再生产地理学的思想脉络、研究议题与展望

武爽

人文地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 1-11.

PDF(8525 KB)
PDF(8525 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 1-11. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.05.001
进展与动态

再生产地理学的思想脉络、研究议题与展望

  • 武爽
作者信息 +

REPRODUCTIVE GEOGRAPHY: INTELLECTUAL LINEAGE, RESEARCH AGENDAS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

  • WU Shuang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

伴随着全球照料危机的加剧,地理学开始关注社会再生产方面的时空安排和转型,再生产地理学的研究应运而生。再生产地理起源于马克思的社会再生产理论,旨在研究生育和照料等社会再生产劳动的地理特征和地理意义。本文梳理了再生产地理的主要思想脉络,总结了现有研究议题,评述了其研究意义和现存问题,并展望了未来的研究方向。目前,再生产地理学的思想脉络大体可分为马克思主义、女性主义、后结构主义、赛博格和超人主义;研究议题涉及人口分布、跨国移民、平台经济、科学技术、法律道德和社会保障。技术进步和人工智能将促使再生产地理的研究对象愈发混杂、研究内容更加多元、研究方法跨学科合作。为应对我国人口可持续发展面临的挑战,基于再生产地理的研究提出:要保障生育实践的空间正义,维护再生产劳动者的主体性和能动性,并加强对生育劳动空间的情感关怀。

Abstract

Against the backdrop of an intensifying global care crisis, which is characterized by demographic shifts, the neoliberal restructuring of welfare systems, and the increasing precariousness of labor, the discipline of geography has rigorously turned its analytical lens toward the complex temporal and spatial reconfigurations of social reproduction. Rooted fundamentally in Marxist social reproduction theory, reproductive geography transcends traditional biological parameters to investigate the spatial logic, uneven geographical developments, and socio-political significance of reproductive labor. This encompasses a comprehensive spectrum of "life-making" activities, ranging from childbirth, child-rearing, elderly care, to domestic maintenance and the continuous reproduction of the labor force. This paper provides a comprehensive, systematic review of the intellectual trajectory of reproductive geography, mapping its historical evolution and categorizing its diverse intellectual lineages into Marxist, feminist, post-structuralist, cyborg, and more-than-human approaches. It synthesizes key research agendas spanning population distribution, transnational migration, platform economies, technoscience, ethics, and social security. Finally, addressing China's urgent challenges in sustainable population development, this research proposes a normative framework for future inquiry and policy intervention: ensuring spatial justice in public resource distribution, safeguarding workers' agency against structural precarity, and strengthening affective care within everyday reproductive spaces to foster social resilience.

关键词

再生产地理 / 社会再生产 / 人口再生产 / 人口可持续发展

Key words

reproductive geography / social reproduction / population reproduction / sustainable population developmen

引用本文

导出引用
武爽. 再生产地理学的思想脉络、研究议题与展望[J]. 人文地理. 2026, 41(5): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.05.001
WU Shuang. REPRODUCTIVE GEOGRAPHY: INTELLECTUAL LINEAGE, RESEARCH AGENDAS AND FUTURE PROSPECTS[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2026, 41(5): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.05.001
中图分类号: K901   

参考文献

[1] 卡尔·马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M]. 郭大力, 王亚南, 译.上海:上海 三联书店, 2009:418.[Marx K. Capital[M]. Guo Dali, Wang Yanan, trans. Shanghai: Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore, 2009:418.][2] Katz C. Social reproduction[C]//Richardson D, Castree N, Goodchild M F, et al. The International Encyclopedia of Geography. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2017:1-11.
[3] Rodríguez-Rocha V. Social reproduction theory: State of the field and new directions in geography[J]. Geography Compass, 2021, 15(8):e12586. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12586.
[4] Strauss K. Unfree again: Social reproduction, flexible labour markets and the resurgence of gang labour in the UK[J]. Antipode, 2013, 45(1):180-197.
[5] 黄桂霞.女性生育权与劳动就业权的保障:一致与分歧[J]. 妇女研 究 论 丛, 2019(5): 89-98.[Huang Guixia. Uniformities and differences in the protection of women's reproductive rights and their rights to employment[J]. Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, 2019 (5):89-98.]
[6] 王天宇, 彭晓博.社会保障对生育意愿的影响:来自新型农村合作 医疗的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(2):103-117.[Wang Tianyu, Peng Xiaobo. The impact of social security on fertility desire: Evidence from the new rural cooperative medical scheme[J]. Economic Research, 2015, 50(2):103-117.]
[7] 原新.我国生育政策演进与人口均衡发展——从独生子女政策到 全面二孩政策的思考[J]. 人口学刊, 2016, 38(5):5-14.[Yuan Xin. The changes of family planning policy and the balanced development of population in China: From the one-child policy to the twochild policy[J]. Population Journal, 2016, 38(5):5-14.]
[8] Lewis S. Cyborg uterine geography: Complicating ‘care' and social reproduction[J]. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2018, 8(3): 300- 316.
[9] Harvey D. Social Justice and the City[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973:310-311.
[10]Harvey D. The Limits to Capital[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1982:428-431.
[11]Smith N. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space[M]. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984:51-52.
[12]封志明, 李鹏.20 世纪人口地理学研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30(2): 131-140.[Feng Zhiming, Li Peng. Review of population geography in the past century[J]. Progress in Geography, 2011, 30(2):131-140.]
[13]郑志国. 马克思主义人口观及其现实意义[J]. 马克思主义研究, 2009(9):42-48.[Zheng Zhiguo. Marxist view of population and its practical significance[J]. Studies on Marxism, 2009(9):42-48.]
[14]李龙, 陈佳鞠.马克思主义人口均衡思想及其中国化[J]. 人口研究, 2019, 43(3): 102-112.[Li Long, Chen Jiaju. Marxist theory of balanced population and its Chinization[J]. Population Research, 2019, 43(3): 102-112.]
[15]刘劲松. 中国人口地理研究进展[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8):1177- 1189.[Liu Jinsong. A review of population geography research in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8):1177-1189.]
[16]Shah A, Lerche J. Migration and the invisible economies of care: Production, social reproduction and seasonal migrant labour in India[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2020, 45(4):719-734.
[17]Daskalaki M, Fotaki M, Simosi M. The gendered impact of the financial crisis: Struggles over social reproduction in Greece[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, 53(4):741- 762.
[18]Power E R, Williams M J. Cities of care: A platform for urban geographical care research[J]. Geography Compass, 2020, 14(1):e12474. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12474.
[19]董金平.马克思主义的女性主义前沿问题及其内在逻辑[J]. 南京 大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版), 2013, 50(5):5-14.[Dong Jinping. Pioneering issues in Marxist feminism studies and their interrelationships[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Philosophy, Humanities and Social Sciences), 2013, 50(5):5-14.]
[20]Mckinnon K. The geopolitics of birth[J]. Area, 2016, 48(3):285-291.
[21]Rivera-Amarillo C, Camargo A. Zika assemblages: Women, populationism, and the geographies of epidemiological surveillance[J]. Gender, Place & Culture, 2020, 27(3):412-428.
[22]Boyer K, Spinney J. Motherhood, mobility and materiality: Material entanglements, journey-making and the process of ‘becoming mother'[J]. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2016, 34(6):1113-1131.
[23]Costa M D, James S. The Power of Women & the Subversion of Community(3rd Edition)[M]. Bristol: Falling Wall Press, 1975:32.
[24]Massey D. Space, Place, and Gender[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994:210.
[25]Katz C. Vagabond capitalism and the necessity of social reproduction[J]. Antipode, 2001, 33(4):709-728.
[26]Mcdowell L. Gender, Identity and Place[M]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999:11-13.
[27]Schwiter K, Strauss K, England K. At home with the boss: Migrant live-in caregivers, social reproduction and constrained agency in the UK, Canada, Austria and Switzerland[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2018, 43(3):462-476.
[28]England K. Home, domestic work and the state: The spatial politics of domestic workers' activism[J]. Critical Social Policy, 2017, 37(3): 367-385.
[29]Mitchell K, Marston S A, Katz C. Life's work: An introduction, review and critique[C]//Mitchell K, Marston S A, Katz C. Life's Work: Geographies of Social Reproduction. New Jersey: WileyBlackwell, 2004:1-26.
[30]Boeri N. Informal work and the appropriation of social reproduction in home-based work in India[J]. Feminist Economics, 2023, 29(3):130-152.
[31]Karaagac E A. The financialization of everyday life: Caring for debts[J]. Geography Compass, 2020, 14(11):e12541. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12541.
[32]Winders J, Smith B E. Social reproduction and capitalist production: A genealogy of dominant imaginaries[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2018, 43(5):871-889.
[33]Mitchell-Eaton E. Postpartum geographies: Intersections of academic labor and care work[J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2020, 39(8):1755-1772.
[34]Manzi M, Ojeda D, Hawkins R. Creating "wiggle room": Spaces of care and possibility within the neoliberal academy[J]. Geoforum, 2024, 149:103962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103962.
[35]Price M J, Hall A. Situating reproduction: How becoming mothers impacts field work and why it matters[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2024, 76(5):675-682.
[36]Lefebvre H. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life[M]. London: Continuum, 2004:73-75.
[37]Mayes R. Mobility, temporality, and social reproduction: Everyday rhythms of the ‘FIFO family' in the Australian Mining Sector[J]. Gender, Place & Culture, 2020, 27(1):126-142.
[38]Fitzpatrick K. "Revealing the extraordinary in the ordinary": Rhythmanalysis and employment related geographical mobilities of Newfoundland and Labrador home care workers[J]. Applied Mobilities, 2021, 6(2):119-134.
[39]Foucault M. The Order of Things[M]. New York: Pantheon Books, 1970:251-252.
[40]Foucault M. Discipline and Punish[M]. New York: Pantheon Books, 1977:26-28.
[41]Gibson-Graham J K. The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy[M]. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996:233-236.
[42]Gibson-Graham J K. Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds'[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2008, 32(5): 613- 632.
[43]Granberg M. Reactionary radicalism and the analysis of worker subjectivity in Marx's critique of political economy[J]. Capital & Class, 2021, 46(2):279-299.
[44]Castree N. Labour geography: A work in progress[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2007, 31(4):853-862.
[45]Coe N M, Jordhus-Lier D C. Constrained agency? Re-evaluating the geographies of labour[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010, 35(2):211-233.
[46]文军, 黄锐. “空间”的思想谱系与理想图景:一种开放性实践空间 的建构[J]. 社会学研究, 2012, 27(2):35-59.[Wen Jun, Huang Rui. The Intellectual genealogy and ideal prospect of space: The construction of an open practical space[J]. Sociological Studies, 2012, 27(2):35-59.]
[47]Bagelman J, Gitome J. Birthing across borders: ‘Contracting' reproductive geographies[J]. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2020, 11(3):352-373.
[48]Coddington K. For political geographies of fertilities[J]. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 2021, 39(8):1675-1691.
[49]Ho E L. Social geography Ⅲ: Emotions and affective spatialities [J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2023, 48(1):94-102.
[50]Hall S M. Revisiting geographies of social reproduction: Everyday life, the endotic, and the infra-ordinary[J]. Area, 2020, 52(4): 812- 819.
[51]Hickman Dunne J, von Benzon N, Whittle R. Facebook as a platform for collecting women's birth stories: Supporting emotional connections between researchers and participants[J]. Emotion, Space and Society, 2022, 42:100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2021.100863.
[52]Kwan H. Women's solidarity, communicative space, the gig economy's social reproduction and labour process: The case of female platform drivers in China[J]. Critical Sociology, 2022, 48(7/8): 1221-1236.
[53]孙萍, 赵宇超, 张仟煜. 平台、性别与劳动:“女骑手”的性别展演 [J]. 妇女研究论丛, 2021(6):5-16.[Sun Ping, Zhao Yuchao, Zhang Qianyu. Platforms, gender, and labor: Female food delivery couriers' gender performativity[J]. Journal of Chinese Women's Studies, 2021(6):5-16.]
[54]Haraway D. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature[M]. New York: Routledge, 1991:149-181.
[55]Whatmore S. Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces[M]. London: Sage Publications, 2002:1-8.
[56]Thorburn E D. Cyborg witches: Class composition and social reproduction in the GynePunk collective[J]. Feminist Media Studies, 2017, 17(2):153-167.
[57]Del Casino V J. Social geographies Ⅱ: Robots[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2015, 40(6):846-855.
[58]Whatmore S. Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2006, 13(4):600-609.
[59]Silberzahn L. Care, ecology, and the crisis of eco-social reproduction: Politicizing more-than-human care[J]. Hypatia, 2024, 39(4): 711-731.
[60]Daisy D. Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women's agency[J]. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 2013, 34(3):167-188.
[61]Jarrett K. Feminism, Labour and Digital Media: The Digital Housewife[M]. New York: Routledge, 2015:192.
[62]Federici S. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle[M]. Oakland: PM Press, 2012:208.
[63]Collard R, Dempsey J. Accumulation by difference-making: An anthropocene story, starring witches[J]. Gender, Place & Culture, 2018, 25(9):1349-1364.
[64]Bledsoe A, Wright W J. The anti-Blackness of global capital[J]. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2018, 37(1):8-26.
[65]Pulido L. Flint, Environmental racism, and racial capitalism[J]. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 2016, 27(3):1-16.
[66]Sultana F. Gendering climate change: Geographical insights[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2014, 66(3):372-381.
[67]Campisi N, Kulu H, Mikolai J, et al. Spatial variation in fertility across Europe: Patterns and determinants[J]. Population, Space and Place, 2020, 26(4):e2308. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2308.
[68]Salvati L, Benassi F, Miccoli S, et al. Spatial variability of total fertility rate and crude birth rate in a low-fertility country: Patterns and trends in regional and local scale heterogeneity across Italy, 2002—2018[J]. Applied Geography, 2020, 124:102321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102321.
[69]封志明, 唐焰, 杨艳昭, 等.中国地形起伏度及其与人口分布的相关 性[J]. 地 理 学 报, 2007, 62(10): 1073-1082.[Feng Zhiming, Tang Yan, Yang Yanzhao, et al. The relief degree of land surface in China and its correlation with population distribution[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007, 62(10):1073-1082.]
[70]吴连霞, 赵媛, 吴开亚, 等.中国人口老龄化区域差异及驱动机制研 究[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(6):877-884.[Wu Lianxia, Zhao Yuan, Wu Kaiya, et al. Regional variations and driving mechanism of aging population in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(6): 877-884.]
[71]于婷婷, 宋玉祥, 浩飞龙, 等.东北地区人口结构对经济增长的影响 [J]. 经济地理, 2016, 36(10):26-32.[Yu Tingting, Song Yuxiang, Hao Feilong, et al. Factors of population structure on economic growth in Northeast China[J]. Economic Geography, 2016, 36(10):26-32.]
[72]Kelly P F. From global production networks to global reproduction networks: Households, migration, and regional development in Cavite, the Philippines[J]. Regional Studies, 2009, 43(3):449-461.
[73]Hanochi S. Constitutionalism in a modern patriarchal state: Japan, the sex sector, and social reproduction[M]//Bakker I, Gill S. Power, Production and Social Reproduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003:83-97.
[74]Bhattacharjee D. A shift from home to the market: The marketization of reproductive labor in India[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2022, 56(1):199-215.
[75]万蕙, 朱竑.女性跨国婚姻移民家空间的性别、资源与权力——粤 西乡村案例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(11):1909-1922.[Wan Hui, Zhu Hong. Gender, resources, and power of female cross-border marriage immigrants' home space: A case of villages in western Guangdong province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(11):1909- 1922.]
[76]Fraser N. Capitalism's crisis of care[J]. Dissent, 2016, 63(4):30-37.
[77]Reid-Musson E, Cockayne D, Frederiksen L, et al. Feminist economic geography and the future of work[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2020, 52(7):1457-1468.
[78]Buckley M. Labour and the city: Some notes across theory and research [J]. Geography Compass, 2018, 12(10):e12400. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12400.
[79]Warren T. Work-life balance and gig work: ‘Where are we now' and ‘where to next' with the work-life balance agenda?[J]. Journal of Industrial Relations, 2021, 63(4):522-545.
[80]Scaravelli G, Spoletini R. The application of reproductive techniques (ART): Worldwide epidemiology phenomenon and treatment outcomes[C]//Watson R R. Handbook of fertility. San Diego: Academic Press, 2015:75-87.
[81]Schurr C. From biopolitics to bioeconomies: The ART of (re-)producing white futures in Mexico's surrogacy market[J]. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 2016, 35(2):241-262.
[82]李碧珍, 吴芃梅.数字经济对社会生产与再生产过程的影响与重 塑[J]. 当代经济研究, 2021(11): 14-19.[Li Bizhen, Wu Pengmei. The impact and reshaping of the digital economy on social production and reproduction[J]. Contemporary Economic Research, 2021 (11):14-19.]
[83]谢璐, 韩文龙.数字技术和数字经济助力城乡融合发展的理论逻 辑与实现路径[J]. 农业经济问题, 2022(11):96-105.[Xie Lu, Han Wenlong. Theoretical logic and practical path of digital technology and digital economy to promote urban-rural integration development[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2022(11):96-105.]
[84]Liu Y, Wang W. Discipline and resistance in the representation of motherhood: Postpartum recovery discussion on Xiaohongshu[J]. Feminist Media Studies, 2023, 23(5):2286-2302.
[85]Boichak O. Geopolitics of reproduction: Investigating technological mediation of maternity tourism on the Russian web[J]. Big Data & Society, 2019, 6(2): 2053951719868491. https://doi.org/10.1177/20 53951719868491.
[86]Calkin S. Towards a political geography of abortion[J]. Political Geography, 2019, 69:22-29.
[87]Calkin S. Legal geographies of medication abortion in the USA[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2022, 47(2): 378-392.
[88]Engle O. Abortion mobilities[J]. Geography Compass, 2022, 16(9): e12656. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12656.
[89]Cassidy K, Amiri R, Davidson G. Reading for refusal in UK maternity care: Entangling struggles for border and reproductive justice [J]. Fennia- International Journal of Geography, 2023, 201(2): 199- 214.
[90]Calkin S, Freeman C, Moore F. The geography of abortion: Discourse, spatiality and mobility[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2022, 46(6):1413-1430.
[91]Hamper J, Nash C. Bonding work: Spacing relations through pregnancy apps[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2021, 46(3):584-597.
[92]Grigorieva E A, Sukhoveeva A B. Quality of life, reproductive health and social security: Medical and social environment at the Russian Far East[J]. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 2020, 13(1):92-98.
[93]Smith F, Wainwright E, Buckingham S, et al. Women, work-life balance and quality of life: Case studies from the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland[J]. Gender, Place & Culture, 2011, 18(5): 603- 610.
[94]Porschitz E T, Siler E A. Miscarriage in the workplace: An authoethnography[J]. Gender, Work & Organization, 2017, 24(6):565-578.
[95]Mcniven A. ‘Geographies of dying and death' in relation to pregnancy losses: Ultrasonography experiences[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2016, 17(2):233-246.
[96]Reiheld A. "The event that was nothing": Miscarriage as a liminal event[J]. Journal of Social Philosophy, 2015, 46(1):9-26.
[97]Rowlands I J, Lee C. ‘The silence was deafening': Social and health service support after miscarriage[J]. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 2010, 28(3):274-286.
[98]Hardy S, Kukla R. Making sense of miscarriage online[J]. Journal of Social Philosophy, 2015, 46(1):106-125.
[99]Bagelman C C, Bagelman J. Digital geographies of miscarriage: A ‘sister-ethnographic' approach to pregnancy apps and loss[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2025, 50(2):e12683. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12683.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目(42301281);教育部人文社科青年基金项目(23YJC840024);北师香港浸会大学校内基金项目(UICR04202412-21)

PDF(8525 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉