基于空间均衡视角的区域高质量发展内涵界定与状态评价——以陕西省为例

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.03.014

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3515 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要本文构建了区域高质量发展的空间均衡度与空间均衡发展度两个指标，衡量了2017年陕西10个地级市的区域高质量发展水平。结论如下：①陕西经济发展质量呈西安与榆林“两极驱动”的空间格局；社会发展质量呈“中心化”发展空间格局；资源环境发展质量呈南高北低的空间格局。②空间均衡视角下，陕西高质量发展呈现以西安为增长极，西安以东以南地区空间均衡发展度低，西安以西以北地区空间均衡发展度高的空间格局。在发展意义上能达到空间均衡状态的只有西安，其他地级市均处于不同程度失衡状态。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	白谨豪
	刘儒
	刘启农

关键词 ：空间均衡, 高质量发展, 内涵界定, 评价

Abstract：The existing literature on high-quality development evaluation mostly adopts the unified index system and weight setting method to evaluate the development of different regions, which guarantees the consistency principle of evaluation methods, but ignores the spatial heterogeneity of regional development.Therefore, this paper tries to measure the high quality development level of the region from the perspective of balanced development of economy, society, resources and environment. This article first from the space balanced perspective to define the connotation of regional high quality development, and to borrow more than the concept of coupling and coupling coordination system and measure method, builds the space of development of high quality equilibrium and space balanced development degrees two indicators to measure regional development level of high quality, and on this basis to build the evaluation system of development of high quality, using the data of 10 cities in Shaanxi Province in 2017 the state of development of high quality evaluation.The conclusion are as follows: 1) The quality of Shaanxi's economic development presents the spatial pattern of "two poles drive" between Xi'an and Yulin; the quality of social development of Shaanxi Province obviously has a spatial pattern of "centralized" development; 2) From the perspective of spatial equilibrium, the high-quality development of 10 prefecture-level cities in Shaanxi Province presents a spatial pattern of growth pole with Xi'an as its center. Finally, under the premise of spatial heterogeneity, some suggestions for spatial governance are put forward for the high-quality development of each region.

Key words： spatial equilibrium quality development connotation definition evaluation

收稿日期: 2019-10-30

PACS:

F129.9

基金资助:国家社会科学基金重点课题项目（17AKS008）

通讯作者: 刘儒(1959-),男,陕西白水人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为社会主义经济理论。

作者简介: 白谨豪(1989-),男,陕西商南人,助理研究员,博士研究生,主要研究方向为社会主义经济理论研究。E-mail:bjhj180106@163.com。

引用本文:

白谨豪, 刘儒, 刘启农. 基于空间均衡视角的区域高质量发展内涵界定与状态评价——以陕西省为例[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(3): 123-130,160. BAI Jin-hao, LIU Ru, LIU Qi-nong. THE CONNOTATION DEFINITION AND STATE EVALUATION OF REGIONAL HIGH QUALITY DEVELOPMENT BASED ON PERSPECTIVE OF SPATIAL EQUILIBRIUM: A CASE OF SHAANXI PROVINCE. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 35(3): 123-130,160.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.03.014 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V35/I3/123

[1]	任保平,文丰安.新时代中国高质量发展的判断标准、决定因素与实现途径[J].改革,2018(4):5-16.[Ren Baoping, Wen Feng'an. Judging criteria, determinants and ways of realizing China's high quality development in the new era[J]. Reform, 2018(4):5-16.]
[2]	金碚.关于"高质量发展" 的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):5-18.[Jin Bei. Study on the "high-quality development" economics[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(4):5-18.]
[3]	牛桂敏,王会芝.生态文明视域下我国经济社会发展评价体系研究[J].理论学刊,2015(5):41-47.[Niu Guimin, Wang Huizhi. Research on China's economic and social development evaluation system from the perspective of ecological civilization[J]. Theory Journal, 2015(5):41-47.]
[4]	周永道,孟宪超,喻志强.区域综合发展的"五位一体" 评价指标体系研究[J].统计与信息论坛,2018,33(5):19-25.[Zhou Yongdao, Meng Xianchao, Yu Zhiqiang. Evaluation index system of the fivepronged approach "five in one" for the regional comprehensive development[J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2018,33(5):19-25.]
[5]	肖宏伟.我国全面建成小康社会评价指标体系研究[J].发展研究, 2014(9):27-34.[Xiao Hongwei. Research on the evaluation index system of building a well-off society in China[J]. Development Research, 2014(9):27-34.]
[6]	朱启贵.全面建成小康社会评价指标体系研究[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2017(4):52-60.[Zhu Qigui. Research on the evaluation index system for building a well-off society in all respects[J]. Frontiers, 2017(4):52-60.]
[7]	易昌良.2015中国发展指数报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社, 2016:46-98.[Yi Changliang. 2015 China Development Index Report[M]. Beijing:Economic Science Press, 2016:46-98.]
[8]	杨新洪. "五大发展理念" 统计评价指标体系构建——以深圳市为例[J].调研世界,2017(7):3-7.[Yang Xinhong. The construction of statistical evaluation index system of "five development concepts":Taking Shenzhen city as an example[J]. The World of Survey and Research, 2017(7):3-7.]
[9]	樊杰,周侃,陈东.生态文明建设中优化国土空间开发格局的经济地理学研究创新与应用实践[J].经济地理,2013,33(1):1-8.[Fan Jie, Zhou Kan, Chen Dong. Innovation and practice of economic geography for optimizing spatial development pattern in construction of ecological civilization[J]. Economic Geography, 2013,33(1):1-8.]
[10]	禚振坤,陈雯,孙伟.基于空间均衡理念的生产力布局研究——以无锡市为例[J].地域研究与开发,2008,27(1):19-22.[Zhuo Zhenkun, Chen Wen, Sun Wei. Study on framework of productive forces based on the theory of spatial balance:With Wuxi city as a case[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2008,27(1):19-22.]
[11]	陈雯,孙伟,赵海霞.区域发展的空间失衡模式与状态评估——以江苏省为例[J].地理学报,2010,65(10):1209-1217.[Chen Wen, Sun Wei, Zhao Haixia. The spatial imbalanced pattern and state assessment of regional development[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(10):1209-1217.]
[12]	习近平.在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话[J]. 求是,2019(20):1-7.[Xi Jinping. Pushing China's development of an ecological civilization to a new stage[J]. QiuShi, 2019(20):1-7.]
[13]	程钰,任建兰,崔昊,等.基于熵权TOPSIS法和三维结构下的区域发展模式——以山东省为例[J].经济地理,2012,32(6):27-31.[Cheng Yu, Ren Jianlan, Cui Hao, et al. A research using entropytopsis method on regional development modes in perspective of the three-dimensional framework:A case study of Shandong province[J]. Economic Geography, 2012,32(6):27-31.]
[14]	李金昌,史龙梅,徐蔼婷.高质量发展评价指标体系探讨[J].统计研究,2019,36(1):4-14.[Li Jinchang, Shi Longmei, Xu Aiting. Probe into the assessment indicator system on high-quality development[J]. Statistical Research, 2019,36(1):4-14.]
[15]	李子联,王爱民.江苏高质量发展:测度评价与推进路径[J].江苏社会科学,2019(1):247-256.[Li Zilian, Wang Aimin. The high-quality development in Jiangsu province:Measurement and advancement[J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2019(1):247-256.]
[16]	罗宣,周梦娣,王翠翠.长三角地区经济增长质量综合评价[J].财经问题研究,2018(4):123-129.[Luo Xuan, Zhou Mengdi, Wang Cuicui. Comprehensive evaluation of economic growth quality in Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2018(4):123-129.]
[17]	马茹,罗晖,王宏伟,等.中国区域经济高质量发展评价指标体系及测度研究[J].中国软科学,2019(7):60-67.[Ma Ru, Luo Hui, Wang Hongwei, et al. Study of evaluating high-quality economic development in Chinese regions[J]. China Soft Science, 2019(7):60-67.]
[18]	张震,刘雪梦.新时代我国15个副省级城市经济高质量发展评价体系构建与测度[J].经济问题探索,2019,40(6):20-31.[Zhang Zhen, Liu Xuemeng. Construction and measurement of high-quality development evaluation system of China's 15 sub-provincial cities in the new era[J]. Inquiry into Economic Issues, 2019, 40(6):20-31.]
[19]	孙平军,丁四保,修春亮.北京市人口-经济-空间城市化耦合协调性分析[J].城市规划,2012,36(5):38-45.[Sun Pingjun, Ding Sibao, Xiu Chunliang. Analysis of the coordination of populationeconomy-space in Beijing[J]. City Planning Review, 2012,36(5):38-45.]
[20]	姜磊,柏玲,吴玉鸣.中国省域经济、资源与环境协调分析——兼论三系统耦合公式及其扩展形式[J].自然资源学报,2017,32(5):788-799.[Jiang Lei, Bai Ling, Wu Yuming. Coupling and coordinating degrees of provincial economy:Resources and environment in China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017,32(5):788-799.]
[21]	彭邦文,武友德,曹洪华,等.基于系统耦合的旅游业与新型城镇化协调发展分析——以云南省为例[J].世界地理研究,2016,25(2):103-114.[Peng Bangwen, Wu Youde, Cao Honghua, et al. Coupling coordination research of tourism industry and new urbanization:A case study of Yunnan[J]. World Regional Studies, 2016,25(2):103-114.]
[22]	高楠,马耀峰,李天顺,等.基于耦合模型的旅游产业与城市化协调发展研究——以西安市为例[J].旅游学刊,2013,28(1):62-68.[Gao Nan, Ma Yaofeng, Li Tianshun, et al. Study on the coordinative development between tourism industry and urbanization based on coupling model:A case study of Xi'an[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2013,28(1):62-68.]