世界城市全球化空间的演变与重塑模式——以柏林波茨坦广场为例

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.03.011

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (8)

全文: PDF (5396 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要全球化空间的产生与发展是世界城市以及发展中的世界城市具有普遍意义的空间议题。运用问卷分析、半结构访谈及文本分析相互佐证的数据，借助三角验证法，对柏林波茨坦广场全球化空间的形成动力与影响因素进行了系统研究。研究表明：①柏林波茨坦广场全球化空间形成的核心动力是跨国政治的作用，以一种历史层累的模式，不断杂糅、混合进生产性服务业集聚的经济动力和世界性艺术文化设施集聚的文化动力。②不同时期全球政治局势、国家及城市发展历史、政府作用、城市重建是波茨坦广场全球化空间形成的影响因素。这些因素在不同历史时期作用于波茨坦广场，综合了跨国政治、跨国经济、跨国文化的空间形态要素，引发波茨坦广场数次地景变迁与功能重组，最终形成了世界上“独一无二”的全球化空间。③波茨坦广场的重建是其全球化空间重塑的关键环节，其空间重塑模式为由单一要素主导转向多种要素融合的国家主导发展模式。对中国世界城市全球化空间的建设与治理具有启示作用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王立
	邱川曦
	薛德升

关键词 ：波茨坦广场, 莱比锡广场, 跨国, 空间转型, 历史层累

Abstract：The emergence and development of globalized space is a universal space issue in world cities and in the developing world cities.Berlin is a city with a special world city status, transnational reshaping of Potsdamer-LeipzigerPlatz is the embodiment of its special status.The transnational reshaping of the PotsdamerLeipzigerPlatz has gone through nearly a century. Its functions changes from the Weimar Republic's transportation and entertainment center to the terror area in Nazi period, the border space and empty spacein cold war period, flagship project of the federal government in order to build world city to the transnational landscape kaleidoscope. As a result of the interdependence of transnational elements in a century, Potsdamer-LeipzigerPlatz has interpreted the space trioproduced by transnational political commemorative space, transnational business affairs space and international art and entertainment space.The process of reshaping of PotsdamerLeipzigerPlatz is dominated by government including transnational economy, transnational politics and transnational culture interplay. It is both a means of spatial transformation and a goal of space transformation.

Key words： Potsdamer Platz Leipziger Platz transnational space transition historical layer tired

收稿日期: 2018-06-05

PACS:

C912.8

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（41801155）；教育部人文社科重点研究基地重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心开放课题（KFJJ2018005）；重庆市社会科学规划项目（2018QNSH43）

通讯作者: 薛德升(1969-),男,山西祁县人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为城市地理、城市规划与经济地理等。E-mail:eesxds@mail.sysu.edu.cn。 E-mail: eesxds@mail.sysu.edu.cn

作者简介: 王立(1984-),男,山西长治人,博士,讲师,主要研究方向为跨国社会空间、城乡社区生活空间。E-mail:hguswl@qq.com。

引用本文:

王立, 邱川曦, 薛德升. 世界城市全球化空间的演变与重塑模式——以柏林波茨坦广场为例[J]. 人文地理, 2019, 34(3): 75-82. WANG Li, QIU Chuan-xi, XUE De-sheng. THE EVOLUTION AND REMOLDING MODE OF GLOBALIZATION SPACE IN WORLD CITY: A CASE STUDY OF POTSDAMER PLATZ IN BERLIN. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 34(3): 75-82.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.03.011 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2019/V34/I3/75

[1]	Geddes P. Cities in Evolution[M]. London:Williams & Norgate, 1915:9-21.
[2]	Hall P G. The World Cities[M]. London:Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1984:1-256.
[3]	Friedmann J, Wolff G. World city formation:An agenda for research and action[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1982,6(3):309-344.
[4]	Friedmann J. The world city hypothesis[J]. Development and Change, 1986,17(1):69-83.
[5]	Smith D A, Timberlake M F. World city networks and hierarchies, 1977-1997 An empirical analysis of global air travel links[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2001,44(10):1656-1678.
[6]	Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J. A roster of world cities[J]. Cities, 1999,16(6):445-458.
[7]	Scott A J. Global City-regions:Trends, Theory, Policy[M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 2001:1-467.
[8]	薛德升,黄鹤绵.关于世界城市研究的两场争论及其对相关研究的影响[J]. 地理科学进展,2013,32(8):1177-1186.[Xue Desheng, Huang Hemian. Two debates and two trends:Review on world city research humanities[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013,32(8):1177-1186.]
[9]	Melchert Saguas Presas L. Transnational urban spaces and urban environmental reforms:Analyzing Beijing's environmental restructuring in the light of globalization[J]. Cities, 2004,21(4):321-328.
[10]	Musil R. European global cities in the recent economic crisis[J]. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Ggeografie, 2014,105(4):492-503.
[11]	Gornig M, Haussermann H. Berlin:Economic and spatial change[J]. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2002,9(4):331-341.
[12]	沈祉杏.穿墙故事:再造柏林城市[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2005:1-327.[Sheng Zhixin. The Story of the Wall:Rebuilding Berlin City[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2005:1-327.]
[13]	章健玲.德国柏林波茨坦广场[J].风景园林,2010(1):59-62.[Zhang Jianling. Potsdamer Platz Berlin, Germany[J]. Landscape Architecture, 2001(1):59-62.]
[14]	哈罗德·博登沙茨,李双志,易鑫.柏林市中心的"批判性重建"[J]. 国际城市规划,2016,31(2):18-24.[Harald Bodenschatz, Li Shuangzhi, Yi Xin. "Critical reconstruction" in Berlin's city centre[J]. Urban Planning International, 2016,31(2):18-24.]
[15]	吴志强.都市缝合——20年柏林和上海规划设计分析的都市发展空间意义透视[J].时代建筑,2004(3):48-53.[Wu Zhiqiang. "Citysewing":Analyzing the meanings of plannings and designs in Shanghai and Berlin in the last two decades from a perspective of urban spacial development[J]. Time Architecture, 2004(3):48-53.]
[16]	Arandjelovic B, Bogunovich D. City profile:Berlin[J]. Cities, 2014, 37:1-26.
[17]	Kulke E. Berlin-German capital and global city[J]. DIE ERDE, 2003,134(3):219-233.
[18]	Paloscia R, INURA. The Contested Metropolis:Six Cities at the Beginning of the 21st Century[M]. Basel:Birkhäuser Publishing Ltd, 2004:1-301.
[19]	Keating P. New urban domains:Potsdamer Platz[J]. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 2001,9(1):78-84.
[20]	Nowobilska M. Potsdamer Platz:The Reshaping of Berlin[M]. New York:Springer, 2014:1-42.
[21]	Lehrer U. The spectacularization of the building process:Berlin, Potsdamer Platz[J]. Genre, 2003,36(3/4):383-404.
[22]	赵力.德国柏林波茨坦广场的城市设计[J].时代建筑,2004(3):118-123.[Zhao Li. Urban planning of Potsdam Plaza in Berlin, Germany[J]. Time Architecture, 2004(3):118-123.]
[23]	Allen J. Ambient Power:Berlin's potsdamer Platz and the seductive logic of public spaces[J]. Urban Studies, 2006,43(2):441-455.
[24]	Colomb C. Pushing the urban frontier:Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin[J]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 2012,34(2):131-152.