人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年6月11日 星期三  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2024, Vol. 39 Issue (4): 75-84    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.04.009
区域 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
“一带一路”沿线军事技术转移网络格局演化与驱动因素——以军事武器装备为例
郭卫东1,2,3, 杜德斌1,2,3
1. 华东师范大学 全球创新与发展研究院, 上海 200062;
2. 华东师范大学 世界地理与地缘战略研究中心, 上海 200062;
3. 华东师范大学 地理科学学院, 上海 200241
PATTERNS AND DRIVERS OF MILITARY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER NETWORKS IN COUNTRIES (REGIONS) ALONG THE BELT AND ROAD: MILITARY WEAPONS AND EQUIPMENT AS AN EXAMPLE
GUO Wei-dong1,2,3, DU De-bin1,2,3
1. Institute for Global Innovation and Development, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
2. Center for World Geography and Geo-Strategic Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
3. School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China

全文: PDF (6140 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 利用武器转让和世界银行数据库对“一带一路”沿线军事技术转移网络格局和驱动因素进行研究,结果发现:“一带一路”沿线军事技术转移规模先升后降,印度成为最大的军事技术转入国,中国军事技术优势区逐步扩大并趋于连片生长;军事技术转移网络呈两极分化特征和核心—边缘结构,中国成为改变网络结构的关键力量;俄罗斯是军事技术转移最大流网络的绝对主导,但影响力和控制力呈下降趋势;美国对域内军事技术转移规模迅速增长,军事影响力日益向中国周边渗透,空间布局符合边缘地带范围并对中国形成合围态势;地理距离、经贸关系、地缘关系、科技创新能力、国家发展水平、资本投入、资源禀赋和政治稳定性对转出国影响显著,而对转入国影响不明显。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
郭卫东
杜德斌
关键词 军事技术转移网络驱动因素“一带一路”    
Abstract:This paper utilizes the Stockholm Institute's arms transfer data and the World Bank's database, adopts network analysis and negative binomial regression and other methods to study the pattern and driving factors of the military technology transfer network along the B&R, and analyzes the influence of the US, and the study finds that:First, the scale of military technology transfer from countries (regions) along the B&R is on a rising trend. Secondly, the military technology transfer network has obvious polarization characteristics and core-marginal structure; Third, Russia is the absolute leader of the largest flow network of military technology transfer, but the network influence and control is on a decreasing trend, and the network influence of China and Turkey is improving significantly. Fourth, the scale of military science and technology transfer from the United States to countries (regions) along B&R Initiative has increased rapidly by 1.52 times, the increasing penetration of military influence into China's neighbourhood and the spatial layout of the militarytechnical transfer is consistent with the scope of Spearman's Rimland theory and creates a posture of encirclement of China. Fifth,Geographical distance, economic and trade relations, geopolitical relations, science and technology innovation capacity, national development level, capital investment, resource endowment and political stability have significant effects on the scale of military technology transfer through the transferring country.
Key wordsmilitary science and technology    transfer network    driving factors    The Belt and Road   
收稿日期: 2023-04-11     
PACS: K901.4  
基金资助:国家社会科学基金重大项目(23&ZD330)
通讯作者: 杜德斌(1963—),男,湖北宜昌人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为世界地理与科技创新政策。E-mail:dbdu@re.ecnu.edu.cn。     E-mail: dbdu@re.ecnu.edu.cn
作者简介: 郭卫东(1992—),男,江西井冈山人,博士生,主要研究方向为世界地理与科技创新。E-mail:guowd28@126.com。
引用本文:   
郭卫东, 杜德斌. “一带一路”沿线军事技术转移网络格局演化与驱动因素——以军事武器装备为例[J]. 人文地理, 2024, 39(4): 75-84. GUO Wei-dong, DU De-bin. PATTERNS AND DRIVERS OF MILITARY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER NETWORKS IN COUNTRIES (REGIONS) ALONG THE BELT AND ROAD: MILITARY WEAPONS AND EQUIPMENT AS AN EXAMPLE. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 39(4): 75-84.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2024.04.009      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V39/I4/75
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司