人文地理
   
文章快速检索 高级检索
Quick Search Adv Search
  Jun. 18, 2025 Home  About Journal  Editorial Board  Instruction  Subscription  Message  Download  Contact Us
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY  2010, Vol. 25 Issue (4): 36-40,160    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2010.04.001
Current Issue| Next Issue| Archive| Adv Search |
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF RADIANT CITY AND BROADACRE CITY
XIANG Lan-lin, LU Bin
College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100871, China

Download: PDF (816 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  Cities and villages experienced great changes in the 20th century. Almost all present cities' forms can be traced back to two famous architects' urban Utopia. One is the Radiant City and the other is Broadacre City. Both were criticized by historians, sociologists and urban planners. From a more humanistic perspective, this paper interprets the contexts and texts of the two different Utopias that Frank Lloyd Wright and Le Corbusier proposed in 1930s with the analysis of the relationship between the architects' world views and the urban forms and structures of the two Cities. The Radiant City, based on the background of philosophy revolution, reflects the dialectical thoughts of Le Corbusier from three perspectives including giving space the order that draws from the mathematic geometry and inner abstract metaphor, maintaining the equilibrium between efficiency and Basic Pleasures (sun, sky, trees, water etc), and coordinating the collective and the individual. Le Corbusier wanted to make cities the creation of harmony. The Broadacre City, based on the background of American liberalism and individualism and Spencer's social Darwin, is the organic integrity of Wright's thoughts. all reflect Wright's American Democracy, a great entity in everything including the Broadacre City. From the philosophically critical view, this paper discloses the paradox which lies in ontology and epistemology of urban citizens and their relationships. The two Urban Utopias reflect the former urban planners' thoughts about the city. They considered that the physical arrangement of the space was the essence of Urban planning and the solution to the present crisis, and the people in the two cities are abstract, but not the real existing ones. They also misunderstood the relationship between the space and the people. They considered that the physical spaces planning could be the effective method of the social revolution, yet that is superficial space, not the real existed social spaces. Their misunderstanding is based on Modernism whose core is the aesthetics since Nietzsche. Though their Utopia's might have defects, it should encourage the present people to pursue more pleasure and hopes in the future.
Key wordsUtopias      urban planning      modernism      dialectics      organic     
Received: 02 September 2009     
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
URL:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2010.04.001      OR     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/Y2010/V25/I4/36
Copyright © 2010  Editorial Board of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and the Peking Union Medical College (PUMC)
Add:Editorial office of Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae , No.9 Dongdansantiao, Beijing PRC(100730)
Fax:010-65133074 E-mail:actacams@263.net.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech