2000—2018年全球恐怖袭击事件危害评价及时空演变研究

王武林, 林瑶, 徐宗煌, 曾献君, 汪呈绚

人文地理 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5) : 92-100.

PDF(35834 KB)
PDF(35834 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5) : 92-100. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.05.012
社会

2000—2018年全球恐怖袭击事件危害评价及时空演变研究

  • 王武林1,2, 林瑶2, 徐宗煌3, 曾献君4,5, 汪呈绚2
作者信息 +

RESEARCH ON THE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF GLOBAL TERRORIST ATTACKS FROM 2000 TO 2018

  • WANG Wu-lin1,2, LIN Yao2, XU Zong-huang3, ZENG Xian-jun4,5, WANG Cheng-xuan2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

本文运用模糊综合评价、K-Means聚类等方法,探讨了全球恐怖袭击事件的危害程度及时空演变特征。研究发现:①发生频次最高的年份为2010年和2011年,地区为南亚、中东和北非,袭击类型为轰炸/爆炸,国家包括印度、伊拉克、巴基斯坦等;②危害程度越高的恐怖袭击事件其集中化程度越高;一级、二级事件主要分布在中东和北非、南亚等地区,三级、四级和五级事件主要分布在南亚、中东和北非及东南亚等地区;③空间上大致分为中东、中亚和南亚三大活跃区,菲律宾群岛等九大次级活跃区,爪哇岛和苏门答腊岛等其他风险区。本文对理解恐怖主义特征以及全球共同抵制恐怖主义具有重要参考价值。

Abstract

In this paper, the data recorded in the Global Terrorism Database from 2000 to 2018 are sorted out, and the damage degree and spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of the global terrorist attacks are discussed by using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and K-Means clustering. The results show that:1) The most frequent years are 2010 and 2011, and the districts are South Asia, Middle East, and North Africa. While countries with the highest frequency are India, Iraq, Pakistan, etc, and the types of attacks are bombing/explosion; 2) The higher the damage degree, the higher the concentration degree of terrorist attacks. The first-level and second-level terrorist attacks are mainly distributed in the Middle East, North Africa and South Asia, while the third-level, fourth-level and fifth-level terrorist attacks are mainly distributed in South Asia, Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia; 3) It can be divided into three active regions in the Middle East, Central Asia and South Asia, nine secondary active regions such as Philippine Islands, and other risk regions such as Java and Sumatra. This paper has important reference for understanding the characteristics of terrorism resisting terrorism globally.

关键词

恐怖袭击事件 / 危害程度 / 时空演变 / 全球

Key words

terrorist attack / damage degree / spatial-temporal evolution / global

引用本文

导出引用
王武林, 林瑶, 徐宗煌, 曾献君, 汪呈绚. 2000—2018年全球恐怖袭击事件危害评价及时空演变研究[J]. 人文地理. 2021, 36(5): 92-100 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.05.012
WANG Wu-lin, LIN Yao, XU Zong-huang, ZENG Xian-jun, WANG Cheng-xuan. RESEARCH ON THE DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND SPATIAL-TEMPORAL EVOLUTION OF GLOBAL TERRORIST ATTACKS FROM 2000 TO 2018[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2021, 36(5): 92-100 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.05.012
中图分类号: K901.4   

参考文献

[1] Lutz J M, Lutz B J. Global Terrorism[M]. London:Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2004:8.
[2] Tutun S, Khasawneh M T, Zhuang J. New framework that uses patterns and relations to understand terrorist behaviors[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017,78:358-375.
[3] Flint C. Terrorism and counterterrorism:Geographic research questions and agendas[J]. Professional Geographer, 2003,55(2):161-169.
[4] Jaspersen J G, Montibeller G. On the learning patterns and adaptive behavior of terrorist organizations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020,282(1):221-234.
[5] Grant M J, Stewart M G. Modelling improvised explosive device attacks in the West-Assessing the hazard[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2017,165:345-354.
[6] Ash K. "The war will come to your street":Explaining geographic variation in terrorism by rebel groups[J]. International Interactions, 2018,44(3):411-436.
[7] 赵秉志.法治反恐的国际视角:难点与对策[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,22(2):80-91.[Zhao Bingzhi. Combating international terrorism through rule of law:Difficulties and countermeasures[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science), 2020,22(2):80-91.]
[8] 张家栋.世界恐怖主义的主要特征与发展趋势[J].国际观察,2011(5):8-15.[Zhang Jiadong. The characteristics and trends of world terrorism[J]. International Review, 2011(5):8-15.]
[9] 刘中民,任华.菲律宾恐怖袭击事件透视[J].当代世界,2017(7):56-59.[Liu Zhongmin, Ren Hua. Perspective on the terrorist attack inPhilippines[J]. Contemporary World, 2017(7):56-59.]
[10] 周秋君.恐怖主义在欧洲发展的新态势及其原因分析[J].社会科学,2019(2):29-37.[Zhou Qiujun. The new situationand causes of terrorismin Europe[J]. Journal of Social Sciences, 2019(2):29-37.]
[11] 许超,刘胜湘.特朗普政府反恐预警机制改革论析[J].国际安全研究,2019,37(2):91-113,158-159.[Xu Chao, Liu Shengxiang. An analysis of the reform on counter-terrorism early-warning mechanism under Trump Administration[J]. Journal of International Security Studies, 2019,37(2):91-113,158-159.]
[12] Siebeneck L K, Medina R M, Yamada I, et al. Spatial and temporal analyses of terrorist incidents in Iraq, 2004-2006[J]. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 2009,32(7):591-610.
[13] LaFree G, Dugan L, Xie M, et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of terrorist attacks by ETA 1970 to 2007[J]. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2012,28(1):7-29.
[14] 王诚聪,刘亚静,刘明月.全球恐怖袭击事件时空演变与态势分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报,2019,21(11):1710-1720.[Wang Chengcong, Liu Yajing, Liu Mingyue. Spatiotemporal evolution and situation analysis of global terrorist attacks[J]. Journal of Geo-information Science, 2019,21(11):1710-1720.]
[15] 陈伟,翟国方,沈志翔,等.1970-2015年中东地区恐怖袭击事件的时空特征分析[J].世界地理研究,2020,29(4):659-668.[Chen Wei, Zhai Guofang, Shen Zhixiang, et al. Analysis of temporal and spatial characteristics of terrorist attacks in the Middle East from 1970 to 2015[J]. World Regional Studies, 2020,29(4):659-668.]
[16] 郝蒙蒙,陈帅,江东,等.中南半岛恐怖袭击事件时空演变特征分析[J].科技导报,2018,36(3):62-69.[Hao Mengmeng, Chen Shuai, Jiang Dong, et al. Analysis on tempo-spatial evolution of terrorist attacks in Indochina Peninsula[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2018,36(3):62-69.]
[17] 申玉坤,骆华松,洪菊花,等.南美洲恐怖袭击事件时空演变研究[J]. 世界地理研究,2021,30(1):12-24.[Shen Yukun, Luo Huasong, Hong Juhua, et al. Study on spatial-temporal evolution of terrorist attacks in South America[J]. World Regional Studies, 2021,30(1):12-24.]
[18] 柴瑞瑞,刘德海,陈静锋.恐怖袭击事件的时空差异特征分析及内生性VAR模型[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(S1):281-288.[Chai Ruirui, Liu Dehai, Chen Jingfeng. Spatial-temporal difference analysis of terrorist attacks and endogeneity based on VAR model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016,24(S1):281-288.]
[19] 蒲俜.试析美国"9·11" 恐怖袭击事件的根源及其影响[J].教学与研究,2001(10):41-43.[Pu Ping. Analysis of the causes and effects of the "9·11" terrorist attacks in the United States[J]. Teaching and Research, 2001(10):41-43.]
[20] 阿地力江·阿不来提,古丽阿扎提·吐尔逊.基于统计分析的"东突" 恐怖主义犯罪原因研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2016,32(4):7-12.[Adilijiang Abelti, Guriazati Turson. The causes of terrorist crimesby"East Turkistan"based on statistical analysis[J]. Journal of People's Public Security University of China (Social Sciences Edition), 2016,32(4):7-12.]
[21] Gordon T J, Sharan Y, Florescu E. Potential measures for the pre-detection of terrorism[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017,123:1-16.
[22] 王吉美.从地缘政治视角看美国边界安全的空间特征与政策变化——兼论对中国边界安全的启示[J].人文地理,2011,26(3):19-23, 105.[Wang Jimei. U.S. border security:Spatial feature, policy change and implication for China:From the perspective of geopolitics[J]. Human Geography, 2011,26(3):19-23,105.]
[23] 安宁,朱竑."东突暴恐" 事件的批判地缘政治分析[J].地理学报, 2015,70(10):1650-1663.[An Ning, Zhu Hong. A critical geopolitical analysis of"East Turkistan violence and terrorism"activities in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015,70(10):1650-1663.]
[24] Stewart M G, Mueller J. Cost-benefit analysis of airport security:Are airports too safe?[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2014(35):19-28.
[25] 杨新贺,亐道远.铁路安全恐怖风险防范研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(S1):145-149.[Yang Xinhe, Qu Daoyuan. Research on prevention of railway safety and terrorist risks[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019,29(S1):145-149.]
[26] Song G, Khan F, Yang M. Probabilistic assessment of integrated safety and security related abnormal events:A case of chemical plants[J]. Safety Science, 2019,113:115-125.
[27] Lilliestam J. Vulnerability to terrorist attacks in European electricity decarbonisation scenarios:Comparing renewable electricity imports to gas imports[J]. Energy Policy, 2014,66:234-248.
[28] 梁立宝.恐怖信息网络传播的刑法规制及其完善[J].法学论坛, 2019,34(1):154-160.[Liang Libao. Criminal regulation of transmission of terrorism information and its perfection[J]. Legal Forum, 2019,34(1):154-160.]
[29] Stewart M G, Mueller J. Responsible policy analysis in aviation security with an evaluation of PreCheck[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2015,48:13-22.
[30] Masse T, O'Neil S, Rollins J. The Department of Homeland Security's Risk Assessment Methodology:Evolution, Issues, and Options for Congress[R]. Library of Congress Washington DC Congressional Research Service, 2007.
[31] Institute for Economics & Peace. Global Terrorism Index 2016[R]. Measuring and Understanding the Impact of Terrorism, 2016.
[32] Zhang X, Jin M, Fu J, et al. On the risk assessment of terrorist attacks coupled with multi-source factors[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo Information, 2018,7(9):354.
[33] 刘子义,蔡中祥,刘宏建,等.恐怖主义研究热点与前沿可视化分析[J].世界地理研究,2016,25(6):28-37.[Liu Ziyi, Cai Zhongxiang, Liu Hongjian, et al. Visual analysis of hotspots and research fronts of terrorism[J]. World Regional Studies, 2016,25(6):28-37.]
[34] 韩增林,王雪,彭飞,等.基于恐袭数据的"一带一路" 沿线国家安全态势及时空演变分析[J].地理科学,2019,39(7):1037-1044.[Han Zenglin, Wang Xue, Peng Fei, et al. Security situation and spatiotemporal evolution along Belt and Road based on terrorist attack data[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2019,39(7):1037-1044.]
[35] 周松青.全球恐怖主义数据库及对中国反恐数据库建设的启示[J].情报杂志,2016,35(9):6-11.[Zhou Songqing. Global terrorism database and its enlightenment to anti-terrorism database construction in China[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016,35(9):6-11.]
[36] 李勇男,梅建明,秦广军.反恐情报分析中的数据预处理研究[J].情报科学,2017,35(11):103-107,113.[Li Yongnan, Mei Jianming, Qin Guangjun. Research on data preprocessing in the field of counter terrorism intelligence analysis[J]. Information Science, 2017,35(11):103-107,113.]

基金

中国博士后科学基金项目(2018M641458);国家自然科学基金项目(41701118,41801160);华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学重点实验室项目(2020ZB12);福建省软科学项目(2017R0051)

PDF(35834 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/