流动性视角下返乡人“家”的拼装建构研究

黄翅勤, 李爽, 苏晓波, 彭惠军

人文地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 12-22.

PDF(7587 KB)
PDF(7587 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5) : 12-22. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.05.002
文化

流动性视角下返乡人“家”的拼装建构研究

  • 黄翅勤1,2, 李爽2, 苏晓波3, 彭惠军2
作者信息 +

ASSEMBLING“HOME”FOR RETURN MIGRANTS: A MOBILITY PERSPECTIVE

  • HUANG Chi-qin1,2, LI Shuang2, SU Xiao-bo3, PENG Hui-jun2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

当前农村回流人口逐步增多,在这场“逆城镇化”的浪潮中,返乡人的“家”从原有固定不变的概念中脱离,在流动过程中不断被解构与重构。本文以“家”作为洞察返乡流动这一复杂社会空间现象的重要棱镜,运用拼装理论并采用扎根理论研究方法,探究返乡群体“家”的形态变化与动态建构机制。研究发现:①返乡人“家”的建构受物质与精神的双重驱动,经历领域化、去领域化和再领域化的动态交替拼装过程;②流动性激发返乡人在建构“家”的过程中由被动感知转向主动塑造,且建构主体的能动性得到提升;③流动性模糊了返乡人“家”的传统边界,各种要素的交互与返乡人的主观能动性推动了“家”的不断解构与重构,使其具有动态性特征。文章打破传统已有研究中主要关注离家这一单向流动“家”的建构实践模式,聚焦返乡人从离开到回流的完整流动过程中的“家”的动态呈现,本文拓展了拼装理论的研究与应用范畴,为中国当前城乡流动态势下返乡情境中新型人地关系构建提供重要借鉴。

Abstract

As the number of rural returnees gradually increases, the concept of "home" breaks away from initial fixed notions amid reverse urbanization and undergoes continuous reconstruction during migration. Taking "home" as an important prism to examine the socio-spatial phenomenon of homecoming mobility, this paper applies the assemblage theory and grounded theory to explore the dynamic construction mechanism of "home". The results indicate that: 1) Home construction is an assembly process involving territorialization, deterritorialization, and reterritorialization, driven by both material and spiritual factors. 2) Mobility shifts returnees from passive perception to active shaping, reinforcing their subjective initiative. 3) Mobility blurs traditional home boundaries, fostering the ongoing dismantling and reassembling of "home" through multiple dynamic factors. Moving beyond conventional unidirectional perspectives, this paper highlights the fullprocess presentation of "home" from departure to return. In light of China's urban-rural dynamics, it broadens the application of assemblage theory and offers valuable insights for fostering new human-land interactions.

关键词

流动性 / 返乡人 / 家的建构 / 拼装理论

Key words

mobility / returnees / the construction of home / assembly theory

引用本文

导出引用
黄翅勤, 李爽, 苏晓波, 彭惠军. 流动性视角下返乡人“家”的拼装建构研究[J]. 人文地理. 2026, 41(5): 12-22 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.05.002
HUANG Chi-qin, LI Shuang, SU Xiao-bo, PENG Hui-jun. ASSEMBLING“HOME”FOR RETURN MIGRANTS: A MOBILITY PERSPECTIVE[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2026, 41(5): 12-22 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2026.05.002
中图分类号: D422.6    F323.6   

参考文献

[1] Hall C M, Müller D K. Tourism, Mobility and Second Homes: Between Elite Landscape and Common Ground[M]. Clevedon: Channel View Publication, 2004:45-59.
[2] 孙九霞, 周尚意, 王宁, 等.跨学科聚焦的新领域:流动的时间、空间与 社会[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(10):1801-1808.[Sun Jiuxia, Zhou Shangyi, Wang Ning, et al. Mobility in geographical research: Time, space and society[J]. Geographical Research, 2016, 35(10):1801-1808.]
[3] Schier M, Hilti N, Schadh H, et al. Residential multi-locality studiesthe added value for research on families and second homes[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 2015, 106(4):439- 452.
[4] Su X B. Tourism, modernity, and the consumption of home in China[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2014, 39(1):50-61.
[5] 万蕙, 朱竑. 女性跨国婚姻移民家空间的性别、资源与权力:粤西 乡村案例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2020, 39(11):1909-1922.[Wan Hui, Zhu Hong. Gender, resources, and power of female cross-border marriage immigrants' home space: A case of villages in Western Guangdong province[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020, 39(11):1909- 1922.]
[6] 苏晓波.他乡变故乡:丽江生活方式型旅游移民“家”的归属与疏离 研究[J]. 旅游学刊, 2022, 37(9):14-26.[Su Xiaobo. From one home to another: Lifestyle migration and the belonging and alienation of home in Lijiang[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2022, 37(9):14-26]
[7] 罗佳丽, 张敏.青年类家消费空间的生产:家的批判地理学视角与 YOU+青年社区案例[J]. 人文地理, 2017, 32(6):56-64.[Luo Jiali, Zhang Min. The construction of youth home-like consumption space: Critical geographies of home and a case study of YOU+ in Guangzhou[J]. Human Geography, 2017, 32(6):56-64.]
[8] 陈淳, 杨盼, 蔡晓梅.流动儿童绘画作品中“家”的想象与实践:批判地 理学视角[J]. 地理科学, 2024, 44(9):1609-1618.[Chen Chun, Yang Pan, Cai Xiaomei. Imagination and practice of "home" in paintings of migrant children: The perspective of critical geography[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2024, 44(9):1609-1618.]
[9] 刘美新, 蔡晓梅, 范雅迪.跨国精英移民的日常生活实践与根植性 家的营造[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(6):60-66.[Liu Meixin, Cai Xiaomei, Fan Yadi. The everyday life practice and home-making of transnational elite migrant[J]. Human Geography, 2021, 36(6):60-66.]
[10]张博, 刘美新, 蔡晓梅.物质、情感和权力:跨国移民与家的地理学 [J]. 世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6):1130-1141.[Zhang Bo, Liu Meixin, Cai Xiaomei. Material, emotion and power: Transnational migration and home geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 2022, 31(6): 1130-1141.]
[11]段圣奎, 苏勤, 张丽, 等. 第二居所居民对“家”的感知与认同研究 [J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(1):55-62.[Duan Shengkui, Su Qin, Zhang Li, et al. A study on the perception and identity of second home residents to home[J]. Human Geography, 2020, 35(1):55-62.]
[12]Blunt A, Varley A. Geographies of home[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2004, 11(1):3-6.
[13]罗伟杰, 汤佩, 陶伟. “家”的地理学:研究概况、最新进展及启示—— 基于CiteSpace和Bibliometric的图谱量化分析[J]. 世界地理研究, 2023, 32(12):155-171.[Luo Weijie, Tang Pei, Tao Wei. The general situation, progress and prospect for the research on the geographies of home: Visualized quantitative study based on CiteSpace and Bibliometric[J]. World Regional Studies, 2023, 32(12):155-171.]
[14]Gmelch G. Return migration[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1980(9):135-139.
[15]孔祥利, 贺音.乡村振兴战略实施中培育壮大返乡入乡创新创业群 体的路径选择与政策支持[J]. 西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 53(2): 66-79.[Kong Xiangli, He Yin. The path choice and policy support of cultivating and strengthening the innovation and entrepreneurship groups returning to the countryside in the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 53(2):66-79.]
[16]冯娟.乡村旅游开发与劳动力回流迁移研究[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学 报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(12):66-70.[Feng Juan. Research on rural tourism development and labor return migration[J]. Journal of Qiqihar University (Phi & Soc Sci), 2022(12):66-70.]
[17]Denier N, Masferrer C. Returning to a new Mexican labor market? Regional variation in the economic incorporation of return migrants from the US to Mexico[J]. Population Research and Policy Review, 2020, 39:617-641.
[18]陈国生, 肖瑜君, 李海波, 等.返乡农民工创业选择的影响因素分析 ——基于 5 省 465 户返乡农民工家庭的调查数据[J]. 经济地理, 2022, 42(1):176-181.[Chen Guosheng, Xiao Yujun, Li Haibo, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of returning migrant workers'choice of entrepreneurship: Based on the survey data of 465 return-ing migrant worker families in 5 provinces[J]. Economic Geography, 2022, 42(1):176-181.]
[19]张圆刚, 田文娟.乡村旅游地返乡从业者幸福感的形成机制研究 [J]. 人文地理, 2025, 40(1):124-133.[Zhang Yuangang, Tian Wenjuan. A qualtitive research on the formation mechanism of well-being of returning migrant workers in rural rourism destiantions[J]. Human Geography, 2025, 40(1):124-133.]
[20]文丰安.乡村振兴战略背景下农村劳动力回流与治理[J]. 农村经济, 2021(5):1-10.[Wen Fengan. Rural labour return and gover-nance in the context of rural revitalisation strategy[J]. Rural Economy, 2021(5): 1-10.]
[21]王子凤, 张桂文.乡村振兴背景下返乡回流农民工主观幸福感研 究——外出务工经历的潜在影响[J]. 西北人口, 2023, 44(1):29-42. [Wang Zifeng, Zhang Guiwen. A study on the subjective well-being of return migrants in the context of rural revitalization: The potential effect of migration experiences[J]. Northwest Population Journal, 2023, 44(1):29-42.]
[22]Papastergiadis N. Dialogues in the Diasporas: Essays and Conversations on Cultural Identity[M]. London: Rivers Oram Press, 1998:35.
[23]Malkki L. National Geographic: The rooting of peoples and the territorialization of national identity among scholars and refugees[J]. Cultural Anthropology, 1992, 7(1):24-44.
[24]Gowans G. Imperial geographies of home: Memsahibs and MissSahibs in India and Britain, 1915-1947[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2003, 10(4):424-441.
[25]Ralph D, Staeheli L A. Home and migration: Mobilities, belongings and identities[J]. Geography Compass, 2011, 5(7):517-530.
[26]Su X B, Cai X M, Liu M X. Prostitution, variegated homes, and the practice of unhomely life in China[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2019, 20(3):407-426.
[27]Longhurst R, Johnston L, Ho E A. Visceral approach: Cooking ‘at home' with migrant women in Hamilton, New Zealand[J].Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2009, 34(3):333-345.
[28]Sheehan R. ‘I'm protective of this yard': Long-term home less persons' construction of home place and workplace in a historical public space[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2010, 11(6):539-558.
[29]张彤, 韦鸣秋, 龙潜颖. 流动性视角下大众旅游者第一居所意义 ——基于扎根理论的探索性研究[J]. 人文地理, 2023, 38(5):172- 179.[Zhang Tong, Wei Mingqiu, Long Qianying. The meaning of mass tourists' peimary home from the perspective of mobility: Exploratory research based on grounded theory[J]. Human Geography, 2023, 38(5):172-179.]
[30]Matteucci X, Gnoth J. Elaborating on grounded theory in tourism research[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2017, 65(1):49-59.
[31]卡麦兹·凯西.建构扎根理论:质性研究实践指南[M]. 边国英, 译.重 庆:重庆大学出版社, 2009:58-91, 145-147.[Kathy C. Con-structing Grounded Theory:A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis[M]. Bian Guoying, trans. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2009: 58-91, 145-147.]
[32]张家宸, 汤爽爽, 黄耿志.拼装理论视角下中国农村流动人口回流决 策生成机制——以江苏省扬州地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2024, 43(7):1750- 1768.[Zhang Jiachen, Tang Shuangshuang, Huang Gengzhi. Return decision-making mechanism of Chinese rural migrants from the perspective of assemblage theory: A case study of Yangzhou, Jiangsu province[J]. Geographical Research, 2024, 43(7):1750-1768.]
[33]蔡晓梅, 曹婧, 刘俊.拼装理论在人文地理学研究中的应用与展望 [J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(10):2633-2649.[Cai Xiaomei, Cao Jing, Liu Jun. The application and prospect of assemblage theory in human geography research[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(10):2633- 2649.]
[34]DeLanda M. Assemblage Theory[M]. Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 2016:51-67.
[35]卢俊, 蔡浩辉, 陶伟.家—城市地理学视角下生活方式移民“家”的 营造与协商[J]. 地理科学进展, 2023, 42(3):518-530.[Lu Jun, Cai Haohui, Tao Wei. Making and negotiating“home”of lifestyle migrants from the perspective of home-city geographies[J]. Progress in Geography, 2023, 42(3):518-530.]
[36]蔡晓梅, 朱竑.新时代面向美好生活的日常生活地理与城乡休闲:“生 活地理与城乡休闲”专栏解读[J]. 地理研究, 2019, 38(7):1557-1565. [Cai Xiaomei, Zhu Hong. Towards a beautiful life in the new era: An introduction to the issue of "everyday life geography and urban-rural leisure"[J]. Geographical Research, 2019, 38(7):1557-1565.]
[37]Easthope H. A place called home[J]. Housing, Theory and Society, 2004, 21(3):128-138.
[38]Adey P. If mobility is everything then it is nothing: Towards a relational politicsof (im) mobilities[J]. Mobilities, 2006, 1(1):75-94.
[39]刘美新, 蔡晓梅, 朱竑.广州跨国精英移民:流动性、日常生活与世 界主义的家[J]. 地理研究, 2023, 42(9):2419-2432.[Liu Meixin, Cai Xiaomei, Zhu Hong. Transnational elite immigrants in Guangzhou: Mobility, daily life and cosmopolitan home[J]. Geographical Research, 2023, 42(9):2419-2432.]
[40]Carr N. The tourism-leisure behavioural continuum[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2002, 29(4):972-986.
[41]Massey D. A place called home[J]. New Formations, 1992, 17(7):3- 15.

基金

湖南省社会科学基金项目(23YBA190);湖南省教育厅科学研究重点项目(24A0502);传统村镇文化数字化保护与创意利用技术国家地方联合工程实验室开放基金项目(2025HSKFJJ008)

PDF(7587 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/

〈 〉