THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HOST AND THE GUEST IN TOURISM INTERCULTURAL LEARNING PROJECT:TEACHING AND LEARNING OF TAICHI IN YANGSHUO
WANG Yu-ning1,2, SUN Jiu-xia1,2
1. School of Tourism Management, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China;
2. Center for Tourism, Leisure & Social Development, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Abstract The dissemination of Chinese traditional culture is of great significance to realize cultural confidence. This article focuses on "foreigners travel to Yangshuo to learn taichi" phenomenon, uses the integrated methods of observation, depth interview and content analysis and regards the changing meaning of "body symbol" as the research context, in order to study "foreigners learning taichi" as an intercultural context and a host-guest interaction activity, and analyze its interactive process and mechanism. In tourism research, symbolic interaction theory is usually used to study the interaction between hosts and guests. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the process of host-guest interaction in intercultural context with symbols, and it is more necessary to explore the roles and mechanism of specific symbol system in the process of interaction. Through the research, we find that: Body symbol plays an important media role in intercultural interaction, which makes up for the limitations of language symbol. With the deepening of interaction, the media significance of body symbol is strengthened, which is reflected in the whole process of connecting multiple roles of interactive subjects, promoting the interaction of differentiated health concepts, deepening the self-cognition of interactive subjects, and providing a medium for the communication and dissemination of local culture.
WANG Yu-ning,SUN Jiu-xia. THE INTERACTION BETWEEN THE HOST AND THE GUEST IN TOURISM INTERCULTURAL LEARNING PROJECT:TEACHING AND LEARNING OF TAICHI IN YANGSHUO[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 37(4): 175-181.
章锦河,汤国荣,胡欢,等.文化全球化背景下地理学视角的文化间性研究[J].地理研究,2018,37(10):2011-2023. [Zhang Jinhe, Tang Guorong, Hu Huan, et al. Research on interculturality from the perspective of geography in the context of cultural globalization[J]. Geographical Research, 2018,37(10):2011-2023.]
[2]
Hottola P. Culture confusion: Intercultural adaptation in tourism[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2004,31(2):447-466.
[3]
章海荣.旅游文化学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2004:35. [Zhang Hairong. Tourism Culture[M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2004:35.]
[4]
Smith V. Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism[M]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012.
[5]
Gunn C A, Var T. Tourism Planning: Basics, Concepts, Cases[M]. London: Psychology Press, 2002:50-66.
[6]
孙九霞,张蔼恒.流动性背景下跨国婚姻缔结的影响因素： 阳朔案例[J].旅游论坛,2015,8(3):1-7. [Sun Jiuxia, Zhang Aiheng. Factors of transnational marriage within mobility context: Yangshuo case study[J]. Tourism Forum, 2015,8(3):1-7. ]
[7]
梁旺兵.跨文化视角中的旅游客主交互与客地关系研究[D].西安: 陕西师范大学,2006:32- 38. [Liang Wangbing. The Research on Host-guest Interaction and Tourist-land Relationship from the Angle of Interculture: Guilin and Xi'an as Case Study[D]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University, 2006:32-38.]
[8]
梁雪松.社会学视野下的东西方跨文化旅游交互习性研究[J].经济地理,2010,30(7):1221- 1226. [Liang Xuesong. Research on crosscultural tourism interaction between east and west from the perspective of sociology[J]. Economic Geography, 2010,30(7):1221-1226.]
[9]
Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Serspective and Method[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969:120-122.
[10]
王金莲,苏勤.第二居所旅居者与当地居民社会互动过程及机制——以三亚市为例[J].地理研究,2021,40(2):462-476. [Wang Jinlian, Su Qin. Process and mechanism of social interaction between second-home sojourners and local residents: A case study of Sanya city[J]. Geographical Research, 2021,40(2):462-476.]
[11]
冯健,叶宝源.西方社会空间视角下的郊区化研究及其启示[J].人文地理,2013,28(3):20-26. [Feng Jian, Ye Baoyuan. Suburbanization from the perspective of western social space and its implications[J]. Human Geography, 2013,28(3):20-26.]
[12]
魏晖“ . 一带一路” 与语言互通[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,47(4):43-47. [Wei Hui. "The belt and road" initiative and language interoperability[J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Humanities and Social Science), 2015,47(4):43-47.]
[13]
纪秀生.关于人类语言局限性问题的思考[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2003,1(1):23-28. [Ji Xiusheng. Reflection on the limitations of human language[J]. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2003,1(1):23-28.]
[14]
赵云亭“ . 行动流”： 可能及其可为的逻辑思考——吉登斯行动理论的研究与启示[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版),2016, 18(6):61-67. [Zhao Yunting. The possibility of action flow-study on Giddens' action theory[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2016,18(6):61-67.]
[15]
陶伟,王绍续,朱竑.身体、 身体观以及人文地理学对身体的研究[J].地理研究,2015,34(6):1173-1187. [Tao Wei, Wang Shaoxu, Zhu Hong. The study of body, body view and human geography on body [J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(6):1173-1187.]
[16]
梅洛-庞蒂.知觉现象学[M].姜志辉,译.北京:商务印书馆,2001: 106-265. [Merleau-Ponty. Phenomenology of Perception[M]. Jiang Zhihui, trans. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2001:106-265. ]
[17]
张秀琴,孔伟.福柯的意识形态论：“话语—权力” 及其“身体—主体” [J].国外理论动态,2016(7):15-26. [Zhang Xiuqin, Kong Wei. Foucault's ideology: Discurse-power and body-subject[J]. Foreign Theoretical Trends, 2016(7):15-26.]
[18]
钱俊希,朱竑.新文化地理学的理论统一性与话题多样性[J].地理研究,2015,34(3):422-436. [Qian Junxi, Zhu Hong. Theoretical unity and topic diversity of new cultural geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(3):422-436.]
[19]
王彬.身体、 符号与媒介[J].中国青年研究,2011(2):45-49. [Wang Bin. Body, symbol and media[J]. China Youth Studies, 2011(2):45- 49.]
[20]
Pile S. Emotions and affect in recent human geography[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2010,35(1):5-20.
[21]
陶伟,蔡浩辉,高雨欣,等.身体地理学视角下非物质文化遗产的传承与实践[J].地理学报,2020,75(10):2256-2268. [Tao Wei, Cai Haohui, Gao Yuxin, et al. The inheritance and practice of intangible cultural heritage from the perspective of physical geography[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(10):2256-2268.]
[22]
刘转青,刘积德.符号互动论视角下民族体育旅游中的主客互动研究[J].大理大学学报,2017,2(6):80-84. [Liu Zhuanqing, Liu Jide. Study on the interaction between host and guest in national sports tourism from the perspective of symbolic interaction theory[J]. Journal of Dali University, 2017,2(6):80-84.]
[23]
姜南,梁勤超,李源.中国国家形象建构中太极拳文化符号的运用[J].武汉体育学院学报,2016,50(1):54-58. [Jiang Nan, Liang Qinchao, Li Yuan. The use of Taijiquan cultural symbols in the construction of Chinese national image[J]. Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education, 2016,50(1):54-58.]
[24]
张杰.基于文化符号圈理论的太极拳文化符号结构研究[J].体育科学,2012,32(12):85-92. [Zhang Jie. Study on structure of Taijiquan culture symbols based on the theory of cultural symbols circle [J]. China Sport Science, 2012,32(12):85-92.]
[25]
王柏利.太极拳： 一种标识性文化符号[J].西安体育学院学报, 2014,31(1):70-74. [Wang Baili. Taijiquan: A mark of sign cultural code[J]. Journal of Xi'an Institute of Physical Education, 2014,31(1):70-74.]
[26]
陈振勇,李斌.人类学视域下武术概念的重新审视[J].成都体育学院学报,2017,43(5):54-60,127. [Chen Zhenyong, Li bin. Review on Wushu concept from anthropological perspective[J]. Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 2017,43(5):54-60,127.]
[27]
陈岗.旅游者符号实践的概念框架及其动态分析[J].旅游学刊, 2018,33(11):66-74. [Chen Gang. The conceptual framework and dynamic analysis of tourist semiotic practice[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2018,33(11):66-74.]
2022, Vol. 37 
