此心安处是故乡——失范理论视域下城市街头艺人空间行为与治理研究

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.02.005

Abstract
Figure/Table
References (0)
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (9856 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Street art has triggered the positive role of urban public space dynamic, but profound transformation in China's urbanization and urban special background of interwoven, due to the lack of perfect social norms governing the behavior of and governance buskers, cause had a negative effect on urban order, at the same time a busker group has also been labeled destroyer "order" and "bottom class" label, become the object of public space and the order of the mainstream crowd out, this not only block the development of street art, but also contributed to the order of urban public space. Through the method of structured theory, first construct a busker "space governance picture-governance rules" the interpretation of the framework, and then to the perspective of "social anomie theory", by on-the-spot investigation, as a whole and the individual two aspects analysis of urban street entertainers space behavior and social behavior, and summarizes its behavior characteristics, behavior, seek a busker space close behind the behavior of real goal demands and existing social governance norms conflict. Furthermore, it is proposed that social governance should change the planning thinking of "de-fluidity" and put forward spatial governance strategies that "adapt to fluidity", mainly including mobile urban space and localized urban rights, etc., in the hope of treating and respecting street performers well and building an open and inclusive urban space with artistic vitality.

Key words： buskers theory of anomie space behavior and governance adaptive mobility Nanjing

Received: 09 July 2019

PACS:

TU981

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZHANG Peng
	PU Hui

Cite this article:

ZHANG Peng,PU Hui. PEACE OF MIND IS HOME HERE: RESEARCH ON SPACE BEHAVIOR AND GOVERNANCE OF URBAN BUSKERS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIAL ANOMIE THEORY[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 35(2): 39-47.

URL:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.02.005 OR http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/EN/Y2020/V35/I2/39

[1]	张京祥,赵丹,陈浩.增长主义的终结与中国城市规划的转型[J].城市规划,2013,37(1):45-55.[Zhang Jingxiang, Zhao Dan, Chen Hao. Termination of growth supremacism and transformation of China's urban planning[J]. City Planning Review, 2013,37(1):45-55.]
[2]	王红扬.整体主义与空间的政治经济学的本质——评《为增长而规划:中国城市与区域规划》[J].国际城市规划,2016(3):3-15.[Wang Hongyang. Holism and the fundamental of the political economy of space:A critical review of planning for growth:Urban and Regional Planning in China[J]. Urban Planning International, 2016(3):3-15.]
[3]	素德·文卡特斯.城中城——社会学家的街头发现[M].孙飞宇,译. 上海:上海人民出版社,2016:12-14.[Sudhir Venkatesh. The City in the City:The Findings of Sociologists on the Streets[M]. Sun Feiyu, trans. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2016:12-14.]
[4]	王笛.街头文化:成都公共空间、下层民众与地方政治(1870-1930)[M].李德英,谢继华,邓丽,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社, 2006:111-112.[Wang Di. Street Culture:Chengdu Public Space, Lower Class and Local Politics (1870-1930)[M]. Li Deying, Xie Jihua, Deng Li, trans. Beijing:China Renmin University Press, 2006:111-112.]
[5]	Van Eijk G. Exclusionary policies are not just about the ‘neoliberal city’:A critique of theories of urban revanchism and the case of Rotterdam[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2010,34(4):1468-2427.
[6]	陈映芳.城市开发的正当性危机与合理性空间[J].社会学研究, 2008(3):29-55.[Chen Yingfang. The legitimate crisis and reasonable space of urban development[J]. Sociological Research, 2008(3):29-55.]
[7]	文军,黄锐. "空间"的思想谱系与理想图景[J].社会学研究,2012(2):19-22.[Wen Jun, Huang Rui. The ideological spectrum and ideal picture of "space"[J]. Sociological Research, 2012(2):19-22.]
[8]	张玉鑫,奚东帆. 聚焦公共空间艺术, 提升城市软实力——关于上海城市公共空间规划与建设的思考[J].上海城市规划,2013(6):23-27.[Zhang Yuxin, Xi Dongfan. Focus on public space art, promote urban soft power:Thinking about the planning and construction of Shanghai urban public space[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning, 2013(6):23-27.]
[9]	许云飞.建构城市特色的途径:艺术介入下的空间规划[J].规划师, 2016(8):18-21.[Xu Yunfei. Construction of city characteristic ways:Art under the intervention of space planning[J]. Planners, 2016(8):18-21.]
[10]	张鹏,蒲卉.街头艺术介入城市公共空间活力提升的途径:台北经验及启示[J].上海城市规划,2019(3):107-112.[Zhang Peng, Pu Hui. Street art as a way to enhance the vitality of urban public spaces:Taipei's experience and enlightenment[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2019(3):107-112.]
[11]	李湘燕.浅议街头艺术的社会介入对传统空间复兴的积极影响[J].建材与装饰,2016(8):163-164.[Li Xiangyan. Discussion on the positive influence of the social intervention of street art onthe revival of traditional space[J]. Building Materials and Decoration, 2016(8):163-164.]
[12]	郑长宁.街头艺术的管理、情理与法理[N].天津日报,2015-01-21(007).[Zheng Changning. Management, reason and law of street art[N]. Tianjin Daily, 2015-01-21(007).]
[13]	张鹏,蒲卉.空间正义视角下南京街头艺人时空分布特征与规划策略[J].上海城市规划,2017(5):126-130.[Zhang Peng, Pu Hui. Spatial-justice perspective of Nanjing busker's characteristic about time & space distribution and planning strategy[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2017(5):126-130.]
[14]	埃米尔·迪尔凯姆.社会学方法的准则[M].狄玉明,译.北京:商务印书馆,1995:23-65.[Emile Durkheim. The Rules of the Sociological Method[M]. Di Yuming, trans. Beijing:Commercial Press, 1995:23-65.]
[15]	Robert K. Merton. Social Theory and Social Structure[M]. New York:Free Press,1949:423.
[16]	罗伯特·K·默顿.论理论社会学[M].何凡兴,李卫红,王丽娟,译.北京:华夏出版社,1990:138.[Robert K. Merton. Theoretical Sociology[M]. He Fanxing, Li Weihong, Wang Lijuan, trans. Beijing:Huaxia Publishing House, 1990:138.]
[17]	罗伯特·K.默顿.社会理论和社会结构[M].唐少杰,齐心,译.南京:译林出版社,2006:60.[Robert K. Merton. Social Theory and Social Structure[M]. Tang Shaojie, Qi Xin, trans. Nanjing:Yilin Press, 2006:60.]
[18]	Lefebvre H. The Production of Space[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1991:8-67.
[19]	曹海军,孙允铖.空间、权力与正义:新马克思主义城市政治理论评述[J].国外社会科学,2014(1):16-23.[Cao Haijun, Sun Yuncheng. Space, power and justice:A review of neo-Marxist urban politics theory[J]. Social Sciences Abroad, 2014(1):16-23.]
[20]	Harvey D. The New Imperialism[M]. Oxford, New York:Oxford University Press, 2003:1-277.
[21]	王丰龙,刘云刚.空间生产再考:从哈维到福柯[J].地理科学,2013, 33(11):1293-1301.[Wang Fenglong, Liu Yungang. Space production retest:From Harvey to Foucault[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(11):1293-1301.]
[22]	殷洁,张京祥,罗小龙.重申全球化时代的空间观:后现代地理学的理论与实践[J].人文地理,2010,25(4):12-17.[Yin Jie, Zhang Jingxiang, Luo Xiaolong. Reaffirmation of the view of space in the globalization era:Theories and practice of postmodern geographies[J]. Human Geography, 2010,25(4):12-17.]
[23]	爱德华.W.苏贾.后现代地理学-重申批判社会理论中的空间[M]. 北京:商务印书馆,2007:76.[Edward W Suja. Postmodern Geography:Reaffirms the Space in Critical Social Theory[M]. Beijing:Commercial Press, 2007:76.]
[24]	王贵楼.空间转向与价值发掘:西方当代马克思主义空间政治思想探究[J].云南社会科学,2014(3):38-41.[Wang Guilou. Spatial orientation and value exploration:A study on contemporary Western Marxist spatial politics[J]. Social Sciences in Yunnan, 2014(3):38-41.]
[25]	Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1973,78(6):1360-1380.
[26]	刘拥华.空间、权力与寻找政治——以鲍曼为中心的考察[J].人文杂志,2014(7):92-101.[Liu Yonghua. Space, power, and the search for politics:An examination centered on Bowman[J]. The Journal of Humanities, 2014(7):92-101.]
[27]	简·雅各布斯.美国大城市的死与生[M].金衡山,译.南京:译林出版社,2006:14.[Jane Jacobs. The Death and Life of Great American Cities[M]. Jin Hengshan, trans. Nanjing:Yilin Press, 2006:14.]
[28]	梁鹤年.城市人[J].城市规划,2012(7):87-96.[Hok-lin Leung. Homo urbanicus[J]. City Planning Review, 2012(7):87-96.]