基于关系视角的企业直接投资区位选择——过程与机理

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.02.018

摘要
图/表
参考文献(0)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2104 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要企业直接投资区位选择是经济地理学的经典议题。目前直接将区位条件与关系网络衔接起来分析企业直接投资区位选择过程的研究较为少见。本文基于关系视角和中国情境，构建了关系连通、区位耦合、博弈谈判三位一体的模型，提出了一种对企业直接投资区位选择过程化的理解方法。文章以案例研究方法，对企业家赴甘肃省和浙江省开发区投资考察过程进行了参与式观察与访谈。研究发现，企业直接投资区位选择遵循关系连通—区位耦合—博弈谈判的过程。第一，企业与投资地关系连通是企业到当地投资的前提，而结构洞有利于企业与投资地关系形成。第二，企业与投资地区位耦合是企业投资区位选择的必经过程。第三，企业与投资地政府博弈谈判是企业投资的重要过程，且必须达成两厢情愿企业才可能在当地投资。在中国情境中，本文的理论模型具有现实代表性。本文的创新之处是结合中国情境，运用关系视角，对企业投资区位选择过程进行了理论重构。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	俞国军
	贺灿飞
	朱华友

关键词 ：投资, 区位, 关系, 产业转移, 招商引资

Abstract：The paper analyses the process of location choices of direct investment (LCDI). Existing literature mainly focuses on the determinants of location choices, but rarely unfolds the dynamic process of location choices. There is no doubt that LCDI is a dynamic process, rather than an instant accomplishment. Based on the relational perspective, this paper constructs a dynamic process model of LCDI, including three pillar:that is, relational connection, location coupling and interactive game. This paper reveals that LCDI follows the complex and dynamic process of relational connection, location coupling and interactive game. First, the relational connection between the enterprises and the destination of investment is a prerequisite for the enterprises to invest, and the structural hole is conducive to the formation of the relationship between the enterprises and the destination of investment. Second, the coupling of enterprises and the location factors is a necessary process of LCDI. Third, the interactive game between enterprises and the local government is an important process of LCDI, and the two sides must reach a consensus.

Key words： investment location relation industrial transfer investment attraction

收稿日期: 2021-04-01

PACS:

F424.2

基金资助:国家自然科学基金重点项目（41731278）

通讯作者: 贺灿飞（1972—），男，江西永新人，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要研究方向为经济地理、产业与区域经济。E-mail:hecanfei@urban.pku.edu.cn。 E-mail: hecanfei@urban.pku.edu.cn。

作者简介: 俞国军（1986—），男，浙江杭州人，博士，主要研究方向为产业与区域发展、产业集群。E-mail:ygj@pku.edu.cn。

引用本文:

俞国军, 贺灿飞, 朱华友. 基于关系视角的企业直接投资区位选择——过程与机理[J]. 人文地理, 2022, 37(2): 150-157. YU Guo-jun, HE Can-fei, ZHU Hua-you. THE LOCATIONAL CHOICE OF DIRECT INVESTMENT FROM THE RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVE:PROCESS AND MECHANISM. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 37(2): 150-157.

链接本文:

http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.02.018 或 http://rwdl.xisu.edu.cn/CN/Y2022/V37/I2/150

[1]	李国平.产业转移与中国区域空间优化[M].北京:科学出版社, 2016:100-131.[Li Guoping. Industrial Transfer and Optimization of Regional Spatial Structure in China[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2016:100-131.]
[2]	刘作丽,贺灿飞.在华外商直接投资区位研究评述[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(6):952- 961.[Liu Zuoli, He Canfei. A literature review on FDI location[J]. Progress in Geography, 2009,28(6):952-961.]
[3]	蒋为,李行云,宋易珈.中国企业对外直接投资快速扩张的新解释——基于路径、社群与邻伴的视角[J].中国工业经济,2019(3):62- 80.[Jiang Wei, Li Xingyun, Song Yijia. The new explaination on the speedy expansion of Chinese enterprises' OFDI:Based on the perspective of path, community and neighboring effect[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(3):62-80.]
[4]	Gao G Y, Wang D T, Che Y. Impact of historical conflict on FDI location and performance:Japanese investment in China[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2018,49(8):1060-1080.
[5]	周政可,梁育填,周克杨.基于关系视角的中国对外直接投资研究进展与展望[J].热带地理,2019,39(6):942-953.[Zhou Zhengke, Liang Yutian, Zhou Keyang. Review of Chinese foreign direct investment from a relationship perspective[J]. Tropical Geography, 2019, 39(6):942-953.]
[6]	贺灿飞,郭琪,邹沛思.基于关系视角的中国对外直接投资区位[J]. 世界地理研究,2013,22(4):1- 12.[He Canfei, Guo Qi, Zou Peisi. Spatial distribution of China's foreign direct investment:A perspective of relationship (guanxi) between China and its host countries[J]. World Regional Studies, 2013,22(4):1-12.]
[7]	梁育填,周政可,刘逸.东南亚华人华侨网络与中国企业海外投资的区位选择关系研究[J].地理学报,2018,73(8):1449-1461.[Liang Yutian, Zhou Zhengke, Liu Yi. Relationship between the location choices of Chinese outbound enterprises and overseas Chinese networks:The case study of Southeast Asia[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(8):1449-1461.]
[8]	李小建.公司地理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:39.[Li Xiaojian. Geography of Firms[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2002:39.]
[9]	Hsing Y. Blood, thicker than water:Interpersonal relations and Taiwanese investment in Southern China[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1996,28(12):2241-2261.
[10]	李小建.香港对大陆工业投资的区位选择[J].中州学刊,1997(4):22-25.[Li Xiaojian. Location choice of Hong Kong's industrial investment in China[J]. Academic Journal of Zhongzhou, 1997(4):22- 25.]
[11]	Qiu Y. Personal networks, institutional involvement, and foreign direct investment flows into China's interior[J]. Economic Geography, 2005,81(3):261-281.
[12]	李小建,罗庆.经济地理学的关系转向评述[J].世界地理研究,2007, 16(4):19-27.[Li Xiaojian, Luo Qing. A review on relational turn in economic geography[J]. World Regional Studies, 2007,16(4):19- 27.]
[13]	刘逸.关系经济地理的研究脉络与中国实践理论创新[J].地理研究,2020,39(5):1005-1017.[Liu Yi. Progress of relational economic geography:Whether theorizing China's experiences[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(5):1005-1017.]
[14]	Boggs J S, Rantisi N M. The 'relational turn' in economic geography[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2003,3(2):109-116.
[15]	Bathelt H, Glückler J. Toward a relational economic geography[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2003,3(2):117-144.
[16]	Yeung H W. Rethinking relational economic geography[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2005,30(1):37-51.
[17]	Grabher G. Rediscovering the social in the economics of interfirm relations[M]//Grabher G. The Embedded Firm:On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. London:Routledge, 1993:1-31.
[18]	Cresswell T. Geographic Thought:A Critical Introduction[M]. West Sussex:Wiley-Blackwell, 2013:218-238.
[19]	Sayer A. The dialectic of culture and culture and economy[M]//Lee R, Wills J. Geographies of Economies. London, New York, Sydney, Auckland:Arnold, 1997:16-26.
[20]	边燕杰.关系社会学及其学科地位[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2010,30(3):1-6,48.[Bian Yanjie. Relational sociology and its disciplinary status[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2010,30(3):1-6,48.]
[21]	Burt R. Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M]. Cambridge:Harvard University Press, 1992:8-49.
[22]	翟学伟.是"关系",还是社会资本[J].社会,2009,29(1):109-121, 226.[Zhai Xuewei. Guanxi or social capital[J]. Society, 2009,29(1):109-121,226.]
[23]	朱向东.中国光伏制造业空间演化及出口动态研究[D].北京:北京大学,2019:20.[Zhu Xiangdong. The Spatial and Export Evolution of Chinese Photovoltaic Manufacturing[D]. Beijing:Peking University, 2019:20.]
[24]	Rockwell S. A resource- based framework for strategically managing identity[J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2019,32(1):80-102.
[25]	Knoben J. The geographic distance of relocation search:An extended resource-based perspective[J]. Economic Geography, 2011,87(4):371- 392.
[26]	Pfeffer J R, Salancik G. The External Control of Organizations:A Resource Dependence Perspective[M]. New York:Harper & Row, 1978:xi-xxix.
[27]	Hannan M, Freeman J. Organizational Ecology[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1989:3-27.
[28]	Håkansson H, Johanson J. The network as a governance structure:Interfirm cooperation beyond markets and hierarchies[M]//Grahher G. The Embedded Firm:On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks. London and New York:Routledge, 1993:35-51.
[29]	Murdoch J. Post- Structuralist Geography:A Guide to Relational Space[M]. London:Sage, 2006:20.
[30]	翟学伟.从社会资本向"关系"的转化——中国中小企业成长的个案研究[J].开放时代,2009(6):60- 69.[Zhai Xuewei. From social capital to guanxi:The case study of Chinese medium- sized and small enterprises[J]. Open Times, 2009(6):60-69.]
[31]	Yin R. Case Study Research Design and Methods (Fourth Edition)[M]. London:Sage, 2009:53-54.
[32]	DeWalt K, DeWalt B. Participant Observation:A Guide for Fieldworkers (Second Edition)[M]. New York:Altamira Press, 2011:19- 40.