明清时期乡村社会治理的空间机制&mdash;&mdash;基于领域性视角

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.005

PDF(4196 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1) : 29-36. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.005

社会

明清时期乡村社会治理的空间机制——基于领域性视角

程朋飞^1,2, 刘云刚^1,2

作者信息 +

THE TERRITORYAND TERRITORIALITY IN THE SPATIAL GOVERNANCE OF CHINESE RURAL SOCIETY IN MING AND QING DYNASTIES

CHENG Peng-fei^1,2, LIU Yun-gang^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

从地理学视角看，乡村治理的过程主要表现为乡村空间权属和空间权力的配置，即领域化和再领域化。本文从当代乡村治理的问题出发，运用领域理论分析明清时期乡村治理中的空间-社会关系及其领域化机制。研究表明：县级政府构建的行政领域难以实现全面有效的治理，乡绅主导构建的社会领域基于乡村特征划定边界和提供公共物品并部分替代了行政领域，其具体领域化机制为家族-宗族-乡族三级治理体系。本文认为明清时期乡村治理存在多元领域，行政领域与社会领域通过有效的协调机制相互补充使乡村治理更有效。乡村治理应注重对当地社会领域和市场领域的培育，同时增强行政领域治理的有效性及其与其他领域的协调能力。

Abstract

During the Ming and Qing dynasties, the governance structure of rural society is mainly composed of county governments, the rural gentries and villagers which are similar to the current rural governance structure. From a geographical perspective, the process of rural governance is mainly reflected in the allocation of rural spatial ownership and spatial power, which namely territorialization and re-territorialization. More specifically, in order to provide reference for problems of modern rural governance, the paper uses qualitative methods which mainly use literature study to interpret the historical background including the characters of county government and social bodies and theoretical background about territory, and then adapts the territory theory to analyze the relation between space and society and to study the territorialization mechanism between administrative subject and social subject in rural governance so as to study the characteristics of spatial power evolution from the perspective of the territoriality. Studies have shown that administrative territory dominated by the county governments with varied territoriality strategies. However, social territory which is constructed by rural bodies dominated by rural gentry and built on ancestral hall and the clan field can effectively demarcation of social territory and provide public goods and even partly replace the former at last, and the territorialization mechanism of it can be summarized as a three level governance mechanism called family-clan-township structure which is built on rural geography and blood relationship.

导出引用

程朋飞, 刘云刚. 明清时期乡村社会治理的空间机制——基于领域性视角[J]. 人文地理. 2017, 32(1): 29-36 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.005

CHENG Peng-fei, LIU Yun-gang. THE TERRITORYAND TERRITORIALITY IN THE SPATIAL GOVERNANCE OF CHINESE RURAL SOCIETY IN MING AND QING DYNASTIES[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2017, 32(1): 29-36 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.01.005

中图分类号： K901.2

参考文献

[1] 杨忍,刘彦随,龙花楼,等.中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架[J].地理科学进展,2015,34(8):1019-1030.[Yang Ren, Liu Yansui, Long Hualou, et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation and reconstruction in China:Paradigms and main content[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(8):1019-1030.]

[2] Liu Yansui, Liu Yu, Chen Yangfen, et al. The process and driving forces of rural hollowing in China under rapid urbanization[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2010,20(6):876-888.

[3] 张京祥,申明锐,赵晨.乡村复兴:生产主义和后生产主义下的中国乡村转型[J]. 国际城市规划,2014,29(5):1-7.[Zhang Jingxiang, Shen Mingrui, Zhao Chen. Rural renaissance:Rural China transformation under productivism and post-productivism[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014,29(5):1-7.]

[4] 贺雪峰.论乡村治理内卷化——以河南省K镇调查为例[J].开放时代,2011(2):86-101.[He Xuefeng. Discussion on rural governance involution:A case study of K town in Henan province[J]. Open Times, 2011(2):86-101.]

[5] 唐鸣,赵鲲鹏,刘志鹏.中国古代乡村治理的基本模式及其历史变迁[J]. 江汉论坛,2011(3):68-72.[Tang Ming, Zhao Kunpeng, Liu Zhipeng. The basic model of rural governance and its historical change in ancient China[J]. Jianghan Tribune, 2011(3):68-72.]

[6] Sack R. Human territoriality:A theory[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1983,73(1):55-74.

[7] Sack R. Human Territoriality:Its Theory and History[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1986:5-51.

[8] Paasi A. Territory[M]//Agnew J, Mitchell K, Toal G. A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford:Blackwell, 2003:109-122.

[9] 刘云刚,叶清露.中国城市基层地域的领域化与领域政治——基于东莞东泰社区的案例研究[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):283-296.[Liu Yungang, Ye Qinglu. Territorialization and territorial politics in the urban grassroots of China:A case study of the Dongtai community in Dongguan city[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):283-296.]

[10] 黄耿志,薛德升.1990年以来广州市摊贩空间政治的规训机制[J]. 地理学报,2011,66(8):1063-1075.[Huang Gengzhi, Xue Desheng. Discipline and anti-discipline:Spatial politics of urban street vending in Guangzhou since the 1990s[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(8):1063-1075.]

[11] Elden S. Land, terrain, territory[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010,34(6):799-817.

[12] 刘云刚,叶清露,许晓霞.空间、权力与领域:领域的政治地理研究综述与展望[J].人文地理,2015,30(3):1-6.[Liu Yungang, Ye Qinglu, Xu Xiaoxia. Space, power and territory:A review on territory political geography[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(3):1-6.]

[13] 魏伟. "酷儿"视角下的城市性和空间政治[J].人文地理,2011,26(1):50-55.[Wei Wei. A queer inquiry of urbanism and spatial politics[J]. Human Geography, 2011,26(1):50-55.]

[14] 费孝通.中国绅士[M].惠海鸣,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006:47-56.[Fei Xiaotong. China's Gentry[M]. Hui Haiming, trans. Beijing:China Social Sciences Publishing House, 2006:47-56.]

[15] 沈延生.中国乡治的回顾与展望[J].战略与管理,2003(1):52-66.[Shen Yansheng. The review and prospective of rural governance of China[J]. Strategy and Management, 2013(1):52-66.]

[16] 张研.清代县以下行政区划[J].安徽史学,2009(1):5-16.[Zhang Yan. The administrative division inside the county in Qing dynasty[J]. Historiography Anhui, 2009(1):5-16.]

[17] 徐祖澜.乡绅之治与国家权力——以明清时期中国乡村社会为背景[J].法学家,2010(6):111-127,177.[Xu Zulan. The rule of gentry and the state power:An analysis based on the rural society in Ming and Qing dynasty[J]. Jurists Review, 2010(6):111-127,177.]

[18] 张仲礼.中国绅士——关于其在19世纪中国社会中作用的研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2008:76-137.[Zhang Zhongli. Chinese Gentry:A Research on Its Function in Chinses Society of the 19th Century[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House,2008:76-137.]

[19] 徐茂明. 江南士绅与江南社会:1368-1911[D].苏州:苏州大学, 2001:35-39,169.[Xu Maoming. Gentry and Society in the South of Yangtze River:1368-1911[D]. Suzhou:Soochow University, 2001:35-39,169.]

[20] 张静.历史:地方权威授权来源的变化[J].开放时代,1999(3):21-28, 2.[Zhang Jing. History:The variation of the local authority's authorized source[J]. Open Times, 1999(3):21-28,2.]

[21] 党晓虹,樊志民.传统乡规民约的历史反思及其当代启示——乡村精英、国家政权和农民互动的视角[J].中国农史,2010(4):100-105.[Dang Xiaohong, Fan Zhimin. The historical reflection and modern inspiration of the traditional village regulations and rules:The interactive relationship between village elites, state and peasants[J]. Agricultural History of China, 2010(4):100-105.]

[22] Luke T. Governmentality and contragovernmentality:Rethinking sovereignty and territoriality after the Cold War[J]. Political Geography, 1996,15(6):491-507.

[23] 吴滔.明清江南基层区划的传统与市镇变迁——以苏州地区为中心的考察[J].历史研究,2006(5):51-71,190.[Wu Tao. Demarcation of grassroots districts and evolution of cities and towns in the Jiangnan area during the Ming and Qing dynasties:With Suzhou as an example[J]. Historical Research, 2006(5):51-71,190.]

[24] 张研.试论清代的社区[J].清史研究,1997(2):1-11.[Zhang Yan. Study on the community in Qing dynasty[J]. The Qing Dynasty Journal, 1997(2):1-11.]

[25] 刘彦波.论清代前期赋役制度的变革与里甲制度的衰落[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2005,28(5):40-44.[Liu Yanbo. On the innovation of revenue system in the former period of Qing dynasty and the decline of Lijia system[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Social Science), 2005,28(5):40-44.]

[26] 王晓琳,吴吉远.清代保甲制度探论[J].社会科学辑刊,2000(3):94-100.[Wang Xiaolin, Wu Jiyuan. Discussion on Baojia system in Qing dynasty[J]. Social Science Journal, 2000(3):94-100.]

[27] 赵秀玲.中国乡里制度[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1998:44,236-285.[Zhao Xiuling. Rural Governance Mechanism of China[M]. Beijing:Social Sciences Academic Press, 1998:44,236-285.]

[28] 金钟博.明清时代乡村组织与保甲制之关系[J].中国社会经济史研究,2002(2):22-25.[Jin Zhongbo. The relationship between rural organization and Baojia system in Ming and Qing dynasties[J]. The Journal of Chinese Social and Economic History, 2002(2):22-25.]

[29] 颜广文.明代县制述论[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),1990(4):97-102,33.[Yan Guangwen. Review on county administration system in Ming dynasty[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 1990(4):97-102,33.]

[30] 保罗·诺克斯,斯蒂文·平奇.城市社会地理学导论[M].柴彦威,等译.北京:商务印书馆,2005:62,57-58.[Knox P, Pinch S. Urban Social Geography:An Introduction[M]. Chai Yanwei, et al, trans. Beijing:The Commercial Press, 2005:62,57-58.]

[31] 林文勋,张锦鹏.乡村精英·土地产权·乡村动力——中国传统乡村社会发展变迁的历史启示[J].中国经济史研究,2009(4):91-101.[Lin Wenxun, Zhang Jinpeng. Rural elite·land property right·rural power:Historical enlightenment from the development and change of Chinese traditional rural society[J]. The Journal of Chinese Social and Economic History, 2009(4):91-101.]

[32] 汪火根.明代仓政与基层社会控制——以预备仓和社仓为例[J]. 龙岩师专学报,2004,22(1):44-46.[Wang Huogen. Ganary policy and social control at the grass-roots level in Ming dynasty[J]. Journal of Longyan Teachers College, 2004,22(1):44-46.]

[33] 吴滔.流动的空间:清代江南的市镇和农村关系研究[D].上海:复旦大学,2003:31-43.[Wu Tao. Flowing Space:Research on the Township-Village Relationship of Jiangnan in Qing Dynasty[D]. Shanghai:Fudan University, 2003:31-43.]

[34] 刘永华.墟市、宗族与地方政治——以明代至民国时期闽西四保为中心[J]. 中国社会科学,2004(6):185-198,208.[Liu Yonghua. Fairs, clans and local politics:A case study of Sibao at western Fujian province during the Ming dynasty and the Republic reign[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2004(6):185-198,208.]

[35] 吴滔.明清江南市镇与农村关系史研究概说[J].中国农史,2005(2):78-88.[Wu Tao. The introduction of the researches on the township-village relationship in Ming-Qing Jiangnan[J]. Agricultural History of China, 2005(2):78-88.]