广州市低收入群体户外活动的时空排斥及其影响机制

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.03.012

PDF(1507 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3) : 97-103,111. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.03.012

城市

广州市低收入群体户外活动的时空排斥及其影响机制

郝新华^1,2, 周素红^1,3, 彭伊侬¹, 文萍¹

作者信息 +

SPATIAL-TEMPORAL EXCLUSION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING MECHANISM OF LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS' OUTDOOR ACTIVITY IN GUANGZHOU

HAO Xin-hua^1,2, ZHOU Su-hong^1,3, PENG Yi-nong¹, WEN Ping¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

低收入群体的社会公平问题是城市发展中的重要问题之一。随着时间地理学的兴起，居民时空间活动为探讨低收入群体的社会排斥提供了一个新视角。文章引入“活动排斥”概念，构建了一套定量衡量居民活动时空排斥程度的指标体系，归纳出时空排斥的衡量因子，将对时空排斥问题从描述统计层面深入到排斥衡量与解释层面。研究发现：低收入群体在活动空间范围与活动等级、丰富度等多个层面与整体评价水平存在差异，户外活动确实受到排斥。这种排斥现象受到受刚性活动时间及个体的社会经济属性等因素的明显制约；居住社区周边的设施服务供给、邻里社交网络等因素分别作用于各个时空排斥维度。

Abstract

Social equity of low-income group is an important issue in the process of urban development for long, and has gradually become a big challenge to China since opening up policy. The research of social exclusion covers multiple areas such as politics, economy, culture and so on. In recent years, spatial-temporal activity has become a new perspective to discuss social exclusion of low-income group with the rapid development of Space-time theory. However, systematical measurement and analysis is still lack of in relative. Therefore, case research of 12 typical residential districts in Guangzhou from April, 2013 to June 2013 is done to build up an analytical framework of social exclusion from the aspect of outdoor activity. Based on descriptive statistics of 1605 residents, the research aims to go deep into the measurement and mechanism of spatial-temporal exclusion through daily outdoor activity. The research found out that obvious difference exists between low-income group and whole resident group in the degree of social exclusion while low-income residents group got the lowest score in four income groups, which means that they experience a serious social exclusion in daily outdoors activity. More specifically, the score of low income group is much lower than three other groups either in activity area or in activity activeness, either on weekdays or on weekend. This kind of activity exclusion is influenced by a comechanism from three different levels, urban level, community level and individual level.

导出引用

郝新华, 周素红, 彭伊侬, 文萍. 广州市低收入群体户外活动的时空排斥及其影响机制[J]. 人文地理. 2018, 33(3): 97-103,111 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.03.012

HAO Xin-hua, ZHOU Su-hong, PENG Yi-nong, WEN Ping. SPATIAL-TEMPORAL EXCLUSION CHARACTERISTICS AND INFLUENCING MECHANISM OF LOW-INCOME RESIDENTS' OUTDOOR ACTIVITY IN GUANGZHOU[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2018, 33(3): 97-103,111 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2018.03.012

中图分类号： C912.81

参考文献

[1] Burchardt T, Le Grand J, Piachaud D. Social exclusion in Britain 1991-1995[J]. Social Policy & Administration, 1999,33(3):227-244.

[2] 丁开杰.西方社会排斥理论:四个基本问题[J].国外理论动态,2009(10):36-41.[Ding Kaijie. Social exclusion theory in western society:Four basic issue[J]. Foreign Theoretical Trends, 2009(10):36-41.]

[3] López-Morales E. Gentrification in Santiago, Chile:A property-led process of dispossession and exclusion[J]. Urban Geography, 2016, 37(8):1-23.

[4] Ward K J. Geographies of exclusion:Seaside towns and houses in multiple occupancy[J]. Journal of rural studies, 2015,37:96-107.

[5] Wang E, Song J, Xu T. From "spatial bond" to "spatial mismatch":An assessment of changing jobs-housing relationship in Beijing[J]. Habitat International, 2011,35(2):398-409.

[6] 景晓芬.社会学视角下的国内外城市空间研究述评[J].城市发展研究,2013,20(3):44-49.[Jing Xiaofen. A review of domestic and foreign research on the city space under the perspective of sociology[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2013,20(3):44-49.]

[7] 万蕙,朱竑.中越通婚中越南女性的空间排斥研究——以云南省河口县桥头村为例[J]. 地理科学,2013,33(5):570-575.[Wan Hui, Zhu Hong. Spatial exclusion of vietnamese brides in sino-vietnam crossborder marriages:A case study of qiaotou village in Yunnan[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013,33(5):570-575.]

[8] 郭华,甘巧林.乡村旅游社区居民社会排斥的多维度感知——江西婺源李坑村案例的质化研究[J].旅游学刊,2011,26(8):87-94.[Guo Hua, Gan Qiaolin. Rural tourism community residents' multi-dimensional prception of social exclusion:A qualitative research on the case of Likeng village in Wuyuan, Jiangxi province[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2011,26(8):87-94.]

[9] 谢妍翰,黄耿志,薛德升.广州城市不同行业女性非正规就业者行为空间差异及其影响[J].人文地理,2010,25(6):25-29.[Xie Yanhan, Huang Gengzhi, Xue Desheng. Female informal employees' behavior space structures in different sectors:Differences and effects[J]. Human Geography, 2010,25(6):25-29.]

[10] 袁媛,吴缚龙,许学强.转型期中国城市贫困和剥夺的空间模式[J]. 地理学报,2009,64(6):753-763.[Yuan yuan, Wu fulong, Xu xueqiang. The spatial pattern of poverty and deprivation in transitional chinese city:Analysis of area-based indicators and individual data[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2009,64(6):753-763.]

[11] 梅丽萍.城市化,社会排斥与社会政策的选择[J].兰州学刊,2011(9):121-127.[Mei Liping. Urbanization, social exclusion and social policies[J]. Lanzhou Academic Journal, 2011(9):121-127.]

[12] 郑文升,丁四保,王晓芳,等.中国东北地区资源型城市棚户区改造与反贫困研究[J]. 地理科学,2008,28(2):156-161.[Zheng Wensheng, Ding Sibao, Wang Xiaofang. Shantytown reconstruction and city antipoverty in resources-dependent cities in northeast China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2008,28(2):156-161.]

[13] 李志刚,刘晔.中国城市"新移民"社会网络与空间分异[J].地理学报,2011,66(6):785-795.[Li Zhigang, Liu Le. Beyond spatial segregation:Neo-migrants and their social networks in Chinese cities[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011,66(6):785-795.]

[14] Cumming S. Lone Mothers Exiting Social Assistance:Gender, Social Exclusion and Social Capital[D]. Ontario:University of Waterloo, 2014:44-52.

[15] Yu H, Shaw S L. Exploring potential human activities in physical and virtual spaces:A spatio-temporal GIS approach[J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2008,22(4):409-430.

[16] Wang J F, Wang Y, Zhang J, et al. Spatiotemporal transmission and determinants of typhoid and paratyphoid fever in Hongta district, Yunnan province, China[J]. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 2013,7(3):e2112.

[17] Neutens T, Versichele M, Schwanen T. Arranging place and time:A GIS toolkit to assess person-based accessibility of urban opportunities[J]. Applied Geography, 2010,30(4):561-575.

[18] 孙樱,陈田,韩英.北京市区老年人口休闲行为的时空特征初探[J]. 地理研究,2001,20(5):537-546.[Sun Ying, Chen Tian, Han Ying. A study on leisure behavior of the aged in Beijing[J]. Geographical Research, 2001,20(5):537-546.]

[19] 冯健,陈秀欣,兰宗敏.北京市居民购物行为空间结构演变[J].地理学报,2007,62(10):1083-1096.[Feng Jian, Chen Xiuxin, Lan Zongming. The evolution of spatial structure of shopping behaviors of Beijing's residents[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2007,62(10):1083-1096.]

[20] 周素红,邓丽芳.基于T-GIS的广州市居民日常活动时空关系[J]. 地理学报,2010,65(12):1454-1463.[Zhou Suhong, Deng Lifang. Spatio-temporal pattern of residents' daily activities based on TGis:A case study in Guangzhou, China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(12):1454-1463.]

[21] 刘志林,张艳,柴彦威.中国大城市职住分离现象及其特征——以北京市为例[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(9):110-117.[Liu Zhilin, Zhang Yan, Chai Yanwei. Home-work separation in the context of institutional and spatial transformation in urban China:Evidence from Beijing household survey data[J]. Urban Studies, 2009,16(9):110-117.]

[22] 周素红,程璐萍,吴志东.广州市保障性住房社区居民的居住-就业选择与空间匹配性[J].地理研究,2010,29(10):1735-1745.[Zhou Suhong, Chen Luping, Wu Zhidong. The jobs-housing relocation and spatial matching of residents in alleviatory housing neighborhoods in Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2010,29(10):1735-1745.]

[23] 江海燕,朱雪梅,吴玲,等.城市公共设施公平评价:物理可达性与时空可达性测度方法的比较[J].国际城市规划,2014,29(5):70-75.[Jiang Haiyan, Zhu Xuemei, Wu Ling, et.al. Comparison of physical accessibility and space-time accessibility measures in the equity of urban public facilities[J]. Urban Planning International, 2014,29(5):70-75.]

[24] 尹海伟,徐建刚.上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(6):71-76.[Yin Haiwei, Xu Jiangang. Spatial accessibility and equity of parks in Shanghai[J]. Urban Studies, 2009,16(6):71-76.]

[25] 张文佳,柴彦威,申悦.基于活动-移动时空可达性的城市社会公平研究[C]//中国地理学会.中国地理学会百年庆典学术论文摘要集.北京:中国地理协会,2009:173.[Zhang Wenjia, Chai Yanwei, Shen Yue. The research on social equity based on activity-mobility[C]//The Geographical Society of China. The Proceeding of Centenary Symposium of the Geographical Society of China. Beijing:The Geographical Society of China, 2009:173.]

[26] 柴彦威.城市空间[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:124-126.[Chai Yanwei. Urban Space[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000:124-126.]

[27] 张艳,柴彦威.北京城市中低收入者日常活动时空间特征分析[J]. 地理科学,2011,31(9):1056-1064.[Zhang Yan, Chai Yanwei. The spatio-temporal activity pattern of the middle and the low-income residents in Beijing, China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2011,31(9):1056-1064.]

[28] 欧阳鹏.城市机动性与反社会排斥——国外城市无障碍交通规划对策的启示[J].现代城市研究,2008,23(8):60-69.[Ouyang Peng. Urban mobility and anti-social exclusion:The inspiration of barrierfree transportation planning measures from abroad cities[J]. Modern Urban Research, 2008,23(8):60-69.]

[29] 王世军.中国城市机动性与社会排斥[J].城市规划学刊,2011(4):87-92.[Wang Shijun. Urban mobility and social exclusion in China[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2011(4):87-92.]

[30] Hanson S, Pratt G. Gender, Work, and Space[M]. London:Routledge, 1995:54-56.

[31] Kwan M P. Gender differences in space-time constraints[J]. Area, 2000,32(2):145-156.

[32] Neutens T, Daniels S, Minnen J, et al. Spatial and temporal fluctuations in individual accessibility:A comparative analysis among subgroups of the population[J]. Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 2014,114(2):119-131.

[33] Novák J, Sýkora L. A city in motion:Time-space activity and mobility patterns of suburban inhabitants and the structuration of the spatial organization of the Prague metropolitan area[J]. Geografiska Annaler B, 2007,89(2):147-168.

[34] Sasabe T, Furukawa A S, Higuchi S, et al. Taking the tyke on a bike:Mothers' and childless women's space-time geographies in Amsterdam compared[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2015,47(3):691-708.