以家庭为单位的活动参与：联合与独立家庭维持性活动中的性别差异&mdash;&mdash; 以北京市家庭为例

蒋晨; 毛子丹; 柴彦威

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.004

PDF(1884 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2) : 24-31. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.004

社会

以家庭为单位的活动参与：联合与独立家庭维持性活动中的性别差异—— 以北京市家庭为例

蒋晨¹, 毛子丹², 柴彦威¹

作者信息 +

ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION IN THE HOUSEHOLD: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN JOINT AND SOLO ACTIVITIES OF HOUSEHOLD MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

JIANG Chen¹, MAO Zi-dan², CHAI Yan-wei¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

个体的日常活动发生在复杂的情境下，受到来自地理环境和社会环境的制约。以往研究揭示了制约下的个体在活动参与上展示出明显的性别差异。然而，传统以个体为单位的研究，忽视了家作为地方秩序的口袋，其内部分成员之间的互动对不同性别家庭成员活动参与的影响。本文从家庭内部分工的视角，研究夫妻双方在参与家庭维持性活动的时间利用的差异。在分析差异形成的过程中，在家庭区位特征、个体社会经济特征外，关注了配偶的社会经济特征、家庭成员间的互动对个体参与独立与联合家庭维持性活动的影响。研究结果验证了我们的假设，微观个体活动参与及时间利用的性别差异，不仅受到社会与地理环境制约，而且是家庭成员之间互动、分工的结果。以家庭为单位的分析能更好地补充和解释以往性别差异的研究成果，为个体活动、移动行为等研究提供新的视角。

Abstract

Daily activities of individuals are embedded in complex context, constrained to both geographic and social environments. Previous studies have revealed significant gender differences in activity participation of individuals. From the perspective of intra-household labor division, this paper studies on the intrahousehold differences of time spent on household affairs. A dataset from activity diary survey of Beijing urban residents in 2007 is used in our analysis. Derived from the time geography theory, the paper demonstrates the activity order of household members by focusing on the home as a pocket of local order. By analyzing the time utilization of participation in household maintenance activities, results show that female household heads spend much more time than male household heads to do household maintenance activities, and male heads tend to spend more time participating in joint activities than solo activities. Using a multivariate tobit model, the paper confirms that social and geographical factors such as family structure, number of preschool children and location of house can influence the participation in solo and joint activities of household affairs. The analysis results confirm our hypothesis that, apart from social and geographic constraints, the gender differences in activity participation also results from intra-household interactions and labor division. Key words: joint activities

导出引用

蒋晨, 毛子丹, 柴彦威. 以家庭为单位的活动参与：联合与独立家庭维持性活动中的性别差异—— 以北京市家庭为例[J]. 人文地理. 2019, 34(2): 24-31 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.004

JIANG Chen, MAO Zi-dan, CHAI Yan-wei. ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION IN THE HOUSEHOLD: GENDER DIFFERENCES IN JOINT AND SOLO ACTIVITIES OF HOUSEHOLD MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2019, 34(2): 24-31 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.02.004

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] Hägerstrand T. What about people in regional science?[J]. Papers in Regional Science, 1970,24(1):7-24.
[2] Buliung R N, Kanaroglou P S. Urban form and household activitytravel behavior[J]. Growth & Change, 2006,37(2):172-199.
[3] 谷志莲,柴彦威.城市老年人的移动性变化及其对日常生活的影响——基于社区老年人生活历程的叙事分析[J].地理科学进展, 2015,34(12):1617-1627.[Gu Zhilian, Chai Yanwei. Change of mobility of urban elderly and effects on their daily life:A narrative analysis of the life of a retired couple living in an urban community[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015,34(12):1617-1627.]
[4] 柴彦威,张文佳,张艳,等.微观个体行为时空数据的生产过程与质量管理——以北京居民活动日志调查为例[J].人文地理,2009,24(6):1-9.[Chai Yanwei, Zhang Wenjia, Zhang Yan, et al. The production and quality management of disaggregated space-time data of individual's behaviors:A case study of activity-diary survey in Beijing[J]. Human Geography, 2009,24(6):1-9.]
[5] Kajsa Ellegård,张艳,蒋晨,等.复杂情境中的日常活动可视化与应用研究[J]. 人文地理,2016,31(5):39-46.[Kajsa Ellegård, Zhang Yan, Jiang Chen, et al. Visualization and applications of daily activities in the complex contexts[J]. Human Geography, 2016,31(5):39-46.]
[6] Ellegård K, Vilhelmson B. Home as a pocket of local order:Everyday activities and the friction of distance[J]. Geografiska Annaler, 2010,86(4):281-296.
[7] Hägerstrand T. Diorama, path and project[J]. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie (Journal of Economic and Social Geography),1982,73(6):323-339.
[8] Hägerstrand T. Time-geography:Focus on the corporeality of man, society and environment[M]//Aidas T. The Science and Praxis of Complexity. Tokyo:United Nations University Press, 1985:193-216.
[9] Kajsa Ellegård,张雪,张艳,等.基于地方秩序嵌套的人类活动研究[J].人文地理,2016,31(5):25-31.[Kajsa Ellegård, Zhang Xue, Zhang Yan, et al. Pockets of local order and its application in human activity research[J]. Human Geography, 2016,31(5):25-31.]
[10] Ellegård K. A time-geographical approach to the study of everyday life of individuals:A challenge of complexity[J]. GeoJournal, 1999, 48(3):167-175.
[11] Kwan M P. Gender, the home-work link, and space-time patterns of nonemployment activities[J]. Economic Geography, 1999,75(4):370-394.
[12] Shaw S M. Gender and leisure:Inequality in the distribution of leisure time[J]. Journal of Leisure Research, 1985,17(4):266-282.
[13] Ettema D, Lippe T V D. Weekly rhythms in task and time allocation of households[J]. Transportation, 2009,36(2):113-129.
[14] Kwan M P. Analysis of human spatial behavior in a GIS environment:Recent developments and future prospects[J]. Journal of Geographical Systems, 2000,2(1):85-90.
[15] Cao X, Chai Y. Gender-role based differences in time allocation:A case study of Shenzhen, China[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007(2014):58-66.
[16] Bittman M, Wajcman J. The rush hour:The character of leisure time and gender equity[J]. Social Forces, 2000,79(1):165-189.
[17] He S Y. Will you escort your child to school? The effect of spatial and temporal constraints of parental employment[J]. Applied Geography, 2013,42(8):116-123.
[18] Wissen L J V. A Model of Household Interactions in Activity Patterns[C]. California:University of California Transportation Center, 1991.
[19] Hanson S. The determinants of daily travel-activity patterns:Relative location and sociodemographic factors[J]. Urban Geography, 1982,3(3):179-202.
[20] Wang D G, Chai Y W. The jobs-housing relationship and commuting in Beijing, China:The legacy of Danwei[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009,17(1):30-38.
[21] Ho C, Mulley C. Tour-based mode choice of joint household travel patterns on weekend and weekday[J]. Transportation, 2013,40(4):789-811.
[22] Schwanen T, Ettema D, Timmermans H. If you pick up the children, I'll do the groceries:Spatial differences in between-partner interactions in out-of-home household activities[J]. Environment & Planning A, 2007,39(11):2754-2773.
[23] 张文佳,柴彦威.基于家庭的购物行为时空间决策模型及其应用[J].地理研究,2010,29(2):338-350.[Zhang Wenjia, Chai Yanwei. A household-based model of shopping decision-making behavior in timing and destination choice:Formulation and application to spatial policy evaluation[J]. Geographical Research, 2010,29(2):338-350.]
[24] Zhao Y, Chai Y W. Residents' activity-travel behavior variation by communities in Beijing, China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2013,23(4):492-505.
[25] Srinivasan S, Bhat C R. Modeling household interactions in daily in-home and out-of-home maintenance activity participation[J]. Transportation, 2005,32(5):523-544.
[26] 伍伟萍.社会性别视角下"80后"家庭分工模式的研究——以浙江省J市为例[D].上海:华东师范大学,2011:26.[Wu Weiping. Study on the "Post-80s" Family Division of Labor Model District from the Gender Perspective:On the Basis of Jiangshan's Experience[D]. Shanghai:East Normal University, 2011:26.]
[27] Gliebe J P, Koppelman F S. A model of joint activity participation between household members[J]. Transportation, 2002,29(1):49-72.
[28] Amemiya T. The estimation of a simultaneous-equation Tobit model[J]. International Economic Review, 1979,20(1):169-181.
[29] Barslund M, Rand J, Tarp F, et al. Understanding victimization:The case of Mozambique[J]. World Development, 2007,35(7):1237-1258.