人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年7月16日 星期三  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2020, Vol. 35 Issue (4): 56-63,120    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.04.008
乡村 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
不同类型传统村落脆弱性比较研究
邹君1,2, 刘媛1,3, 刘沛林1
1. “传统村镇文化数字化与创意利用”国家地方联合工程实验室, 衡阳 421008;
2. 衡阳师范学院 城市与旅游学院, 衡阳 421008;
3. 福建师范大学 地理科学学院, 福州 350117
A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON VULNERABILITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TRADITIONAL VILLAGES
ZOU Jun1,2, LIU Yuan1,3, LIU Pei-lin1
1. National-Local Joint Engineering Laboratory on Digital Preservation and Innovative Technologies for the Culture of Traditional Villages and Towns, Hengyang 421008, China;
2. The department of city and tourism, Hengyang Normal University, Hengyang 421008, China;
3. College of Geography Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China

全文: PDF (4341 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 以湘南地区作为研究单元,多元化获取数据,运用“敏感—暴露—适应”分析框架和数理模型评价法对3种类型、6个村落的脆弱程度和致脆因素进行比较研究。结果表明:①务工型强脆弱、工贸型中脆弱、旅游型微脆弱;②旅游型和工贸型属复合E-A致脆类型,务工型属均衡E-A-S致脆类型;③务工型的敏感性远大于其他类型,民俗文化和村落居民是主要敏感因子;④旅游型为强暴露、工贸型为中暴露、务工型为微暴露。城镇化和旅游开发是主要暴露因素;⑤旅游型的适应性最高,工贸型次之,务工型最差;⑥不同类型村落的致脆短板因素差异较大。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
邹君
刘媛
刘沛林
关键词 传统村落脆弱性分类定量评价三角图法    
Abstract:The quantitative evaluation index system of landscape vulnerability of traditional village was constructed by using the framework of ‘sensitive exposure adaptability’. According to the difference of industry and income, the traditional villages are divided into three types: Tourism type, industry and trade type and migrant type, with Hunan Province as the research area, and 2 villages are selected as case villages for each type. The data were obtained from field surveys, literature reviews, questionnaires and interviews, and village vulnerability was calculated by a mathematical model method. The results show that: 1) From perspective of the degree of vulnerability, the migrant type presents the strong vulnerability, the industry and trade type presents the medium vulnerability, and the tourism type presents the micro-vulnerability; 2) From the perspective of system layer's brittle structure, tourism type, industry and trade type belong to compound fragile E-A type, and migrant type belongs to balanced E ≤ A-S type; 3) In terms of sensitivity, the sensitivity of migrant type is much higher than that of the other two types. 4) In terms of exposure, tourism type is the strong exposure, industry and trade type is the medium exposure and migrant type is the micro exposure. 5) In terms of adaptability, the tourism type is the highest, the industry and trade type is the second, and the migrant type is the worst. The main contributing factors of tourist villages are maintenance ability (O) and ideology (C). 6) There are also some differences among different types of villages in terms of brittle short plates.
Key wordstraditional villages    vulnerability    classification    quantitative evaluation    triangulation   
收稿日期: 2019-08-13     
PACS: K901  
基金资助:国家社科重大招标项目(16ZDA159)
通讯作者: 刘沛林(1963-),男,湖南汉寿人,教授,主要研究方向为传统聚落保护、人居环境学和旅游地理。E-mail:liu_peilin@126.com。     E-mail: liu_peilin@126.com
作者简介: 邹君(1973-),男,湖南邵东人,博士,教授,主要研究方向为传统聚落保护、脆弱性与区域可持续发展。E-mail:zoujun4@163.com。
引用本文:   
邹君, 刘媛, 刘沛林. 不同类型传统村落脆弱性比较研究[J]. 人文地理, 2020, 35(4): 56-63,120. ZOU Jun, LIU Yuan, LIU Pei-lin. A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON VULNERABILITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF TRADITIONAL VILLAGES. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 35(4): 56-63,120.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2020.04.008      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2020/V35/I4/56
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司