面向人本治理的社区生活圈休闲步行与环境协调关系及影响因素研究——以南京市为例

姜玉培, 甄峰, 张振龙

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 62-71.

PDF(7166 KB)
PDF(7166 KB)
人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 62-71. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.04.008
社会

面向人本治理的社区生活圈休闲步行与环境协调关系及影响因素研究——以南京市为例

  • 姜玉培1, 甄峰2, 张振龙1
作者信息 +

COORDINATION RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEISURE WALKING AND ACTIVITY ENVIRONMENT AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN COMMUNITY LIFE CIRCLE FOR PEOPLE-ORIENTED GOVERNANCE: A CASE OF NANJING

  • JIANG Yu-pei1, ZHEN Feng2, ZHANG Zhen-long1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

社区生活圈休闲步行与活动环境的协调关系是对两者实际供需匹配状况的直接反映,并可能存在显著的社会分异,甚至不平等,但将生活圈内行为与环境协调作为整体目标,揭示人群内在属性驱动影响的研究鲜有涉及。基于此,本文构建相关理论分析框架及指标体系,并利用耦合协调度模型和混合效应模型开展实证分析。结果表明:①频率、单次持续时间、活动空间距离可从不同侧面构成评价休闲步行水平的重要维度,可达性、整洁性、可利用性、安全性能够从不同方面刻画活动环境质量。②不同个体间休闲步行与活动环境间的协调性水平存在显著差异,即使 60% 左右居民能够在两者之间达到较高质量的协调,但仍有接近 37% 居民的协调水平低于平均水平。③中老年人群、退休人员、高学历者、超重者及邻里交往密切的居民更容易实现其休闲步行与活动环境之间较高水平的协调,而家庭人口较多、个人收入较高的居民在两者之间协调关系上往往处于较低水平。④最后,为促进社区生活圈高质量且充足均衡的休闲步行生活,提出致力于实现全民优质共享、供需灵活匹配的休闲步行与活动环境协调的治理策略。

Abstract

Studies that take the coordination of behavior and the environment in the community life circle as the overall goal and reveal the driving influence of the intrinsic attributes of the population are rarely involved. Therefore, this study constructs the theoretical analysis framework and indicator system, carries out empirical analysis. The study found that:1) Frequency, duration, and activity space distance can form important dimensions for evaluating leisure walking level. Accessibility, cleanliness, availability, and safety can describe the quality of activity environment. 2) There are significant differences in the coordination level between leisure walking and activity environments among different individuals. 3) Middle-aged and elderly people, retirees, highly educated people, overweight people and residents with close relationships with neighbors are more likely to achieve a higher level of coordination, while residents with larger family populations and higher individual incomes tend to be at a lower level of coordination. 4) Finally, a governance strategy for the coordination of leisure walking and the activity environment is proposed.

关键词

协调关系 / 休闲步行 / 活动环境 / 休闲生活质量 / 南京

Key words

coordination relationship / leisure walking / activity environment / leisure life quality / Nanjing

引用本文

导出引用
姜玉培, 甄峰, 张振龙. 面向人本治理的社区生活圈休闲步行与环境协调关系及影响因素研究——以南京市为例[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(4): 62-71 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.04.008
JIANG Yu-pei, ZHEN Feng, ZHANG Zhen-long. COORDINATION RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEISURE WALKING AND ACTIVITY ENVIRONMENT AND ITS INFLUENCING FACTORS IN COMMUNITY LIFE CIRCLE FOR PEOPLE-ORIENTED GOVERNANCE: A CASE OF NANJING[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(4): 62-71 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.04.008
中图分类号: K901.2   

参考文献

[1] 自然资源部.自然资源部关于发布《社区生活圈规划技术指南》行业标准的公告[EB/OL].(2021-06-09)[2022-01-25].http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202106/t20210616_2657688.html.[Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China. Announcement on the industry standard of "technical guidelines for community living circle planning" by Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China[EB/OL].(2021-06-09)[2022-01-25]. http://gi.mnr.gov.cn/202106/t20210616_2657688.html.]
[2] 蔡晓梅,朱竑.新时代面向美好生活的日常生活地理与城乡休闲——"生活地理与城乡休闲专栏解读[J].地理研究,2019,38(7):1557-1565.[Cai Xiaomei, Zhu Hong. Towards a beautiful life in the new era:An introduction to the issue of "everyday life geography and urban-rural leisure"[J]. Geographical Research, 2019,38(7):1557-1565.]
[3] 姜玉培,甄峰,孙鸿鹄,等.健康视角下城市建成环境对老年人日常步行活动的影响研究[J].地理研究,2020,39(3):570-584.[Jiang Yupei, Zhen Feng, Sun Honghu, et al. Research on the influence of urban built environment on daily walking of older adults from a perspective of health[J]. Geographical Research, 2020,39(3):570-584.]
[4] Jack E, Mccormack G R. The associations between objectivelydetermined and self-reported urban form characteristics and neighborhood-based walking in adults[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 2014,11(1):71. DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-11-71.
[5] Ghani F, Rachele J N, Washington S, et al. Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation:Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods[J]. Preventive Medicine Reports, 2016,4:75-80.
[6] 刘志林,柴彦威.深圳市民周末休闲活动的空间结构[J].经济地理, 2001, 21(4):504-508.[Liu Zhilin, Chai Yanwei. The leisure spatial structure of Shenzhen citizens on weekends[J]. Economic Geography, 2001,21(4):504-508.]
[7] 齐兰兰,周素红.邻里建成环境对居民外出型休闲活动时空差异的影响——以广州市为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(1):31-40.[Qi Lanlan, Zhou Suhong. The influence of neighborhood built environments on the spatial-temporal characteristics of residents' daily leisure activities:A case study of Guangzhou[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(1):31-40.]
[8] Van Dyck D, Cerin E, Conway T L, et al. Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes associated with adults' leisure-time physical activity:Findings from Belgium, Australia and the USA[J]. Health & Place, 2013,19:59-68.
[9] Frank L D, Saelens B E, Powell K E, et al. Stepping towards causation:Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity[J]. Social Science and Medicine, 2007,65(9):1898-1914.
[10] Owen N, Cerin E, Leslie E, et al. Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2007,33(5):387-395.
[11] Mccormack G R, Friedenreich C, Sandalack B A, et al. The relationship between cluster-analysis derived walkability and local recreational and transportation walking among Canadian adults[J]. Health & Place, 2012,18(5):1079-1087.
[12] Knuiman M W, Christian H E, Divitini M L, et al. A longitudinal analysis of the influence of the neighborhood built environment on walking for transportation:The reside study[J]. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2014,180(5):453-461.
[13] Christian H E, Bull F C, Middleton N J, et al. How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the reside study[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2011, 8(1):55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-55.
[14] Feuillet T, Commenges H, Menai M, et al. A massive geographically weighted regression model of walking-environment relationships[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2018,68:118-129.
[15] Boakye-Dankwa E, Nathan A, Barnett A, et al. Walking behaviour and patterns of perceived access to neighbourhood destinations in older adults from a low-density (Brisbane, Australia) and an ultradense city (Hong Kong, China)[J]. Cities, 2019,84:23-33.
[16] Sugiyama T, Gilescorti B, Summers J, et al. Initiating and maintaining recreational walking:A longitudinal study on the influence of neighborhood green space[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2013,57(3):178-182.
[17] Sugiyama T, Gunn L D, Christian H, et al. Quality of public open spaces and recreational walking[J]. American Journal of Public Health, 2015,105(12):2490-2495.
[18] Van C J, Cerin E, Timperio A S, et al. Park proximity, quality and recreational physical activity among mid-older aged adults:Moderating effects of individual factors and area of residence[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2015, 12:46-53.
[19] Foster S, Gilescorti B. The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity:An exploration of inconsistent findings[J]. Preventive Medicine, 2008,47(3):241-251.
[20] Cerin E, Macfarlane D, Sit H, et al. Effects of built environment on walking among Hong Kong older adults[J]. Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2013,19(3):39-41.
[21] Sugiyama T, Thompson C W. Associations between characteristics of neighbourhood open space and older people's walking[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008,7(1):41-51.
[22] Li F. Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults[J]. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 2005,59(7):558-564.
[23] Cauwenberg J V, Holle V V, Simons D, et al. Environmental factors influencing older adults' walking for transportation:A study using walkalong interviews[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 2012,9(1):85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-85.
[24] Razieh Z, Javier M, Johannes F, et al. Older adults' outdoor walking:Inequalities in neighbourhood safety, pedestrian infrastructure and aesthetics[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2016,13(12):1179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13121179.
[25] 刘珺,王德,朱玮,等.新旧城区休闲步行环境质量比较——以上海市鞍山新村和江湾新城为例[J].地理研究,2015,34(11):2195-2204.[Liu Jun, Wang De, Zhu Wei, et al. A comparison of the recreational walking environment quality between old and new towns:A case study in Shanghai[J]. Geographical Research, 2015,34(11):2195-2204.]
[26] 周梦茹,魏寒宾,边兰春.街道空间步行环境测评研究——以北京什刹海历史文化街区为例[J].上海城市规划, 2021(3):74-80.[Zhou Mengru, Wei Hanbin, Bian Lanchun. Research on evaluation of walking environment on streets:A case study of Shichahai Historic Scenic Area[J]. Shanghai Urban Planning Review, 2021(3):74-80.]
[27] Timmermans H, Arentze J. Analysing space-time behaviour:New approaches to old problems[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2002,26(2):175-190.
[28] Sun H H, Zhen F, Lobsang Tashi, et al. Spatial characteristics of urban life resilience from the perspective of supply and demand:A case study of Nanjing, China[J]. Habitat International, 2019, 88(4):101983. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.05.002.
[29] Shmelev S E, Shmeleva I A. Global urban sustainability assessment:A multidimensional approach[J]. Sustainable Development, 2018,26(6):904-920.
[30] 丛晓男.耦合度模型的形式、性质及在地理学中的若干误用[J].经济地理,2019,39(4):18-25.[Cong Xiaonan. Expression and mathematical property of coupling model, and its misuse in geographical science[J]. Economic Geography, 2019,39(4):18-25.]
[31] 郝静,孙成,郭兴宇,等.京津冀内陆平原区PM2.5浓度时空变化定量模拟[J].环境科学,2018,39(4):1455-1465.[Hao Jing, Sun Cheng, Guo Xingyu, et al. Simulation of the spatio-temporally resolved PM2.5 aerosol mass concentration over the inland plain of the Beijing-TianjinHebei region[J]. Environmental Science, 2018,39(4):1455-1465.]
[32] Cerin E, Saelens B E, Sallis J F, et al. Neighborhood environment walkability scale:Validity and development of a short form[J]. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2006,38(9):1682-1691.
[33] Bracy N L, Millstein R A, Carlson J A, et al. Is the relationship between the built environment and physical activity moderated by perceptions of crime and safety[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2014,11(1):24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-24.
[34] 南京市人民政府.市政府关于印发南京市全民健身实施计划的通知[EB/OL].(2017-01-25)[2022-01-03]. http://www.nanjing.gov.cn/xxgk/szf/201701/t20170126_4351268.html.[The people's Government of Nanjing. Implementation plan of national fitness program in Nanjing[EB/OL].(2017-01-25)[2022-01-03]. http://www.nanjing.gov.cn/xxgk/szf/201701/t20170126_4351268.html.]
[35] Chaix B, Simon C, Charreire H, et al. The environmental correlates of overall and neighborhood based recreational walking (a crosssectional analysis of the RECORD Study)[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 2014, 11(1):20. DOI:10.1186/1479-5868-11-20.
[36] Florindo A A, Barrozo L V, Cabral-Miranda W, et al. Public open spaces and leisure-time walking in Brazilian adults[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2017,14(6):553. DOI:10.3390/ijerph14060553.
[37] Steindorf K, Chang-Claude J, Flesch-Janys D, et al. Determinants of sports, cycling, walking and overall leisure-time physical activity among postmenopausal women in Germany[J]. Public Health Nutrition, 2010,13(11):1905-1914.
[38] Gomes G A, Reis R S, Parra D C, et al. Walking for leisure among adults from three Brazilian cities and its association with perceived environment attributes and personal factors[J]. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 2011,8(1):1-8.
[39] Wijk D C V, Groeniger J O, Lenthe F J V, et al. The role of the built environment in explaining educational inequalities in walking and cycling among adults in the Netherlands[J]. International Journal of Health Geographics, 2017, 16(1):10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-017-0083-y.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目(20AZD040);江苏高校优势学科建设工程三期项目-城乡规划学(081910001);国家一流专业(城乡规划)建设工程项目

PDF(7166 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/