人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年7月17日 星期四  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2005, Vol. 20 Issue (4): 9-14    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2005.04.003
城市经济 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
长江三角洲大都市区划分研究——兼论中美大都市区界定指标体系的比较
罗海明, 甄峰
南京大学城市与资源学系, 南京 210093
STUDY ON DEFINING THE METROPOLITAN AREAS OF YANGTZE RIVER DELTA——Comparison between Standards for Defining Metropolitan Areas in China and Those in America
LUO Hai-ming, ZHEN Feng
Department of Urban and Resource Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China

全文: PDF (1237 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 本文运用中国大都市区界定指标体系,根据2002年数据对长江三角洲大都市区进行了重新划分。从划分的结果看,后者与前者相比发生较大变化。而中国大都市区界定指标体系对这种变化表现出了一定的不适应性,因此本文试图通过中美大都市区界定指标体系的比较研究为中国大都市区界定指标体系的修订提供参考。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 大都市区界定指标体系长江三角洲    
Abstract:In recent years, standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China have been studied and the Metropolitan Areas of Yangtze River Delta have been defined according to the data in 1995. With great changes taking place in the Yangtze River Delta, this paper is dedicated to use standards for defining Metropoliltan Areas in China to redefine the Metropolitan Areas of Yangtze River Delta according to the data in 2002, which shows big changes in three aspects-Center city, Outer county and Metropolitan Interlocking Region. Since standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China cannot adjust to these changes.
Firstly, this paper introduces the development of standards for defining the metropolitan areas in America in the past one hundred years from four aspects:functional integration, metropolitan feature, central core and geographical unit.
Secondly, this paper compares the standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China with those in America. There are four main distinctions as follows:1) The standards in China are lacking in the data of flow by comparison with those in America; 2) The number of Metropolitan features in China is smaller than that in America; 3) The minimum size of center core in China is larger than that in America; the center core is limited by the administrative rank; the value of size of center core is hard to get; 4) The standards in China are short of the center county contrasting with those in America.
Thirdly, this paper divides these distinctions into two groups:1) The first group includes the smaller number, different types and the lower value of Metropolitan features, lacking in center county, the center core limited by the administrative rank, etc.; 2) The second group includes lacking in the data of flow, difficulty in getting the value of center core, larger size of center core and so on.
Finally, in light of the distinctions between standards for defining Metropolitan Areas in China and those in America, the paper is to give six main suggestions to these in China.
Key wordsMetropolitan Area    standards for defining    Yangtze River Delta   
收稿日期: 2004-07-08     
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金(40301014),项目名称"信息化影响下的区域城市网络形成过程及机制研究:以长江三角洲为例"资助。

作者简介: 罗海明(1979-),男,江苏东台人,硕士研究生,主要从事城市与区域规划研究。
引用本文:   
罗海明, 甄峰. 长江三角洲大都市区划分研究——兼论中美大都市区界定指标体系的比较[J]. 人文地理, 2005, 20(4): 9-14. LUO Hai-ming, ZHEN Feng. STUDY ON DEFINING THE METROPOLITAN AREAS OF YANGTZE RIVER DELTA——Comparison between Standards for Defining Metropolitan Areas in China and Those in America. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2005, 20(4): 9-14.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2005.04.003      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2005/V20/I4/9
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司