第二居所旅居地社会互动及其对社区发展的影响——以三亚市为例

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.01.009

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (2)

全文: PDF (3650 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要第二居所旅居是一种旅游现象，旅居者为了追求愉悦和非日常经历，在目的地长时间逗留，重构旅居地的社会关系。本文以社区场域理论为研究框架，综合运用访谈法、观察法等研究方法，探析三亚市第二居所旅居者与当地居民社会互动的现状及其对社区发展的影响，并讨论如何提升两者的互动。结果发现：旅居者与当地居民以浅层次的社会互动为主，缺乏深入的情感性互动，并呈现“空间性”与“社会性”特征；社会互动的空间异质性，导致了不同地理空间内社区场域发展存在显著差异，对集体行动与集体意识产生不同的影响。最后，本文构建了共建共享的和谐社区发展模式，以期为旅居地发展政策的制定提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王金莲
	苏勤
	吴骁骁

关键词 ：第二居所旅居者, 当地居民, 社会互动, 社区场域理论, 社区发展

Abstract：The second home sojourn situated in the grey zone between tourism and immigrants, which is a response to the desire of people for pleasure and non-daily experience. Grounded in community field theory, this paper uses the methods of interview and observation, studies the social interaction between the second home sojourners and the local residents in Sanya city, and analyses its implication for the community development, in order to fill this gap in the literature. Community field theory provides a framework for assessing how different members create inclusive chances for the betterment of the second home sojourn destination. Guided by this approach, successful community development can be achieved through the construction of the community field. Guided by this framework, we evaluated whether and how sojourners and local residents with obvious cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds interacted with each other in Sanya city. We found that economic, social and cultural differences, and spatial barriers created a climate in which the social interaction between second home sojourners and local residents was primarily mundane social interactions such as "exchange" and "greet", and did not lead to social integration such as "help" and "integrate". The social interaction reported from local residents and second home sojourners was based on fulfilling a basic need. The social interaction presented the characteristics of "spatial" and "hierarchical". Our findings suggested that the lack of social interaction in Sanya city also extended to community development processes.

Key words： second home sojourners local residents social interaction community field theory community development

收稿日期: 2020-02-23

PACS:

K901

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（41971189）；安徽省教育厅人文社会科学一般研究项目（SKHS2015B01）

通讯作者: 苏勤(1964-),男,安徽安庆人,教授,博士生导师,主要研究方向为旅游社会文化影响。E-mail:ahsuqin@263.net。 E-mail: ahsuqin@263.net

作者简介: 王金莲(1985-),女,安徽宣城人,讲师,博士研究生,主要研究方向为旅游地理。E-mail:wjl85@hsu.edu.cn。

引用本文:

王金莲, 苏勤, 吴骁骁. 第二居所旅居地社会互动及其对社区发展的影响——以三亚市为例[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(1): 66-72. WANG Jin-lian, SU Qin, WU Xiao-xiao. SOCIAL INTERACTION IN THE SECOND HOME SOJOURN DESTINATION AND ITS IMPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: A CASE STUDY OF SANYA, CHINA. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 36(1): 66-72.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.01.009 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I1/66

[1]	马凌,孙九霞,朱竑.流动、旅游与后现代——一个研究视角与一种精神转向[J].人文地理,2017,32(3):146-151.[Ma Ling, Sun Jiuxia, Zhu Hong. Mobility, tourism and postmodernism:A research perspective and spirituality turn[J]. Human Geography, 2017,32(3):146-151.]
[2]	王金莲,苏勤,吴骁骁,等.旅游地理学视角下第二居所旅居研究[J]. 人文地理,2019,34(1):90-98.[Wang Jinlian, Su Qin, Wu Xiaoxiao, et al. Research on second home sojourn:A review from tourism geography perspective[J]. Human Geography, 2019,34(1):90-98.]
[3]	Benson M, O'Reilly K. Migration and the search for a better way of life:A critical exploration of lifestyle migration[J]. The Sociological Review, 2009,57(4):608-625.
[4]	Matarrita D, Stocks G. Amenity migration to the global south:Implications for community development[J]. Geoforum, 2013,49(10):91-102.
[5]	徐红罡,马少吟,姜辽.生活方式型旅游企业主移民社会交往研究[J].旅游学刊,2017,32(7):69-76.[Xu Honggang, Ma Shaoyin, Jiang Liao. Social interactions of lifestyle tourism entrepreneurial migrants[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2017,32(7):69-76.]
[6]	Wu Y F, Xu H G, Lew A. Consumption-led mobilized urbanism:Socio-spatial separation in the second-home city of Sanya[J]. Mobilities, 2015,10(1):136-154.
[7]	Slalazar N, Zhang Y. Seasonal lifestyle tourism:The case of Chinese elites[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2013,43(4):81-99.
[8]	Matarrita D, Zunino H, Sagner J T. Amenity/lifestyle migration in the chileanandes:Understanding the views of "the other" and its effects on integrated community development[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 32(9):1-19.
[9]	Mendez L A. Second Homes in Mexico:An Exploration of the Social Connections of International Residents in the City of Merida[D]. Waterloo:University of Waterloo, 2017:3-14.
[10]	Ruiz B E, Caceres F R. Community-building and amenity migration in community-based tourism development. An approach from southwest Spain[J]. Tourism Management, 2016,54(1):513-523.
[11]	Gallent N. Bridging social capital and the resource potential of second homes:The case of Stintino, Sardinia[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2015,38(5):99-108.
[12]	张机,徐红罡.民族旅游地区家空间的主客角色冲突研究——以丽江白沙村为例[J].地理科学,2016,36(7):1057-1066.[Zhang Ji, Xu Honggang. The role conflicts between hosts and guests in home space in ethnic areas, Lijiang, China[J]. Scientia Geographical Sinica, 2016,36(7):1057-1066.]
[13]	张机,徐红罡.民族餐馆里的主客互动过程研究——以丽江白沙村为例[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(2):97-108.[Zhang Ji, Xu Honggang. The host-guest interaction process in ethnic restaurants:A case study of Lijiang, China[J]. Tourism Tribun, 2016,31(2):97-108.]
[14]	柴彦威.行为地理学研究的方法论问题[J].地域研究与开发,2005, 24(4):1-5.[Chai Yanwei. Methodological problems in behavioral geography study[J]. Areal Research and Development,2005,24(4):1-5.]
[15]	Fagence M. Coping with tourists[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 1998,25(1):256-258.
[16]	Kaufman H. Toward and interactional conception of community[J]. Social Forces, 1959,38(1):8-17.
[17]	Wilkinson K. The Community in Rural America[M]. Middletown:Social Ecology Press, 1991:1-108.
[18]	刘江.重识社区:从"共同体" 到"场域" 的转向[J].社会工作,2016, 2(4):84-127.[Liu Jiang. Community revisited:From gemeinschaft to field[J]. Journal of Social Work, 2016,2(4):84-127.]
[19]	谭华云,许春晓.巴马盘阳河流域季节性移民社区类型与形成机理[J].人文地理,2018,33(5):46-54.[Tan Huayun, Xu Chunxiao. A study on the types and mechanism of seasonal immigrant community in Bama Panyang river basin[J]. Human Geography, 2018,33(5):46-54.]
[20]	Flint C G, Luloff A E, Theodori G L. Extending the concept of community interaction to explore regional community fields[J]. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 2010,25(1):22-36.
[21]	刘操.善待善用候鸟人才[N].海南日报,2019-01-23(03).[Liu Cao. Make good use of migrant bird[N]. Hainan Daily, 2019-01-23(03).]
[22]	李晓凤,佘双好.质性方法研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2006:119-174.[Li Shuangfeng, She Shuanghao. The Qualitative Research[M]. Wuhan:Wuhan University Press, 2006:119-174.]
[23]	Babbie E. The Practice of Social Research[M]. Belmont:Thomson Wadsworth, 2007:22-151.
[24]	彼特·布劳.不平等和异质性[M].王春光,谢圣赞,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1991:5-68.[Blau P M. Inequality and Heterogentity[M]. Wang Chunguang, Xie Shengzan, trans. Beijing:China Social Sciences Press, 1991:5-68.]
[25]	孙九霞,张皙.民族旅游社区交往研究——以西双版纳傣族园景区为例[J].青海民族研究,2015,26(1):1-8.[Sun Jiuxia, Zhang Xi. Study on the interaction of ethnic tourism community:A case study of Dai garden scenic area in Xishuangbanna[J]. Qinghai Nationalities Research, 2015,26(1):1-8.]
[26]	姚华松,周春山,黄耿志,等.空间的力量:广场舞的社会文化意义与地方认同效应[J].地理研究,2019,38(5):1136-1146.[Yao Huasong, Zhou Chunshan, Huang Gengzhi, et al. The power of space:Socio-cultural implication of square dancing and its effects of place identity[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(5):1136-1146.]
[27]	Dines N, Cattell V. Public Spaces, Social Relations and Well-being[M]. Bristol:The Policy Press, 2006:1-231.
[28]	Matarrita D, Brennan M. Conceptualizing community development in the 21st century community development[J]. The Journal of the Community Development Society, 2012,43(3):293-305.
[29]	饶勇.旅游开发背景下的精英劳动力迁入与本地社区边缘化——以海南三亚为例[J].旅游学刊,2013,28(1):46-53.[Rao Yong. Elite labor immigration and marginalization of local communityintourism development:A case study of Sanyacity, China[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2013,28(1):46-53.]