following secondary indexes: distribution of enterprises above a designated size, situation of industrial parks, and distribution of high-tech and new-tech enterprises. 4) The transportation infrastructure index is a measure of the accessibility of each node. It can be calculated by examining the number of railways, highways, provincial roads, county roads and rural roads in a given region.
The four above-mentioned indexes and the comprehensive evaluation method can be used to calculate the different urbanization levels present in Lintong district. The results show that towns in Lintong district can be assigned to one of the following classifications: core urbanized area, centrally-located town, important town, general town. This method of evaluation will contribute to the urban system planning in Lintong district.
Key wordsurbanization level    fuzzy comprehensive evaluation    Lintong district   
收稿日期: 2007-01-30     
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(40571002)

作者简介: 王文博(1981-),男,北京人,博士研究生,主要从事资源与区域(旅游)开发方面的研究。
引用本文:   
王文博, 蔡运龙. 城镇化水平差异的模糊综合评价——以西安市临潼区为例[J]. 人文地理, 2008, 23(1): 48-51. WANG Wen-bo, CAI Yun-long. FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION OF DIFFERENCES IN URBANIZATION LEVELS——A Case Study of Lintong District, Xi'an. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 23(1): 48-51.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2008.01.011      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2008/V23/I1/48
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司