ANALYSIS OF CHINA'S URBAN INNOVATION NETWORK PATTERN AND ITS PROXIMITY MECHANISM FROM A MULTI-SCALE PERSPECTIVE
MA Shuang1, ZENG Gang2
1. Institute of Information, Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, Shanghai 200235, China;
2. The Center for Modern Chinese City Studies/School of Urban & Regional Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
Abstract：Actively cultivating and constructing urban innovation network has become the key to promote the development of higher quality economy for country and region. This paper using the co-patent data of the SIPO to construct the city innovation network. Then, depicting its structure of three spatial scales (country, inter-region and province) based on the complex network and spatial analysis methods, and analyzing the proximity mechanism of innovation cooperation based on negative two regression method. The research finds that:1) the overall connection of the national innovation network is weak and the network polarization is obvious. The spatial structure shows a radial network with Beijing as the core, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Nanjing, Hangzhou and Fuzhou as the main nodes. In the south China, Shanghai, Nanjing, Suzhou, Hangzhou, Nanchang, Shenzhen and other cities have formed a number of innovation cooperation loops. The interregional innovation network is stronger than that of intra-regional network at sub-region scale. A heterogeneous spatial structure centered on regional central cities is formed in every sub-region. 2) Regression results confirm that geographical proximity, social proximity and technological proximity play a significant role in promoting urban innovative networking. Among them, geographical proximity plays a significant role in promoting proximity, followed by technological proximity and social proximity. The moderating effect of technological proximity and geographical proximity is not significant, the moderating effect of technological proximity and social proximity is significantly positive, and the moderating effect of social proximity and geographical proximity is not significant.
马双, 曾刚. 多尺度视角下中国城市创新网络格局及邻近性机理分析[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(1): 95-103.
MA Shuang, ZENG Gang. ANALYSIS OF CHINA'S URBAN INNOVATION NETWORK PATTERN AND ITS PROXIMITY MECHANISM FROM A MULTI-SCALE PERSPECTIVE. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 35(1): 95-103.
Edward J M. Technology and economic development:The dynamics of local, regional, and national change[J]. Economic Geography, 1997,69(1):94-96.
[2]
Evangelista R. Sectoral patterns of technological change in services[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2000,9(3):183-222.
[3]
Tether B S. Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey[J]. Industry & Innovation, 2005,12(2):153-184.
[4]
Pianta M. Technology and growth in OECD countries 1970-1990[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995,19(1):175-187.
[5]
Godin B, Gingras Y. The place of universities in the system of knowledge production[J]. Research Policy, 2000,29(2):273-278.
[6]
王缉慈.创新的空间[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001:25-30.[Wang Jici. Innovative Space[M]. Beijing:Peking University Press, 2001:25-30.]
[7]
曾刚,林兰.不同空间尺度的技术扩散影响因子研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006,27(2):22-27.[Zeng Gang, Lin Lan. Study on the factors of technology diffusion[J]. Science of Science and Management of S & T, 2006,27(2):22-27.]
[8]
Hagerstrand T. Innovation for Loppet Ur Korologisk Synpunkt[M]. Lund:Gleerup, 1953:21-45.
[9]
Pred A. City System in Advanced Societies[M]. London:Hutchinson, 1977:44-60.
[10]
Hall P. Creative cities and economic development[J]. Urban Studies, 1999,37(4):639-649.
[11]
Simmie J. Innovative Cities[M]. London & New York:Spon Press, 2001:3-4.
[12]
Christian W M, Annette W S. The top-level global research system, 1997-1999:Centers, networks and nodality-an analysis based on bibliometric indicators[J]. Urban Studies, 2002,39(5/6):903-927.
[13]
Ouwersloot H, Rietveld P. The geography of R&D:Tobit analysis and a Bayesian approach to mapping R&D activities in the Netherlands[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2000,32(9):1673-1688.
[14]
Jeroen P J, Mark F. Geographical distance of innovation collaborations[J]. Business and Policy Research, 2010(2):56-74.
[15]
吕拉昌,梁政骥,黄茹.中国主要城市间的创新联系研究[J].地理科学,2015,35(1):30-37.[Lyu Lachang, Liang Zhengji, Huang Ru. The innovation linkage among Chinese major cities[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(1):30-37.]
[16]
Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P. Clusters and knowledge:Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2004,28(1):31-56.
[17]
司月芳,曾刚,曹贤忠,等.基于全球-地方视角的创新网络研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2016,35(5):600-609.[Si Yuefang, Zeng Gang, Cao Xianzhong, et al. Research progress of glocal innovation networks[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(5):600-609.]
[18]
Boschma R. Proximity and innovation:A critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 2005,39(1):61-74.
[19]
Lazonick W. The Innovative Firm[M]. Oxford:The Oxford Handbooks, 2006:29-55.
[20]
Balland A. Proximity and the evolution of collaboration networks:Evidence from research and development projects within the globalnavigation satellite system (GNSS) industry[J]. Regional Studies, 2012,46(6):741-756.
[21]
Ponds R, Oort F V, Frenken K. The geographical and institutionalproximity of research collaboration[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 2007,86(3):423-443.
[22]
Zeller C. North Atlantic innovative relations of Swiss pharmaceuticalsand the proximities with regional biotech arenas[J]. Economic Geography, 2010,80(1):83-111.
[23]
王兴平,冯淼,顾惠.城际创新联系的尺度差异特征分析:以长三角核心区为例[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,17(6):108-116.[Wang Xingping, Feng Miao, Gu Hui. A study of discriminative characteristics of intercity innovation linkage at different scales:A case study of Yangtze River Delta[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science), 2015,17(6):108-116.]
[24]
段德忠,杜德斌,谌颖,等.中国城市创新技术转移格局与影响因素[J]. 地理学报,2018,73(4):738-754.[Duan Dezhong, Du Debin, Shen Ying, et al. Technology transfer in China's city system:Process, pattern and influencing factors[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(4):738-754.]
[25]
Scherngell T, Hu Y. Collaborative knowledge production in China:Regional evidence from a gravity model approach[J]. Regional Studies, 2011,45(6):755-772.
[26]
Leydesdorff L. On the normalization and visualization of author cocitation data:Salton's cosine versus the Jaccard index[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008,59(1):77-85.
[27]
Jaffe A B, Fogarty M S, Banks B A. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1998, 46(2):183-205.
