社会空间视角下大遗址区乡村地域功能结构研究&mdash;&mdash;以关中5处大遗址区为例

吴冲; 余压芳; 张建新

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.009

PDF(45823 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 75-86. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.009

社会

社会空间视角下大遗址区乡村地域功能结构研究——以关中5处大遗址区为例

吴冲^1,2, 余压芳^1,2, 张建新³

作者信息 +

THE RURAL TERRITORIAL FUNCTION OF THE GREAT RELICS AREA FROM THE SOCIAL SPACE PERSPECTIVE:A CASE STUDY OF FIVE GREAT RELICS AREAS IN GUANZHONG

WU Chong^1,2, YU Ya-fang^1,2, ZHANG Jian-xin³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

新时期国家大力推进遗产“活化”与遗产旅游，大遗址保护与利用过程既影响区域空间功能重构又涉及深刻的社会关系调整。研究选取大遗址数量多、分布密集的关中地区中5处大遗址区为案例，从社会与空间维度构建指标体系，采取因子生态分析划定社会区，以“社会—空间”综合交互视角解析乡村地域功能结构特征。研究发现大遗址区乡村社会空间存在文保限制因子、旅游带动因子、工业与商贸因子等8个主因子，各主因子空间分布体现典型的分异特征，并呈现出6种功能属性的片区。其地域功能结构特征表现为：①保护区划产生圈层式地域功能格局，②高附加值功能空间沿交通线嵌入，③核心与边缘区功能构成与遗址影响力及城乡区位相关，④各功能片区并未形成产业联动。在此基础上，进一步剖析了大遗址区乡村非均衡发展成因及优化路径。

Abstract

Under the background of Cultural Confidence, China has promoted heritage activation and heritage tourism. The protection and utilization of Great Relics not only affects the reconstruction of regional spatial functions, but also involves the profound adjustment of social relations in rural areas. This study takes five Great Relics areas in Guanzhong as an example, which has a large number of Great Relics and dense distribution. In order to promote the scientific transformation of rural areas around Great Relics, we have set up the research framework of rural territorial function from the perspective of social space. Drawing on the theory of space production, we have constructed a dialectical analysis framework that includes social and spatial dimensions.This study constructs the index system from the social and the spatial dimensions. Then this paper analyzes the causes of functional structure of rural area around Great relics with socio-spatial dialectics method. This research finds that there are eight main factors of social space in rural areas around the Great Relics, and the spatial distribution of each main factor shows typical differentiation characteristics.

导出引用

吴冲, 余压芳, 张建新. 社会空间视角下大遗址区乡村地域功能结构研究——以关中5处大遗址区为例[J]. 人文地理. 2022, 37(4): 75-86 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.009

WU Chong, YU Ya-fang, ZHANG Jian-xin. THE RURAL TERRITORIAL FUNCTION OF THE GREAT RELICS AREA FROM THE SOCIAL SPACE PERSPECTIVE:A CASE STUDY OF FIVE GREAT RELICS AREAS IN GUANZHONG[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2022, 37(4): 75-86 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.009

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 习近平.习近平谈世界遗产[N].人民日报(海外版),2019-06-06(9). [Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping talks about world heritage[N]. People's Daily (Overseas Edition), 2019-06-06(9).]
[2] 中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.关于在城乡建设中加强历史文化保护传承的意见[N].人民日报,2021-09-04(1). [General Office of the CPC Central Committee, General Office of the State Council. Opinions on strengthening the protection and inheritance of history and culture in urban and rural construction[N]. People's Daily, 2021- 09-04(1).]
[3] 孟宪民.温故求新：促进大遗址保护的科学发展——大遗址保护思路再探[J].东南文化,2009(3):7-17. [Meng Xianmin. Reviewing the past and seeking for the new: Promoting the scientific development of the protection of the great ruins[J]. Southeast Culture, 2009(3):7-17.]
[4] 杨兴柱,杨周,朱跃.世界遗产地乡村聚落功能转型与空间重构——以汤口、寨西和山岔为例[J].地理研究,2020,39(10):2214- 2232. [Yang Xingzhu, Yang Zhou, Zhu Yue. Rural settlements functional transformation and spatial restructuring in world heritage sites: Take Tangkou, Zhaixi and Shancha as examples[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(10):2214-2232.]
[5] Vladislavas K. Specific characteristics of real estate development in Cultural Heritage areas[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017,208:69-75.
[6] Amin H M T M. The impact of heritage decline on urban social life [J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2018,55:34-47.
[7] 吴冲,朱海霞,彭邦文.资本循环视角下大遗址区乡村社会空间生产机制研究——以秦始皇陵为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2020,39(5): 751- 765. [Wu Chong, Zhu Haixia, Peng Bangwen. Rural social space production mechanism in a Great Relics Area from the perspective of capital circulation theory of Harvey: A case of Qin Shihuang Mausoleum[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(5):751-765.]
[8] Kovacs J F, Galvin K J, Shipley R. Assessing the success of heritage conservation districts: Insights from Ontario, Canada[J]. Cities, 2015,45:123-132.
[9] 余洁,潘秋玲,梁学成.我国大遗址保护区控制农地流转的法律及制度研究[J].经济地理,2007,27(4):629-633. [Yu Jie, Pan Qiuling, Liang Xuecheng. A study of legislation and institutions on the restrictions to the rural land transference in large archaeological sites [J]. Economic Geography, 2007,27(4):629-633.]
[10] 王维艳.农业文化遗产旅游利用与保护补偿机制研究——基于《物权法》之地役权制度视角[J].旅游学刊,2017,32(12):101-110. [Wang Weiyan. Research on compensation mechanism of tourism utilization and protection in agricultural cultural heritage: Based on easement in property law[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2017,32(12):101- 110.]
[11] Wang X, Aoki N. Paradox between neoliberal urban redevelopment, heritage conservation, and community needs: Case study of a historic neighbourhood in Tianjin, China[J]. Cities, 2018,85:156- 169.
[12] 张立新,杨新军,陈佳,等.大遗址区人地系统脆弱性评价及影响机制：以汉长安城大遗址区为例[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1848- 1859. [Zhang Lixin, Yang Xinjun, Chen Jia, et al. Vulnerability assessment and mechanism of human-land systems in the Han Dynasty Chang'an Large Relic area[J]. Resources Science, 2015,37(9): 1848-1859.]
[13] Fatori S, Egberts L. Realising the potential of cultural heritage to achieve climate change actions in the Netherlands[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,274:1-9.
[14] 乔伟峰,戈大专,高金龙,等.江苏省乡村地域功能与振兴路径选择研究[J]. 地理研究,2019,38(3):522- 534. [Qiao Weifeng, Ge Dazhuan, Gao Jinlong, et al. Detecting the pathways towards rural vitalization from the perspective of territorial functions in Jiangsu province[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(3):522-534.]
[15] 帕克,伯吉斯,麦肯齐.城市社会学——芝加哥学派城市研究文集[M].宋俊岭,译.北京:华夏出版社,1997:49-62. [Park R, Burgess E, Mckenzie, R. Urban Sociology： Collection of Chicago School Urban Studies[M]. Song Junling, trans. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 1997:49-62.]
[16] Shevky E, Williams M. The Social Areas of Los Angeles[M]. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1949:15-28.
[17] Massey D S. Reflections on the dimensions of segregation[J]. Social Forces, 2012,91(1):39-43.
[18] 许学强,胡华颖,叶嘉安.广州市社会空间结构的因子生态分析[J]. 地理学报,1989,44(4):385-399. [Xu Xueqiang, Hu Huaying, Ye Jiaan. A factorial ecological study of social spatial structure in Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1989,44(4):385-399.]
[19] 尹保红.西方马克思主义空间理论建构及其当代价值[M].北京:光明日报出版社,2016:18- 19. [Yin Baohong. The Construction of Western Marxist Space Theory and Its Contemporary Value[M]. Beijing: Guangming Daily Press, 2016:18-19.]
[20] 大卫·哈维.跟大卫哈维读《资本论》 (第一卷)[M].刘英,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2014:93-117. [Harvey D. A Companion to Marx's Capital[M]. Liu Ying, trans. Shanghai: Shanghai Translation Publishing House, 2014:93-117.]
[21] 孙九霞,苏静.旅游影响下传统社区空间变迁的理论探讨：基于空间生产理论的反思[J].旅游学刊,2014,29(5):78-86. [Sun Jiuxia, Su Jing. Traditional community space change under the influence of tourism: A reflective study based on space production theory. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(5):78-86. ]
[22] 方远平,易颖,毕斗斗.传承与嬗变：广州市小洲村的空间转换[J]. 地理研究,2018,37(11):2318- 2330. [Fang Yuanping, Yi Ying, Bi Doudou. Inheritance and transmutation: Space transformation of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou[J]. Geographical Research, 2018, 37(11):2318-2330.]
[23] 张京祥,胡毅,孙东琪.空间生产视角下的城中村物质空间与社会变迁——南京市江东村的实证研究[J]. 人文地理,2014,29(2):1-6. [Zhang Jingxiang, Hu Yi, Sun Dongqi. The physical space change and social variation in urbanvillage from the perspective of Space Production: A case study of Jiangdong village in Nanjing[J]. Human Geography, 2014,29(2):1-6. ]
[24] 郭文,王丽.文化遗产旅游地的空间生产与认同研究：以无锡惠山古镇为例[J].地理科学,2015,35(6):708-716. [Guo Wen, Wang Li. The production of space and identity in cultural heritage tourism destination: A case study of Huishan Ancient Town in Wuxi, China [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015,35(6):708-716. ]
[25] 赵荣.陕西省大遗址保护新理念的探索与实践[J].考古与文物, 2009(2):3-7,70. [Zhao Rong. Exploration and practice of the new concept of the protection of the Great Relics in Shaanxi province [J]. Archaeology and Cultural Relics, 2009(2):3-7,70. ]
[26] 戈大专,陆玉麒.面向国土空间规划的乡村空间治理机制与路径[J].地理学报,2021,76(6):1422-1437. [Ge Dazhuan, Lu Yuqi. Rural spatial governance for territorial spatial planning in China: Mechanisms and path[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021,76(6):1422- 1437.]