新流动范式背景下流动基础设施的研究进展与展望

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.06.002

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2622 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要新流动范式背景下，流动基础设施成为国内外研究的新热点。流动基础设施是指在流动准备期、流动进行期和流动后稳定期均能促进和制约流动者行为的所有相联系的技术、机构和行动者的集合系统。以主体的流动过程为线索，流动基础设施现有的实证研究主要聚焦于出发与入境过程中的流动基础设施、停留与定居过程中的流动基础设施、非自愿流动情境下的流动基础设施和打破空间尺度的流动基础设施。未来流动基础设施研究主要关注：中国境内流动基础设施体系的研究与运用；采用数字化方式来描绘并解释全球流动基础设施的空间异质性；更多聚焦“线上流动基础设施”和“以人为流动基础设施”的研究；从社会治理视角来剖析流动基础设施的应用与发展。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	蔡晓梅
	萧千阅
	郭子萱

关键词 ：新流动范式, 流动基础设施, 流动性, 移民, 研究进展

Abstract：Taking the migration trajectory of the subject as the cue, the existing empirical studies on migration infrastructure mainly focus on four aspects: The migration infrastructure in the process of departure and entry, the migration infrastructure in the process of stay and settlement, the migration infrastructure in the context of forced migration, and the migration infrastructure breaking the spatial scale. The findings are as follows: 1) The technological and regulatory migration infrastructures play the function of serving as the material foundation and guaranteeing the basic rights of the migrants respectively which shape the mobility behavior of the subject. 2) The "from-the-above" migration infrastructures, including the commercial, technological and regulatory part, can alleviate the precarity of the migrants' economy or settlement. 3) From the perspective of a broader scope of services space, with "online migration infrastructure" and "human migration infrastructure" to represent the core part of both breaking the defining borders of flowing space, and breaking through the space between real and virtual, which constitute the potential social capital of migrants. 4) In the condition of forced migration, "deportation infrastructure" reflects the national position and the willingness of the government in the context of transferring targeted objects.

Key words： the new mobilities paradigm migration infrastructures mobilities migrant research progress

收稿日期: 2022-10-31

PACS:

F294

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（42371239；42071191；42071189）；广东省普通高校哲学社会科学重点实验室（2022WSYS004）；南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室（珠海）创新团队建设项目（311021018）

作者简介: 蔡晓梅(1976-),女,湖南隆回人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为社会文化地理与旅游管理。E-mail:caixm@scnu.edu.cn。

引用本文:

蔡晓梅, 萧千阅, 郭子萱. 新流动范式背景下流动基础设施的研究进展与展望[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(6): 8-14,114. CAI Xiao-mei, XIAO Qian-yue, Guo Zi-xuan. MIGRATION INFRASTRUCTURES UNDER THE NEW MOBILITIES PARADIGM: RESEARCH PROGRESS AND FUTURE PROSPECT. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 38(6): 8-14,114.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.06.002 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2023/V38/I6/8

[1]	杨茜好,朱竑.西方人文地理学的"流动性"研究进展与启示[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(2):1-11.[Yang Xihao, Zhu Hong. Progress and revelation of researches on the anglophone geography of mobilities[J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2015,47(2):1-11.]
[2]	Sheller M, Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm[J]. Environment and Planning A:Economy and Space, 2006,38(2):207-226.
[3]	刘英,石雨晨."回归"抑或"转向"?——国外流动性研究的兴起、发展与最新动向[J].国外社会科学,2021(2):122-133.[Liu Ying, Shi Yuchen. "Turn" or "return" ?The rise development and new trends of mobilities studies abroad[J]. Social Sciences Abroad, 2021(2):122-133.]
[4]	Xiang B, Lindquist J. Migration infrastructure[J]. International Migration Review, 2014,48:S122-S148.
[5]	陈庆保.基础设施涵义的演化[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2007(S2):104-105.[Chen Qingbao. Evolution of the connotation of infrastructure[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2007(S2):104-105.]
[6]	蔡晓梅,卜美玲,李军.以流动看世界——基于彼得·阿迪《流动性》的研究述评[J].热带地理,2020,40(3):455-465.[Cai Xiaomei, Bu Meiling, Li Jun. See the world from a mobile perspective:A review on"mobility"edited by Peter Adey[J]. Tropical Geography, 2020, 40(3):455-465.]
[7]	孙九霞,周尚意,王宁,等.跨学科聚焦的新领域:流动的时间、空间与社会[J].地理研究,2016,35(10):1801-1818.[Sun Jiuxia, Zhou Shangyi, Wang Ning, et al. Mobility in geographical research:Time, space and society[J]. Geographical Research, 2016,35(10):1801-1818.]
[8]	Keeling D J. Transportation geography-new regional mobilities[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2008,32(2):275-283.
[9]	Richardson T, Jensen O B. How mobility systems produce inequality:Making mobile subject types on the Bangkok Sky Train[J]. Built Environment, 2008,34(2):218-231.
[10]	项飙,约翰·林德奎斯特.流动,还是被流动:跨国劳务的基础设施[J].社会学评论,2019,7(6):3-17.[Xiang Biao, Lindquist J. Moving or being moved:The migration infrastructure in transnational labor mobility[J]. Sociological Review of China, 2019,7(6):3-17.]
[11]	Rodima-Taylor D. Promise, ethnography, and the anthropocene:Investigating the infrastructural turn[J]. American Anthropologist, 2020,122(4):973-975.
[12]	曾国军,徐雨晨,王龙杰,等.从在地化、去地化到再地化:中国城镇化进程中的人地关系转型[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(1):28-39.[Zeng Guojun, Xu Yuchen, Wang Longjie, et al. From localization to de-localization and re-localization:Transformation of the humanland relationship in China's urbanization process[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(1):28-39.]
[13]	道格拉斯·格林沃尔德.经济学百科全书[K].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1992:686.[Douglas Greenwald Editor in Chief. Dictionary of Modern Economics[K]. Beijing:China Social Sciences Press, 1992:686.]
[14]	赵玉林,王化中.经济学辞典[K].北京:中国经济出版社,1990:334.[Zhao Yulin, Wang Huazhong. Economic Dictionary[K]. Beijing:China Economic Press, 1990:334.]
[15]	世界银行. 1994年世界发展报告:为发展提供基础设施[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1994:2-14.[The World Bank. Development report of 1994:Providing Infrastructure for Development[M]. Beijing:China Financial and Economic Publishing House, 1994:2-14.]
[16]	李瑶.新基建,是什么?[J].全球商业经典,2020(9):8-13.[Li Yao. What is new infrastructure construction?[J]. Global Business, 2020(9):8-13.]
[17]	包弼德,夏翠娟,王宏甦.数字人文与中国研究的网络基础设施建设[J].图书馆杂志, 2018, 37(11):18-25.[Bao Bide, Xia Cuijuan, Wang Hongsu. The digital humanities and a cyberinfrastructure for China studies[J]. Library Journal, 2018,37(11):18-25.]
[18]	Meeus B, Arnaut K, Heur B. Arrival Infrastructures:Migration and Urban Social Mobilities[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2019.
[19]	Walters W. Aviation as deportation infrastructure:Airports, planes, and expulsion[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2018, 44(16):2796-2817.
[20]	王保乾,李含琳.如何科学理解基础设施概念[J].甘肃社会科学, 2002(2):62-64.[Wang Baoqian, Li Hanlin. How to understand infrastructure concept scientifically[J]. Gansu Social Sciences, 2002(2):62-64.]
[21]	Spijkerboer T. The global mobility infrastructure:Reconceptualising the externalisation of migration control[J]. European Journal of Migration, 2018(20):452-469.
[22]	Hwang M C. Infrastructure of mobility:Navigating borders, cities and markets[J], Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 2021,21(1):108-126.
[23]	Seiger F K. Migration infrastructure, moral economy, and intergenerational injustice in mother-and-child migration from the Philippines to Japan[J]. Mobilities, 2021,16(5):707-723.
[24]	Schrooten M, Meeus B. The possible role and position of social work as part of the arrival infrastructure[J]. European Journal of Social Work, 2020,23(3):414-424.
[25]	Xiang B, Lindquist J. Infrastructuralization:Evolving sociopolitical dynamics in labour migration from Asia[J]. Pacific Affairs, 2018, 91(4):759-773.
[26]	Robertson S. Infrastructures of insecurity:Housing and language testing in Asia-Australia migration[J]. Geoforum, 2017,82:13-20.
[27]	Chang A S. Producing the self-regulating subject:Liberal protection in Indonesia's migration Infrastructure[J]. Pacific Affairs, 2019, 91(4):695-716.
[28]	Hirish M. Emerging infrastructures of low-cost aviation in Southeast Asia[J]. Mobilities, 2017,12(2):250-276.
[29]	Xu Z C, Sun T S. The Siphon effects of transportation infrastructure on internal migration:Evidence from China's HSR network[J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2021,28(13):1066-1070.
[30]	Wang B Y. Infrastructures in migration:Mobile foreign academics in China and the "everyday", "agency" and "arrival" focus[J]. Geoforum, 2020,129:141-150.
[31]	Lindquist J. Brokers, channels, infrastructure:Moving migrant labor in the Indonesian-Malaysian oil palm complex[J]. Mobilities, 2017,12(2):213-226.
[32]	Tuxen N, Robertson S. Brokering international education and (re) producing class in Mumbai[J]. International Migration, 2019,57(3):280-294.
[33]	Chau H S, Schwiter K. Who shapes migration in open labour markets?Analysing migration infrastructures and brokers of circularly migrating home care workers in Switzerland[J]. Mobilities, 2021, 16(5):724-738.
[34]	Van Eerbeek P, Hedberg C. Chameleon brokers:A translocal take on migration industries in the Thai-Swedish wild berry business[J]. Migration Studies, 2021,9(3):830-851.
[35]	Yeoh B S A, Chee H L, Baey G. Managing risk, making a match:Brokers and the management of mobility in international marriage[J]. Mobilities, 2017,12(2):227-242.
[36]	Sigona N, Kato J, Kuznetsova I. Migration infrastructures and the production of migrants'irregularity in Japan and the United Kingdom[J]. Comparative Migration Studies, 2021,9(1):1-19.
[37]	Lobo M. Living on the edge:Precarity and freedom in Darwin,Australia[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2021,47(20):4615-4630.
[38]	Popescu M, Libal K. Social work with migrants and refugees[J]. Advances in Social Work, 2018,18(3):i-x.
[39]	Van Dam S, Raeymaeckers P. Migrants in the periphery:Migrant organisations and their networks[J]. European Journal of Social Work, 2017,20(6):921-934.
[40]	Coutin S B. Deportation studies:Origins, themes and directions[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2015,41(4):671-681.
[41]	Ethan B. Strange passages:Carceral mobility and the liminal in the catastrophic history of American deportation[J]. National Identities, 2015(17):175-194.
[42]	Simone A. People as infrastructure:Intersecting fragments in Johannesburg[J]. Public Culture, 2004,16(3):407-429.
[43]	Elyachar J. Phatic labor, infrastructure, and the Question of Empowerment in Cairo[J]. American Ethnologist, 2010,37(3):452-464.
[44]	Hobbis S K, Hobbis G. Non-/Human infrastructures and digital gifts:The cables, waves and brokers of Solomon Islands internet[J]. Ethnos, 2020,87(5):851-873.
[45]	Sabie D, Ahmed S I. Moving into a Technology Land:Exploring the Challenges for the Refugees in Canada in Accessing Its Computerized infrastructures[C]. Compass'19-Proceedings of the Conference on Computer&Sustainable Societies, 2019:218-233.
[46]	Udwan G, Leurs K, Alencar A. Digital resilience tactics of Syrian refugees in the Netherlands:Social media for social support, health, and identity[J]. Social Media+Society, 2020,6(2):1-11.
[47]	Dekker R, Engbersen G. How social media transform migrant networks and facilitate migration[J]. Global Networks-A Journal of Transnational Affairs, 2014,14(4):401-418.
[48]	Jayadeva S. Keep calm and apply to Germany:How online communities mediate transnational student mobility from India to Germany[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2020, 46(11):2240-2257.
[49]	王炳钰,卢燕璇.移民基础设施与南南流动:在穗非洲商人的制度身份困境、日常生活体验与能动性实践[J].广东社会科学,2021(2):190-204.[Wang Bingyu, Lu Yanxuan. Immigrant infrastructure and south-south mobility:Institutional identity dilemma, daily life experience and dynamic practice of African businessmen in Guangzhou[J]. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 2021(2):190-204.]