城中村遗产价值&mdash;&mdash;公共地理学视角与深圳案例

李蕾蕾; 任珺

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.05.005

PDF(2526 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5) : 33-39,88. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.05.005

文化

城中村遗产价值——公共地理学视角与深圳案例

李蕾蕾¹, 任珺²

作者信息 +

URBAN VILLAGE AS URBAN HERITAGE:PUBLIC GEOGRAPHIES AND A CASE STUDY OF SHENZHEN

LI Lei-lei¹, REN Jun²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

运用公共地理学方法，讨论城中村的文化遗产价值。文章考察了新老两代村民和四类不同租户构成的核心群体，对于城中村的认知、记忆和情感的差异与代际隔阂。研究发现，以深圳为案例的南方中国的城中村，出现原住民业主被大量外来租户逐步替代、导致传统宗族村落文化难以后继、并从"落脚城市"向"可居社区"成熟转变的发展趋势。城中村的文化遗产被识别为"半村半城"的混合型生活文化、以乡镇企业工业遗存和非正规经济为代表的生产文化、凝结移民草根之奋斗精神的理性文化，以及凸显城中村生命活体的感性文化等四个类型。文章认为城中村文化遗产的价值，需要通过社会（代际）与地域空间的双重尺度提升，在公共地理学讨论平台，达成共识。

Abstract

Applying qualitative research of public talks, field works and second-hand information collecting on Shenzhen urban villages in South China, this paper attempts to discuss the potentiality of protecting urban village as part of the whole city's urban heritage from the perspective and the methodology of co-producing public geographies. The main research question is about how to identify and valorize cultural heritage of urban village in the context of current urban regeneration, rapid urbanization and economic reconstruction in a city like Shenzhen where the villages as a kind of acceptable urban renewal model starts to be criticized in general. The issue of concerning the physical and social disappearance of urban villages may be normally categorized into the study of gentrification but this paper's main concern is about the rising consciousness of regarding urban villages as urban heritage rather than the displacement of local residents. Moreover, the paper emphasizes the much higher proportion of migrating tenants than urban village house owners. The paper takes the social stratification of the public related to urban villages as a starting point. The paper has investigated and identified not only the aboriginal urban village house owners and the migrant tenants as two core groups, but also identified four sub-groups of migrant tenants according to their residential history in urban villages. The main finding is that different social groups have very different attitudes, perceptions, memories, emotions and understandings on urban village as urban heritage.

导出引用

李蕾蕾, 任珺. 城中村遗产价值——公共地理学视角与深圳案例[J]. 人文地理. 2017, 32(5): 33-39,88 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.05.005

LI Lei-lei, REN Jun. URBAN VILLAGE AS URBAN HERITAGE:PUBLIC GEOGRAPHIES AND A CASE STUDY OF SHENZHEN[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2017, 32(5): 33-39,88 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2017.05.005

中图分类号： K902

参考文献

[1] 李培林.巨变:村落的终结——都市里的村庄研究[J].中国社会科学, 2002(1):168-179.[Li Peilin. Tremendous changes:The end of villages:A study of villages in the center of Guangzhou city[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2002(1):168-179.]

[2] 魏立华,闫小培."城中村":存续前提下的转型——兼论"城中村" 改造的可行性模式[J].城市规划,2005,29(7):9-13,56.[Wei Lihua, Yan Xiaopei. Transformation of ‘urban village’ and feasible mode[J]. City Planning Review, 2005,29(7):9-13,56.]

[3] 刘晓云.深圳46个城中村进入全面改造[EB/OL].(2007-08-19)[2017-03-24].http://www.guandian.cn/article/20070819/67328.html.[Liu Xiaoyun. 46 urban villages in Shenzhen in total regeneration[EB/OL].(2007-08-19)[2017-03-24].http://www.guandian.cn/article/20070819/67328.html.]

[4] 深圳大冲旧村改造:造就10个亿万富翁400个千万富翁[EB/OL]. (2010-01-25)[2017-03-23].http://finance.ifeng.com/roll/20100125/1751986.shtml.[Shenzhen Dachong urban village renewal is making 10 billionaires and 400 multi-millionaires[EB/OL].(2010-01-25)[2017-03-23]. http://finance.ifeng.com/roll/20100125/1751986.shtml.]

[5] 费孝通.乡土中国(修订版)[M].上海:上海世纪出版集团,2013:36-40.[Fei Xiaotong. Rural China[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Century Publishing Group, 2013:36-40.]

[6] Fuller D. Public geographies:Taking stock[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2008.32(6):834-844.

[7] Larner W. Annual conference 2014 welcome from the chair of conference[EB/OL] [2017-03-24]. http://www.rgs.org/NR/rdonlyres/D34439E5-A2D7-4084-A2A6-D2B0F4B63EB2/0/AC2014.pdf.

[8] Acker J. Comments on Burawoy on public sociology[J]. Critical Sociology, 2005,31:327-31.

[9] Participatory action research[EB/OL].[2017-03-24]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_action_research.

[10] Public participation geographic information system[EB/OL].[2017-03-24].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_participation_geographic_information_system.

[11] 《岗厦漫谈》公开座谈会[EB/OL].[2017-03-24].http://www.retumu.org/wordpress/?p=418.[Gangxia public forum[EB/OL].[2017-03-24].http://www.retumu.org/wordpress/?p=418.]

[12] 岗厦罗生门第一次项目会议探讨[EB/OL].[2017-03-24].http://www.retumu.org/wordpress/?p=308[The first meeting on Gangxia Rashomon project[EB/OL].[2017-03-24].http://www.retumu.org/wordpress/?p=308.]

[13] 李蕾蕾,Soyez D.中国工业旅游发展评析:从西方的视角看中国[J].人文地理,2003,18(6):20-25.[Li Leilei, Soyez D. Evaluation of industrial tourism development of China:From a western perspective[J]. Human Geography, 2003,18(6):20-25.]

[14] 成颖,杜菲. 社区视角下的工厂-城中村共生发展探讨——以深圳红花岭为例[J].特区经济, 2009(6):37-39.[Cheng Ying, Du Fei. Factories in community probing into village development in city:Take Shenzhen Hong Hualin as example[J]. Special Zone Economy, 2009(6):37-39.]

[15] 袁艳". 城中村"的媒介话语建构[J].新闻大学,2007(1):20-27.[Yuan Yan. Media construction on urban village discourse[J]. Journalistic University, 2007(1):20-27.]

[16] 何深静,于涛方,方澜.城市更新中社会网络的保存和发展[J].人文地理,2001,16(6):36-39.[He Shenjing, Yu Taofang, Fang Lan. Protection and development of social networks in urban renewal[J]. Human Geography, 2001,16(6):36-39.]

[17] [加]道格·桑德斯,著.落脚城市[M].陈信宏,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2012.[Doug Saunders. Arrival City[M]. Chen xinhong, trans. Shanghai:Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2012.]

[18] 蓝宇蕴,郭志坚.城中村"景观"问题的社会学思考[J].学术研究, 2006(5):83-87.[Lan Yuyun, Guo Zhijian. A sociological thinking of the problem of villages within city as a landscape[J]. Academic Research, 2006(5):83-87.]

[19] 2017 UABB第一次新闻发布会召开[EB/OL]. (2017-03-20)[2017-03-24].http://www.szhkbiennale.org/News/newsDe.aspx?id=10001139.[The first press conference on 2017 UABB[EB/OL].(2017-03-20)[2017-03-24].http://www.szhkbiennale.org/News/newsDe.aspx? id=10001139.]

[20] 胡不喜.虚妄的故乡和虚伪的返乡[EB/OL].(2015-02-20)[2017-03-24].http://www.ngocn.net/home/news/article/id/362106.[Hu Buxi. Delusive home and the false of going home[EB/OL].(2015-02-20)[2017-03-24].http://www.ngocn.net/home/news/article/id/362106.]

[21] 孟岩". 城中村"中的美术馆:深圳大芬美术馆[J].时代建筑,2007(5):100-107.[Meng Yan. A museum in the "Village Amidst the City":Dafen art museum, Shenzhen[J]. Time Architecture, 2007(5):100-107.]

[22] 天津创业咖啡.[深圳考察纪实]——引"创客之风"刮入津门[EB/OL].(2015-02-18)[2017-03-24]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MjM5ODA0Mjk0MA==&mid=203968454&idx=3&snf52b6739402a7598a28f4e8f569a&3rd=MzA3MDU4NTYzMw=__=&scene=6#rd.[Tianjin Chuangye Coffee.Shenzhen survey-the wind of makeblowing to Tianjin[EB/OL].(2015-02-18)[2017-03-24].http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MjM5ODA0Mjk0MA==&mid=203968454&idx=3&sn=f52b673948c8c02a7598a28f4e8f569a&3rd=MzA3MD U4NTYzMw==&scene=6#rd.]

[23] 何深静,钱俊希,吴敏华". 学生化"的城中村社区——基于广州下渡村的实证分析[J].地理研究,2011,30(8):1508-1519.[He Shenjing, Qian Junxi, Wu Minhua. Studentification in urban village:A case study of Xiadu village, Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2011,30(8):1508-1519.]

[24] 朱荣远,张立民,郭旭东.表情复杂的中国城市化附生物-城中村:有关深圳市城中村调查研究的启示[J].城市规划,2006,30(9):84-88.[Zhu Rongyuan, Zhang Limin, Guo Xudong. Implication from the survey of villages in Shenzhen urban area[J]. City Planning Review, 2006,30(9):84-88.]

[25] 柳冬妩.城中村:拼命抱住最后一些土[J].读书,2005(2):155-165.[Liu Dongwu. Urban village:Holding hard the last soil[J]. Reading, 2005(2):155-165.]

[26] 邓妍.深圳城中村已是外国艺术家热门,OCAT国际艺术工作室艺术展下月开幕[EB/OL].(2011-10-31)[2017-03-24].http://huanan.artron.net/20111031/n198585.html.[Deng Yan. Shenzhen urban village is hotspot to foreign artists, the exhibition of international artist residence in OCAT will be open next month[EB/OL].(2011-10-31)[2017-03-24].http://huanan.artron.net/20111031/n198585.html.]

[27] 曾锐,唐国安.拥挤空间中的居住行为分析——以深圳城中村为例[J].中外建筑,2011(6):38-40.[Zeng Rui, Tang Guo'an. Living behavior analysis in crowded space:Village-in-city of Shenzhen as an example[J]. Chinese and Overseas Architecture, 2011(6):38-40.]

[28] Wang Y P, Wang Y L, Wu J S. Urbanization and informal development in China:Urban villages in Shenzhen[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2009,33(4):957-73.

[29] 谭刚.城中村经济主体、经济活动及主要特征:深圳市福田区城中村调查[J].开放导报,2005,120(3):51-56.[Tan Gang. Urban villages’economic entities, activities and features:A survey on urban villages in Futian district, Shenzhen[J]. China Opening Herald, 2005, 120(3):51-56.]

[30] 周大鸣. 外来工与"二元社区"——珠江三角洲的考察[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2000,40(2):107-112.[Zhou Daming. Migrant labor and the "Dual Community" in the Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Sun Yatsen University(Social Science Edition), 2000,40(2):107-112.]

[31] Wu F L, Zhang F Z, Webster C. Informality and the development and demolition of urban villages in the Chinese peri-urban area[J]. Urban Studies, 2013,50(10):1919-1934.

[32] 尹晓颖,薛德升,闫小培."城中村"非正规部门形成发展机制——以深圳市蔡屋围为例[J]. 经济地理,2006,26(6):969-973.[Yin Xiaoying, Xue Desheng, Yan Xiaopei. Study of the development mechanism of the informal sector in the‘urban village':A case of Caiwuwei[J]. Economic Geography, 2006,26(6):969-973.]

[33] 张盈.深圳劳务工博物馆:大时代里的小人物[EB/OL].(2016-11-09)[2017-03-24].http://help.3g.163.com/16/1109/09/C5DVTN6B00964J4O.html.[Zhang Ying. Shenzhen contract labors museum:Small potatoes in great time[EB/OL].(2016-11-09)[2017-03-24]. http://help.3g.163.com/16/1109/09/C5DVTN6B00964J4O.html.]

[34] 欧宁.克里斯钦自由城的生与死[EB/OL].(2014-11-05)[2017-03-24]. [On Ning. The life and death of Fristaden Christiania[EB/OL]. (2014-11-05)[2017-03-24].]

[35] 陶然.城中村作为低成本生活区的价值思考——以深圳大冲村为例[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版),2011,13(1):261-263.[Tao Ran. Thinking of the value of urban village as a low cast living area:A case of Shenzhen Dachong[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University(Social Science Edition), 2011,13(1):261-263.]

[36] 杨慧.一次低空飞行姿态的公共雕塑展[N/OL].深圳晚报.(2014-12-22)[2017-03-24]. http://wb.sznews.com/html/2014-12/22/content_3100628.htm.[Yang hui. The exhibition of social sculpture with a gesture of low altitude flight[N/OL].Shenzhen Evening News.(2014-12-22)[2017-03-24]. http://wb.sznews.com/html/2014-12/22/content_3100628.htm.]

[37] OCT当代艺术中心(OCAT). "OCAT放映":《夜场》-多种视野中的艺术电影[EB/OL].[2017-03-14]. https://www.douban.com/event/23292454/.[OCAT.OCAT movie nights:Art films with multiperspectives[EB/OL].[2017-03-14]. https://www.douban.com/event/23292454/.]

[38] 道长.岗厦村文氏的前朝后代[EB/OL]. (2015-04-08)[2017-03-24]. http://www.linjia114.com/detail/6251.htm.[Dao Zhang. A family history of Wen in Gangxia village[EB/OL]. (2015-04-08)[2017-03-24]. http://www.linjia114.com/detail/6251.htm.]

[39] 戴春.深城深筑·深圳当代建筑系列活动之二"新里巷运动的可能性——有关城中村的未来"研讨会[EB/OL].(2015-01-27)[2017-03-24].http://www.douban.com/note/481764818/.[Dai Chun. A seminar of Shenzhen modern architecture event No.2 with the title of‘'The new street movement for the future potential of urban village''[EB/OL].(2015-01-27)[2017-03-24]. http://www.douban.com/note/481764818/.]

[40] 何畅. "非主流"美国学者马立安:没有城中村就没有深圳[EB/OL].(2013-12-08)[2017-03-24]. http://www.sznews.com/news/content/2013-12/18/content_8897204_6.htm.[He Chang. Alternative intellectual Mary Ann O'Donnell:No urban village, no Shenzhen[EB/OL].(2013-12-08)[2017-03-24]. http://www.sznews.com/news/content/2013-12/18/content_8897204_6.htm.]

[41] 李蕾蕾,任珺,陈杨.社区文艺的阶层分化与情感认同:以深圳为案例的时空分析模式[C]//宁越敏《. 中国城市研究》(第9辑).北京:科学出版社,2016:137-151.[Li Leilei, Ren Jun, Chen Yang. Community culture and emotional identity with social stratification:A social-temporal-spatial analysis for Shenzhen case study[C]//Ning Yuemin, ed. China Urban Studies(No.9). Beijing:Science Press, 2016:137-151.]

[42] 吴晓波.费孝通的好奇心[EB/OL].(2014-11-02)[2017-03-24]. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_1342ac9e20102v3mg.html.[Wu Xiaobo. Fei Xiaotong's curiosity[EB/OL].(2014-11-02)[2017-03-24]. http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_1342ac9e20102v3mg.html.]

[43] 张宇星.城中村作为一种城市公共资本与共享资本[J].时代建筑, 2016(6):15-21.[Zhang Yuxing. Urban village as a form of urban public capital and shared capital[J].Time Architecture, 2016(6):15-21.]