基于社交网络的个人.com社区行动者行为空间及其未来

张一诺; 路紫; 张宇辰; 冯富晶

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.010

PDF(5701 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4) : 87-94. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.010

社会

基于社交网络的个人.com社区行动者行为空间及其未来

张一诺¹, 路紫¹, 张宇辰², 冯富晶¹

作者信息 +

THE BEHAVIOR SPACE OF ACTORS IN PERSONAL COMMUNITY BASED ON SOCIAL NETWORK AND ITS FUTURE

ZHANG Yi-nuo¹, LU Zi¹, ZHANG Yu-chen², FENG Fu-jing¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

社交网络应用催生了新一代互联网空间重新分配。本文旨在从一些细微迹象中透视个人.com社区行动者行为空间的形成及其组织形式并感知其未来变化趋势。研究认为：社交网络提供的精益性和异步性信息交互引领个人.com社区行动者行为空间形成、更新和融汇，这是一个与现实地理社区相联系并向虚拟社区理性跳跃和空间系统重构的过程；个人.com社区行动者行为空间源于自我呈现并由受众“第二度可见”所决定，它是由若干特殊空间形式组织起来的；社交网络赋予草民行动者个人权力从而使其成为未来行为空间再塑造的决定性力量。基此提出社交网络背景下个人.com社区行动者行为空间存续的三个基本观点：信息方式转变、生活需求新维度产生和网络价值等效兑现。

Abstract

A new media community is emerging in the context of social networks. The information dissemination based on networked individuals activates the user interaction relationship, which is related to each other in daily life and forms a common cultural sustaining force between several individuals or communities, resulting in a community of social life with close interaction. This community of networked individuals is called personal community. Based on the investigation of social network usage and social network services, this paper explores the formation and spatial organization of the behavior space in personal community from some subtle signs according to the actor scenario-analysis method. According to the thinking method of future geography, this paper also presents and imagines the future change of the behavior space of personal community. Based on this, it reveals the power of the future and presents the main clues for the building of its new order. It is concluded that: 1) The lean and asynchronous information interaction provided by social networks leads the formation, updating and integration of the backspace of personal communities, which is a process of connecting with the real geographic community and making a rational leap to the virtual community and reconstructing its spatial system. 2) The behavior space of actors in personal community originates from self-presentation and is determined by the audience, which exists in the form of "second degree visibility" in most cases. 3) Personal social network space is different from the information and communication space in the past.

导出引用

张一诺, 路紫, 张宇辰, 冯富晶. 基于社交网络的个人.com社区行动者行为空间及其未来[J]. 人文地理. 2022, 37(4): 87-94 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.010

ZHANG Yi-nuo, LU Zi, ZHANG Yu-chen, FENG Fu-jing. THE BEHAVIOR SPACE OF ACTORS IN PERSONAL COMMUNITY BASED ON SOCIAL NETWORK AND ITS FUTURE[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2022, 37(4): 87-94 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2022.04.010

中图分类号： K901.2

参考文献

[1] 路紫,张秋娈.引领与思辨— 《信息时代社会经济空间组织的变革》评介[J].地理学报,2019,74(5):1058. [Lu Zi, Zhang Qiuluan. Leading and thinking: A review of "The Transformation of Socio- economic Spatial Organization in the Information Age"[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(5):1058.]
[2] Hampton K N. Persistent and pervasive community: New communication technologies and the future of community[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2016,60(1):101-124.
[3] Morley D. The geography of television: Ethnography, communications, and community[M]//James H, Lawrence G, Ellen W. The Audience and Its Landscape. London: Routledge, 2018:317-342.
[4] 刘一鸣,吴磊,李贵才.空间理论的图景拓展——基于哈格斯特朗与布迪厄的理论互构研究[J].人文地理,2019,34(6):1-9. [Liu Yiming, Wu Lei, Li Guicai. The outlook of space theory: Based on the mutual- construction of hägerstrand and bourdieu's theory[J]. Human Geography, 2019,34(6):1-9.]
[5] Lü G, Yuan L, Yu Z. Information geography: A new fulcrum of geographic ternary world[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2021,65(2): 383-386.
[6] Reda K, Tantipathananandh C, Johnson A, et al. Visualizing the evolution of community structures in dynamic social networks[J]. Computer Graphics Forum, 2011,30(3):1061-1070.
[7] Dragos S. Being surprised and surprising ourselves: A geography of personal and social change[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2020, 44(1):99-118.
[8] Glückler J, Panitz R. Unleashing the potential of relational research: A meta-analysis of network studies in human geography[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2021,45(6):1531-1557.
[9] 黄鑫楠,孙斌栋,张婷麟.地理距离对互联网社会中网络信息传播的影响[J].地理学报,2020,75(4):722-735. [Huang Xinnan, Sun Bindong, Zhang Tinglin. The influence of geographical distance on the dissemination of internet information in the internet society[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(4):722-735.]
[10] Hayat T, Dimitrova D, Wellman B. The differential impact of network connectedness and size on researchers' productivity and influence[J]. Information, Communication & Society, 2020,23(5):701- 718.
[11] Corradini C. The geography of innovation as reflected by social media[J]. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 2021,53(2):227-229.
[12] Mehta V. The new proxemics: COVID-19, social distancing, and sociable space[J]. Journal of Urban Design, 2020,25(6):669-674.
[13] Thulin E, Vilhelmson B. Bringing the background to the fore: Timegeography and the study of mobile ICTs in everyday life[M]//Kajsa E. Time Geography in the Global Context. London: Routledge, 2018:96-112.
[14] O'Sullivan D, Bergmann L, Thatcher J E. Spatiality, maps, and mathematics in critical human geography: Toward a repetition with difference[J]. The Professional Geographer, 2018,70(1):129-139.
[15] Marttunen M, Lienert J, Belton V. Structuring problems for multicriteria decision analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 263(1):1-17.
[16] Patel K. Impact of advancements in technological aids in communication media in bringing about social reformation[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2018,1(1):1-5.
[17] Christmann G B, Ibert O, Jessen J, et al. Innovations in spatial planning as a social process-phases, actors, conflicts[J]. European Planning Studies, 2020,28(3):496-520.
[18] Far H, Raoof M. Analysis of personal space requirements of the political geography approach (Case study: Citizens of Kermanshah) [J]. Research Political Geography Quarterly, 2020,5(2):1-15.
[19] Thrift N. Space: The fundamental stuff of geography[J]. Key Concepts in Geography, 2003,2(1):95-107.
[20] Asgari H, Jin X, Rojas M B. Time geography of daily activities: A closer look into telecommute impacts[J]. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2019,16(3):99-107.
[21] Campbell C J. Space, place and scale: Human geography and spatial history in past and present[J]. Past and Present, 2018,239(1):23- 45.
[22] Klapka P, Halás M. Conceptualising patterns of spatial flows: Five decades of advances in the definition and use of functional regions [J]. Moravian Geographical Reports, 2016,24(2):2-11.
[23] Zuo Y, Ma Y, Zhang M, et al. The impact of sharing physical activity experience on social network sites on residents' social connectedness: A cross-sectional survey during COVID-19 social quarantine [J]. Globalization and Health, 2021,17(1):1-12.
[24] Iranmanesh A, Alpar A R. Reading the changing dynamic of urban social distances during the COVID-19 pandemic via Twitter[J]. European Societies, 2021,23(sup1):872-886.
[25] Schoenberger E, Walker R A. Beyond exchange and agglomeration: Resource flows and city environments as wellsprings of urban growth[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2016,17(5):935-958.
[26] Lang R E, Sanchez T W, Oner A C. Beyond edge city: Office geography in the new metropolis[J]. Urban Geography, 2009,30(7):726- 755.
[27] Kellerman A. Image spaces and the geography of Internet screenspace[J]. GeoJournal, 2016,81(4):503-517.
[28] 周葆华,钟媛“ . 春天的花开秋天的风”：社交媒体、集体悼念与延展性情感空间——以李文亮微博评论（2020—2021）为例的计算传播分析[J]. 国际新闻界,2021,43(3):79- 106. [Zhou Baohua, Zhong Yuan. Social media, collective mourning and extended affective space: A computational communication analysis of Li Wenliang's Weibo comments(2020—2021)[J]. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 2021,43(3):79-106.]
[29] Horng S M, Wu C L. How behaviors on social network sites and online social capital influence social commerce intentions[J]. Information & Management, 2020,57(2):103-116.
[30] Jiao J, Holmes M, Griffin G P. Revisiting image of the city in cyberspace: Analysis of spatial Twitter messages during a special event [J]. Journal of Urban Technology, 2018,25(3):65-82.
[31] 吴晓,王凌瑾,宁昱西,等.从社交网络到地理网络——基于南京市高校新浪微博用户的分析[J].经济地理,2020,40(4):83-95. [Wu Xiao, Wang Lingjin, Ning Yuxi, et al. From social network to geographical network: A case study of college Sina Weibo users in Nanjing[J]. Economic Geography, 2020,40(4):83-95.]
[32] Kurniawan J H, Kundurpi A. Integrating human geography into futures studies: Reconstructing and reimagining the future of space [J]. Geography Compass, 2019,13(6):1-12.
[33] 路紫,张秋娈,张佳卿,等.SNS社区空间交流特征与教育社会资源理论的地理解释——以百度贴吧的“高考吧” 为例[J].世界地理研究,2017,26(1):124- 133. [Lu Zi, Zhang Qiuluan, Zhang Jiaqing, et al. The geographical interpretation of space communication characteristics in SNS community by education social resources theoryTaking "college entrance examination" of Baidu Post Bar as an example[J]. World Regional Studies, 2017,26(1):124-133.]
[34] Country B, Wright S, Suchet-Pearson S, et al. Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2015,40(4):1-13.
[35] Gesink D, Salway T, Kimura L, et al. The social geography of partner selection in Toronto, Canada: A qualitative description of "convection mixing"[J]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2020,49(5):1839- 1851.
[36] Müller M, Schurr C. Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross- fertilisations[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2016,41(3):217-229.
[37] Simpson P. Sonic affects and the production of space: 'Music by handle' and the politics of street music in Victorian London[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2017,24(1):89-109.
[38] Tuan Y F. Humanistic geography[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1976,66(2):266-276.
[39] Emmanuel Eveno. Comment l' intelligence vnt aux villes? [J]. Urbanisme, 2014,21(10):26-27.
[40] 成婷婷,刘云刚.信息权力及其地理学研究展望[J].人文地理,2019, 34(1):28- 36. [Cheng Tingting, Liu Yungang. Information power and its geographical research prospects[J]. Human Geography, 2019,34(1):28-36.]
[41] James A C. Don't stand so close to me: Public spaces, behavioral geography, and COVID-19[J]. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2020, 10(2):187-190.
[42] Hopkins D A. The space between us: Social geography and politics [J]. Perspectives on Politics, 2019,17(2):566-568.
[43] Aydin C, Woge M G, Verbeek P P. Technological environmentality: Conceptualizing technology as a mediating milieu[J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2019,32(2):321-338.
[44] Nye Jr J S. Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace[J]. International Security, 2017,41(3):44-71.
[45] Robert K C, Lin H, Sulmeyer M. Rules of engagement for cyberspace operations: A view from the USA[J]. Journal of Cybersecurity, 2017,3(1):2656-2671.
[46] Gretzel U, Stankov U. ICTs and well-being: Challenges and opportunities for tourism[J]. Information Technology & Tourism, 2021,23(1):1-4.
[47] Wellman B, Gulia M. Net-surfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities[M]//Wellman B. Networks in the Global Village. New York: Routledge, 2018:331-366.
[48] Nedjar-Guerre A. Quelles influences des dispositifs numériques sur l'engagement environnemental? Avant-propos[J]. Netcom, 2021,35(1):1-6.