基于DPSIR模型的城市人居环境韧性评价&mdash;&mdash;以长三角城市群为例

李雪铭; 刘凯强; 田深圳; 关莹莹; 刘贺

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.007

PDF(8955 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1) : 54-62. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.007

城市

基于DPSIR模型的城市人居环境韧性评价——以长三角城市群为例

李雪铭^1,2, 刘凯强¹, 田深圳¹, 关莹莹¹, 刘贺¹

作者信息 +

EVALUATION OF URBAN HUMAN SETTLEMENTS RESILIENCE BASED ON DPSIR MODEL: A CASE STUDY OF THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA URBAN SYSTEMS

LI Xue-ming^1,2, LIU Kai-qiang¹, TIAN Shen-zhen¹, GUAN Ying-ying¹, LIU He¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本文将韧性原理引入到人居环境中，首次对城市人居环境韧性进行定量研究。基于DPSIR模型构建城市人居环境韧性评价指标体系，综合运用熵值法、GIS空间分析法和地理探测器技术，以2006、2010、2014、2018年为研究时间节点，对长三角城市群26个城市的人居环境韧性时空演化特征及影响因素进行分析。研究发现：①长三角城市群各城市人居环境韧性水平不断上升，位序变化显著；②长三角城市群城市人居环境韧性水平在空间上呈现出整体与区域两种演变格局；③经济动力、能源压力、教育水平是影响城市人居环境韧性水平的主导因子，因子之间的交互作用进一步对城市人居环境韧性施加影响。本文从韧性视角出发，为城市人居环境的研究提供了一种新的思路及参考。

Abstract

Urban human settlements and urban resilience are closely related to the quality of life of residents and have become a hot topic in geographical research. In order to better explore the ability of urban human settlements to cope with shocks and build a sustainable human settlements, this paper introduces the principle of resilience into the human settlements and carries out a quantitative study on the resilience of urban human settlements for the first time. Based on the DPSIR model, an index system for evaluating the resilience of urban human settlements was established. Taking 2006, 2010, 2014 and 2018 as research time points, the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of human settlements resilience of 26 cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban systems were analyzed by using entropy method, GIS spatial analysis method and geographical detector technology. The results show that:1) The resilience level of human settlements of the cities in the Yangtze River Delta urban systems has undergone significant ranking changes. 2) There are two spatial patterns of human settlements resilience in the Yangtze River Delta urban systems. The first is the overall change pattern with the Yangtze River, Qiantang River and coastal cities as the three axisbelts diminishing to the north and south; the second is a pattern of diminishing changes in the region with Shanghai as the main core and provincial capital as the secondary core. 3) Economic dynamics, energy pressure, and education level are the dominant factors affecting the resilience of urban human settlements.

导出引用

李雪铭, 刘凯强, 田深圳, 关莹莹, 刘贺. 基于DPSIR模型的城市人居环境韧性评价——以长三角城市群为例[J]. 人文地理. 2022, 37(1): 54-62 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.007

LI Xue-ming, LIU Kai-qiang, TIAN Shen-zhen, GUAN Ying-ying, LIU He. EVALUATION OF URBAN HUMAN SETTLEMENTS RESILIENCE BASED ON DPSIR MODEL: A CASE STUDY OF THE YANGTZE RIVER DELTA URBAN SYSTEMS[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2022, 37(1): 54-62 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.01.007

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 胡文燕, 李梦雅, 王军, 等.暴雨内涝影响下的城市道路交通拥挤特征识别[J].地理科学进展, 2018, 37(6):772-780.[Hu Wenyan, Li Mengya, Wang Jun, et al. Urban traffic congestion caused by rainstorms and innudation[J]. Progress in Geography, 2018, 37(6):772-780.]
[2] 张凤, 陈彦光, 刘鹏.京津冀城镇体系与水系结构的时空关系研究[J].地理科学进展, 2020, 39(3):377-388.[Zhang Feng, Chen Yanguang, Liu Peng. Spatiotemporal relationships between urban system and water system in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(3):377-388.]
[3] 王甫园, 王开泳, 虞虎, 等.珠三角城市群生态游憩空间分异特征及关联性因素[J].地理研究, 2020, 39(9):2148-2164.[Wang Fuyuan, Wang Kaiyong, Yu Hu, et al. Spatial differentiation and correlative factors of ecological recreation space distribution in the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration[J]. Geographical Research, 2020, 39(9):2148-2164.]
[4] 卢洪友, 张奔.长三角城市群的污染异质性研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2020, 30(8):110-117.[Lu Hongyou, Zhang Ben. Study on pollution heterogeneity of urban agglomeration in Yangtze River Delta[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(8):110-117.]
[5] Yang J, Guan Y Y, Xia J H, et al. Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of green space ecosystem service value at urban fringes:A case study on Ganjingzi district in Dalian, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 639:1453-1461.
[6] Galderisi A, Limongi G, Salata K. Strengths and weaknesses of the 100 resilient cities initiative in southern Europe:Rome and Athens' experiences[J]. City, Territory and Architecture, 2020, 7(1):1-22.
[7] Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1):1-23.
[8] Lee M, Basu D. An integrated approach for resilience and sustainability in geotechnical engineering[J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 48(2):207-234.
[9] Barnes A, Nel V. Putting spatial resilience into practice[J]. Urban Forum, 2017, 28(2):219-232.
[10] Villagra P, Herrmann M G, Quintana C, et al. Community resilience to tsunamis along the Southeastern Pacific:A multivariate approach incorporating physical, environmental, and social indicators[J]. Natural Hazards, 2017, 88(2):1087-1111.
[11] Aydin N Y, Duzgun H S, Wenzel F, et al. Integration of stress testing with graph theory to assess the resilience of urban road networks under seismic hazards[J]. Natural Hazards, 2018, 91(1):37-68.
[12] Garschagen M. Resilience and organisational institutionalism from a cross-cultural perspective:An exploration based on urban climate change adaptation in Vietnam[J]. Natural Hazards, 2013, 67(1):25-46.
[13] 陈彦光, 姜世国.城市集聚体、城市群和城镇体系[J].城市发展研究, 2017, 24(12):8-15.[Chen Yanguang, Jiang Shiguo. Urban agglomeration, urban system and chengshiqun:Different concepts[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2017, 24(12):8-15.]
[14] 李连刚, 张平宇, 谭俊涛, 等.韧性概念演变与区域经济韧性研究进展[J].人文地理, 2019, 34(2):1-7, 151.[Li Liangang, Zhang Pingyu, Tan Juntao, et al. Review on the evolution of resilience concept and research progress on regional economic resilience[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(2):1-7, 151.]
[15] 修春亮, 魏冶, 王绮.基于"规模-密度-形态"的大连市城市韧性评估[J].地理学报, 2018, 73(12):2315-2328.[Xiu Chunliang, Wei Ye, Wang Qi. Evaluation of urban resilience of Dalian city based on the perspective of "Size-Density-Morphology"[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(12):2315-2328.]
[16] 彭翀, 林樱子, 顾朝林.长江中游城市网络结构韧性评估及其优化策略[J].地理研究, 2018, 37(6):1193-1207.[Peng Chong, Lin Yingzi, Gu Chaolin. Evaluation and optimization strategy of city network structural resilience in the middle reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(6):1193-1207.]
[17] 白立敏, 修春亮, 冯兴华, 等.中国城市韧性综合评估及其时空分异特征[J].世界地理研究, 2019, 28(6):77-87.[Bai Limin, Xiu Chunliang, Feng Xinghua, et al. A comprehensive assessment of urban resilience and its spatial differentiation in China[J]. World Regional Studies, 2019, 28(6):77-87.]
[18] 孙阳, 张落成, 姚士谋.基于社会生态系统视角的长三角地级城市韧性度评价[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8):151-158.[Sun Yang, Zhang Luocheng, Yao Shimou. Evaluating resilience of prefecture cities in the Yangtze River Delta region from a socio-ecological perspective[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8):151-158.]
[19] 冯苑, 聂长飞, 张东.中国城市群经济韧性的测度与分析——基于经济韧性的Shift-Share分解[J].上海经济研究, 2020(5):60-72.[Feng Yuan, Nie Zhangfei, Zhang Dong. Measurement and analysis of economic resilience of China's urban agglomerations based on Shift-Share decomposition of economic resilience[J]. Shanghai Journal of Economics, 2020(5):60-72.]
[20] 吴良镛.人居环境科学导论[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版, 2001.[Wu Liangyong. Introduction to Science of Human Settlements[M]. Beijing:China Architectural Building Press, 2001:38-48.]
[21] Okulicz-Kozaryn A, Valente R R. Livability and subjective well-being across European cities[J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2019, 14(1):197-220.
[22] Hancock T. Indicators of environmental health in the urban setting[J]. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2002, 93(1):45-51.
[23] Holden M. Bringing the neighbourhood into urban infill development in the interest of well-being[J]. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 2019, 1(2):137-155.
[24] Khorasani M, Zarghamfard M. Analyzing the impacts of spatial factors on livability of peri-urban villages[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2018, 136(2):693-717.
[25] 李雪铭, 田深圳.中国人居环境的地理尺度研究[J].地理科学, 2015, 35(12):1495-1501.[Li Xueming, Tian Shenzhen. The geographic scale of human settlements in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(12):1495-1501.]
[26] 李兆中, 甄峰.多源数据结合的城市生活空间质量评价——以南京为例[J].人文地理, 2019, 34(6):53-61.[Li Zhaozhong, Zhen Feng. Evaluation of urban life space quality based on multi-source data:A case study of Nanjing[J]. Human Geography, 2019, 34(6):53-61.]
[27] 李雪铭, 张英佳, 高家骥.城市人居环境类型及空间格局研究——以大连市沙河口区为例[J].地理科学, 2014, 34(9):1033-1040.[Li Xueming, Zhang Yingjia, Gao Jiaji. Spatial pattern and classification of human settlement:A case study of Shahekou in Dalian[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2014, 34(9):1033-1040.]
[28] 郭政, 姚士谋, 陈爽, 等.长三角城市群城市宜居水平时空演化及影响因素[J].经济地理, 2020, 40(2):79-88.[Guo Zheng, Yao Shimou, Chen Shuang, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of the livability levels in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomerations and its influencing factors[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(2):79-88.]
[29] 李雪铭, 郭玉洁, 田深圳, 等.辽宁省城市人居环境系统耦合协调度时空格局演变及驱动力研究[J].地理科学, 2019, 39(8):1208-1218.[Li Xueming, GuoYujie, Tian Shenzhen, et al. The spatiotemporal pattern evolution and driving force of the coupling coordination degree of urban human settlements system in Liaoning province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019, 39(8):1208-1218.]
[30] Xiao Q L, Tian C, Wang Y J, et al. Measurement and comparison of urban haze governance level and efficiency based on the DPSIR model:A case study of 31 cities in north China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(6):549-561.
[31] 杨俊, 关莹莹, 李雪铭, 等.城市边缘区生态脆弱性时空演变——以大连市甘井子区为例[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(3):778-787.[Yang Jun, Guan Yingying, Li Xueming, et al. Urban fringe area ecological vulnerability space-time evolution research:The case of Ganjingzi district, Dalian[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(3):778-787.]
[32] Wang J F, Li X H, Christakos G, et al. Geographical detectorsbased health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(1):107-127.
[33] 王劲峰, 徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报, 2017, 72(1):116-134.[Wang Jingfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector:Principle and prospective[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1):116-134.]