旧城更新语境下的失所现象不仅是地理维度的人口移动，还有环境剧变对个人、家庭和社区带来的深层社会心理冲击。以天津西沽南拆除为例，基于问卷调查和访谈考察了历史街区原住民的地方依恋现状及其形成机制。结果显示原住民与该地方在功能、象征、情感、社会等方面均存在依恋关系，其形成机制中的关键性因素包括家庭历史延续、日常亲切经验、邻里支持网络，以及时间和记忆的媒介作用。据此认为，旧城更新需警惕社会—空间重构对原住民造成的物质与非物质性地方剥夺，并利用人地纽带提升城市遗产的社会价值。
Abstract
Threats to historic neighbourhoods in contemporary urbanization include the physical clearance and more importantly, the uprooting of local community. Displacement in the context of inner-city redevelopment involves not only the geographical movement of a population, but also the profound socio-psychological impacts of place upheaval on individuals, families, and communities. Previous studies on displacement in Chinese cities mainly focused on the socioeconomic exclusion issues caused to low income households, however the intangible dimensions remain under-researched, especially in studies on historic neighbourhood conservation. Based on humanistic geographers' thought of place and the theory of place attachment in environmental psychology, as well as the recent global discussion about social value of heritage, this study delves into local residents'place attachment and its contributing factors, taking the demolition project of Xigunan in Tianjin as the case study, within which local residents were undergoing displacement during the fieldwork. The methods of questionnaire survey and interview are employed for data collection. The results demonstrate that residents have functional, symbolic, emotional, and social attachments to the place, while the demographic differences in such as age, income and birthplace (local or non-local) make residents'place attachment different in intensity and type.
关键词
地方依恋 /
失所 /
旧城更新 /
历史街区保护
Key words
place attachment /
displacement /
inner-city redevelopment /
historic neighbourhood conservation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 刘颖,张平宇.绅士化语境下的失所现象:概念溯源及研究综述[J]. 人文地理,2018,33(4):1-6,145.[Liu Ying, Zhang Pingyu. Gentrification-induced displacement:Concepts and literature review[J]. Human Geography, 2018,33(4):1-6,145.]
[2] Tuan Y-F. Place:An experiential perspective[J]. Geographical Review, 1975,65(2):151-165.
[3] Altman I, Low S M. Place Attachment[M]. Boston:Springer, 1992:152,253-278.
[4] Harvey D. The right to the city[J]. New Left Review, 2008,53:23-40.
[5] Lewicka M. Place attachment:How far have we come in the last 40 years?[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2011,31(3):207-230.
[6] Scannell L, Gifford R. Defining place attachment:A tripartite organizing framework[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010, 30(1):1-10.
[7] Australia ICOMOS. The Burra Charter[EB/OL].(1999-11-26)[2018-04-03]. https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/BURRA_CHARTER.pdf.
[8] Schofield J. Who Needs Experts? Counter-Mapping Cultural Heritage[M]. Abingdon:Ashgate, 2014:1-12.
[9] Jones S. Wrestling with the social value of heritage:Problems, dilemmas and opportunities[J]. Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 2017,4(1):21-37.
[10] 王洋,于立.历史环境的情感意义与历史城市的保护[J].国际城市规划,2019,34(1):71-75.[Wang Yang, Yu Li. The emotional significances of historic environment and conservation of historic cities[J]. Urban Planning International, 2019,34(1):71-75.]
[11] Stokols D, Shumaker S A. People in places:A transactional view of setting[M]//Harvey J H. Cognition Social Behaviour and the Environment. Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981:441-488.
[12] Proshansky H M. The city and self-identity[J]. Environment and Behavior, 1978,10:147-169.
[13] Twigger-Ross C L, Uzzell D L. Place and identity processes[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1996,16:205-220.
[14] Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R. Testing the dimensionality of Place attachment in recreational settings[J]. Environment and Behavior, 2005,37(2):153-177.
[15] Ramkissoon H, Weiler B, Smith L D G. Place attachment and proenvironmental behaviour in national parks:The development of a conceptual framework[J]. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2012,20(2):257-276.
[16] Cheung L T O, Hui D L H. Influence of residents' place attachment on heritage forest conservation awareness in a peri-urban area of Guangzhou, China[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2018,33:37-45.
[17] Till K E. Wounded cities:Memory-work and a place-based ethics of care[J]. Political Geography, 2012,31(1):3-14.
[18] Relph E. Place and Placelessness[M]. London:Pion, 1976:37,60, 65,117.
[19] Hartman C, Keating D, LeGates R. Displacement:How to Fight It[M]. Berkeley:National Housing Law Project, 1982:3.
[20] Davidson M. Displacement, space and dwelling:Placing gentrification debate[J]. Ethics, Place & Environment, 2009,12(2):219-234.
[21] Marris P. Loss and Change[M]. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986:57.
[22] He S. New-Build gentrification in central Shanghai:Demographic changes and socioeconomic implications[J]. Population Space and Place, 2010,16(5):345-361.
[23] Liu Y, Tang S, Geertman S, et al. The chain effects of property-led redevelopment in Shenzhen:Price-shadowing and indirect displacement[J]. Cities, 2017,67:31-42.
[24] Manzo L C, Devine-Wright P. Place Attachment:Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications[M]. New York:Routledge, 2014:12, 14,49-60,141-153.
[25] Raymond C M, Brown G, Weber D. The measurement of place attachment:Personal, community, and environmental connections[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010,30(4):422-434.
[26] 段义孚.恋地情结[M].志丞,刘苏,译.北京:商务印书馆,2018:92, 146,257.[Tuan Y-F. Topophilia[M]. Zhi Cheng, Liu Su, trans. Beijing:The Commercial Press, 2018:92,146,257.]
[27] Zajonc R B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968,9(2-Part 2):1-27.
[28] Riegl A. The modern cult of monuments:Its character and its origin[M]//Forster K W. Oppositions. New York:Rizzoli International Publications, 1982:21-51.
[29] Rowles G D. Place and personal identity in old age:Observations from Appalachia[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1983,3(4):299-313.
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目（12&ZD230）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（51878438）
PDF(4623 KB)
