对landscape旅游景观的判读传统由来已久。文章对landscape同源异形的景观与地景两种译法进行了比较,区分了旅游景观与旅游地景的异同,并将旅游地景分为"成为的"旅游地景、"再造的"旅游地景和"创造的"旅游地景。选用地景主要是考虑对其原意的尊重、强调土地在中华文明中的重要地位及重视其传导的地方性信息。研究从有形的空间与无形的文化相交汇的视角来探讨旅游地景与地方的关联机理,认为空间视角下的旅游地景与地方是"依附中的割裂"关系,文化视角下的地方与旅游地景则呈现出"渗透下的不可控"的关系。研究提出了处理旅游地景与地方关系的理想模式,即由多方均衡参与的基础支持和内外融合的策略来实现神形兼备的目标的全方位一体化融入模式。

"Lvyoujingguan" (all the natural, cultural and social resources, scenery views and landscape in Chinese) is a traditional interpretation of tourism landscape. This article compares and distinguishes the two kinds of translation:namely "jingguan" (scenery, landscape and sights in Chinese) and "dijing" (landscape) of the same word "landscape" through the understanding from Chinese semantics. "Jingguan" and "Dijing" are the same in their whole attributes, forming conditions and categories; however, they are quite different in the contents and spatial realm. Then, the interrelationship between tourism landscape and place from the converging perspective of tangible space and intangible culture is discussed. From the spatial perspective, tourism landscape relies on place but also tries to be isolated from place for maintaining the uniqueness and being different from other building or spectacles; from the cultural perspective, the locality or placeness permeate in tourism landscape due to historical and cultural reasons but can not take it under full control because of the culture globalization and fast spreading, hence sometimes tourism landscapes are unrecognizable to a certain place. Finally, an ideal mode is proposed as the conclusion, the mode is called "All Round Integration between Tourism Landscape and Place".