Abstract：As the basic unit of smart city, smart community is the practice of smart city on a smaller scale. This research reviews the research on smart communities in Western countries in the last ten years. It aims to make up for the deficiencies of the discussions in Chinese documents in aspects of basic connotation, development characteristics, components, development goals, and existing problems of smart communities. Review shows that the meaning of smart community is mainly defined from three perspectives: a technical perspective, a human capital perspective, and a social-technical perspective. The components of smart community involve provision of community service, establishment of community facilities, community governance, etc. Smart facilities in communities include information and data of smart facilities such as transportation, energy, home construction and environmental monitoring. Smart community governance refers to the service system developed by using ICT technology and participating in community governance. The field of community smart service is the application of ICT technology to provide residents with various services closely related to their daily lives. There are four development modes of smart community: Government-led, government-enterprise-resident multi cooperation, private drive and community autonomy. The evaluations of smart city are made from two main dimensions-community construction and development and residents' quality of life of the smart community. Meanwhile, smart communities are confronted with problems such as privacy, digital divide, delays in data processing, lack of voice from residents, and lack of long-term management and monitoring. A systematic review of the research on smart communities in Western countries helps to promote the further research and development of smart communities in China.
郭凯菲, 蒋华雄, 戴特奇, 宋金平. 西方智慧社区研究进展[J]. 人文地理, 2024, 39(4): 19-26,159.
GUO Kai-fei, JIANG Hua-xiong, DAI Te-qi, SONG Jin-ping. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON SMART COMMUNITIES IN WESTERN COUNTRIES. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 39(4): 19-26,159.
申悦, 柴彦威, 马修军. 人本导向的智慧社区的概念、模式与架构[J]. 现代城市研究, 2014(10):13-17. [Shen Yue, Chai Yanwei, Ma Xiujun. Concept, model and framework of human-oriented smart community[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2014(10):13-17.]
[2]
常恩予, 甄峰. 智慧社区的实践反思及社会建构策略——以江苏省国家智慧城市试点为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2017(5):2-8. [Chang Enyu, Zhen Feng. Practice reflections and social construction strategies of smart community: A case study of national pilot smart city in Jiangsu province[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2017(5):2-8.]
[3]
陈卉, 甄峰. 信息通讯技术对老年人的社区满意度影响路径——以南京市锁金社区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(9):1167-1176. [Chen Hui, Zhen Feng. Impact of ICT on community satisfaction among elderly: The case of Suojin community in Nanjing city[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(9):1167-1176.]
[4]
柴彦威, 郭文伯.中国城市社区管理与服务的智慧化路径[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(4):466-472. [Chai Yanwei, Guo Wenbo. Smart management and service of communities in Chinese cities[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(4):466-472.]
[5]
常恩予, 甄峰, 孙晨.社区网络的使用及其对社区参与的影响——以南京市为例 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(7): 785-794. [Chang Enyu, Zhen Feng, Sun Chen. Use of community networks and its impact on community participation: A case study of Nanjing city[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(7):785-794.]
[6]
郭杰, 王珺, 姜璐.等.从技术中心主义到人本主义：智慧城市研究进展与展望[J]. 地理科学进展, 2022, 41(3):488-498. [Guo Jie, Wang Jun, Jiang Lu, et al. From technocentrism to humanism: Progress and prospects of smart city research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022, 41(3):488-498.]
[7]
秦萧, 甄峰.大数据与小数据结合：信息时代城市研究方法探讨[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(3):321-330. [Qin Xiao, Zhen Feng. Combination between big data and small data: New methods of urban studies in the information era[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017, 37(3):321-330.]
[8]
秦萧, 甄峰, 魏宗财.未来城市研究范式探讨——数据驱动亦或人本驱动[J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(1):31-40. [Qin Xiao, Zhen Feng, Wei Zongcai. The discussion of urban research in the future: Data driven or human-oriented driven[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(1):31-40.]
[9]
陈福平.智慧社区建设的“社区性”——基于技术与治理的双重视角[J]. 社会科学, 2022(3):64-73. [Chen Fuping. The 'communityness' of smart community building: A dual perspective based on technology and governance[J]. Journal of Social Sciences, 2022(3):64-73.]
[10]
吴旭红. 智慧社区建设何以可能?——基于整合性行动框架的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 2020, 17(4):110-125. [Wu Xuhong. The possibilities of building a smart community: An analysis based on integrated action framework[J]. Journal of Public Management, 2020, 17(4):110-125.]
[11]
王法硕.智能化社区治理：分析框架与多案例比较[J]. 中国行政管理, 2020(12): 76-83. [Wang Fashuo. Intelligent community governance: Analysis framework and multi case comparative study[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2020(12):76-83.]
[12]
宗成峰. 中国“互联网+”城市社区治理：挑战、趋势与模式[J]. 城市发展研究, 2020, 27(10):23-27. [Zong Chengfeng. China's internet plus city community governance: Challenges, trend and models[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020, 27(10):23-27.]
[13]
梁珺濡, 刘淑欣, 张惠. 从被动韧性到转型韧性：智慧社区的灾害韧性提升研究[J]. 广州大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 20(2):47-54. [Liang Junru, Liu Shuxin, Zhang Hui. From passive resilience to transformational resilience: Improving disaster resilience of smart community[J]. Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition), 2021, 20(2):47-54.]
[14]
胡苏云, 肖黎春. 特大城市社会治理创新：城市功能疏解的视角[J]. 城市发展研究, 2016, 23(12):43-49. [Hu Suyun, Xiao Lichun. Innovation of social governance in megacity: Perspective from function easing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016, 23(12):43-49.]
[15]
He D, Chan S, Qiao Y, et al. Imminent communication security for smart communities[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2018, 56(1):99-103.
[16]
Li X, Lu R, Liang X, et al. Smart community: An internet of things application[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2011, 49(11): 68-75.
