人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年4月9日 星期三  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2016, Vol. 31 Issue (3): 122-127    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.018
政治 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
论地缘战略的主体间性——兼论中国地缘战略抉择
胡志丁1,2, 刘卫东2
1. 云南师范大学 旅游与地理科学学院, 昆明 650500;
2. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101
STUDY ON THE INTER-SUBJECTIVITY OF GEOPOLITICAL STRATEGY: DISCUSS ON THE CHOISE OF CHINA'S GEOPOLITICAL STRATEGY
HU Zhi-ding1,2, LIU Wei-dong2
1. School of Tourism and Geography Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, China;
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

全文: PDF (1462 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 主体间性一词是20世纪西方哲学凸显出来的一个重要概念,对这一问题的研究有助于解决本体论、认识论和伦理学等多方面的问题。简单来说,主体间性就是主体之间的交互作用。主体间性具有物质性、实践性、历史性和社会性,其存在于集体主体之中,可以通过"教化"获得。据此,本文通过对四个经典地缘政治理论,即国家有机体论、海权论、陆权论和边缘地带论的历史分析,挖掘了隐含在其中的主体间性。并以美国对苏联和中国实施的地缘战略围堵为例,通过分析同一地缘战略所导致的截然不同结果,表明了地缘战略的构建、制定和实施都必须遵循主体间性。最后根据主体间性提出中国未来地缘战略抉择。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 主体间性地缘战略国家有机体论海权论陆权论边缘地带论    
Abstract:This article analysis on the four classical geopolitical theories based on the perspective of history. The four classical geopolitical theories are national organism theory, sea power theory, land power theory and the edge district theory. At the same time, we can understand why the four classic geopolitical theories have so much influence and role. To further demonstrate, we take the U.S.A containment China and the Soviet Union to interpret. During the cold war, the U.S.A executed containment strategy towards the Soviet Union, in the late 20th century and the early 21st century the United States executed this strategy towards China too. But the results of the two states are completely different, the Soviet Union collapsed, and thanks to over 30 years of reform and opening up, China has achieved sustained and rapid economic development and considerably improved its overall national strength. This is mainly due to the main body of inter-subjectivity has changed. Because that is the big gap between China and the United States, and China has no nature of aggression. However, during the cold war the United States and the Soviet Union had the equal power. And the two countries have a consensus in many aspects, such as they all expanded their national territory by aggression, and they all believe the importance of geography. This suggests that the construction, formulate and implement of geopolitical strategy must follow the inter-subjectivity.
Key wordsinter-subjectivity    geopolitical strategy    national organism theory    sea power theory    land power theory    the edge district theory   
收稿日期: 2015-01-20     
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(41401157);云南省应用基础研究计划基金项目(2014FD014)

通讯作者: 刘卫东(1967-),男,河北隆化人,研究员,博士生导师,博士,主要研究方向为经济地理和区域发展。E-mail:liuwd@igsnrr.ac.cn。     E-mail: liuwd@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介: 胡志丁(1986-),男,江西上饶人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,中科院地理科学与资源研究所博士后,主要研究方向为全球化与地缘环境。Email:huzhiding2007@126.com。
引用本文:   
胡志丁, 刘卫东. 论地缘战略的主体间性——兼论中国地缘战略抉择[J]. 人文地理, 2016, 31(3): 122-127. HU Zhi-ding, LIU Wei-dong. STUDY ON THE INTER-SUBJECTIVITY OF GEOPOLITICAL STRATEGY: DISCUSS ON THE CHOISE OF CHINA'S GEOPOLITICAL STRATEGY. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 31(3): 122-127.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2016.03.018      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2016/V31/I3/122
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司