“制度—生活”视角下城市过渡型社区的转型:对江苏姜堰安置区的实证

孙庆颖, 罗小龙, 刘晓曼, 丁子尧

人文地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 88-98.

PDF(21792 KB)
PDF(21792 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 88-98. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.02.010
城市

“制度—生活”视角下城市过渡型社区的转型:对江苏姜堰安置区的实证

  • 孙庆颖, 罗小龙, 刘晓曼, 丁子尧
作者信息 +

THE TRANSFORMATION OF TRANSITIONAL COMMUNITIES FROM AN INSTITUTION-LIFE PERSPECTIVE: EVIDENCE FORM JIANGYAN NEW DISTRICT, JIANGSU PROVINCE

  • SUN Qing-ying, LUO Xiao-long, LIU Xiao-man, DING Zi-yao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

过渡型社区作为中国快速城镇化的阶段性产物,不仅是推动安置居民身份转变与社会融入的基础媒介,更是缓解城乡发展矛盾、构建和谐社会的重要载体。本文从“制度—生活”视角出发,以江苏泰州市姜堰新区为例,系统展现过渡型社区内正式制度与居民实践的动态发展轨迹与特征,并进一步剖析其转型机制与规律。研究发现:①制度安排是过渡型社区转型的外源驱动,制度以规制化的安置空间改变失地农民的居住环境,并通过制度供给、制度转型、制度调适,推动社区环境从物质空间过渡逐渐转向社会空间融入。②生活实践是过渡型社区转型的内生动能,生活主体的实践经历了从非正式到参与式的特征转变,将社区空间秩序从离散割裂重构为协作共治。③“制度—生活”的交互形塑作用推动过渡型社区的螺旋演进,制度对生活实践进行系统性和顺应性调整,同时生活对制度安排进行创造性拓展和内化吸收,共同构成过渡型社区的城乡融合发展之路。

Abstract

As a transitional outcome of China's rapid urbanization, resettlement-based transitional communities have become a critical spatial form for supporting rural residents'identity shifts and easing urban-rural disparities. This study adopts an“institution-life”interaction perspective to unravel the developmental trajectory and transformation mechanisms of such communities, drawing on evidence from Jiangyan, Jiangsu Province. The findings reveal three interrelated processes. First, institutional arrangements constitute the external driving force of transformation. Through successive phases of institutional supply, transformation, and adjustment, resettlement communities have evolved from spaces of physical relocation into more socially integrated environments, reflecting both the state's adaptive governance capacity and the structuring role of formal rules. Second, everyday practices provide the endogenous momentum for transformation. Residents' practices have shifted from informal adaptation to active participation, reshaping community order from fragmentation toward collaborative co-governance. Residents thus emerge not only as subjects of policy intervention but also as agents of spatial change. Third, the interplay between institutions and daily life drives the spiral evolution of transitional communities: institutions structure and partially codify everyday practices, while residents creatively reinterpret, internalize, and extend institutional arrangements. This reciprocal shaping underscores that China's urban-rural transformation is neither a linear extension of modernity nor a rigid persistence of tradition, but a distinctive path of integration forged through the dynamic interaction of institutions and lived practices.

关键词

制度 / 生活 / 过渡型社区 / 转型 / 姜堰新区

Key words

institutions / life / transitional community / tranasformation / Jiangyan new area

引用本文

导出引用
孙庆颖, 罗小龙, 刘晓曼, 丁子尧. “制度—生活”视角下城市过渡型社区的转型:对江苏姜堰安置区的实证[J]. 人文地理. 2026, 41(2): 88-98 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.02.010
SUN Qing-ying, LUO Xiao-long, LIU Xiao-man, DING Zi-yao. THE TRANSFORMATION OF TRANSITIONAL COMMUNITIES FROM AN INSTITUTION-LIFE PERSPECTIVE: EVIDENCE FORM JIANGYAN NEW DISTRICT, JIANGSU PROVINCE[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2026, 41(2): 88-98 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.02.010
中图分类号: TU981   

参考文献

[1] 陆大道,陈明星.关于“国家新型城镇化规划(2014-2020)”编制大背景的几点认识[J].地理学报,2015,70(2):179-185. [Lu Dadao, Chen Mingxing. Several viewpoints on the background of compiling the "National New Urbanization Planning (2014-2020)"[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(2):179-185.]
[2] 李志刚,于涛方,魏立华,等.快速城市化下“转型社区”的社区转型研究[J].城市发展研究,2007(5):84-90. [Li Zhigang, Yu Taofang,Wei Lihua, et al. Research on community transformation of "transitional communities" under rapid urbanization[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2007(5):84-90.]
[3] 何演,马晴.快速城市化进程中过渡型社区的发展困境及出路分析[J].农村经济,2013(10):82-86. [He Yan, Ma Qing. Analysis of the development challenges and solutions of transitional communities in the rapid urbanization process[J]. Rural Economy, 2013(10):82-86.]
[4] Gao W, Vries W T D, Zhao Q. Understanding rural resettlement paths under the increasing versus decreasing balance land use policy in China [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 103: 105325. https://doi. org/10.1016/j. landusepol.2021.105325.
[5] 宋伟轩,袁亚琦,谷跃,等.南京棚户区改造的城市社会空间重构效应[J].地理研究,2021,40(4):1008-1024. [Song Weixuan, Yuan Yaqi, Guyue, et al. Socio-spatial effects of urban shantytown renovation in Nanjing[J]. Geographical Research, 2021,40(4):1008-1024.]
[6] 吴俊伯,罗震东,乔艺波.混杂的价值:中国城乡接合部经济空间研究综述[J].地理科学进展, 2025, 44(1): 88-102. [Wu Junbo, Luo Zhendong, Qiao Yibo. Mixed values: A systematic review of research on the economic space of urban-rural fringe in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2025,44(1):88-102.]
[7] 孔翔,宋志贤.内群体交往对开发区拆迁安置社区居民社区感的影响研究——以昆山经济技术开发区周边X社区为例[J].人文地理,2019,34(4):47-53. [Kong Xiang, Song Zhixian. The influence of intra-group communication on the residents' sense of community in the demolition and resettlement community around development zone: A case study on X community around Kunshan economic and technological development zone[J]. Human Geography, 2019,34(4): 47-53.]
[8] 杜培培.从差序、离散到融入——“村改居”社区的空间生产研究[J].城市规划,2019,43(6):64-70. [Du Peipei. Space production of "village-turned community": From differentiation and discretization to integration[J]. City Planning Review, 2019,43(6):64-70.]
[9] 黄文炜,袁振杰.地方、地方性与城中村改造的社会文化考察——以猎德村为例[J].人文地理,2015,30(3):42-49. [Huang Wenwei, Yuan Zhenjie. Place, placeness and the social-cultural investigation on urban village redevelopment: A case study of Liede village[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(3):42-49.]
[10] 陈明.拆迁安置社区:治理困境与改革路径——基于北京市海淀区Z村的调查[J].农村经济,2018(4):75-81. [Chen Ming. Demolition and resettlement communities: governance challenges and reform paths: Based on a survey of Z village in Haidian district, Beijing[J]. Rural Economy, 2018(4):75-81.]
[11] 张晓玲.对城市建设拆迁中土地制度的思考[J].城市规划,2006(2):31-33. [Zhang Xiaoling. Considerations over land systemin in relocation for urban construction[J]. City Planning Review, 2006(2):31-33.]
[12] Long H. Land consolidation: An indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2014, 24(2):211-225. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11442-014-1083-5.
[13] 王勇,邹晴晴,李广斌.基于活力特征分析的城市安置社区公共空间研究——以苏州城区6个安置社区为例[J].地理科学,2018, 38(5): 747-754. [Wang Yong, Zou Qingqing, Li Guangfu. Public space construction of urban resettlement community base on analysis of vitality characteristics: Taking the 6 resettlement communities of Suzhou as examples[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(5):747-754.]
[14] 谷玉良,江立华.空间视角下农村社会关系变迁研究——以山东省枣庄市L村“村改居”为例[J].人文地理,2015,30(4):45-51. [Gu Yuliang, Jiang Lihua. Changes of the rural social relations under spatial perspective: A case of L village in Zaozhuang of Shangdong Province[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(4):45-51.]
[15] 夏永久,朱喜钢.城市被动式动迁居民社区满意度评价研究——以南京为例[J].地理科学,2013,33(8):918-925. [Xia Yongjiu, Zhu Xigang. The evaluation of urban forced movers' community satisfaction: A case study of Nanjing[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(8):918-925.]
[16] 毛丹.赋权、互动与认同:角色视角中的城郊农民市民化问题[J].社会学研究,2009,24(4):28-60,243. [Mao Dan. Empowerment, interaction, and identity: The urbanization of suburban farmers from a role perspective[J]. Sociological Studies, 2009,24(4):28-60,243.]
[17] 王园,张敏,罗佳丽.拆迁农民安置区社会空间的重构——以镇江市平昌新城为例[J].城市问题, 2017(10): 90-96. [Wang Yuan, Zhang Min, Luo Jiali. Social spaces' reconstruction of resettlement communities for rural residents: Taking Pingchang new town of Zhenjiang city for example[J]. Urban Problems, 2017(10):90-96.]
[18] Zhu Q. Displaced villagers' adaptation in concentrated resettlement community: A case study of Nanjing, China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 88(11):104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104097.
[19] 申云,贾晋,洪程程,等.安置区空间重构对农户社区融入的影响及其效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(5):176-188. [Shen Yun, Jia Jin, Hong Chengcheng, et al. Impact of spatial reconstruction of resettlement areas on farmers' community integration and its effect [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2022,32(5):176-188.]
[20] 叶裕民.特大城市包容性城中村改造理论架构与机制创新——来自北京和广州的考察与思考[J].城市规划,2015,39(8):9-23. [Ye Yumin. Theoretical framework and mechanism innovation of the inclusive urban village reconstruction in Chinese megacities: Study and reflections on Beijing and Guangzhou[J]. City Planning Review, 2015,39(8):9-23.]
[21] Xu Y, Chan E H W. Community question in transitional China, a case-study of state-led urbanization in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2011,137(4):416-424.
[22] Chen Y, Zhu Q. Urbanization through resettlement and the production of space in Hangzhou's concentrated resettlement communities[J]. Cities, 2022,129:103846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103846.
[23] Zhang M, Wu W, Zhong W, et al. The reshaping of social relations: resettled rural residents in Zhenjiang, China[J]. Cities, 2016,60:495-503.
[24] Ostrom E. Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework[M]. Routledge: In Theories of the Policy Process, 2007:21-64.
[25] 李友梅,黄晓春,张虎祥,等.从弥散到秩序“:制度与生活”视野下的中国社会变迁(1921—2011)[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2011: 7-10. [Li Youmei, Huang Xiaochun, Zhang Huxiang, et al. From Dispersion to Order: Social Changes in China from the Perspective of "Institutions and Life" (1921-2011)[M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, 2011:7-10.]
[26] 肖瑛.从“国家与社会”到“制度与生活”:中国社会变迁研究的视角转换[J].中国社会科学,2014(9):88-104,204-205. [Xiao Ying. From "state and society" to "institutions and life": The changing perspective of research on social changes in China[J]. Social Sciences in China,2014(9):88-104,204-205.]
[27] 郭紫薇.社区治理解析框架及其规划路径——基于“制度-生活”分析范式[J].城市规划,2021,45(1):54-61. [Guo Ziwei. The analytical framework of community governance and the paths to community planning: Based on the 'institution-life' analysis paradigm[J]. City Planning Review, 2021,45(1):54-61.]
[28] 道格拉斯·诺斯.制度、制度变迁与经济绩效[M].刘守英译.上海:上海三联书店,1994:49. [Douglas D N. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance[M]. Liu Shouying, Trans. Shanghai: Shanghai Joint Publishing Company, 1994:49.]
[29] Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
[30] De Certeau M. The Practice of Everyday Life[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
[31] 张洪恩,刘紫玥.制度与生活视角下封建社会时期的街区空间演变研究[J].现代城市研究,2024(2):42-47. [Zhang Hongen, Liu Ziyue. Study on the evolution of block space in the feudal society period from the perspective of system and life[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2024(2):42-47.]
[32] Smith N. The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City[M]. London: Routledge, 1996:30-39.
[33] Lees L. Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renaissance? [J]. Urban Studies, 2008,45(12):2449-2470.
[34] López-Morales E, Herrera N. (Dis)connecting rent gap and gentrification in verticalizing cities: The cases of Iquique and Antofagasta, Chile[J]. Cities, 2024, 150: 105084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105084.
[35] Benson O G, Smith R, Song C. Resettlement cities: A mixture model analysis of the dispersion and placement strategy of U. S. refugee policy[J]. Cities, 2022,126:103698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103698.
[36] Ziorklui B E A, Okyere S A, Abunyewah M, et al. Social capital and community-driven development: A multi-group analysis of migrant and indigenous informal settlements in Greater Accra, Ghana [J]. Habitat International, 2024,145:103016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103016.
[37] Slater T. The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research [J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2006, 30(4):737-757.
[38] Paredes L H L, Vigiola G Q. Microspheres of self-governance: platform communities in times of need in Bogotá, Colombia [J]. Cities, 2024,153:105311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105311.
[39] 刘守英,熊雪锋.二元土地制度与双轨城市化[J].城市规划学刊, 2018(1): 31-40. [Liu Shouying, Xiong Xuefeng. Dual-track urbanization under the dual land ownership system[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2018(1):31-40.]
[40] 田莉,陶然.土地改革、住房保障与城乡转型发展——集体土地建设租赁住房改革的机遇与挑战[J].城市规划,2019,43(9):53-60. [Tian Li, Tao Ran. Land reform, housing guarantee, and transition of urban-rural development: opportunities and challenges for developing rental housing in collective land[J]. City Planning Review, 2019,43(9):53-60.]
[41] 王诗乐.整体性治理视域下“村改居”社区治理的路径研究[J].农村经济,2022(11):50-58. [Wang Shile. Research on the path of community governance of "village to residence" from the perspective of holistic governance[J]. Rural Economy,2022(11):50-58.]
[42] 孙东琪,张京祥,陈浩,等.中国大城市拆迁安置居民补偿方式与受益率测度——以南京为例[J].地理科学,2016,36(2):161-169. [Sun Dongqi, Zhang Jingxiang, Chen Hao, et al. The measure of displaced households' compensation approaches and benefits rate based on regression model: A case of Nanjing[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016,36(2):161-169.]
[43] Nie X, Huang Z, Wu L. Community governance during the Shanghai COVID lockdown II: Bridging neighborhood cohesion and the perception of community governance[J]. Cities, 2024,151:105110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105110.
[44] 高新宇,许佳君.空间重构与移民社区融入——基于“无土安置”工程的社会学思考[J].社会发展研究,2017,4(1):73-93,243. [Gao Xinyu, Xu Jiajun. Spatial reconstruction and integration of immigrant communities: Sociological considerations based on the "soilless resettlement" project[J]. Journal of Social Development, 2017, 4(1):73-93,243.]
[45] 王振坡,张安琪,王丽艳.新时代我国转型社区治理模式创新研究[J].城市发展研究,2020,27(1):89-94,101. [Wang Zhenpo, Zhang Anqi, Wang Liyan, Research on the innovation of governance mode of China's transitional communities under the new urbanization[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2020,27(1):89-94,101.]
[46] 黄静晗,邱霈恩,张佳琳.城市化进程中转型社区的韧性重塑研究——以福州L社区为例[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(6):112-118. [Huang Jinhan, Qiu Peien, Zhang Jialin. Resilience reconstruction of transitional communities in the process of urbanization: Taking L Community of Fuzhou as an example[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021,28(6):112-118.]
[47] 韦雪霁,罗小龙,刘宝国,等.半城市化地区农村社会和空间迁研究——以江苏省姜堰市城郊结合部为例[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2012,21(9):1039-1045. [Wei Xueji, Luo Xiaolong, Liu Baoguo, et al. Social and spatial transition of rural society: A case of periurban areas in Jiangyan city[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2012,21(9):1039-1045.]
[48] 叶丹,张京祥.日常生活实践视角下的非正规空间生产研究——以宁波市孔浦街区为例[J].人文地理,2015,30(5):57-64. [Ye Dan, Zhang Jingxiang. Research on production of informal space from the perspective of practice of everyday life: A case study of Kongpu district in Ningbo[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(5):57-64.]
[49] Zinzani A, Proto M. Politics, conflict and "political" community: The case of Bologna[J]. Political Geography, 2023,106:102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102961.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(42271198,42401256)

PDF(21792 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/