人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年7月19日 星期六  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2021, Vol. 36 Issue (5): 184-192    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.05.022
旅游 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
恩施州乡村旅游扶贫模式及其效应差异研究
谢双玉1,2, 阴姣姣1,2, 乔花芳1,2, 鲁静1, 李琳1,2, 王安琦1
1. 华中师范大学 城市与环境科学学院, 武汉 430079;
2. 中国旅游研究院武汉分院, 武汉 430079
RESEARCH ON RURAL TOURISM POVERTY-ALLEVIATION MODES AND THE DIFFERENCE OF THEIR EFFECTS IN ENSHI PREFECTURE
XIE Shuang-yu1,2, YIN Jiao-jiao1,2, QIAO Hua-fang1,2, LU Jing1, LI Lin1,2, WANG An-qi1
1. School of Urban and Environmental Science, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China;
2. Wuhan Branch of China Tourism Academy, Wuhan 430079, China

全文: PDF (7561 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 为了回答如何判别旅游扶贫模式、旅游扶贫模式是否影响旅游扶贫效应等问题,提出了由区位—产业—文化组成的旅游扶贫资源多要素协同框架作为判别旅游扶贫模式的依据,以此为指导,利用访谈数据,将恩施州南部4县的22个旅游扶贫重点村划分为4种模式:优势景区依托模式、生态农业依托模式、民宿农家乐依托模式和民族文化依托模式。而后,利用问卷调查数据,运用方差分析法比较了不同模式扶贫村居民的旅游扶贫效应感知差异,结果发现:①不同旅游扶贫模式村居民对经济收益、经济成本、环境成本和社会成本的感知具有显著差异,说明旅游扶贫模式是影响旅游扶贫效应的因素;②与其他两种模式村相比,优势景区、生态农业依托模式村居民的旅游扶贫经济效益感知更高,同时经济、环境或社会成本感知也更高,表明旅游扶贫在带来经济效益的同时,也带来了较高的经济、环境和社会成本。最后,提出了促进民族地区旅游扶贫工作改进的对策建议。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
谢双玉
阴姣姣
乔花芳
鲁静
李琳
王安琦
关键词 旅游扶贫模式扶贫效应区位-产业-文化多要素协同框架恩施州    
Abstract:In order to answer the question "how to distinguish tourism poverty-alleviation (TPA) modes and whether different TPA modes have different poverty alleviation effects", a multi-element collaborative framework of TPA resources composed of location (L)-industry (I)-culture (C) was proposed as the basis for identifying the TPA mode of a village. Guided by this framework and using the interview data, 22 TPA key villages in 4 counties in the south of Enshi prefecture were divided into four modes. Then, residents' perception of TPA effects were compared among different TPA mode villages by using the questionnaire survey data and ANOVA method. The results show that:1) Residents' perception of economic benefits, economic costs, environmental costs and social costs are significantly different among different TPA mode villages, indicating that TPA mode is a factor influencing the TPA effects; 2) The difference mainly derived from the well-known landscape dominant mode, the ecological agriculture dominant mode and the other two modes, the former two mode villages residents perceived economic benefits higher and meanwhile economic, environmental or social costs higher than those from the latter ones, implying that TPA has brought economic benefits and simultaneously economic, environmental and social costs. Accordingly, the paper puts forward some countermeasures and suggestions to promote TPA in ethnic areas.
Key wordstourism poverty alleviation mode    poverty alleviation effect    multi-element collaborative frame work of location-industry-culture    Enshi Prefecture   
收稿日期: 2020-12-31     
PACS: F592  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(42001172);教育部人文社会科学基金项目(19YJA840018)
通讯作者: 乔花芳(1981-),女,河南辉县人,副教授,博士,主要研究方向为区域旅游经济与政策。E-mail:qiaohuafang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn。     E-mail: qiaohuafang@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
作者简介: 谢双玉(1970-),女,湖北鹤峰人,教授,博士,博士生导师,主要研究方向为旅游地理、区域旅游与环境。E-mail:xieshuangyu@mail.ccnu.edu.cn。
引用本文:   
谢双玉, 阴姣姣, 乔花芳, 鲁静, 李琳, 王安琦. 恩施州乡村旅游扶贫模式及其效应差异研究[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(5): 184-192. XIE Shuang-yu, YIN Jiao-jiao, QIAO Hua-fang, LU Jing, LI Lin, WANG An-qi. RESEARCH ON RURAL TOURISM POVERTY-ALLEVIATION MODES AND THE DIFFERENCE OF THEIR EFFECTS IN ENSHI PREFECTURE. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 36(5): 184-192.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.05.022      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I5/184
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司