道路社会文化研究：基于路学与流动性的思考

薛熙明

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.05.001

PDF(1590 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 1-7. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.05.001

进展与动态

道路社会文化研究：基于路学与流动性的思考

薛熙明

作者信息 +

THE SOCIO-CULTURAL RESEARCH ON ROAD: BASED ON THE THINKING OF ROADOLOGY AND MOBILITY

XUE Xi-ming

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

路学与流动性研究极为重视道路与人类社会文化的关系研究，是道路社会文化研究的重要基础。国内外路学和流动性相关研究表明，以文化人类学为重心的路学研究关注道路建设和使用过程中国家与地方、网络与节点之间的关系，强调物质流动与社会建构的内在联系。社会文化地理学者热衷的流动性研究则以人地关系为基础，将道路本身视为一个流动的物质空间，探讨其中的社会空间的生产、人的主体空间感知和身份认同。二者聚焦道路本体又极具批判精神，但在研究内容、方法、对象和尺度上都尚存缺陷，还未建立科学的道路社会文化研究框架。因此，可尝试从道路的空间关系、社会关系和权力关系等方面展开道路社会文化研究，以推动这一领域广泛而深入的知识生产。

Abstract

As the field of international frontier research, the socio-cultural study on road has been given much attention by much amount of subjects such as anthropology, sociology and geography. The paper gives the reflection and outlook on the social and cultural aspects of road based on the literature review of roadology and mobilility at home and abroad. According to the research, cultural anthropology-orientated roadology in has been greatly influenced by the reflection on Critical Sociology and Neo-Marxism on modern transportation, focusing on how road and transportation function and affect in the process of the state power extension and nation-state construction, with the purpose of probing into the symbolic significance of the road landscape, the political rights and daily life practice in the course of road material production. In the context of Neoliberal economic globalization, the study on mobility academically grounded on geography and sociology aims to probe into the relationship between human and space in the process of movement, with the primary concern on issues of mobility politics, the identification and the perception of place in a flowing space. As the important foundation of the socio-cultural research of road, the study on roadology and mobility attaches great importance to the socio-cultural relationship of humans and the road, integrating the ontology research into the critical aspect. However, some limitations lie in both spheres of current study in terms of how to define the connotation and magnitude of the object, methods, and contents of the research. Current researches leave much room to be desired, especially, failing to analyze carefully the interaction and complicated relationship among road, local society and the subject of mobility, and to establish the scientific socio-cultural research framework on road. This paper attempts to put forward the integration research of spatial relationship, social relationship and powers interaction of road, and to promote the extensive and in-depth construction of the paradigm of sociocultural research on road.

导出引用

薛熙明. 道路社会文化研究：基于路学与流动性的思考[J]. 人文地理. 2020, 35(5): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.05.001

XUE Xi-ming. THE SOCIO-CULTURAL RESEARCH ON ROAD: BASED ON THE THINKING OF ROADOLOGY AND MOBILITY[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2020, 35(5): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.05.001

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 赵旭东.线索民族志:民族志叙事的新范式[J].民族研究,2015(1):47-57.[Zhao Xudong. Clues ethnography:A new paradigm of ethnographic narrative[J]. Ethno-National Studies, 2015(1):47-57.]
[2] 安东尼·吉登斯.民族-国家与暴力[M].胡宗泽,赵力涛,译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1998:68.[Anthony Giddens. The Nation·State and Violence[M]. Hu Zongze, Zhao Litao, trans. Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1998:68.]
[3] Harvey D. Spaces of Capital:Towards a Critical Geography[M]. Edinburgh:Edinburgh University Press, 2001:304-310,326-327.
[4] Harvey P, Knox H. "Otherwise engaged" culture, deviance and the quest for connectivity through road construction[J]. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2008(1):1,79-92.
[5] Dalakoglou D. The road:An ethnography of the Albanian-Greek cross-border motorway[J]. American Ethnologist, 2010,37(1):132-149.
[6] Larkin B. The politics and poetics of infrastructure[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 2013,42(1):327-343.
[7] Khan N. Flaws in the flow:Roads and their modernity in Pakistan[J]. Social Text, 2006,24(89):87-113.
[8] Knox H. Affective infrastructures and the political imagination[J]. Public Culture, 2017,29(2):363-384.
[9] Harvey P, Knox H. Roads:An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise[M]. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press, 2015.
[10] Fiona W. Towards a political economy of roads:Experiences from Peru[J]. Development and Change, 2004,35(3):525-546.
[11] Rankin K, S igdel T, Rai L, et al. Political economies and political rationalities of road buildingin Nepal[J]. Studies in Nepali History and Society, 2017,22(1):43-84.
[12] Madeleine R. Materialising state space:"Creeping migration" and territorial integrity in Southern Kyrgyzstan[J]. Europe-Asia Studies, 2009,61(7):1277-1313.
[13] Dalakoglou D, Harvey P. Roads and anthropology:Ethnographic perspectives on space, time and (im)mobility[J]. Mobilities, 2012,7(4):459-465.
[14] Flynn D K. "We are the border":Identity, exchange, and the state along the Bénin-Nigeria border[J]. American Ethnologist, 1997,24(2):311-330.
[15] Campbell B. Rhetorical routes for development:A road project in Nepal[J]. Contemporary South Asia, 2010,18(3):267-279.
[16] Klaeger G. Rush and relax:The rhythms and speeds of touting perishable products on a Ghanaian roadside[J]. Mobilities, 2012,7(4):537-554.
[17] Murton G. Trans-Himalayan transformation:Building roads, making markets, and cultivating consumption between Nepal and China's Tibet[M]//周永明.路学:道路、空间与文化.重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2016:328-340.[Murton G. Trans-Himalayan transformation:Building roads, making markets, and cultivating consumption between Nepal and China's Tibet[M]//Zhou Yongming. Roadology:Roads, Space and Culture. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2016:328-340.]
[18] 周永明.引论:道路研究与路学[M]//周永明.路学:道路、空间与文化.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2016:1-11.[Zhou Yongming. Introduction:Road research and roadology[M]//Zhou Yongming. Roadology:Roads, Space and Culture. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2016:1-11.]
[19] 周恩宇.道路研究的人类学框架[J].北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016(3):77-82.[Zhou Enyu. Anthropological perspective and framework of road research[J]. Journal of the Second Northwest Institute for Ethnic Minorities (Philosophy and Social Science), 2016(3):77-82.]
[20] 崔延虎,陈祥军.阿尔泰山区游牧牧道:现代化挤压下的游牧文化空间[M]//周永明.路学:道路、空间与文化.重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2016:80-100.[Cui Yanhu, Chen Xiangjun. The nomadic paths in Altai mountains:A nomadic cultural space under the pressure of modernization[M]//Zhou Yongming. Roadology:Roads, Space and Culture. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2016:80-100.]
[21] 孙九霞,王学基.川藏公路与鲁朗社区的旅游中心化[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,39(6):36-44.[Sun Jiuxia, Wang Xueji. Sichuan-Tibet highway and tourism centralization of Lulang community:From the perspective of road anthropology[J]. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2017,39(6):36-44.]
[22] 朱凌飞.修路事件与村寨过程——对玉狮场道路的人类学研究[J].广西民族研究,2014(3):69-78.[Zhu Lingfei. Road construction event and village process:An anthropological study on the roads of Yushichang[J]. Study of Ethnics in Cuangxi, 2014(3):69-78.]
[23] 张锦鹏,高孟然.从生死相依到渐被离弃:云南昆曼公路沿线那柯里村的路人类学研究[J].云南社会科学,2015(4):98-104.[Zhang Jinpeng, Gao Mengran. From dependence to abandonment:An anthropological study on the Nakeli village in Kunming-Bangkok road in Yunnan[J]. Social Sciences in Yunnan, 2015(4):98-104.]
[24] 朱凌飞,马巍.边界与通道:昆曼国际公路中老边境磨憨、磨丁的人类学研究[J].民族研究,2016(4):40-52.[Zhu Lingfei, Ma Wei. Border and channel:An anthropological study on China-Laos border villages of Mohan and Boten along Kunming-Bangkok international road[J]. Ethno-National Studies, 2016(4):40-52.]
[25] 辛育航.故土与远方:王金庄村道路的分界与融合[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017,34(6):125-132.[Xin Yuhang. Homeland and distant places:Demarcation and integration of roads in the Wangjinzhuang village[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2017,34(6):125-132.]
[26] 周大鸣,廖越.聚落与交通:路学视域下中国城乡社会结构变迁[J]. 广东社会科学,2018(1):179-191.[Zhou Daming, Liao Yue. Settlement and transportation:Changes of urban and rural social structure in China from the perspective of roadology[J]. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2018(1):179-191.]
[27] 周永明.汉藏公路的路学研究:道路空间的生产、使用、建构与消费[M]//周永明.路学:道路、空间与文化.重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2016:15-32.[Zhou Yongming. A Roadology study of Han-Tibetan highway:Production, use, construction and consumption of road space[M]//Zhou Yongming. Roadology:Roads, Space and Culture. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2016:15-32.]
[28] 周永明.重建史迪威公路:全球化与西南中国的空间卡位战[M]//周永明.路学:道路、空间与文化.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2016:179-193.[Zhou Yongming. Rebuilding the Stilwell highway:Globalization and the space occupying war in Southwest China[M]//Zhou Yongming. Roadology:Roads, Space and Culture. Chongqing:Chongqing University Press, 2016:179-193.]
[29] 陈静静.从藏彝走廊、茶马古道到路学——晚近康区学术话语的空间嬗变[J].西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(4):1-6.[Chen Jingjing. From Tibetan-Yi corridor and ancient tea-horse road to study of roads:Spatial evolution of academic discourse in Kang area in recent years[J]. Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities, 2017(4):1-6.]
[30] 吴寅姗,陈家熙,钱俊希.流动性视角下的入藏火车旅行研究:体验、实践、意义[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(12):17-27.[Wu Yinshan, Chen Jiaxi, Qian Junxi. The experiences, practices and meanings from the perspective of mobilities:A case study of the train travel to Tibet[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2017,32(12):17-27.]
[31] Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm[J]. Environment & Planning A, 2006,38(2):207-226.
[32] Harvey D. The geopolitics of capitalism[M]//Gregory D, Urry J. Social Relations and Spatial Structures. London:Macmillan Education, 1985:3.
[33] Urry J. The ‘system’ of automobility[J]. Theory, Culture & Society, 2004,21(4/5):25-39.
[34] Cresswell T. Towards a politics of mobility[J]. Environment and Planning D, 2010,28(1):17-31.
[35] Fincham B. Bicycle messengers and the road to freedom[J]. The Sociological Review, 2006,54(S1):208-222.
[36] Blickstein S G. Automobility and the politics of bicycling in New York city[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2010,34(4):886-905.
[37] Adey P. Surveillanceat the airport:Surveilling mobility/mobilising surveillance[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2004,36(8):1365-1380.
[38] 约翰·布林克霍夫·杰克逊.发现乡土景观[M].俞孔坚,陈义勇,等, 译.北京:商务印书馆,2016:58-61.[John Brinckerhoff Jackson. Discovering the Vernacular Landscape[M]. Yu Kongjian, Chen Yiyong, et al, trans. Beijing:The Commercial Press, 2016:58-61.]
[39] Graham S, Marvin S. Splintering Urbanism:Network Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition[M]. London and New York:Routledge, 2001:200-202.
[40] Turner B S. The enclave society:Towards a sociology of immobility[J]. European Journal of Social Theory, 2007,10(2):287-304.
[41] Melissa Butcher. Cultures of commuting:The mobile negotiation of space and subjectivity on Delhi's metro[J]. Mobilities, 2011,6(2):237-254.
[42] Richardson T, Jensen O B. How mobility systems produce inequality:Making mobile subject types on the Bangkok Sky Train[J]. Built Environment, 2008,34(2):218-231.
[43] Law R. Gender and daily mobility in a New Zealand city, 1920-1960[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2002,3(4):425-445.
[44] Hanson S, Pratt G. Reconceptualizing the links between home and work in urban geography[J]. Economic Geography, 1988,64(4):299-321.
[45] Enevold J. Men and Women on the move-Dramas on the road[J]. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 2000,3(3):403-420.
[46] Gregory D. Culture of travel and spatial formations of knowledge[J]. Erdkunde, 2000,54(4):297-319.
[47] Morin K M. British women travellers and constructions of racial difference across the nineteenth-century American West[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1998,23(3):311-330.
[48] Bissell D. Passenger mobilities:Affective atmospheres and the sociality of transport[J]. Environment & Planning D, 2010,28(2):270-289.
[49] Crang M, Zhang J. Transient dwelling:Trains as places of identification for the floating population of China[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2012,13(8):895-914.
[50] Symes C. Coaching and training:An ethnography of student commuting on Sydney's suburban trains[J]. Mobilities, 2007,2(3):443-461.
[51] Merriman P. Driving places:Marc Augé, non-places, and the geographies of England's M1 motorway[J]. Theory, Culture & Society, 2004,21(4/5):145-167.
[52] Kellerman A. International airports:Passengers in an environment of "authorities"[J]. Mobilities, 2008,3(1):161-178.
[53] Merriman P, Revill G, Cresswell T, et al. Landscape, mobility, practice[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2008,9(2):191-212.
[54] Augé, M. Non-Places:Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity[M]. Howe J, trans. London:Verso, 1995:73-77,106,118.
[55] Lorimer H. Walking:New forms and spaces for studies of pedestrainism[M]//Cresswell T, ed. Geographies of Mobilities:Practices, Spaces, Subjects. Farnham, Burlington, V T:Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2011:19-34.
[56] 朱璇,解佳,江泓源.移动性抑或流动性?——翻译、沿革和解析[J]. 旅游学刊,2017,32(10):104-114.[Zhu Xuan, Xie Jia, Jiang Hongyuan. Mobility or liquidity?Translation, evolution and interpretation[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2017,32(10):104-114.]
[57] 杨茜好,朱竑.西方人文地理学的"流动性" 研究进展与启示[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(2):1-11.[Yang Xihao, Zhu Hong. Progress and revelation of researches on the anglophone geography of mobilities[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015,47(2):1-11.]
[58] 徐红罡,唐香姐.流动性视角下打工旅游者行为特征研究——以大理古城为例[J].人文地理,2015,30(4):129-135.[Xu Honggang, Tang Xiangjie. The behavior of working tourists on mobility analysis:A case study of Dali historical town[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(4):129-135.]
[59] 张朝枝,张鑫.流动性的旅游体验模型建构-基于骑行入藏者的研究[J].地理研究,2017,36(12):2332-2342.[Zhang Chaozhi, Zhang Xin. Constructing a mobile travel experience model:Empirical study of cyclists travelling to Tibet[J]. Geographical Research, 2017,36(12):2332-2342.]
[60] 黄佩,王文宏,张蓁.网络中的背包客:从流动中寻求认同[J].旅游学刊,2014,29(11):87-94.[Huang Pei, Wang Wenhong, Zhang Zhen. Backpacker online:Seeking identification from mobility[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(11):87-94.]
[61] 吴静,杨兴柱,孙井东.基于新地理信息技术的南京市游客流动性空间特征研究[J].人文地理,2015,30(2):148-154.[Wu Jing, Yang Xingzhu, Sun Jingdong. The spatial characteristics of tourist flows in Nanjing based on the new geographic information technology[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(2):148-154.]
[62] 席广亮,甄峰,沈丽珍,等.南京市居民流动性评价及流空间特征研究[J]. 地理科学,2013,33(9):1051-1057.[Xi Guangliang, Zhen Feng, Shen Lizhen, et al. The evaluation of resident fluidity and the spatial characteristics of flow in Nanjing[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(9):1051-1057.]
[63] Martin van der Velde, Ton van Naerssen,王韬,等.影响移民流动性的地理门槛与移民政策[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(12):1540-1551.[Martin van der Velde, Ton van Naerssen, Wang Tao, et al. Acting on thresholds:Policies and geographical thresholds to mobility[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017,36(12):1540-1551.]
[64] 唐雪琼,杨茜好,钱俊希.流动性视角下边界的空间实践及其意义——以云南省河口县中越边境地区X村为例[J].地理研究, 2016, 35(8):1535-1546.[Tang Xueqiong, Yang Xihao, Qian Junxi. Meanings and practices of borders from the perspective of cross-border mobility:A case study of village X, Hekou, Yunnan at the SinoVietnamese borderlands[J]. Geographical Research, 2016,35(8):1535-1546.]
[65] 孙九霞,周尚意,王宁,等.跨学科聚焦的新领域:流动的时间、空间与社会[J].地理研究,2016,35(10):1801-1818.[Sun Jiuxia, Zhou Shangyi, Wang Ning, et al. Mobility in geographical research:Time, space and society[J]. Geographical Research, 2016,35(10):1801-1818.]
[66] 王学基,孙九霞,黄秀波.中介、身体与情感:川藏公路旅行中的流动性体验[J].地理科学,2019,39(11):1780-1786.[Wang Xueji, Sun Jiuxia, Huang Xiubo. Mediation, body and emotion:Mobility experiences in road travel on Sichuan-Tibet highway[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(11):1780-1786.]