越南难侨的身份协商与国家认同&mdash;&mdash;基于珠海市原红旗华侨农场的案例

李锦昊; 陈浩然; 马凌

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.01.007

PDF(8410 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1) : 56-63. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.01.007

文化

越南难侨的身份协商与国家认同——基于珠海市原红旗华侨农场的案例

李锦昊^1,2, 陈浩然³, 马凌^1,2,4

作者信息 +

IDENTITY NEGOTIATION AND NATIONAL IDENTITY OF RETURNED VIETNAMESE CHINESE: A CASE STUDY OF THE FORMER HONGQI FARM IN ZHUHAI

LI Jin-hao^1,2, CHEN Hao-ran³, MA Ling^1,2,4

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

20世纪中期，东南亚多国先后出现排华潮，大量华人华侨以“难侨”身份被迫返回祖国。难侨独特的生命历程和空间实践，使其展演出不同的身份协商过程和国家认同变迁。本文以珠海市原红旗华侨农场的越南难侨为研究对象，采用定性研究方法，剖析其在归国前后不同时期和不同空间的各方互动中身份协商和国家认同的演变过程。研究指出：越南难侨在群体互动、政府政策以及社会支持的影响下，在归国之前、归国初期和归国后期有着明显的身份认同变化；在这一过程中，其对祖国（中国）的国家认同不断加强。研究通过时空耦合视角为移民的身份协商和国家认同研究提供新的分析框架，亦从侧面反映出中国近半个世纪以来在难民治理和侨务政策方面所取得的成效。

Abstract

In the middle of the 20^th century, a wave of violence against Chinese emerged in Southeast Asian countries, and a large number of overseas Chinese were forced to return to China as returned overseas Chinese (Nanqiao). It should be pointed out that Nanqiao is a binary system, not only returned overseas Chinese but also refugees. Nanqiao performs different identity negotiation and national identity with their unique life course and space practice. This article takes the returned Vietnamese Chinese (Vietnamese Nanqiao) in the former Hongqi Farm in Zhuhai as the case study, and uses the qualitative research method to explore their change process of identity negotiation and national identity with the interaction of various subject in different spaces. This results shows that the change of space environment promotes the change of identity negotiation among the returned Vietnamese Chinese. This article provides a new analytical framework for the immigrant identity and national identity from the perspective of time-space coupling.

导出引用

李锦昊, 陈浩然, 马凌. 越南难侨的身份协商与国家认同——基于珠海市原红旗华侨农场的案例[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(1): 56-63 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.01.007

LI Jin-hao, CHEN Hao-ran, MA Ling. IDENTITY NEGOTIATION AND NATIONAL IDENTITY OF RETURNED VIETNAMESE CHINESE: A CASE STUDY OF THE FORMER HONGQI FARM IN ZHUHAI[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(1): 56-63 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.01.007

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 杨立冰. 印支难民出逃原因浅析[J]. 八桂侨史,1987,1(2):48-51.[Yang Libing. Analysis on the reasons of Indochina refugees fleeing[J]. History of Bagui Overseas Chinese, 1987,1(2):48-51.]
[2] 孔结群. 难民认同:基于苦难历史记忆、政策及现实利益的想象——以广东省小岭华侨农场越南归侨为例[J]. 华侨华人历史研究,2010,25(1):43-53.[Kong Jiequn. Identity of refugees:A collective imagination based on the shared suffering recollection, policy and practical benefits as seen from the case study on the returned vietnamese Chinese in Xiaoling overseas Chinese farm of Guangdong province[J]. Overseas Chinese History Studies, 2010,25(1):43-53.]
[3] 陈浩然,安宁,朱竑.城市的垂直流动:广州再领域化中的人地关系重构[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(10):1627-1635.[Chen Haoran, An Ning, Zhu Hong. Vertical mobility of city:Reconstruction of humanenvironment system in Guangzhou's reterritorialization[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020,40(10):1627-1635.]
[4] 曹燕,隋福民.明清时期移民经济对会馆、公所兴起及区域市镇化的影响[J]. 人文地理,2007,22(4):124-128.[Cao Yan, Sui Fumin. The effects of immigration economy on emergence of Guildhalls and regional urbanization in the Ming & Qing dynasties[J]. Human Geography, 2007,22(4):124-128.]
[5] 陈秀容. 中国海外移民类型及移民族群特征探讨[J]. 地理研究, 1999,18(1):46-53.[Chen Xiurong. A study on the types and ethnic groups of Chinese overseas immigrants[J] Geographical Research, 1999,18(1):46-53.]
[6] 马凌,谢圆圆,袁振杰.新型全球化与流动性背景下知识移民研究:议题与展望[J].地理科学,2021,41(7):1129-1138.[Ma Ling, Xie Yuanyuan, Yuan Zhenjie. A review of intellectual migration research under the background of globalization and mobility:Topics and prospects[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(7):1129-1138.]
[7] Li W, Sadowski-Smith C, Yu W. Return migration and transnationalism:Evidence from highly skilled academic migration[J]. Papers in Applied Geography, 2018,4(3):243-255.
[8] Wang L K. The Benefits of in-betweenness:Return migration of second-generation Chinese American professionals to China[J]. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2016,42(12):1941-1958.
[9] Deshingkar P, Zeitlyn B. South-south migration for domestic work and poverty[J]. Geography Compass, 2015,9(4):169-179.
[10] Botchwey G, Crawford G, Loubere N, et al. South-South Irregular migration:The impacts of China's informal gold rush in Ghana[J]. International Migration, 2019,57(4):310-328.
[11] Franca T, Cairns D. South-South student migration:Socially integrating students from Portuguese-speaking Africa at UNILAB, Brazil[J]. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2020,18(5):578-588.
[12] 黎相宜.国家需求、治理逻辑与绩效——归难侨安置制度与华侨农场政策研究[J].华侨华人历史研究,2017,32(1):50-58.[Li Xiangyi. National demand, governance logic and performance efficiency:The study on the institutional arrangement of returned persecuted overseas Chinese and the policies on overseas Chinese farms[J]. Journal of Overseas Chinese History Studies, 2017,32(1):50-58.]
[13] 胡修雷.从"印尼村"现象看华侨农场归难侨的文化再适应[J].世界民族,2017,40(2):75-82.[Hu Xiulei. The cultural readjusting of returned overseas Chinese in overseas Chinese farms base on the "Yin ni-cun"[J]. Journal of World Peoples Studies, 2017,40(2):75-82.]
[14] 姚俊英.越界:广州H华侨农场越南归侨跨国流动研究[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,31(3):57-62.[Yao Junying. Crossing border:On transnational flow of returned overseas Chinese from Vietnamin H overseas Chinese farm in Guangzhou[J]. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities(Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 2009,31(3):57-62.]
[15] Ho E L. Transnational Identities, Multiculturalism or Assimilation? China's 'refugee-returnees' and generational transitions[J]. Modern Asian Studies, 2015,49(2):525-545.
[16] Ho E L. Caught between two worlds:Mainland Chinese return migration, hukou considerations and the citizenship dilemma[J]. Citizenship Studies, 2011,15(6/7):643-658.
[17] 林琳,李禹辰,肖玲.广东省华侨农场的类型划分与发展思路[J].热带地理,2008,29(2):166-171.[Lin Lin, Li Yuchen, Xiao Ling. Classification and economic development of the overseas Chinese farms in Guangdong province[J]. Tropical Geography, 2008,29(2):166-171.]
[18] 王敏,赵美婷,江荣灏,等.边界与想象社区的建构:以广州归侨聚居区为例[J]. 人文地理,2018,33(1):24-30,123.[Wang Min, Zhao Meiting, Jiang Ronghao, et al. Boundary and the construction of imagined community:A case study of overseas Chinese village community in Guangzhou[J]. Human Geography, 2018,33(1):24-30, 123.]
[19] 刘云刚,周雯婷,黄徐璐,等.全球化背景下在华跨国移民社区的空间生产——广州远景路韩国人聚居区的案例研究[J].地理科学, 2017,37(7):976-986.[Liu Yungang, Zhou Wenting, Huang Xulu, et al. Production of space of South Korean enclave in Yuanjing Road, Guangzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(7):976-986.]
[20] Roh S Y, Chang I Y. Exploring the role of family and school as spaces for 1.5 generation south Korean's adjustment and identity negotiation in New Zealand:A qualitative study[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(12):4408.
[21] Burke P J. Identity change[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly, 2006, 69(1):81-96.
[22] Ethier K A, Deaux K. Negotiating social identity when context change -maintaining identification and responding to threat[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994,67(2):243-251.
[23] 韩丽颖.青少年国家认同的主体基础、发展趋向和教育进路[J].中国青年研究,2021,33(4):38-43.[Han Liying.The main basis, development trend and educational approach of national identity of teenagers[J]. China Youth Study, 2021,33(4):38-43.]
[24] 许纪霖. 国家/国民、国家/民族:国家认同的两个面向[J]. 浙江社会科学,2017,33(6):4-16,155.[Xu Jilin.State/citizen, state/nation:Two aspects of national identity[J]. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 2017, 33(6):4-16,155.]
[25] 肖滨.两种公民身份与国家认同的双元结构[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,63(1):76-83.[Xiao Bin. Two types of citizenship and the dualistic structure of national Identity[J]. Wuhan University Journal(Philosophy & Social Science), 2010,63(1):76-83.]
[26] 肖滨. 公民认同国家的逻辑进路与现实图景——兼答对"匹配论"的若干质疑[J]. 中山大学学报(社会科学版),2011,51(4):160-168.[Xiao Bin. The logical path and realistic picture of citizen's identification with The state——simultaneously answering some doubts of "matching theory"[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-sen University (Social Science Edition), 2011,51(4):160-168.]
[27] 中国侨网. 广东省华侨农场[EB/OL].(2014-04-29)[2021-05-19]. http://www.chinaqw.com/gnqw/2014/04-29/2343.shtml.[China's overseas Chinese website. Overseas Chinese farms in Guangdong province[EB/OL].(2014-04-29)[2021-05-19]. http://www.chinaqw.com/gnqw/2014/04-29/2343.shtml.]
[28] 本尼迪克特·安德森.想象的共同体:民族主义的起源与散布[M]. 吴叡人,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2016:5.[Anderson B, Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism[M]. Wu Ruiren, trans. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2016:5.]
[29] Quinn B. Changing festival places:Insights from Galway[J]. Social & Cultural Geography. 2010,6(2):237-252.
[30] 莫里斯·哈布瓦赫.论集体记忆[M].毕然,郭金华,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2000:334-335.[Halbwachs M. On Collective Memory[M]. Bi Ran, Guo Jinhua, trans. Shanghai:Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2000:334-335.]
[31] 广东政协网. 关于解决我省华侨农场改制遗留问题的建议[EB/OL].(2006-10-14)[2021-06-22].http://www.gdzxb.gov.cn/dptt/dpta/200610/t20061014_65307.htm.[Guangdong CPPCC Network. Suggestions on solving the problems left over from the reform of overseas Chinese farms in Guangdong province.[EB/OL].(2006-10-14)[2021-06-22]. http://www.gdzxb.gov.cn/dptt/dpta/200610/t20061014_65307.htm.]
[32] 国务院侨务办公室. 中华人民共和国归侨侨眷权益保护法实施办法[EB/OL].(2004-07-01)[2021-06-25]. http://www.gqb.gov.cn/node2/node3/node5/node9/userobject7ai1271.html.[Overseas Chinese affairs office of the State Council. Measures of the People's Republic of China for implementing the protection law on the rights and interests of returned overseas Chinese and the family members of overseas Chinese[EB/OL].(2004-07-01)[2021-06-25]. http://www.gqb.gov.cn/node2/node3/node5/node9/userobject7ai1271.html.]
[33] 钱超英. 身份概念与身份意识[J]. 深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2000,17(2):89-94.[Qian Chaoying. On the concept and awareness of identity[J].Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2000,17(2):89-94.]