1800&mdash;1945年长春市街道命名的文化政治阐释&mdash;&mdash;基于葛兰西霸权理论的视角

冯婧; 杨青山; 刘鉴; 江孝君

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.04.005

PDF(2441 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4) : 40-46. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.04.005

文化

1800—1945年长春市街道命名的文化政治阐释——基于葛兰西霸权理论的视角

冯婧^1,2, 杨青山^1,2, 刘鉴^1,2, 江孝君^1,2

作者信息 +

CULTURAL AND POLITICAL INTERPRETATION OF STREET NAMING IN CHANGCHUN DURING 1800 TO 1945: BASED ON GRAMSCI'S HEGEMONY THEORY

FENG Jing^1,2, YANG Qing-shan^1,2, LIU Jian^1,2, JIANG Xiao-jun^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

20世纪80年代，西方文化地理学界对传统地名学进行了批判转向，地方命名中的文化政治过程成为研究核心。本文以2017年被国务院列为国家历史文化名城的长春市为例，在批判地名学的背景下，借鉴葛兰西的霸权理论，对1800—1945年间长春街道命名过程进行文化政治分析。研究发现：1931年九一八事变前，长春街道命名成为不同政权控制下各种力量争夺的战场，形成清政府控制的长春地方力量、俄国殖民者力量和日本殖民者力量分区控制下的街道名称，争夺加深了城市内部分异。1931年九一八事变后，长春沦为日本的殖民地，日本殖民者为隐藏其妄图永久占领东北并实现霸权统治的野心，在其划定规划的“实在国都事业区域”进行中式命名，却隐喻了明显的归顺色彩。

Abstract

The academic circles of foreign culture and geography have made a critical reformulation towards the study of traditional toponymy since the 1980s, and the political process in place naming has become the core topic of research. In 2017, Changchun was listed as a historical and cultural city by the State Council, that further affirming its historical and cultural values. In order to correctly handle the relationship between urban construction and the protection of historical and cultural heritage, it is of great significance to dig deep into the historical and cultural connotations of the city. In the current study, the critical theory of toponymy was used for analyzing the street naming process of Changchun from the year 1800 to 1945. The main results are:1) Under the intervention of capitalist power, the naming of Changchun's streets presents the results of the combination of naming method, power and power source. 2) The intervention of power and the resistance of the people made the name of Changchun street a cultural battlefield for political competition. 3) After the "September 18th" incident, Japanese imperialism realized that the acquisition of leadership was not a simple conveyance of ideology. Overall, the current research is expected to provide a new perspective and new theoretical basis for the protection and planning of urban pattern in Changchun city.

导出引用

冯婧, 杨青山, 刘鉴, 江孝君. 1800—1945年长春市街道命名的文化政治阐释——基于葛兰西霸权理论的视角[J]. 人文地理. 2019, 34(4): 40-46 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.04.005

FENG Jing, YANG Qing-shan, LIU Jian, JIANG Xiao-jun. CULTURAL AND POLITICAL INTERPRETATION OF STREET NAMING IN CHANGCHUN DURING 1800 TO 1945: BASED ON GRAMSCI'S HEGEMONY THEORY[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2019, 34(4): 40-46 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2019.04.005

中图分类号： K901.6

参考文献

[1] 钱俊希,朱竑.新文化地理学的理论统一性与话题多样性[J].地理研究,2015,34(3):422-436.[Qian Junxi, Zhu Hong. Theoretical unity and thematic diversity in new cultural geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(3):422-436.]
[2] 朱竑,钱俊希,封丹.空间象征性意义的研究进展与启示[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(6):634-648.[Zhu Hong, Qian Junxi, Feng Dan. On the symbolic meaning of space progress in geography[J]. Progress in Geography, 2010,29(6):634-648.]
[3] Zelinsky W. Along the frontiers of name geography[J]. Professional Geographer, 1997,49(4):464-466.
[4] Goodchlid M F. GIScience, geography, form, and process[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2004,94(4):709-714.
[5] 纪小美,王卫平,陈洁,等.批判转向以来地名学研究回顾与展望[J]. 地理科学进展,2016,35(7):910-919.[Ji Xiaomei, Wang Weiping, Chen Jie, et al. Review and prospect of toponymy research since the 1980s[J]. Progress in Geography, 2016,35(7):910-919.]
[6] Redwood R R, Alderman D, Azaryahu M. Geographies of toponymic inscription:New directions in critical place-name studies[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010,34(4):453-470.
[7] Azaryahu M. German reunification and the politics of street name:The case of East Berlin[J]. Political Geography, 1997,16(6):479-493.
[8] 纪小美,陶卓民,李涛,等.近代以来福州城市地名空间政治变迁研究[J]. 城市发展研究,2015,22(11):101-108.[Ji Xiaomei, Tao Zhuomin, Li Tao, et al. The study on spatial politics evolution of place-name in Fuzhou city since the Opium War[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2015,22(11):101-108.]
[9] 李鹏,封丹.地名变迁中的文化政治阐释:以从化温泉为例[J].人文地理,2015,30(2):58-64.[Li Peng, Feng Dan. The politics of place naming:Changing place name and reproduction of meaning for Conghua Hotspring[J]. Human Geography, 2015,30(2):58-64.]
[10] 黄雯娟.台北市街道命名的空间政治[J].地理学报(中国台湾), 2014,73:79-105.[Huang Wenjuan. The politics of space in relation to street naming in Taipei city[J]. Journal of Geographical Science (Taiwan, China), 2014,73:79-105.]
[11] 特里·伊格尔顿.理论之后[M].商正,译.北京:商务印书馆,2009:43-46.[Eagleton T. After Theory[M]. Shang Zheng, trans. Beijing:The Commercial Press, 2009:43-46.]
[12] 李艳丰. "文化政治"话语内涵及理论生成的历时性考察[J].云南社会科学,2016(5):171-176.[Li Yanfeng. "Cultural Politics":A diachronic study on discourse connotation and theory formation[J]. Social Sciences in Yunnan, 2016(5):171-176.]
[13] 苏晓波.霸权, 文化政治和葛兰西的地理思想[J].人文地理,2013, 28(1):10-13.[Su Xiaobo. Hegemony, cultural, and geographical ideology of Gramsci[J]. Human Geography, 2013,28(1):10-13.]
[14] Jessop B. Gramsci as a spatial theorist[J]. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 2005,8(4):421-437.
[15] Lefebvre H. The Production of Space[M]. Oxford:Blackwell, 1991.
[16] 越泽明.中国东北都市计划史[M].黄世孟,译.台北:大佳出版社, 1986:145.[Yue Zeming. History of Urban Design in Northeast China[M]. Huang Shimeng, trans. Taipei:Dajia Press, 1986:145.]
[17] 顾万春,李荣先.长春市志·总志(上卷)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2000:81-82.[Gu Wanchun, Li Rongxian. Changchun City Annals·General Annals (volume 1)[M]. Changchun:Jilin People's Press, 2000:81-82.]
[18] 王海梁.长春古今政区[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1995:4.[Wang Hailiang. Ancient and Modern Administrative Division of Changchun[M]. Changchun:Jilin People's Press, 1995:4.]
[19] 房友良.长春街路图志[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2016:7,53.[Fang Youliang. Map of Changchun Street Road[M]. Changchun:Jilin People's Press, 2016:7,53.]
[20] 于泾.长春厅志·长春县志[M].长春:长春出版社,2002:124-129, 134-137.[Yu Jing. Changchun Office Annals·Changchun County Annals[M]. Changchun:Changchun Publishing House, 2002:124-129,134-137.]
[21] 曲晓范.近代东北城市的历史变迁[M].长春:东北师范大学出版, 2001:42,115.[Qu Xiaofan. The Historical Changes of Modern Northeast Cities[M]. Changchun:Northeast Normal University Press, 2001:42,115.]
[22] 汤士安.东北城市规划史[M].沈阳:辽宁大学出版社,1995:397-403.[Tang Shian. History of Urban Planning in Northeast China[M]. Shenyang:Liaoning University Press, 1995:397-403.]
[23] 越泽明.伪满洲国首都规划[M].欧硕,译.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2011:81,84,119.[Yue Zeming. Planning of The Capital of Manchuria[M]. Ou Shuo, trans. Beijing:Social Science Literature Press, 2011:81,84,119.]
[24] 黄晓军,李诚固,庞瑞秋,等.伪满时期长春城市社会空间结构研究[J].地理学报,2010,65(10):1198-1208.[Huang Xiaojun, Li Chenggu, Pang Ruiqiu, et al. The social spatial structure of Changchun in the puppet Manchuria period[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2010,65(10):1198-1208.]
[25] 伪满洲国政府国务院国都建设局.国都大新京[O].新京(长春):伪满洲国政府国务院国都建设局,1933:13.吉林省图书馆珍藏.[Puppet Manchuria Council Construction Bureau. Hsinking[O]. Hsinking(Changchun):Puppet Manchuria Council Construction Bureau,1933:13. Jilin Province Library Collection.]
[26] 于维联,李之吉,戚勇.长春近代建筑[M].长春:长春出版社,2001:111.[Yu Weilian, Li Zhiji, Qi Yong. The Modern Time Building of Changchun[M]. Changchun:Changchun Publishing House, 2001:111.]
[27] Carter P. The Road to Botany Bay[M]. London:Faber, 1987:293-319.
[28] Cohen S B, Kliot N. Place-names in Israel's ideological struggle over the administered territories[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1992,82(4):653-680.
[29] Hagen J. ‘Pork’ spending, place names, and political stature in West Virginia[J]. Southeastern Geographer, 2007,47(2):341-364.
[30] Mitchelson M L, Alderman D, Popke E J. Branded:The economic geographies of streets named in honor of reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr[J]. Social Science Quarterly, 2007,88(1):120-145.