居民流动力对幸福感的影响——基于南京市的实证研究

常恩予, 张敏, 陈培培

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6) : 34-43,91.

PDF(4218 KB)
PDF(4218 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6) : 34-43,91. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.06.005
流动性专栏

居民流动力对幸福感的影响——基于南京市的实证研究

  • 常恩予1,2, 张敏1,2, 陈培培1,2
作者信息 +

DECONSTRUCTING THE EFFECTS OF MOTILITY ON WELLBEING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF NANJING RESIDENTS

  • CHANG En-yu1,2, ZHANG Min1,2, CHEN Pei-pei1,2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

在流动性增强且日益复杂化的现代社会中,流动性对居民幸福感的影响受到越来越多关注。但现有研究多从效用视角考虑居民实际发生的流动行为对幸福感的作用,缺乏从能力视角分析流动的能力和潜力如何影响幸福感。为弥补这一不足,本文引入Kaufmann提出的流动力概念,采用多元回归模型探究流动力及其构成要素对幸福感的影响机制,以及社会资本的中介效应。结果表明,流动力显著影响居民幸福感,且对自我实现幸福感的影响大于享乐幸福感;在构成维度上,获取维度对于幸福感的贡献大于能力和安排维度,且获取维度更多地促进享乐幸福感,安排维度更多地促进自我实现幸福感;流动力和幸福感的关系中,社会资本的中介效应显著。本研究为评估流动能力如何促进人的全面发展和赋能提供了一个探索框架,对制定城市空间规划和居民福利政策有一定的启示。

Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of information, communication and transport technology, mobility patterns of urban residents in modern society have become even more complex and diverse than before. Motility consists of a combination of geographical, social and cultural elements that influence individual mobility. The connotation reveals the dynamics and constraints of mobility within a social structure, while also emphasises the agency and ability of individuals to shape mobility. The concept of motility highlights the intrinsic value of mobility, which may contribute to personal growth and a meaningful life. Based on survey data collected from 10 communities in the main city area of Nanjing in 2019, we use multiple regression models to investigate the effects of different components of motility on wellbeing, including access, competence, and appropriation. And mediating effect analysis is used to investigate the relationship among social capital, motility and wellbeing. The findings suggest that motility contributes to residents' wellbeing significantly. More specifically, 1) Motility has a positive effect on both hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing, with a greater effect on the latter; 2) Access contributes more to wellbeing than the competence and appropriation dimensions. 3) Social capital has a significant mediating effect in the relationship between the variables of access and appropriation and wellbeing.

关键词

流动力 / 流动性 / 幸福感 / 出行行为 / 社会资本

Key words

motility / mobility / wellbeing / travel behaviour / social capital

引用本文

导出引用
常恩予, 张敏, 陈培培. 居民流动力对幸福感的影响——基于南京市的实证研究[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(6): 34-43,91 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.06.005
CHANG En-yu, ZHANG Min, CHEN Pei-pei. DECONSTRUCTING THE EFFECTS OF MOTILITY ON WELLBEING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF NANJING RESIDENTS[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(6): 34-43,91 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.06.005
中图分类号: K901.2   

参考文献

[1] Kwan M P, Schwanen T. Geographies of mobility[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2016,106(2):243-256.
[2] Mokhtarian P L. Subjective well-being and travel:Retrospect and prospect[J]. Transportation, 2019,46(2):493-513.
[3] De Vos J, Schwanen T, Van Acker V, et al. Travel and subjective well-being:A focus on findings, methods and future research needs[J]. Transport Reviews, 2013,33(4):421-442.
[4] Reardon L, Abdallah S. Well-being and transport:Taking stock and looking forward[J]. Transport Reviews, 2013,33(6):634-657.
[5] Hickman R, Cao M, Lira B M, et al. Understanding capabilities, functionings and travel in high and low income neighbourhoods in Manila[J]. Social Inclusion, 2017,5(4):161-174.
[6] Kaufmann V, Bergman M M, Joye D. Motility:Mobility as capital[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2004,28(4):745-756.
[7] Urry J. Mobilities[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press, 2007:38-39.
[8] Schwanen T, Nixon D V. Understanding the relationships between wellbeing and mobility in the unequal city:The case of community initiatives promoting cycling and walking in São Paulo and London//Keith M, de Souza Santos A A. Urban Transformations and Public Health in the Emergent City[M]. Manchester, UK:Manchester University Press, 2020:79-101.
[9] Shliselberg R, Givoni M, Kaplan S. A behavioral framework for measuring motility:Linking past mobility experiences, motility and eudemonic well-being[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2020,141:69-85.
[10] Cuignet T, Perchoux C, Caruso G, et al. Mobility among older adults:Deconstructing the effects of motility and movement[J]. Urban Studies, 2020,57(2):383-401.
[11] Cairns S, Harmer C, Hopkin J, et al. Sociological perspectives on travel and mobilities:A review[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2014,63:107-117.
[12] 周红云.社会资本:布迪厄、科尔曼和帕特南的比较[J].经济社会体制比较,2003,19(4):46-53.[Zhou Hongyun. Social capital in Bourdieu's, Coleman's and Putnam's theory[J]. Comparative Economic&Social Systems, 2003,19(4):46-53.]
[13] Currie G, Stanley J. Investigating links between social capital and public transport[J]. Transport Reviews, 2008,28(4):529-547.
[14] Viry G, Kaufmann V, Widmer E D. Social integration faced with commuting:More widespread and less dense support networks[M]//Ohnmacht T, Maksim H, Bergman M M. Mobilities and Inequality. New York, USA:Routledge, 2009:121-143.
[15] Stanley J K, Hensher D A, Stanley J R, et al. Mobility, social exclusion and well-being:Exploring the links[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2011,45(8):789-801.
[16] Schwanen T, Lucas K, Akyelken N, et al. Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2015,74:123-135.
[17] Shliselberg R, Givoni M. Motility as a policy objective[J]. Transport Reviews, 2018,38(3):279-297.
[18] Kaufmann V, Audikana A. Handbook of Urban Mobilities[M]. New York, USA:Routledge, 2020:41-45.
[19] Sheller M. Theorising mobility justice[J]. Tempo Social, 2018, 30(2):17-34.
[20] 唐香姐,徐红罡.大理打工旅游者的流动力研究[J].旅游学刊, 2019,34(10):137-146.[Tang Xiangjie, Xu Honggang. Study on the motility of working tourists in Dali, Yunnan[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2019,34(10):137-146.]
[21] Kaufmann V, Dubois Y, Ravalet E. Measuring and typifying mobility using motility[J]. Applied Mobilities, 2018,3(2):198-213.
[22] De Witte A, Hollevoet J, Dobruszkes F, et al. Linking modal choice to motility:A comprehensive review[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2013,49:329-341.
[23] Atkinson S. Beyond components of wellbeing:The effects of relational and situated assemblage[J]. Topoi, 2013,32(2):137-144.
[24] Diener E, Emmons R A, Larsen R J, et al. The satisfaction with life scale[J]. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1985,49(1):71-75.
[25] Ryff C D, Singer B H. Know thyself and become what you are:A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being[J]. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2008,9(1):13-39.
[26] Olsson L E, Gärling T, Ettema D, et al. Happiness and satisfaction with work commute[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2013,111(1):255-263.
[27] 赵延东,罗家德.如何测量社会资本:一个经验研究综述[J].国外社会科学,2005,28(2):18-24.[Zhao Yandong, Luo Jiade. How to measure social capital:A review of empirical studies[J]. Social Sciences International, 2005,28(2):18-24.]
[28] Stanley J K, Hensher D A, Stanley J R, et al. Mobility, social exclusion and well-being:Exploring the links[J], Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2011,45(8):789-801.
[29] Bergstad C J, Gamble A, Gärling T, et al. Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel[J]. Transportation, 2011,38(1):1-15.
[30] Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986,51(6):1173-1182.
[31] 刘晔,肖童,刘于琪,等.城市建成环境对广州市居民幸福感的影响——基于15min步行可达范围的分析[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(8):1270-1282.[Liu Ye, Xiao Tong, Liu Yuqi, et al. Impacts of urban built environments on residents'subjective well-being:An analysis based on 15-minute walking distance[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(8):1270-1282.]
[32] 温忠麟,叶宝娟.中介效应分析:方法和模型发展[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(5):731-745.[Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Analyses of mediating effects:The development of methods and models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014,22(5):731-745.]
[33] Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable[J]. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2014,67(3):451-470.
[34] De Vos J, Witlox F. Travel satisfaction revisited. On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process[J]. Transportation Research Part A:Policy and Practice, 2017,106:364-373.
[35] Abou-Zeid M, Ben-Akiva M. Well-being and activity-based models[J]. Transportation, 2012,39(6):1189-1207.
[36] Son J, Wilson J. Volunteer work and hedonic, eudemonic, and social well-being[J]. Sociological Forum, 2012,27(3):658-681.
[37] 常恩予,张敏.西方流动性研究与交通地理学的对话:进展、启示与展望[J].地理科学进展,2022,41(8):1516-1529.[Chang Enyu, Zhang Min.Mobility studies and transport geography in the West:Progress, implications and prospects[J]. Progress in Geography, 2022,41(8):1516-1529.]
[38] 熊伟,黄媚娇,蔡晓梅,等.新流动范式下非流动性的研究进展与展望[J].地理研究,2022,41(3):748-763.[Xiong Wei, Huang Meijiao, Cai Xiaomei, et al. Immobility under the new flow paradigm:Research progress and future prospect[J]. Geographical Research, 2022,41(3):748-763.]

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(41871131,42271230)

PDF(4218 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/