长征国家文化公园红色遗产地旅游者角色认同与实践研究

王兆峰, 黄曼丽

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 45-54.

PDF(5526 KB)
PDF(5526 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 45-54. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.04.006
文化

长征国家文化公园红色遗产地旅游者角色认同与实践研究

  • 王兆峰, 黄曼丽
作者信息 +

RESEARCH ON THE ROLE IDENTIFICATION AND PRACTICE OF TOURISTS IN THE RED HERITAGE SITES OF THE LONG MARCH NATIONAL CULTURAL PARK

  • WANG Zhao-feng, HUANG Man-li
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

厘清旅游者角色认同与实践机制,对高质量推进长征国家文化公园建设大有裨益。本文聚焦长征国家文化公园红色遗产地,基于角色理论和场所精神,构建“角色-场所”研究分析框架,运用内容分析法探究“重走长征路”旅游者在场所中的认同与实践机制。研究发现:①角色情境由长征沿线持续性长征场所和流动性地方场所双重架构,场所精神由持续性长征精神和流动性地方精神交织构成;②角色实践呈现角色间互动和角色场所互动两种模式,旅游者与东道主、历史事件人物及自然生态空间的互动是主要的角色实践行为;③角色认同发生在角色与场所互动过程中,旅游者在互动实践中产生自我认同、国家认同与人类身份认同,人类身份认同来源于人类身份属性和场所刺激两方面。本文引入人类身份认同与流动性地方场所精神,拓展了红色旅游中的角色认同理论与场所精神,以期为长征国家文化公园的旅游高质量发展提供实践参考。

Abstract

Clarifying the tourist role and practice mechanism is of great benefit to effectively promote the construction of the Long March National Cultural Park. Built on the role theory and genius loci, this research focuses on the red heritage sites of the Long March National Cultural Park and constructs an analysis framework of "role-place" by using the content analysis method to explore the role and practice mechanism of tourists who take the Long March route.The research found that:1) The role situation is composed of the dual structure of the continuous Long March site and the fluid local place, and the genius loci is composed of the continuous Long March spirit and the fluid local spirit; 2) Role practice presents two modes of interaction between roles and interaction between roles and places. The interaction between tourists and hosts, historical event figures and natural ecological space is the main role practice behavior; 3) Role identity occurs in the process of interaction between roles and places. Tourists generate self-identity, national identity and human identity in the interactive practice. Human identity originates from both human identity attributes and place stimulation.This paper introduces human identity and the spirit of fluid place, enriches the theory of role identity and genius loci in red tourism, and provides a practical reference for the high-quality tourism development of the Long March National Cultural Park.

关键词

角色认同 / 场所精神 / 人类身份认同 / 红色遗产地 / 长征国家文化公园

Key words

role identity / genius loci / human identity / red heritage site / Long March National Cultural Park

引用本文

导出引用
王兆峰, 黄曼丽. 长征国家文化公园红色遗产地旅游者角色认同与实践研究[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(4): 45-54 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.04.006
WANG Zhao-feng, HUANG Man-li. RESEARCH ON THE ROLE IDENTIFICATION AND PRACTICE OF TOURISTS IN THE RED HERITAGE SITES OF THE LONG MARCH NATIONAL CULTURAL PARK[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(4): 45-54 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.04.006
中图分类号: F592.7   

参考文献

[1] 李飞,邹统钎.论国家文化公园:逻辑·源流·意蕴[J].旅游学刊,2021, 36(1):14-26.[Li Fei, Zou Tongqian.National culture park:Logic, origins and implications[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021,36(1):14-26.]
[2] 李磊,陶卓民,赖志城,等.长征国家文化公园红色旅游资源网络关注度及其旅游流网络结构分析[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(7):1811-1824.[Li Lei, Tao Zhuomin, Lai Zhicheng, etal. Analysis of the internet attention and tourism flow network structure of red tourism resources in Long March National Cultural Park[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021,36(7):1811-1824.]
[3] 马东艳,张旭辉.民族村寨旅游行为意向研究——以桃坪羌寨、甲居藏寨、泸沽湖为例[J].西南民族大学学报:人文社会科学版, 2021,42(1):33-41.[Ma Dongyan, Zhang Xuhui. Research on the intention of tourism behavior in ethnic villages:Taking Taoping Qiang village, Jiaju Tibetan village, and Lugu lake as examples[J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Humanities and Social Science), 2021,42(1):33-41.]
[4] 李单晶.长征精神及其当代价值研究[D].成都:电子科技大学, 2017:1-11.[Li Danjing. Research on the Long March Spirit and Its Contemporary value in China[D]. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2017:1-11.]
[5] 喻安伦.社会角色理论磋探[J].理论月刊,1998(12):40-41.[Yu Anlun. Discussion on socialrole theory[J]. Theory Monthly, 1998(12):40-41.]
[6] Farmer S M, Tierney P, Kung-Mcintyre K. Employee creativity in Taiwan:An application of role identity theory[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003,46(5):618-630.
[7] 徐克帅.红色旅游和社会记忆[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(3):35-42.[Xu Keshuai. Red tourism and social memory[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2016, 31(3):35-42.]
[8] 左冰.红色旅游与政党认同——基于井冈山景区的实证研究[J].旅游学刊,2014,29(9):60-72.[Zuo Bing. Red tourism and communist party identity in China:An empirical study based on Jinggangshan scenic area[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2014,29(9):60-72.]
[9] 刘润佳,黄震方,余润哲,等.红色旅游对游客国家认同的影响[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(7):1673-1683.[Liu Runjia, Huang Zhenfang, Yu Runzhe, et al. The impact of red tourismon national identity of tourists[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021,36(7):1673-1683.]
[10] 郑华伟.红色旅游价值观内化的网络文本研究——兼论国民幸福感的生成机制[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(5):111-118.[Zheng Huawei. Web-based text analysis of value internalization of red tourism:The generative mechanism of national happiness[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2016,31(5):111-118.]
[11] 李文明,敖琼,殷程强,等.韶山红色旅游地游客亲环境行为的驱动因素与影响机理[J].经济地理, 2020, 40(11):233-240.[Li Wenming, Ao Qiong, Yin Chengqiang, et al. Driving factors and influencing mechanism of tourists' pro-environmental behavior in Shaoshan red tourism area[J]. Economic Geography, 2020,40(11):233-240.]
[12] 邹统钎,黄鑫,陈歆瑜.长征国家文化公园建设发展要把握的五对关系[N].中国旅游报,2019-12-31(3).[Zou Tongjian, Huang Xin, Chen Xinyu. Five pairs of relationships to be grasped in the construction and develop-ment of the Long March National Cultural Park[N]. China Tourism News, 2019-12-31(3).]
[13] Vecco M. Genius loci as a meta-concept[J]. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 2020,41:225-231.
[14] 周坤,颜珂,王进.场所精神重解:兼论建筑遗产的保护与再利用[J].四川师范大学学报(社会科学版),2015,42(3):67-72.[Zhou Kun, Yan Ke, Wang Jin. The reinterpretation of place spirit:On the protection and reuse of architectural heritage[J]. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), 2015,42(3):67-72.]
[15] Christou P A, Farmaki A, Saveriades A, et al. The "genius loci" of places that experience intense tourism development[J]. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2019,30:19-32.
[16] 孙佼佼,谢彦君.从权力在场到审美在场:旅游体验视角下场所精神的变迁——以陕西省兴平市汉武帝茂陵为例[J].人文地理, 2017,32(2):129-136.[Sun Jiaojiao, Xie Yanjun. From the presence of power to the pres-ence of aesthetics:The shift of place spirit from the perspective of tourism experience:A case of Mao mausoleum of emperor Wu of Han dynasty[J]. Human Geography, 2017, 32(2):129-136.]
[17] 冯一鸣,田焯玮,周玲强.旅游流动性视角下的场所精神——革命历史纪念空间的新议题[J].旅游学刊,2021,36(6):11-12.[Feng Yiming, Tian Zhuowei, Zhou Lingqiang. The spirit of place from the perspective of tourism mobility:A new issue in the memorial space of revolutionary history[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2021,36(6):11-12.]
[18] 郑杭生,社会学概论新修(精编版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009:107.[Zheng Hangsheng. New Introduction to Sociology (Contracted Edition)[M].Beijing:Renmin University of China Press, 2009:107.]
[19] HallS, Du Gay P. Questions of Cultural Identity[M]. London:Sage Publications, 1996:18.
[20] Hyde K F, Harman S. Motives for a secular pilgrimage to the Gallipoli battlefields[J]. Tourism Management, 2011,32(6):1343-1351.
[21] Keshuai Xu. Types of red tourists in China:Evidence from Shaoshan[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2015,51:57-59.
[22] Goulding C, Domic D. Heritage, identity and ideological manipulation:The case of Croatia[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2009, 36(1):85-102.
[23] Brown L, Ibarra K A. Commemoration and the expression of political identity[J]. Tourism Management, 2018,68:79-88.
[24] Palmer C. Touring Churchill's England:Rituals of kinship and belonging[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2003,30(2):426-445.
[25] 刘欢,岳楠,白长虹.红色旅游情境下情绪唤起对游客认知的影响[J].社会科学家,2018(3):84-90.[Liu Huan, Yue Nan, Bai Changhong. Influence of emotional arousal on tourists' cognition in red tourism contexts[J]. Social Scientist, 2018(3):84-90.]
[26] 蒋亚军,陈亮,周慧玲.塑魂铸人:红色旅游文化认同的路径[J].社会科学家,2021(5):68-72.[Jiang Yajun, Chen Liang, Zhou Huiling. Shaping the soul and casting people:The path of red tourism cultural identity[J]. Social Scientist, 2021(5):68-72.]
[27] 钟士恩,陆文镔,彭红松,等.红领巾儿童对红色旅游资源与爱国主义的认知——雨花台烈士陵园案例实证及启示[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(7):1684-1699.[Zhong Shien, Lu Wenbin, Peng Hongsong, et al. Red scarf children's cognition of red tourism resources and patriotism:Evidence from Yuhuatai Revolutionary Martyrs[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021,36(7):1684-1699.]
[28] 张红艳,马肖飞.新格局下基于国家认同的红色旅游发展[J].经济问题,2020(1):123-129.[Zhang Hongyan, Ma Xiaofei. Red tourism development based on national identity under the new pattern[J]. On Economic Problems, 2020(1):123-129.]
[29] 张新成,梁学成,高楠,等.长征主题红色旅游资源关注度的空间网络结构及其形成机制分析[J].旅游科学,2021,35(3):1-23.[Zhang Xincheng, Liang Xuecheng, Gao Nan, et al. Ananalysis of the spatial network structure and formation mechanism of the attention degree of long-march-themed red tourism resources[J]. Tourism Science, 2021,35(3):1-23.]
[30] 谭红日,刘沛林,李伯华.基于网络文本分析的大连市旅游目的地形象感知[J].经济地理,2021,41(3):231-239.[Tan Hongri, Liu Peilin, Li Bohua. Perception of tourism destinationImage in Dalian based on network text analysis[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(3):231-239.]
[31] Soica S. Tourism as practice of making meaning[J]. Annals of Tourism Research, 2016,61:96-110.
[32] 徐建平,张厚粲.质性研究中编码者信度的多种方法考察[J].心理科学,2005(6):152-154.[Xu Jianping, Zhang Houcan. Testing intercoder reliability by multi-approaches in qualitative research[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2005(6):152-154.]
[33] 吴雪.室内空间设计中场所精神的营建[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2016,36(2):132-136.[Wu Xue. Constructing of genius loci in interior design[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2016,36(2):132-136.]
[34] 韦俊峰,明庆忠.侗族百家宴非遗文化旅游空间生产中的角色实践:基于"角色-空间"理论分析框架[J].人文地理,2020,35(2):48-54.[Wei Junfeng, Ming Qingzhong. Role practice and the cultural tourism space production:A case study of the Dong Hundredfamily Feast[J]. Human Geography, 2020,35(2):48-54.]
[35] Schatzki T R.Practice-based Education:Perspectives and Strategies[M]. Rotterdam:Sense Publishers, 2012:13-26.
[36] 陈才,卢昌崇.认同:旅游体验研究的新视角[J].旅游学刊,2011, 26(3):37-42.[Chen Cai, Lu Changchong. ldentity:A new perspective in the study of tourism experience[J]. Tourism Tribune, 2011, 26(3):37-42.]
[37] 汪信砚.全球化中的价值认同与价值观冲突[J].哲学研究,2002(11):22-26.[Wang Xinyan. Value identity and value conflict in globalization[J]. Philosophical Research, 2002(11):22-26.]
[38] Giddens A. Modernity and Self-Identity:Self and Society in the Late Modern Age[M]. Stanford:Stanford university press, 1991,15-30.
[39] Wetherell M, Mohanty C T. The SAGE Handbook of Identities[M]. London:Sage publications, 2010:45-62.
[40] Zhang Yachen. Experiencing human identity at dark tourism sites of natural disasters[J]. Tourism Manage-ment, 2022,89:104451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104451.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA080)

PDF(5526 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/