人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年6月1日 星期日  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2012, Vol. 27 Issue (2): 17-25    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2012.02.011
进展与动态 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
1995至2010年中外节事研究的比较和启示
戴光全1,2, 左平1,2, 肖璐1,2
1. 华南理工大学 经济与贸易学院, 广州 510006;
2. 华南理工大学 现代服务业研究院, 广州 510006
DIFFERENCES AND TRENDS OF THE RESEARCH ON CHINESE AND FOREIGN EVENTS: 1995-2010
DAI Guang-quan1,2, 1,2, ZUO Ping1,2
1. School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China;
2. Institute of Modern English Service, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China

全文: PDF (1018 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文以中国期刊网CNKI数据库和国际学术界具有较高权威性和较大影响力的节事、旅游研究期刊中检索到的1995年至2010年间的554篇节事研究学术文献为研究文本,运用内容分析法及简单的文献计量学方法,对文献的关键词、研究方法、研究地域范围及研究者情况等信息进行统计、分析和比较,探讨中外节事研究的异同、趋势及特点,在此基础上提出对中国节事研究进一步发展的启示和思考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 节事研究内容分析文献计量学中外异同和趋势    
Abstract:In order to comprehend the differences between Chinese and foreign event studies, this paper makes a quantitative comparison based on related research articles from Chinese CNKI Database and several important and authoritative international journals of tourism and event studies. 554 event study articles from 1995 to 2010 were found in all, including 328 international articles and 226 Chinese ones. Firstly, the paper analyzes the general situation of Chinese and foreign event studies, and then makes classification and statistical analysis of the keywords, study methods, data sources, case areas of research, and researchers of these articles, using Content Analysis Method(CAM) and Bibliometric Method. The result indicates that the contents of event studies in China are generally coincident with those in foreign countries, but the extent of the contents of foreign study is more wide and balanced, especially in the fields of event expenditure, experience of event-goers and event volunteer where foreign studies have more and deeper research and findings. Several implications can be reached from the comparison of Chinese and foreign event studies in this paper. Chinese event studies should enhance the selection of hot topics, and pay attention to wider and more comprehensive contents of the planned-event phenomenon. Furthermore, a focus on the study of event's basic conceptions and related theories is necessary to develop the theoretical system of event study along with the specialty of contemporary China Mainland. Alternative qualitative or quantitative methods should be spontaneously utilized in Chinese event studies. And it is quite important to improve the study methods of event research from the multi-disciplinary perspective. Finally, there should be a better condition of international collaboration and communication in China Mainland, so as to improve the research capability and the academic influence of Chinese event studies.
Key wordsevent studies    Content Analysis Method (CAM)    bibliometric method    Chinese and Foreign    differences and trends   
收稿日期: 2011-10-12     
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(40971090;D010202);广东省教育部产学研结合项目(2009B090200062)

作者简介: 戴光全(1966-),男,江西赣州人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为节事旅游与旅游地理、会展经济与管理。E-mail:gqdai@scut.edu.cn。
引用本文:   
戴光全, 左平, 肖璐. 1995至2010年中外节事研究的比较和启示[J]. 人文地理, 2012, 27(2): 17-25. DAI Guang-quan,, ZUO Ping,, XIAO Lu. DIFFERENCES AND TRENDS OF THE RESEARCH ON CHINESE AND FOREIGN EVENTS: 1995-2010. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 27(2): 17-25.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2012.02.011      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2012/V27/I2/17
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司