PDF(2814 KB)
PDF(2814 KB)
PDF(2814 KB)
西方感知可达性研究进展及对国内研究的启示
RESEARCH PROGRESS ON PERCEIVED ACCESSIBILITY IN THE WEST AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DOMESTIC RESEARCH
随着人本主义规划的不断精细化与人地关系的日益复杂化,传统社区忽略居民的多元需求所引发的公平问题慢慢显现,同时社会科学领域对于个体需求与感知的关注也持续升温。由于个体感知和需求会强烈影响出行行为和活动参与,而仅基于空间数据的客观可达性往往无法提供完整的信息,因此,西方学者逐渐将研究焦点转向感知可达性。目前,感知可达性凭借其独特优势,已成为可达性研究的重要补充。然而,与西方较为丰富的研究成果相比,我国在这一领域的研究仍相对滞后。因而本文在整体把握西方研究进展的基础上,系统述评了感知可达性的研究源起、核心内涵和测度方法,而后通过梳理感知可达性在出行方式、人口群体、空间区位和新兴技术四个关键维度的研究内容,提出了未来深入研究感知可达性的方向和框架。最后,结合当前国内研究的空白,总结了西方感知可达性对我国可达性研究的启示,以期为相关理论探索和实践研究提供依据和支撑。
With the continuous refinement of humanistic planning and the growing complexity of human-land relationships, the fairness issues caused by traditional communities ignoring the diverse needs of residents have gradually emerged. Simultaneously, there has been a rising interest in the individual's needs and perceptions in the field of social sciences. Given that individual perceptions and needs significantly influence travel behavior and activity participation, relying solely on spatial data for objective accessibility often fails to provide complete information. Western scholars have begun to shift their research focus to perceived accessibility. Currently, perceived accessibility, owing to its unique advantages, has emerged as a significant complement in accessibility research. However, compared with the rich research achievements in the West, studies in China are still relatively lacking. Therefore, based on a comprehensive understanding of the current Western research status, the paper systematically reviews the origins, core concepts, and measurement methods of perceived accessibility. Subsequently, by examining the research content of perceived accessibility across four key dimensions: travel modes, population groups, spatial locations and emerging technologies, the paper proposes future directions and a framework for in-depth research on perceived accessibility. Finally, considering the current research gaps in China, the paper summarizes the implications of Western perceived accessibility research for accessibility studies in China, aiming to provide a basis and support for theoretical exploration and practical research in relevant fields.
人本主义 / 感知可达性 / 客观可达性 / 概念模型 / 测度方法
humanism / perceived accessibility / objective accessibility / conceptual model / assessment method
| 1 |
赵鹏军, 罗佳, 胡昊宇. 基于大数据的生活圈范围与服务设施空间匹配研究——以北京为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40 (4): 541- 553.
|
| 2 |
周春山, 高军波. 转型期中国城市公共服务设施供给模式及其形成机制研究[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31 (3): 272- 279.
|
| 3 |
钟家晖, 易芳蓉, 何正国, 等. 基于弱势人群个体可达性评价的社区服务设施配置研究[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24 (5): 875- 888.
|
| 4 |
陆锋, 陈洁. 武汉城市圈城市区位与可达性分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2008 (4): 68- 74.
|
| 5 |
宋正娜, 陈雯, 张桂香, 等. 公共服务设施空间可达性及其度量方法[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29 (10): 1217- 1224.
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
张婧远, 陈培育. 面向城市公园的感知可达性研究进展述评与人本规划思潮下的应用启示[J]. 国际城市规划, 2021, 36 (5): 96- 103.
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
刘春济, 高静. 大都市滨水区感知可达性的维度结构及其关系——以上海市浦江滨水区为例[J]. 城市问题, 2017 (12): 33- 39.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
尹海伟, 徐建刚. 上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析[J]. 城市发展研究, 2009, 16 (6): 71- 76.
|
| 15 |
陈洁, 陆锋, 程昌秀. 可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2007 (5): 100- 110.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
赵渺希, 陈汝霜. 网络社会视角下的城市意象理论辨析与规划应用[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38 (1): 71- 78.
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |