THE PROCESS AND MECHANISM OF THE PRODUCTION OF WATERFRONT PUBLIC RECREATION SPACE IN WUHAN

HAN Lei; XIE Shuang-yu

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.020

PDF(4816 KB)

HUMAN GEOGRAPHY ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6) : 183-192. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.020

TOURISM

THE PROCESS AND MECHANISM OF THE PRODUCTION OF WATERFRONT PUBLIC RECREATION SPACE IN WUHAN

HAN Lei^1,2, XIE Shuang-yu^1,3

Author information +

History +

Abstract

Urban waterfront public recreational spaces (WPRS) are typical regions of transformation of urban functions from manufacturing and flood-prevention to recreation and consumption. By the method of on-site survey, deep interview, critical discourse analysis, and applying Lefebvre's theory of production of space and Foucault's theory of micro-power, this study established a deconstruction framework involving the whole process of production of space including planning, constructing, public recreation and administration. Applying this framework, we analyzed the production process of the WPRS in Wuhan from the perspective of disciplinarian-resistant. The study found that: 1)The production of Wuhan's WPRS has been driven by the involved disciplinarians and resistants interacting with each other in the process and has gone through three stages, namely the stage of "recreationized planning" dominated by the representation of space, the stage of "waterfront remodeling" led by the practice of space and the stage of "flowing order practice" led by the space of representation, which respectively produces an ideal space, a perceived space and a living space; 2) In these stages, various agents such as governments, mass media and local residents implemented top-down convergent spatial reconstruction, and meanwhile formed bottom-up heterogenous spatial practice, the governments have dominated the process of the production of WPRS, which has ensured the direction of the production being recreational and public.

Key words

production of space / Wuhan / waterfront public recreational space / Henri Lefebvre / disciplinarian resistant

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations

HAN Lei, XIE Shuang-yu. THE PROCESS AND MECHANISM OF THE PRODUCTION OF WATERFRONT PUBLIC RECREATION SPACE IN WUHAN[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2022, 37(6): 183-192 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.020

References

[1] Yu L, Liu J M, Li T, et al. Important progress and future prospects for studies on urban public recreational space in China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2019,29(11):1923-1946.
[2] 陆大道.长江大保护与长江经济带的可持续发展——关于落实习总书记重要指示,实现长江经济带可持续发展的认识与建议[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(10):1829-1836. [Lu Dadao. Conservation of the Yangtza River and sustainable development of the Yangtze River economic belt: An understanding of general secretary Xi Jinping's important instructions and suggestions for their implementation[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(10):1829-1836.]
[3] 董祚继. 新时代国土空间规划的十大关系[J]. 资源科学,2019, 41(9):1589-1599. [Dong Zuoji. Ten relations of territorial planning in the new era[J]. Resources Science, 2019,41(9):1589-1599.]
[4] Wakefield S. Great expectations: Waterfront redevelopment and the Hamilton Harbour waterfront trail[J]. Cities, 2007,24(4):298-310.
[5] 张璟.城市老港区的游憩功能改造与文脉传承——以上海十六铺地区为例[J]. 旅游学刊 , 2006, 21(1): 25-30. [Zhang Jing. On the remalding of recreational function and cultural inheritance of the urban old port area: A case study on Shanghai Shiliupu area[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2006,21(1):25-30.]
[6] 张环宙,沈旭炜,吴茂英.滨水区工业遗产保护与城市记忆延续研究——以杭州运河拱宸桥西工业遗产为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(2): 183-189. [Zhang Huanzhou, Shen Xuwei, Wu Maoying. Waterfront industrial heritage protection and prolonging the spirit of the city: A case study of the industrial heritage area in the west side of Gongchen bridge, Hangzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(2):183-189.]
[7] Mann R B. Ten trends in the continuing renaissance of urban waterfronts[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 1988,16(1):177-199.
[8] Oakley S. A Lefebvrian analysis of redeveloping derelict urban docklands for high-density consumption living, Australia[J]. Housing Studies, 2014,2(29):235-250.
[9] Desfor G, Jorgensen J. Flexible urban governance: The case of Copenhagen's recent waterfront development[J]. European Planning Studies, 2004,12(4):479-496.
[10] Gunay Z, Docmeci V. Culture-led regeneration of Istanbul waterfront: Golden Horn cultural valley project[J]. Cities, 2012, 29(4): 213-222.
[11] Boland P, Bronte J, Muir J, et al. On the waterfront: Neoliberal urbanism and the politics of public benefit[J]. Cities, 2017, 61(61): 117-127.
[12] 叶超.人文地理学空间思想的几次重大转折[J].人文地理,2012,27(5):1-5,61. [Ye Chao. The significant turns of thoughts on space in human geography[J]. Human Geography, 2012,27(5):1-5,61.]
[13] Castells M. In“Towards a Political Urban Sociology” . M Harloe ed. New Perspective in Urban Change and Conflict[M]. London, Michael Harloe Heinemann Educational Books, 1981:37.
[14] 吴志才,张凌媛,郑钟强,等.旅游场域中古城旅游社区的空间生产研究——基于列斐伏尔的空间生产理论视角[J].旅游学刊,2019, 34(12):86-97. [Wu Zhicai, Zhang Lingyuan, Zheng Zhongqiang, et al. The production of space within the field of tourism: A case study of the tourism community of Chaozhou ancient city[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2019,34(12):86-97.]
[15] 李春敏. 资本积累的全球化与空间的生产[J]. 教学与研究,2010, 57(6): 32-37. [Li Chunmin. Globalization of capital accumulation and production of space[J]. Teaching and Research, 2010,57(6):32- 37.]
[16] 魏开,许学强.城市空间生产批判——新马克思主义空间研究范式述评[J]. 城市问题, 2009,28(4):83-87. [Wei Kai, Xu Xueqiang. Space production critique: An introduction and evaluation on Neo— Marxism space research paradigm[J]. Urban Problems, 2009,28(4): 83-87.]
[17] 郭文.西方社会文化地理学新范式的缘由、内涵及意义[J].地理研究,2020,39(3):508-526. [Guo Wen. The reasons, connotations and significance of the new paradigm of western social and cultural geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(3):508-526.]
[18] 郭文,王丽,黄震方.旅游空间生产及社区居民体验研究——江南水乡周庄古镇案例[J]. 旅游学刊,2012,27(4):28-38. [Guo Wen, Wang Li, Huang Zhenfang. Study on the production of tourism space and residents' experience: A case study of Zhouzhuang ancient water town in the south of Yangtze River[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2012,27(4):28-38.]
[19] 黄剑锋,陆林.空间生产视角下的旅游地空间研究范式转型—— 基于空间涌现性的空间研究新范式[J].地理科学,2015,35(1):47- 55. [Huang Jianfeng, Lu Lin. The paradigm transformation of space in tourism destination from perspective of production of space: A new paradigm of space based on emergence of space[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(1):47-55.]
[20] 王丰龙,刘云刚.空间生产再考：从哈维到福柯[J].地理科学,2013, 33(11):1293-1301. [Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. Revisiting production of space: From Harvey to Foucault[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(11):1293-1301.]
[21] 徐晓峰. 新马克思主义视角下的城市空间演变——以上海工人新村为例[J]. 城市规划,2019,43(7):75-82. [Xu Xiaofeng. Urban spatial change from the perspective of Neo-Marxism: A case study of workers' village in Shanghai[J]. City Planning Review, 2019, 43(7):75-82.]
[22] 刘云刚,王丰龙.城乡结合部的空间生产与黑色集群——广州M垃圾猪场的案例研究[J].地理科学,2011,31(5):563-569. [Liu Yungang, Wang Fenglong. Production of space and the black cluster in the urban-rural frontier: A case study of M garbage pig farm in Guangzhou city[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011, 31(5): 563- 569.]
[23] 叶丹,张京祥.日常生活实践视角下的非正规空间生产研究—— 以宁波市孔浦街区为例[J].人文地理,2015,30(5):57-64. [Ye Dan, Zhang Jingxiang. Research on production of informal space from the perspective of practice of everyday life: A case study of Kongpu district in Ningbo[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(5):57-64.]
[24] 杨永春.中国模式：转型期混合制度“生产” 了城市混合空间结构[J]. 地理研究, 2015,34(11):2021-2034. [Yang Yongchun. Chinese cities in transition: Mixed spatial structures produced by a hybrid institutional model[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(11): 2021- 2034.]
[25] Leary M E. The production of space through a shrine and vendetta in Manchester: Lefebvre's spatial triad and the regeneration of a place renamed castle field[J]. Planning Theory & Practice, 2009, 10(2):189-212.
[26] 胡俊修,李勇军.近代城市公共活动空间与市民生活——以汉口中山公园（1929—1949）为表述中心[J]. 甘肃社会科学,2009(1): 178-181. [Hu Junxiu, Li Yongjun. Modern urban public activity space and citizens' life: Zhongshan park in Hankou (1929-1949) as the center of expression[J]. Gansu Social Sciences, 2009(1): 178- 181.]
[27] 方远平,易颖,毕斗斗.传承与嬗变：广州市小洲村的空间转换[J]. 地理研究 , 2018, 37(11): 2318-2330. [Fang Yuanping, Yi Ying, Bi Doudou. Inheritance and transmutation: Space transformation of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11):2318-2330.]
[28] Qin Xie. Critical discourse analysis of news discourse[J]. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2018,8(4):399-403.
[29] 陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社 , 2000: 333-335. [Chen Xiangming. Qualitative Research in Social Sciences[M]. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House, 2000:333-335.]
[30] 孙其昂,杜培培,张津瑞, 等“ . 规训—反规训” 空间的生产——NJ市H社区公共空间违法侵占的实证研究[J].城市发展研究,2015, 22(3): 39-43, 50. [Sun Qi'ang, Du Peipei, Zhang Jinrui, et al. The production of disciplinary resistant space: Case study from the illegal occupation of public space in H community, NJ city[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015,22(3):39-43,50.]
[31] 孙九霞,苏静.旅游影响下传统社区空间变迁的理论探讨——基于空间生产理论的反思[J].旅游学刊,2014,29(5):78-86. [Sun Jiuxia, Su Jing. Traditional community space change under the influence of tourism: A reflective study based on space production theory[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(5):78-86.]
[32] Lefebvre H. The Production of Space[M]. Smith D N, trans. Oxford: Blackwell(Original work published 1974), 1991:33-39.
[33] 吴飞“ . 空间实践” 与诗意的抵抗——解读米歇尔·德塞图的日常生活实践理论[J]. 社会学研究,2009,24(2):177-199,245-246. [Wu Fei. "Spatial Practice" and poetic resistance: On Michel de Certeau's theory ofthe practice of everyday life[J]. Sociological Studies, 2009,24(2):177-199,245-246.]