人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年5月4日 星期日  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2008, Vol. 23 Issue (2): 124-128    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2008.02.006
其他 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
边疆的空间涵义及其人文地理研究框架
金晓哲1, 林涛1, 王茂军2
1. 北京大学 环境学院 城市与区域规划系, 北京 100871;
2. 首都师范大学 资源环境与旅游学院, 北京 100037
FRONTIERS' SPATIAL MEANING AND THEIR RESEARCH FRAMEWORK IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY
JIN Xiao-zhe1, LIN Tao1, WANG Mao-jun2
1. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
2. College of Resources Enviorment & Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100037, China

全文: PDF (569 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 基于空间维度的地理学边疆研究一直为欧美地理学界所关注,并促进了地理学的理论建构。相比之下,我国的边疆研究一直以历史学为主流,人文地理学在边疆研究中的地位有待加强。本文通过对边疆概念的评述认为,习惯上的领土边疆概念无法反映当前边疆所具有的多重涵义,根据功能的不同对边疆进行类型划分十分必要。为此作者将边疆划分为政治边疆、文化边疆和拓居边疆三种类型,并分析了每一类型边疆的空间涵义。基于边疆的分类与空间涵义,本文构建了一个根植于人文地理学的边疆研究框架,并初步提出了人文地理学边疆研究的维度、视角及重点内容。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 边疆空间涵义人文地理研究框架    
Abstract:Frontier is a key to understand the national spatial structure, which is as important as the capital and core region. Unlike the time narrative paradigm in history, American and European geographers have paid a lot of attention to the frontier research based on spatial dimensionality. The frontier research has inspired the construction of geography theoretical frameworks. Chinese geography research on frontier began in ancient times, but the research was mainly in physical and regional geography field for the county to explore and develop the frontier region. Human geography is becoming the periphery in the Chinese frontier research field in which history perspective is mainstream today. So renaissance and strengthening of frontier study on human geography are very indispensable.
Fontier is a historical and relative concept, which in different county has different meanings. The conventional frontier concept in China only refers to the territory frontier which is close to national boundaries. So the conventional territory fontier can not embody multi-meaning of frontier and hinder the development of China's frontier research in geography. Through reviewing frontier concept, the authors consider that it is very necessary to extend the meaning of the Chinese frontier concept. According to different spatial constituents and functions of frontier, the authors classify frontier concept into three types: politic frontier including territory frontier and benefit frontier, cultural frontier and settlement frontier, which are defined from political, cultural and regional development perspective respectively. As the spatial representation of sovereign dominion of a country, the territory frontier is opposite to upcountry and close to national borders. As the spatial representation of sovereignty and benefit of a country, the benefit frontier is a abroad strategic controll area for gainnig maximal nation benefit; As the representation of the integration of culture landscape difference and culture identification, cultural frontier mainly refers to minority districts where there are different cultural landscapes from core culture area. As the representation of capital territorial expansion, settlement frontier is between settled area and unsettled area.
Finally, based on different spatial meanings and characters of frontiers, the authors put forward a research framework which is embeded into human geography, and make linkages between politic frontier and politic geography, culture frontier and culture geogrpahy and settlement frontier and region development research. The authors also propose three dimensions, perspective and main content of frontier research in human geography respectively.
Key wordsfrontier    spatial meaning    human geography    conceptional framework   
收稿日期: 2007-04-12     
作者简介: 金晓哲(1977-),男,吉林磐石人,博士研究生,研究方向为人文地理与城市规划。
引用本文:   
金晓哲, 林涛, 王茂军. 边疆的空间涵义及其人文地理研究框架[J]. 人文地理, 2008, 23(2): 124-128. JIN Xiao-zhe, LIN Tao, WANG Mao-jun. FRONTIERS' SPATIAL MEANING AND THEIR RESEARCH FRAMEWORK IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2008, 23(2): 124-128.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2008.02.006      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2008/V23/I2/124
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司