社会建构主义视角下的区域:研究综述与启示

陈品宇, 李鲁奇, 孔翔

人文地理 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 10-16,61.

PDF(1605 KB)
PDF(1605 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 10-16,61. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.06.002
进展与动态

社会建构主义视角下的区域:研究综述与启示

  • 陈品宇, 李鲁奇, 孔翔
作者信息 +

CONCEPTUALIZING REGION FROM A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PERSPECTIVE: RESEARCH PROGRESS AND IMPLICATIONS

  • CHEN Pin-yu, LI Lu-qi, KONG Xiang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

区域一直是地理学研究的核心概念。近些年来,如同“空间”和“地方”在本体论和认识论的变化,“区域”的含义也受到了由空间分析范式转变所带来的挑战和修正。基于这种背景,本文梳理了从社会建构主义视角理解区域问题的相关文献,并归纳了主要研究议题。研究发现:区域的含义逐渐从封闭性、有边界的、稳定的领域性特征转向开放性、可渗透的、流动的关系性特征。当前区域的社会建构的研究议题主要包括区域身份的形成与建构、区域的制度化与去制度化、区域化与区域发展三个方面。值得指出的是,区域的社会建构不是要摒弃区域具有固定领域形状的观点,而是要看到经济、社会和政治力量对区域变化的影响,理解区域是制度化、社会建构和政治上存在争议的空间。更重要在于,探讨区域在领域性和关系性之间的相互作用并对区域发展的影响。此外,文章试图廓清“区域”和“地方”这两个术语在人文地理研究中的区别和联系。最后讨论了运用社会建构主义视角看待区域问题的方法论意义,并进一步提出了国内未来研究值得关注的方向。

Abstract

Region has always been the core concept of geographical research. Recently, just like the change of "space" and "place" in ontology and epistemology, the region has continued to be an elusive category: its various meanings and the implications therein frequently being challenged and modified through paradigmatic shifts in such spatial analysis. Under this background, this paper reviews the literatures on understanding regional issues from the perspective of social constructivism and summarizes the main research topics. It is found that the meaning of region gradually changes from close, bounded and stable to open, unbounded and flowing. There are three aspects for the main research topics of region by the understanding of social construction, including the formation and construction of regional identity, the institutionalization and de-institutionalization of region, regionalization and regional development. However, it is worthy to point out that the social construction of region is not to abandon the view that region has the fixed territory, but to see the influence of economic, social and political forces on regional changes and understand that region is the space of institutionalization, social construction and politics. Finally, this article discusses the methodological significance of using social constructivism to understand regional issues, and further puts forward the research direction worthy of attention in the future.

关键词

区域身份 / 区域的制度化 / 区域的去制度化 / 区域化 / 区域地理研究

Key words

regional identity / institutionalization of region / deinstitutionalization of region / regionalization / regional geographic study

引用本文

导出引用
陈品宇, 李鲁奇, 孔翔. 社会建构主义视角下的区域:研究综述与启示[J]. 人文地理. 2019, 34(6): 10-16,61 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.06.002
CHEN Pin-yu, LI Lu-qi, KONG Xiang. CONCEPTUALIZING REGION FROM A SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONIST PERSPECTIVE: RESEARCH PROGRESS AND IMPLICATIONS[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2019, 34(6): 10-16,61 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.06.002
中图分类号: K901   

参考文献

[1] Cresswell T. Geographic Thought:A Critical Introduction[M]. West Sussex:John Wiley&Sons, 2012:58-79.
[2] Hudson R. Regions and regional uneven development forever? Some reflective comments upon theory and practice[J]. Regional Studies, 2007,41(9):1149-1160.
[3] Moulaert F, Mehmood A. Analysing regional development and policy:A structural-realist approach[J]. Regional Studies, 2010,44(1):103-118.
[4] Gaberell S, Debarbieux B. Mapping regions, framing projects:A comparative analysis on the role of mapping in the region-building process of two European regions[J]. Geoforum, 2014,52:123-136.
[5] Pike A. Editorial:Whither regional studies?[J]. Regional Studies, 2007,41(9):1143-1148.
[6] Macleod G, Jones M. Territorial, scalar, networked, connected:In what sense a ‘regional world’?[J]. Regional Studies, 2007,41(9):1177-1191.
[7] Fitjar R D. Region-building in the arctic periphery:The discursive construction of a petroleum region[J]. Geografiska Annaler:Series B, Human Geography, 2013,95(1):71-88.
[8] Paasi A, Metzger J. Foregrounding the region[J]. Regional Studies, 2017,51(1):19-30.
[9] Burr V. An Introduction to Social Constructionism[M]. London, UK:Routledge, 1995:1-208.
[10] Hudson R. Re-thinking regions:Some preliminary considerations on regions and social change[M]//Johnston R J, Hauer J, Hoekveld G A. Regional Geography:Current Developments and Future Prospects. London:Routledge, 1990:67-84.
[11] 陈传康.区域概念及其研究途径[J].中原地理研究,1986(1):10-14.[Chen Chuankang. The concept of region and its research approach[J]. Central China Geography Study, 1986(1):10-14.]
[12] Scott A, Storper M. Regions, globalization, development[J]. Regional Studies, 2003,37(6):579-593.
[13] Paasi A. The institutionalization of regions:A theoretical framework for understanding the emergence of regions and the constitution of regional identity[J]. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 1986,164:105-146.
[14] 周尚意.社会文化地理学中小区域研究的意义[J].世界地理研究, 2007,16(4):41-46.[Zhou Shangyi. The significance of small space unit in socio-cultural geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 2007, 16(4):41-46.]
[15] Vanchoski A. Region Building in the Western Balkan and Visegrad Countries-Political and Media Discourse in Macedonia[D]. Budapest:Univerzita Karlova V Praze, 2016:1-97.
[16] Hettne B, Soderbaum F. Theorising the rise of regionness[J]. New Political Economy, 2000,5(3):457-472.
[17] 苗长虹.从区域地理学到新区域主义:20世纪西方地理学区域主义的发展脉络[J].经济地理,2005,25(5):593-599.[Miao Changhong. From regional to new regionalism:The evolutionary trajectory of western geography in the 20th century[J]. Economic Geography, 2005,25(5):593-599.]
[18] Paasi A, Zimmerbauer K. Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes:Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning[J]. Environment&Planning A, 2016,48(1):73-82.
[19] Amin A. Regions unbound:Towards a new politics of place[J]. Geografiska Annaler, 2004,86(1):33-44.
[20] Jonas A E G. Region and place:Regionalism in question[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2012,36(2):263-272.
[21] Jones M. A Regional world:Introducing reanimating regions[M]//Riding J. Reanimating Regions:Culture, Politics and Performance. London:Routledge, 2017:1-7.
[22] Keating M. Contesting European regions[J]. Regional Studies, 2017,51(1):9-18.
[23] Paasi A, Zimmerbauer K. Theory and practice of the region:A contextual analysis of the transformation of Finnish regions[J]. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Geografia, 2011:163-178.
[24] Murphy A B. Regions as social constructs:The gap between theory and practice[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1991,15(1):23-35.
[25] Chakma B. SAARC and region-building:Is South Asia a region?[J]. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 2018,14(2):189-205.
[26] Luo X, Shen J. The making of new regionalism in the cross-boundary metropolis of Hong Kong-Shenzhen, China[J]. Habitat International, 2012,36(1):126-135.
[27] Zimmerbauer K. Constructing supranational regions and identities through branding:Thick and thin region-building in the Barents and Ireland-Wales[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2016, 23(3):322-337.
[28] Paasi A. Deconstructing regions:Notes on the scales of spatial life[J]. Environment&Planning A, 1991,23(2):239-256.
[29] Paül V, Mckenzie F H.‘About time the regions were recognised’:Interpreting region-building in Western Australia[J]. Australian Geographer, 2015,46(3):363-388.
[30] Zimmerbauer K, Suutari T, Saartenoja A. Resistance to the deinstitutionalization of a region:Borders, identity and activism in a municipality merger[J]. Geoforum, 2012,43(6):1065-1075.
[31] Zimmerbauer K, Riukulehto S, Suutari T. Killing the regional leviathan? Deinstitutionalization and stickiness of regions[J]. International Journal of Urban&Regional Research, 2017,41(9):676-693.
[32] Zhu H, Qian J X, Feng L. Negotiating place and identity after change of administrative division[J]. Social&Cultural Geography, 2011,12(2):143-158.
[33] Paasi A. Region and place:Regional identity in question[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2003,27(4):475-485.
[34] Brenner N. Regulation theory and the regionalization debate:Recent German contributions[J]. Environment and Planning D:Society and Space, 1999,17(6):645-650.
[35] Perkmann M. Construction of new territorial scales:A framework and case study of the EUREGIO cross-border region[J]. Regional Studies, 2007,41(2):253-266.
[36] Su X B. Rescaling the Chinese state and regionalization in the Great Mekong Subregion[J]. Review of International Political Economy, 2010,19(3):501-527.
[37] Su X B. Multi-scalar regionalization, network connections and the development of Yunnan Province, China[J]. Regional Studies, 2014, 48(1):91-104.
[38] García-Álvarez J, Trillo-Santamaría J M. Between regional spaces and spaces of regionalism:Cross-border region building in the Spanish ‘state of the autonomies’[J]. Regional Studies, 2013,47(1):104-115.
[39] 罗小龙.竞争性区域主义与区域建构研究展望[J].人文地理,2012, 27(3):7-10.[Luo Xiaolong. Prospects of competitive regionalism and region-building[J]. Human Geography, 2012,27(3):7-10.]
[40] Luo X, Shen J, Chen W. Urban networks and governance in city-region planning:State-led region building in Nanjing city-region, China[J]. Geografiska Annaler:Series B, Human Geography, 2010, 92(4):311-326.
[41] Li Y, Wu F. Understanding city-regionalism in China:Regional cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Regional Studies, 2018,52(3):313-324.
[42] Paasi A. Place and region:Regional worlds and words[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2002,26(2):802-811.
[43] Paasi A. Place and region:Looking through the prism of scale[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2004,28(4):536-546.
[44] 王丰龙,刘云刚.尺度政治理论框架[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1500-1509.[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. Towards a theoretical framework of ‘politics of scale’[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(12):1500-1509.]
[45] Keating M. Rethinking the region:Culture, institutions and economic development in Catalonia and Galicia[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2001,8(3):217-234.
[46] Wu F. China's emergent city-region governance:A new form of state spatial selectivity through state-orchestrated rescaling[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2016,40(6):1134-1151.
[47] Yeh A G O, Xu J. Regional cooperation in the Pan-Pearl River Delta:A formulaic aspiration or a new imagination?[J]. Built Environment, 2008,34(4):408-426.
[48] Yang C. The geopolitics of cross-boundary governance in the Greater Pearl River Delta, China:A case study of the proposed Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge[J]. Political Geography, 2006,25(7):817-835.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(41771156);中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学共享交叉基金(人文社会科学)项目(2019ECNUGXJC002);2019年度广东佛山社科规划项目—青年项目

PDF(1605 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/