人文地理
   
文章快速检索 高级检索
Quick Search Adv Search
  Jul. 13, 2025 Home  About Journal  Editorial Board  Instruction  Subscription  Message  Download  Contact Us
HUMAN GEOGRAPHY  2005, Vol. 20 Issue (4): 9-14    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2005.04.003
Current Issue| Next Issue| Archive| Adv Search |
STUDY ON DEFINING THE METROPOLITAN AREAS OF YANGTZE RIVER DELTA——Comparison between Standards for Defining Metropolitan Areas in China and Those in America
LUO Hai-ming, ZHEN Feng
Department of Urban and Resource Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

Download: PDF (1237 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
Abstract  In recent years, standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China have been studied and the Metropolitan Areas of Yangtze River Delta have been defined according to the data in 1995. With great changes taking place in the Yangtze River Delta, this paper is dedicated to use standards for defining Metropoliltan Areas in China to redefine the Metropolitan Areas of Yangtze River Delta according to the data in 2002, which shows big changes in three aspects-Center city, Outer county and Metropolitan Interlocking Region. Since standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China cannot adjust to these changes.
Firstly, this paper introduces the development of standards for defining the metropolitan areas in America in the past one hundred years from four aspects:functional integration, metropolitan feature, central core and geographical unit.
Secondly, this paper compares the standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China with those in America. There are four main distinctions as follows:1) The standards in China are lacking in the data of flow by comparison with those in America; 2) The number of Metropolitan features in China is smaller than that in America; 3) The minimum size of center core in China is larger than that in America; the center core is limited by the administrative rank; the value of size of center core is hard to get; 4) The standards in China are short of the center county contrasting with those in America.
Thirdly, this paper divides these distinctions into two groups:1) The first group includes the smaller number, different types and the lower value of Metropolitan features, lacking in center county, the center core limited by the administrative rank, etc.; 2) The second group includes lacking in the data of flow, difficulty in getting the value of center core, larger size of center core and so on.
Finally, in light of the distinctions between standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China and those in America, the paper is to give six main suggestions to these in China.
Key wordsMetropolitan Area      standards for defining      Yangtze River Delta     
Received: 08 July 2004     
Service
E-mail this article
Add to my bookshelf
Add to citation manager
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
URL:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2005.04.003      OR     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/Y2005/V20/I4/9
Copyright © 2010  Editorial Board of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) and the Peking Union Medical College (PUMC)
Add:Editorial office of Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae , No.9 Dongdansantiao, Beijing PRC(100730)
Fax:010-65133074 E-mail:actacams@263.net.cn
Supported by:Beijing Magtech