人文地理
 
  联系我们 | 在线留言 | 注册 | 遗忘密码?
  读者在线:
  用户名   密码   登录
2025年8月11日 星期一  首页 期刊介绍 编委会 作者中心 审稿中心 在线期刊 | 期刊订阅 | 下载中心 | 广告合作 友情链接 | 联系我们
人文地理  2021, Vol. 36 Issue (4): 134-142,167    DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.04.016
经济 最新目录| 下期目录| 过刊浏览| 高级检索 |
中国与欧盟产业强关联复杂网络系统的比较研究
原嫄, 孙欣彤
西北工业大学 人文与经法学院, 西安 710072
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPLEX INDUSTRY NETWORK SYSTEM WITH STRONG INDUSTRIAL LINKAGES BETWEEN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
YUAN Yuan, SUN Xin-tong
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China

全文: PDF (44084 KB)   HTML (1 KB) 
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 基于投入产出表构建中国和欧盟细分产业的强关联网络,运用社会网络分析法从整体、子群及个体三个层级对中欧的产业网络进行比较分析,以探讨中国产业复杂网络发展趋势、规律以及阶段定位。研究发现:①产业强关联网络的发展具有显著规律性,欧盟产业强关联网络发展形态是中国的高级演化模式;②欧盟产业间的紧密度及群体聚集趋势均优于中国,但中国产业间的资源传输效率表现更好;③中国当前正处于分配性及生产性服务业与制造业换位的转型期,但尚未达到欧盟所处的以服务业高度集聚作为网络枢纽以带动全行业发展的成熟稳定期;④中国和欧盟的区块网络均呈现近似“核心—边缘”的等级层次结构,分块网络从“单核心”驱动向“双核心”共振驱动更迭,但欧盟比中国更早实现双核心驱动模式。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入我的书架
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
原嫄
孙欣彤
关键词 产业强关联网络社会网络分析块模型比较研究    
Abstract:The formation of an industrial network is an inevitable evolutionary trend caused by industrial specialization, and it also anintrinsic driving force for the evolution of industrial structure. Thus, the topological characteristics of industrial networks canprovide a more detailed and precise reference for portraying macro industrial economic characteristics.This paper constructs the strongly related networks of China and EU subdivided industries based on the input-output tables, and uses the social network analysis to compare the industrial networks of China and EU at three levels:Overall, subgroups and individual. The aim of this study is to explore the development trend, pattern and development stage of the complex industrial networks in China. Therefore, we draw some conclusions. First of all, the development of strongly related industry networks has significant regularity, and the development form of EU industrial networks is the advanced model of Chinese industrial networks; Second, EU's inter-industry tightness and clustering trend are better than China's, but China's inter-industry resource transmission efficiency is better; Third, China is currently in a transition period where the distributive and productive services sectors are switching places with the manufacturing sector. However, China has not yet reached the mature and stable period in which a large number of service industries gather together as network centers to drive the development of the whole industry; Fourth, the Chinese and EU block networks are approximately presented with a "core-edge" hierarchical structure, and the block networks change from "single-core" drive to "dual-core" resonance drive. But the EU has achieved the dual core drive model earlier than China.
Key wordsstrongly related industry networks    social network analysis    block model    comparative research   
收稿日期: 2020-09-16     
PACS: F062.9  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金青年项目(41601117);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(3102018JCC016)
通讯作者: 孙欣彤(1995-),女,吉林延边人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为区域经济、气候经济等。   
作者简介: 原嫄(1986-),女,陕西西安人,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为产业融合与结构演化、气候经济等。
引用本文:   
原嫄, 孙欣彤. 中国与欧盟产业强关联复杂网络系统的比较研究[J]. 人文地理, 2021, 36(4): 134-142,167. YUAN Yuan, SUN Xin-tong. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPLEX INDUSTRY NETWORK SYSTEM WITH STRONG INDUSTRIAL LINKAGES BETWEEN CHINA AND THE EUROPEAN UNION. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 36(4): 134-142,167.
链接本文:  
http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.04.016      或     http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2021/V36/I4/134
2011 © 人文地理编辑部 版权所有
技术支持: 北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司