城市公共空间与移民跨群体融合研究——时空间行为视角的研究综述

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.006

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (4611 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要大规模人口流动背景下的社会极化和社会排斥是全球城市普遍面临的挑战，移民的跨群体社会融合已成为中国城市研究关注的新议题。城市规划和地理学者长期重视公共空间的社会融合效应，强调通过公共空间的营造改善群体间的包容态度、促进群体间融合。然而，持续增强的移动性使得本就存在争议的公共空间跨群体融合效应更加复杂。本文从时空间行为的视角出发，从时间、空间、行为三个维度，构建围绕公共空间的移民—本地居民跨群体融合效应综合分析框架。此框架整合空间、行为和时间三个维度，考虑个体活动与移动的连续性，构建多重空间情境下的活动—移动链，揭示公共空间在不同时间尺度上的跨群体融合效应。在移动性增强的背景下，时空间行为视角的研究框架有助于理解人—地交互的社会融合效应，为包容性城市建设提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王晓梦
	刘志林
	谭一洺

关键词 ：公共空间, 社会融合, 移动性, 时空间行为, 移民

Abstract：Social integration of immigrants has become an important goal purposed by worldwide cities in the context of increasing social mobility. Inter-group social cohesion between migrants and local residents has been a new theme of Chinese urban studies. Urban planning and geography have long emphasized the impact of public space on social cohesion, focusing on the inclusiveness attitude fostered by encounters in public space. However, international literature has debated on the mechanism of public space and migrants' social integration in the context of individual mobility. Drawing on the theoretical and methodological basis from time geography and the activity-based approach, this study constructs a holistic research framework to understand the relationships among mobility-based public space exposures, activity-mobility patterns, and social integration outcomes of migrants. Based on three dimensions of space, time and behavior, this framework constructs the continuous individual activity-trip chain in multiple spatial contexts, hoping to reveal the inter-group social interaction and social cohesion effect of public space in different time scales. This study also contributes to the inclusive urbanization strategy in China.

Key words： public space social integration mobility space-time behavior migrants

收稿日期: 2021-09-06

PACS:

K901.2

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（42071208， 42271204）

通讯作者: 谭一洺(1987-),女,辽宁阜新人,博士,副教授,主要研究方向为城市社会地理、时空间行为。E-mail:tanym7@mail.sysu.edu.cn。 E-mail: tanym7@mail.sysu.edu.cn

作者简介: 王晓梦(1996-),女,河南南阳市人,博士生,主要研究方向为城市社会地理、城市规划与政策。E-mail:wangxm18@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn。

引用本文:

王晓梦, 刘志林, 谭一洺. 城市公共空间与移民跨群体融合研究——时空间行为视角的研究综述[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(6): 47-55. WANG Xiao-meng, LIU Zhi-lin, TAN Yi-ming. PUBLIC SPACE AND MIGRANTS’SOCIAL INTEGRATION: A REVIEW FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SPACE-TIME BEHAVIORS. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 37(6): 47-55.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.06.006 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V37/I6/47

[1]	Fincher R, Iveson K, Leitner H, et al. Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference?[J]. Progress in Planning, 2014,92:1-55.
[2]	Liu Z L, Tan Y M, Chai Y W. Neighbourhood-scale public spaces, inter-group attitudes and migrant integration in Beijing, China[J]. Urban Studies, 2020,57(12):2491-2509.
[3]	Wu F L, Logan J. Do rural migrants 'float' in urban China? Neighbouring and neighbourhood sentiment in Beijing[J]. Urban Studies, 2016,53(14):2973-2990.
[4]	Raijman R. Foreigners and outsiders: Exclusionist attitudes towards labour migrants in israel[J]. International Migration, 2013, 51(1): 136-151.
[5]	Wang W W, Fan C C. Migrant workers' integration in Urban China: Experiences in employment, social adaptation, and self-identity[J]. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 2012,53(6):731-749.
[6]	Liu, Z, Wang, Y, & Tao, R. Social Capital and migrant housing experiences in urban China: A structural equation modeling analysis[J]. Housing Studies, 2013,28(8):1155-1174.
[7]	Liu Y, Li Z, Breitung W. The social networks of new-generation migrants in China's urbanized villages: A case study of Guangzhou[J]. Habitat International, 2012,36(1):192-200.
[8]	Wu F L, Zhang F Z, Webster C. Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area[J]. Urban Studies, 2013,50(10):1919-1934.
[9]	黎晓玲,李志刚. 中国城市“新移民” 聚居区的社会融合助推机制——对东莞的实证[J]. 城市规划,2019,43(3):27-33. [Li Xiaoling, Li Zhigang. State-led social integration mechanism within new migrant enclaves of Chinese cities: A case of Dongguan[J]. City Planning Review, 2019,43(3):27-33.]
[10]	李志刚,刘晔,陈宏胜.中国城市新移民的“乡缘社区”：特征、机制与空间性——以广州“湖北村” 为例[J]. 地理研究,2011,30(10): 1910-1920. [Li Zhigang, Liu Ye, Chen hongsheng. Characteristics, mechanism, and spatiality of neo-migrants' homeplace-based communities in China: A case study of Hubei Village, Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2011,30(10):1910-1920.]
[11]	Shen J, Xiao Y. Emerging divided cities in China: Socioeconomic segregation in Shanghai, 2000-2010[J]. Urban Studies, 2020,57(6): 1338-1356.
[12]	沈洁. 当代中国城市移民的居住区位与社会排斥——对上海的实证研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2016,23(9):10-18. [Shen Jie. Migrants' residential location and social exclusion in Chinese cities[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2016,23(9):10-18.]
[13]	李志刚,吴缚龙,肖扬.基于全国第六次人口普查数据的广州新移民居住分异研究[J]. 地理研究,2014,33(11):2056-2068. [Li Zhigang, Wu Fulong, Xiao Yang. Residential segregation of new migrants in Guangzhou, China: A study of the 6th census[J]. Geographical Research, 2014,33(11):2056-2068.]
[14]	刘志林,王晓梦,马静.转型期北京社区公共空间对邻里交往的影响机理：本地居民与移民的对比分析[J].地理科学,2020,40(1):69- 78. [Liu Zhilin, Wang Xiaomeng, Ma Jing. The influence of public spaces on neighborhood social interaction in transitional urban Beijing: Comparing local residents and migrants[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(1):69-78.]
[15]	吴蓉,黄旭,刘晔等. 地方依恋对城市居民社区参与的影响研究——以广州为例[J]. 地理科学,2019,39(5):734-741. [Wu Rong, Huang Xu, Liu Ye, et al. The effect of place attachment on urban residents' civic engagement: The case of Guangzhou city[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(5):734-741.]
[16]	Liu Z L. Supporting or dragging? Effects of neighbourhood social ties on social integration of rural-to-urban migrants in China[J]. Housing Studies, 2019,34(9):1-18.
[17]	Lin S N, Wu F L, Li Z G. Beyond neighbouring: Migrants' place attachment to their host cities in China[J]. Population, Space and Place, 2021,27(1):1-13.
[18]	Wu R, Huang X, Li Z G, et al. Deciphering the meaning and mechanism of migrants' and locals' neighborhood attachment in Chinese cities: Evidence from Guangzhou[J]. Cities, 2019,85(August 2018): 187-195.
[19]	Wang Z, Zhang F, Wu F. Social trust between rural migrants and urban locals in China-exploring the effects of residential diversity and neighbourhood deprivation[J]. Population, Space and Place, 2017, 23(1):e2008.
[20]	Wang Z, Zhang F Z, Wu F L. Affective neighbourly relations between migrant and local residents in Shanghai[J]. Urban Geography, 2017,38(8):1182-1202.
[21]	Wang Z, Zhang F Z, Wu F L. Intergroup neighbouring in urban China: Implications for the social integration of migrants[J]. Urban Studies, 2015,53(4):651-668.
[22]	Orum A M, Bata S, Shumei L, et al. Public man and public space in Shanghai today[J]. City and Community, 2009,8(4):369-389.
[23]	Du H M, Song J, Li S M. "Peasants are peasants": Prejudice against displaced villagers in newly-built urban neighbourhoods in China [J]. Urban Studies, 2021,58(8):1598-1614.
[24]	Wang Z, Zhang F Z, Wu F L. Neighbourhood cohesion under the influx of migrants in Shanghai[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2017,49(2):407-425.
[25]	Lu Y, Ruan D, Lai G. Social capital and economic integration of migrants in urban China[J]. Social Networks, 2013,35(3):357-369.
[26]	简霞,韩西丽,李贵才等.城市社区户外共享空间促进交往的模式研究[J]. 人文地理,2011,26(1):34-38. [Jian Xia, Han Xili, Li Guicai, et al. A mode study for stimulating inteaction in the shared space of urban community[J]. Human Geography, 2011,26(1):34- 38.]
[27]	高万辉,李亚婷.新型城镇化下城市社区公共空间的(社会)服务价值[J].经济地理,2018,38(3):92-97,141. [Gao Wanhui, Li Yating. Social service value of public space in urban communities under new urbanization: A case of edge communities of Xi'an[J]. Economic Geography, 2018,38(3):92-97,141.]
[28]	Thompson C W. Urban open space in the 21st century[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002,60(2):59-72.
[29]	Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities[M]. New York: Random House, 1961:56.
[30]	薛丰丰. 城市社区邻里交往研究[J]. 建筑学报,2004(4):26-28. [Xue Fengfeng. The research of neighborly interaction in urban neighborhoods[J]. Architectural Journal, 2004(4):26-28.]
[31]	Valentine G. Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2008,32(3):323-337.
[32]	Matejskova T, Leitner H. Urban encounters with difference: The contact hypothesis and immigrant integration projects in eastern Berlin[J]. Social and Cultural Geography, 2011,12(7):685-699.
[33]	Kwan M P. The uncertain geographic context problem[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012,102(5):958-968.
[34]	Kwan M P. The limits of the neighborhood effect: Contextual uncertainties in geographic, environmental health, and social science research[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2018,108(6):1482-1490.
[35]	Kwan M P. Beyond space (as we knew it): Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility: Spacetime integration in geography and GIScience[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2013,103(5):1078-1086.
[36]	Wong D W S, Shaw S L. Measuring segregation: An activity space approach[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2011,13(2):127-145.
[37]	塔娜,柴彦威.基于收入群体差异的北京典型郊区低收入居民的行为空间困境[J]. 地理学报,2017,72(10):1776-1786. [Ta Na, Chai Yanwei. Spatial dilemma of suburban low-income residents: An analysis of behavior space among different income groups[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(10):1776-1786.]
[38]	张艳,刘志林.市场转型背景下北京市中低收入居民的住房机会与职住分离研究[J]. 地理科学,2018,38(1):11-19. [Zhang Yan, Liu Zhilin. Access to housings and home-work separation of moderate to low-income residents in Beijing under the market-oriented transition[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):11-19.]
[39]	柴彦威,塔娜. 中国时空间行为研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展,2013, 32(9): 1362-1373. [Chai Yanwei, Ta Na. Progress in space-time behavior research in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013,32(9):1362- 1373.]
[40]	Hägerstraand T. What about people in regional science?[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 1970,24(1):7-24.
[41]	Kim J, Kwan M P. Beyond commuting: Ignoring individuals' activity-travel patterns may lead to inaccurate assessments of their exposure to traffic congestion[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(1):89.
[42]	柴彦威,王恩宙.时间地理学的基本概念与表示方法[J].经济地理, 1997(3): 55-61. [Chai Yanwei, Wang Enzhou. Basic concepts and notion of time-geography[J]. Economic Geography, 1997(3):55-61.]
[43]	柴彦威. 时间地理学的起源、主要概念及其应用[J]. 地理科学, 1998(1):70-77. [Chai Yanwei. Time-geography: Its origin, key concepts and applications[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1998(1):70- 77.]
[44]	Amin A. The good city[J]. Urban Studies, 2006,43(5-6):1009-1023.
[45]	Pettigrew T F, Tropp L R. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2006,90(5): 751-783.
[46]	Tropp L R, Pettigrew T F. Relationships between inter group contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups[J]. Psychological Science, 2005,16(12):951-957.
[47]	Pettigrew T F. Intergroup contact theory[J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 1998,49(1):65-85.
[48]	Allport G. The Nature of Prejudice[M]. Reading, MA: AddisonWesley, 1954:537.
[49]	Nielsen I, Nyland C, Smyth R, et al. Effects of intergroup contact on attitudes of Chinese urban residents to migrant workers[J]. Urban Studies, 2006,43(3):475-490.
[50]	Nielsen I, Smyth R. The contact hypothesis in urban China: The perspective of minority-status migrant workers[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2011,33(4):469-481.
[51]	Nielsen I, Paritski O, Smyth R. A minority-status perspective on intergroup relations: A study of an ethnic Chinese population in a small Italian town[J]. Urban Studies, 2012,49(2):307-318.
[52]	Górny A, Toruńczyk-Ruiz S. Neighbourhood attachment in ethnically diverse areas: The role of interethnic ties[J]. Urban Studies, 2014,51(5):1000-1018.
[53]	Gu J, Nielsen I, Shachat J, et al. An experimental study of the effect of intergroup contact on attitudes in urban China[J]. Urban Studies, 2016,53(14):2991-3006.
[54]	Holland C, Clark A, Katz J, et al. Social interactions in urban public places[J]. Policy Press, 2007,13(2):348-357.
[55]	Li J X, Tong Y Y. Coming together or remaining apart? A closer examination of the contexts of intergroup contact and friendship between urban residents and rural-to-urban migrants in China[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2020,46(1):66-86.
[56]	Cattell V, Dines N, Gesler W, et al. Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations[J]. Health & Place, 2008,14(3):544-561.
[57]	Leitner H. Spaces of encounters: Immigration, race, class, and the politics of belonging in small-town America[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2012,102(4):828-846.
[58]	Pratsinakis M, Hatziprokopiou P, Labrianidis L, et al. Living together in multi-ethnic cities: People of migrant background, their interethnic friendships and the neighbourhood[J]. Urban Studies, 2017,54(1):102-118.
[59]	Phillips D. Parallel Lives? Challenging discourses of british muslim self-segregation[J]. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2006,24(1):25-40.
[60]	Piekut A, Valentine G. Spaces of encounter and attitudes towards difference: A comparative study of two European cities[J]. Social Science Research, 2017,62:175-188.
[61]	Spijkers F E, Loopmans M. Meaningful intercultural contact: How different places pave the way for learning to live together in diversity[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2020,21(8):1146-1167.
[62]	申悦,柴彦威.基于GPS数据的城市居民通勤弹性研究——以北京市郊区巨型社区为例[J]. 地理学报,2012,67(6):733-744. [Shen Yue, Chai Yanwei. Study on commuting flexibility of residents based on gps data: A case study of suburban mega-communities in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(6):733-744.]
[63]	Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2006,38(2):207-226.
[64]	Pinchak N P, Browning C R, Calder C A, et al. Activity locations, residential segregation and the significance of residential neighbourhood boundary perceptions[J]. Urban Studies,2021,58(13):2758- 2781.
[65]	Forrest R, Yip N-M. Neighbourhood and neighbouring in contemporary Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Contemporary China, 2007,16(50): 47-64.
[66]	Hazelzet A, Wissink B. Neighborhoods, social networks, and trust in post-reform china: The case of Guangzhou[J]. Urban Geography, 2012,33(2):204-220.
[67]	Tan Y, Chai Y, Chen Z. Social-contextual exposure of ethnic groups in urban China: From residential place to activity space[J]. Population Space and Place, 2019, 25(7): e2248. http://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2248.
[68]	Zhang X, Wang J, Kwan M P, et al. Reside nearby, behave apart? Activity-space-based segregation among residents of various types of housing in Beijing, China[J]. Cities, 2019,88(March 2018):166- 180.
[69]	Wang H, Kwan M P, Hu M X. Social exclusion and accessibility among low- and non-low-income groups: A case study of Nanjing, China[J]. Cities, 2020, 101(January 2019): 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102684.
[70]	Wang H, Kwan M-P, Hu M X. Usage of urban space and sociospatial differentiation of income groups: A case study of Nanjing, China[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2020,111(4):616-633.
[71]	Shen J. Stuck in the suburbs? Socio-spatial exclusion of migrants in Shanghai[J]. Cities, 2017,60:428-435.
[72]	Lin S, Gaubatz P. Socio-spatial segregation in China and migrants' everyday life experiences: The case of Wenzhou[J]. Urban Geography, 2017,38(7):1019-1038.
[73]	Chen Z F, Yeh A G O. Socioeconomic variations and disparity in space-time accessibility in suburban China: A case study of Guangzhou[J]. Urban Studies, 2021,58(4):750-768.
[74]	程雪洁,刘志林,王晓梦.职住分离背景下社区公共空间对社区融合的影响——以北京市为例[J]. 城市发展研究,2019,26(12):28- 36,45. [Cheng Xuejie, Liu Zhilin, Wang Xiaomeng. Effects of neighborhood-scale public spaces on social cohesion in the context of home-work separation: The case of Beijing[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2019,26(12):28-36,45.]
[75]	Wang Q, Phillips N E, Small M L, et al. Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America's 50 largest cities[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018,115(30):7735-7740.
[76]	Li F, Wang D. Measuring urban segregation based on individuals' daily activity patterns: A multidimensional approach[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2017,49(2):467-486.
[77]	Wang D G, Li F. Daily activity space and exposure: A comparative study of Hong Kong's public and private housing residents' segregation in daily life[J]. Cities, 2016,59:148-155.
[78]	Levy B L, Phillips N E, Sampson R J. Triple disadvantage: Neighborhood networks of everyday urban mobility and violence in U.S. cities[J]. American Sociological Review, 2020,85(6):925-956.
[79]	Ellis M, Wright R, Parks V. Work together, live apart? Geographies of racial and ethnic segregation at home and at work[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004,94(3):620-637.
[80]	柴彦威,颜亚宁,冈本耕平.西方行为地理学的研究历程及最新进展[J].人文地理,2008,23(6):1-6,59. [Chai Yanwei, Yan Yaning, Okamoto Kohei. Development of behavioral geographic research in western countries and its recent progress[J]. Human Geography, 2008,23(6):1-6,59.]
[81]	Golledge R G. Geographical Perspectives on Spatial Cognition, in Behavior and Environment [M]. North-Holland, 1993:16-46.
[82]	Greenberg Raanan M, Shoval N. Mental maps compared to actual spatial behavior using GPS data: A new method for investigating segregation in cities[J]. Cities, 2014,36:28-40.
[83]	Chapin S. Human Activity Patterns in the City: Things People Do in Time and in Space[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1974:51.
[84]	Mooney S J, Bader M D M, Lovasi G S, et al. Validity of an ecometric neighborhood physical disorder measure constructed by virtual street audit[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2014,180(6):626-635.
[85]	Browning C R, Calder C A, Boettner B, et al. Ecological networks and urban crime: The structure of shared routine activity locations and neighborhood-level informal control capacity[J]. Criminology, 2017,55(4):754-778.
[86]	Browning C R, Calder C A, Soller B, et al. Ecological networks and neighborhood social organization[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2017,122(6):1939-1988.
[87]	Browning C R, Soller B. Moving beyond neighborhood: Activity spaces and ecological networks as contexts for youth development [J]. Cityscape, 2014,16(1):165-196.
[88]	Yin J J, Chi G Q. Characterizing people's daily activity patterns in the urban environment: A mobility network approach with geographic context-aware twitter data[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2021,111(7):1967-1987.
[89]	Browning C R, Calder C A, Boettner B, et al. Neighborhoods, activity spaces, and the span of adolescent exposures[J]. American Sociological Review, 2021,86(2):201-233.
[90]	Palmer J R B, Espenshade T J, Bartumeus F, et al. New approaches to human mobility: Using mobile phones for demographic research [J]. Demography, 2013,50(3):1105-1128.
[91]	Sampson R J. Urban sustainability in an age of enduring inequalities: Advancing theory and ecometrics for the 21st-century city[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017,114(34):8957-8962.
[92]	Boettner B, Browning C R, Calder C A. Feasibility and validity of geographically explicit ecological momentary assessment with recall-aided space-time budgets[J]. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2019,29(3):627-645.
[93]	Kwan M P. From oral histories to visual narratives: Re-presenting the post-September 11 experiences of the Muslim women in the USA[J]. Social and Cultural Geography, 2008,9(6):653-669.
[94]	Browning C R, Cagney K A, Boettner B. Neighborhood, Place, and the Life Course, in Handbook of the Life Course[M]. New York: Springer, 2004:597-620.