被拐儿童原生家庭韧性演变过程与风险应对策略&mdash;&mdash;基于社会&mdash;生态系统视角的分析

周俊俊; 李钢; 洪丹丹; 徐锋; 徐嘉辉; 于悦

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.010

PDF(3421 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2) : 79-87. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.010

社会

被拐儿童原生家庭韧性演变过程与风险应对策略——基于社会—生态系统视角的分析

周俊俊^1,2, 李钢^1,2, 洪丹丹^1,2, 徐锋^1,2, 徐嘉辉^1,2, 于悦^1,2

作者信息 +

RESILIENCE CHANGES AND RISK COPING STRATEGIES OF THE TRAFFICKED CHILDREN’ S BIOLOGICAL FAMILY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM

ZHOU Jun-jun^1,2, LI Gang^1,2, HONG Dan-dan^1,2, XU Feng^1,2, XU Jia-hui^1,2, YU Yue^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本文基于实地田野调查和在线网络访谈获取的案例资料，在社会—生态系统视角下揭示被拐儿童原生家庭的压力与认知、结构与功能、风险与韧性变化，构建原生家庭的风险应对策略。结果表明：拐卖事件在短时间内对原生家庭造成强烈冲击，而寻亲活动与寻亲成功后的多重要素在长时间内对原生家庭造成持续扰动。微观尺度中家庭成员面临的压力挑战与观念认知影响着原生家庭的变化。在中观尺度，拐卖破坏了家庭“三角关系”结构，呈现离散型、聚合型和中间型三种家庭类型，直接导致原生家庭的经济功能、健康照顾功能、家庭抚育功能与情感功能衰退。在宏观尺度，由于原生家庭受到外部因素的扰动程度各不相同，他们经历的风险阶段以及在每个阶段停留的时间长短各有差异，原生家庭的韧性强度也存在一定差异，呈现非线性和异质性的复杂特征。

Abstract

Based on the case data obtained from field investigation and online interview, this paper revealed the pressure, cognition, structure, function, risk of the trafficked children's biological family under the perspective of socio-ecological system. The results indicate that: Trafficking incident has a strong impact on family in a short time, while the families began to look for the child until it was found, the multiple factors in the process have a lasting impact on family for a long time. At the micro scale, the pressure faced by family members and the concept cognition affect the changes of the family. At the mesoscale, trafficking destroys the stability of family, resulting in a discrete, aggregated and intermediate family structure, which directly led to the decline of the economic function, health care function, nurturing function and emotional function of the family. At the macro scale, due to the different degree of disturbance of the family by external factors, the families experienced different risk stages, and their resilience paths were also different in each stages, presenting nonlinear and heterogeneous characteristics.

导出引用

周俊俊, 李钢, 洪丹丹, 徐锋, 徐嘉辉, 于悦. 被拐儿童原生家庭韧性演变过程与风险应对策略——基于社会—生态系统视角的分析[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(2): 79-87 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.010

ZHOU Jun-jun, LI Gang, HONG Dan-dan, XU Feng, XU Jia-hui, YU Yue. RESILIENCE CHANGES AND RISK COPING STRATEGIES OF THE TRAFFICKED CHILDREN’ S BIOLOGICAL FAMILY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(2): 79-87 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.02.010

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 安东尼·吉登斯.现代性与自我认同[M].赵旭东,等,译.北京:三联书店, 1998:8.[Anthony Giddens. Modernity and Self-Identity[M]. Zhao Xudong, et al, trans. Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company, 1998:8.]
[2] 乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].何博闻,译.南京:译林出版社,2004:137.[Ulrich B. Risk Society[M]. He Bowen, trans. Nanjing:Yilin Press, 2004:137.]
[3] 薛淑艳,李钢,王会娟,等.被拐儿童生命历程变迁与原生家庭融入研究——基于寻亲成功案例的实证[J].人文地理,2021,36(3):58-66.[Xue Shuyan, Li Gang, Wang Huijuan, et al. Life course change and biological family integration of trafficked children:Evidence from the successful cases of seeking relatives[J]. Human Geography, 2021,36(3):58-66.]
[4] 王葆莳.被拐卖儿童获救后的收养问题研究[J].中国青年研究, 2015(1):91-96.[Wang Baoshi. A study on the adoption of abducted children after being rescued[J]. China Youth Study, 2015(1):91-96.]
[5] 李春雷,任韧,张晓旭.我国被拐卖儿童救助保护现状及完善对策研究——基于对近年133个公开报道案例的分析[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版), 2013,29(6):16-25.[Li Chunlei, Renren, Zhang Xiaoxu. Research on the current situation of rescue and protection of abducted children in China and the improvement countermeasures:Based on the analysis of 133 public report cases in recent years[J]. Journal of People's Public Security University of China (Social Sciences Edition), 2013,29(6):16-25.]
[6] 蔡曦蕾.拐卖儿童罪:设刑与动刑——兼论"轻处"倾向的背后因素[J].北京社会科学,2016(7):13-26.[Cai Xilei. Penalties configuration and penalties distribution of the crime of child trafficking:The hidden factors of tendency of relatively lenient sentencing[J]. Social Sciences of Beijing, 2016(7):13-26.]
[7] 徐颖.收买妇女、儿童犯罪中的罪名适用疑难问题研究[J].法学论坛,2019,34(2):154-160.[Xu Ying. On the accusation in the crime of buying abducted women or children[J]. Legal Forum, 2019,34(2):154-160.]
[8] 王锡章.拐卖儿童犯罪的现状与遏制对策——以F省为例的实证研究[J].中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版),2015,31(5):21-31.[Wang Xizhang. The current situation of trafficking children and the containment countermeasure:An empirical study based on F province[J]. Journal of People's Public Security University of China (Social Sciences Edition), 2015,31(5):21-31.]
[9] Shen A, Antonopoulos G A, Papanicolaou G. China's stolen children:Internal child trafficking in the People's Republic of China[J]. Trends in Organized Crime, 2013,16(1):31-48.
[10] 李钢,谭然,王会娟,等.中国拐卖儿童犯罪的地理特征研究[J].地理科学,2017,37(7):1049-1058.[Li Gang, Tan Ran, Wang Huijuan, et al. Geographic characteristics of child trafficking crime in China[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2017,37(7):1049-1058.]
[11] 李钢,谭然,王会娟,等.中国拐卖儿童犯罪时空格局演变及其影响因素[J].人文地理,2018,33(2):26-34.[Li Gang, Tan Ran, Wang Huijuan, et al. Spatio-temporal change and influencing factors of trafficking in children in China[J]. Human Geography, 2018,33(2):26-34.]
[12] 李钢,王会娟,谭然,等.中国拐卖儿童犯罪的时空特征与形成机制——基于"成功案例"的管窥[J].地理研究,2017,36(12):2505-2520.[Li Gang, Wang Huijuan, Tan Ran, et al. Spatio-temporal characteristics and formation mechanism of child trafficking in China based on "successful cases"[J]. Geographical Research, 2017, 36(12):2505-2520.]
[13] 李钢,薛淑艳,马雪瑶,等.中国儿童非正常迁移的时空分异及综合机制——拐卖与抱养对比视角[J].人口研究,2020,44(3):102-117.[Li Gang, Xue Shuyan, Ma Xueyao, et al. Spatiao-temporal differentiation and comprehensive mechanism of irregular migration of children in China:Comparison between child trafficking and informal adoption[J]. Population Research, 2020,44(3):102-117.]
[14] Masten A S. Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development[J]. American Psychologist, 2001,56(3):227-238.
[15] 汪辉,徐蕴雪,卢思琪,等.恢复力、弹性或韧性?——社会-生态系统及其相关研究领域中"Resilience"一词翻译之辨析[J].国际城市规划,2017,32(4):29-39.[Wang Hui, Xu Yunxue, Lu Siqi, et al. A comparative study of Chinese translation of resilience terminology in socio-ecological system and its related research fields[J]. Urban Planning International, 2017,32(4):29-39.]
[16] Folke C. Resilience:The emergence of a perspective for socialecological system analyses[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16(3):253-267.
[17] 李彤玥.韧性城市研究新进展[J].国际城市规划,2017,32(5):15-25.[Li Tongyue. New progress in study on resilient Cities[J]. Urban Planning International, 2017,32(5):15-25.]
[18] McCubbin H I, McCubbin M A. Typologies of resilient families:Emerging roles of social class and ethnicity[J]. Family Relations, 1988,37(3):247-254.
[19] Walsh F. Strengthening family resilience[J]. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 1998,41(2):252-253.
[20] Hawley D R, De Haan L. Toward a definition of family resilience:Integrating life-span and family perspectives[J]. Family Process, 1996,35:283-298.
[21] Henry C S, Morris A S, Harrist A W. Family resilience:Moving into the third wave[J]. Family Relations, 2015,64(1):22-43.
[22] Oh S, Chang S J. Concept analysis:Family resilience[J]. Open Journal of Nursing, 2014,4(13):980-990.
[23] Masten A S, Monn A R. Child and family resilience:A call for integrated science, practice, and professional training[J]. Family Relations, 2015,64(1):5-21.
[24] Walsh F. Family Resilience:Strengths Forged through Adversity[M]. New York:Guilford, 2012:399-427.
[25] 田北海,王连生.支出型贫困家庭的贫困表征、生成机制与治理路径[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(3):27-36,152-153.[Tian Beihai, Wang Liansheng. On expenditure poverty families:Characteristics, forming mechanism and governance countermeasures[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018,18(3):27-36,152-153.]
[26] 郭雨,刘堃,翟燕雪.离异家庭儿童青少年家庭教养方式与心理韧性相关性[J].中国学校卫生,2016,37(5):701-703,707.[Guo Yu, Liu Kun, Zhai Yanxue. Correlation between parenting style and resilience in children and adolescents from divorced families[J]. Chinese Journal of School Health, 2016,37(5):701-703,707.]
[27] 张珊珊,李惠萍,宋江艳,等.乳腺癌患者家庭韧性评估量表的汉化及信效度研究[J].护理学报,2021,28(24):1-5.[Zhang Shanshan, Li Huiping, Song Jiangyan, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Family Resilience Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients[J]. Journal of Nursing (China), 2021,28(24):1-5.]
[28] 王琦妍.社会生态系统概念性框架研究综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011(21):440-443.[Wang Qiyan. Review of the research on social-ecological system sconceptual framework[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011(21):440-443.]
[29] 王成,任梅菁,胡秋云,等.乡村生产空间系统韧性的科学认知及其研究域[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(1):85-94.[Wang Cheng, Ren Meijing, Hu Qiuyun, et al. Rural production space system resilience and its research domains[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(1):85-94.]
[30] 刘志敏,叶超.社会-生态韧性视角下城乡治理的逻辑框架[J].地理科学进展,2021,40(1):95-103.[Liu Zhimin, Ye Chao. A logical framework of rural-urban governance from the perspective of social-ecological resilience[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021,40(1):95-103.]
[31] 贺雪峰.农村代际关系论:兼论代际关系的价值基础[J].社会科学研究,2009(5):84-92.[He Xuefeng. Discussion on rural intergenerational relations:Also on the value basis of intergenerational relations[J]. Social Science Research, 2009(5):84-92.]
[32] 贾玉娇,范家绪.从断裂到弥合:时空视角下家庭养老保障功能的变迁与重塑[J].社会科学战线,2019(7):214-221.[Jia Yujiao, Fan Jiaxu. From rupture to bridging:Changes and remodeling of family retirement protection functions in spatial and temporal perspective[J]. Social Science Front, 2019(7):214-221.]
[33] 闫敏,张同全,田一丹.全面两孩政策下中国家庭关系的变化——基于105个案例的模糊集定性分析[J].人口与经济,2020(6):48-60.[Yan Min, Zhang Tongquan, Tian Yidan. The changes of family relationship under the background of comprehensive two-child policy:Based on 105 cases through fsQCA[J]. Population & Economics, 2020(6):48-60.]
[34] Panaghi L, Ahmadabadi Z, Khosravi N, et al. Living with addicted men and codependency:The moderating effect of personality traits[J]. Addiction & Health, 2016,8(2):98-106.
[35] 易春丽,钱铭怡,章晓云.Bowen系统家庭的理论及治疗要点简介[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004(1):53-55.[Yi Chunli, Qian Mingyi, Zhang Xiaoyun. Brief introduction of Bowen's family system theory and treatment points[J]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 2004(1):53-55.]
[36] Haan L D, Hawley D R, Deal J E. Operationalizing family resilience:A methodological strategy[J]. American Journal of Family Therapy, 2002,30(4):275-291.
[37] Ungar M. Varied patterns of family resilience in challenging contexts[J]. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 2016,42(1):19-31.