机心存于胸中：数字劳动之中的工位束缚与空间化用

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.05.004

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (2)

Download: PDF (0 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Digital labour reshapes the contemporary global labour order. Previous critiques of digital labour have tended to focus on the subjective perspective of the human, neglecting the spatial perspective of the place. This article takes the human-machine-place relationship in the office cubicle as the object of study and draws on German critical theorist Rahel Jaeggi's concept of alienation-appropriation and qualitative research methods to develop relevant theories and case studies to gain a deeper understanding of the internal structure and interaction mechanisms in contemporary digital labour. This study, firstly, finds that there are three actors in the digital labour space: Humans, machines, and place. Multiple coupling and decoupling processes exist between them. In addition, computer-led office cubicles' bondage and employee-led spatial appropriation are the two main processes in the game of digital labour space, and everyday alienation and everyday resistance are intertwined in the digital labour space. Lastly, digital labour space is an important perspective for the critique of digital labour, which is conducive to complementing the study of human-place relations in digital labour, and exploring the relationship between digital labour and digital labour space. The digital labour space critique in this article is an effective complement to the critique of the digital labour subject and is conducive to further exploring the possible forms of emancipation of digital labour from the perspective of Marxist geography.

Key words： Marxist geography office cubicles' bondage spatial appropriation machine obscuration human-machine-place relationship

Received: 01 March 2023

PACS:

K901.6

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHEN Hao-ran
	LUO Shen

Cite this article:

CHEN Hao-ran,LUO Shen. “WITH A MACHINE HEART IN YOUR BREAST”: OFFICE CUBICLES’BONDAGE AND SPATIAL APPROPRIATION IN DIGITAL LABOUR[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 39(5): 27-33,108.

URL:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.05.004 OR http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V39/I5/27

[1]	中华人民共和国国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和2035年远景目标纲要[N]. 人民日报,2021-03-13(7). [Outline of the 14th five-year plan (2021—2025) for national economic and social development and vision 2035 of the People's Republic of China[N]. People's Daily, 2021-03-13(7).]
[2]	习近平. 不断做强做优做大我国数字经济[J]. 求是,2022(2):4-8. [Xi Jinping. Building up the strength, quality, and size of China's digital economy[J]. Qiushi Journal, 2022(2):4-8.]
[3]	Kenney M, Zysman J. The rise of the platform economy[J]. Issues in Science and Technology, 2016,32(3):61-69.
[4]	陈龙“. 数字控制”下的劳动秩序——外卖骑手的劳动控制研究[J]. 社会学研究,2020,35(6):113-135,244. [Chen Long. Labor order under digital control: A study on the labor control of take-out platform riders[J]. Sociological Studies, 2020,35(6):113-135,244.]
[5]	Fuchs C. Capitalism, patriarchy, slavery, and racism in the age of digital capitalism and digital labour[J]. Critical Sociology, 2018, 44(4/5):677-702.
[6]	Richardson L. Coordinating office space: Digital technologies and the platformization of work[J]. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space, 2021,39(2):347-365.
[7]	Bissell D, del Casino V. Whither labor geography and the rise of the robots?[J]. Social and Cultural Geography, 2017,18(3):435-442.
[8]	Richardson L. Digital work: Where is the urban workplace and why does it matter?[J]. Geography, 2022,107(2):79-84.
[9]	Castree N, Coe N, Ward K, et al. Spaces of Work: Global Capitalism and the Geographies of Labour[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2004.
[10]	Lier D. Places of work, scales of organising: A review of labour geography[J]. Geography Compass, 2007,1(4):814-833.
[11]	Gray N, Clare N. From autonomous to autonomist geographies[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2022,46(5):1185-1206.
[12]	Negroponte N. Being Digital[M]. London: Vintage, 1996:1-272.
[13]	方勇.庄子译注[M]. 北京:中华书局,2010:192. [Fang Yong. Translation and Commentary of Zhuangzi[M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2010:192.]
[14]	梁彬,颜秉秋. 马克思主义地理学简述[J]. 中山大学研究生学刊(自然科学、医学版),2006,27(4):18-28. [Liang Bin, Yan Bingqiu. A brief introduction of marxism geography[J]. Journal of the Graduates Sun Yat-sen University (Natural Sciences, Medicine), 2006, 27(4):18-28.]
[15]	Kitchin R, Dodge M. Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011:3-21.
[16]	Briziarelli M. Spatial politics in the digital realm: The logistics/precarity dialectics and Deliveroo's tertiary space struggles[J]. Cultural Studies, 2019,33(5):823-840.
[17]	Heiland H. Controlling space, controlling labour? Contested space in food delivery gig work[J]. New Technology Work and Employment, 2021,36(1):1-16.
[18]	Paakkari A, Rautio P, Valasmo V. Digital labour in school: Smartphones and their consequences in classrooms[J]. Learning Culture and Social Interaction, 2019,21:161-169.
[19]	Bergan T, Gorman-Murray A, Power E. Coliving housing: Home cultures of precarity for the new creative class[J]. Social and Cultural Geography, 2021,22(9):1204-1222.
[20]	Green P. Disruptions of self, place and mobility: Digital nomads in Chiang Mai, Thailand[J]. Mobilities, 2020,15(3):431-445.
[21]	Dutta M. Place of life stories in labour geography: Why does it matter? [J/OL]. Geoforum, 2016, 77: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum. 2016.10.002.
[22]	Kingma S. New ways of working (NWW): Work space and cultural change in virtualizing organizations[J]. Culture and Organization, 2019,25(5):383-406.
[23]	Kingma S. The constitution of 'third workspaces' in between the home and the corporate office[J]. New Technology, Work and Employment, 2016,31(2):176-193.
[24]	Graham M. Regulate, replicate, and resist-the conjunctural geographies of platform urbanism[J]. Urban Geography, 2020,41(3):453-457.
[25]	Grenzdörffer S. Transformative perspectives on labour geographies -the role of labour agency in processes of socioecological transformations[J/OL]. Geography Compass, 2021, 15(6): e12565. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12565.
[26]	郑作彧.化用的生活形式，还是共鸣的世界关系？——批判理论第四代的共识与分歧[J]. 社会科学,2021(3):53-67. [Zheng Zuoyu. Appropriated forms of life, or resonant world relations?: Consensus and divergence in the fourth generation of critical theory[J]. Journal of Social Sciences, 2021(3):53-67.]
[27]	Jaeggi R. Alienation[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016:36-38.
[28]	Vaneigem R. The Revolution of Everyday Life[M]. London: Rebel Press, 2001:86.
[29]	袁振杰,周健好,谢宇琳,等.以家为校：新冠疫情背景下大学生替代性学习空间的建构及策略[J]. 地理研究,2022,41(6):1684-1699. [Yuan Zhenjie, Zhou Jianhao, Xie Yulin, et al. Making home as school: Construction of alternative education space at home among Chinese undergraduates in the context of COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Geographical Research, 2022,41(6):1684-1699.]
[30]	沈河西.专访奈格里：当你坐在星巴克时，价值榨取过程就已完成[N]. 澎湃新闻,2017-06-07. [Shen Hexi. Interview Negri: When you sit at Starbucks, the process of value extraction is complete[N]. The Paper, 2017-06-07.]
[31]	Harvey D. Spaces of Hope[M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000:101.
[32]	朱云汉.数字文明时代对政治思潮创新的呼唤[J]. 世界政治研究, 2022,5(1):1-5,164. [Zhu Yunhan. A call for innovation in political thoughts in the age of digital civilisation[J]. World Politics Studies, 2022,5(1):1-5,164.]
[33]	董金平,周丽云.生产、失控与共鸣——数字资本主义视角下的社会理论批判[J]. 当代世界与社会主义,2022(5):26-34. [Dong Jinping, Zhou Liyun. Production, out of control and resonance: A critique of social theory in the perspective of digital capitalism[J]. Contemporary World and Socialism, 2022(5):26-34.]
[34]	Scott J. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985:xv-xxii.
[35]	蔡运龙,叶超,特雷弗·巴恩斯,等.马克思主义地理学及其中国化：规划与实践反思[J]. 地理研究,2016,35(8):1399-1419. [Cai Yunlong, Ye Chao, Trevor Barnes, et al. Marxist geography and its development in China: Reflections on planning and practice[J]. Geographical Research, 2016,35(8):1399-1419.]