城市自然的关怀实践：动物园的空间、关系与行为

黄惠珠; 张敏; 陈培培

doi:10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.05.012

PDF(4941 KB)

人文地理 ›› 2023, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5) : 98-106. DOI: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.05.012

城市

城市自然的关怀实践：动物园的空间、关系与行为

黄惠珠, 张敏, 陈培培

作者信息 +

CARING PRACTICES FOR URBAN NATURE: SPACE, RELATIONSHIPS AND ACTS OF THE ZOO

HUANG Hui-zhu, ZHANG Min, CHEN Pei-pei

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

生态文明建设要求反思人类的自然观以及人与自然的道德联系，城市自然是人与非人关系的可能性空间。研究从关怀视角出发，运用质性方法，构建空间、关系与行为三元分析框架，探究南京红山森林动物园中人与动物多维关系的具体表现及关怀实践形成机制。研究发现，人与自然的互动及关怀关系的建立以多情景相遇为条件；关怀关系能够促成示范、响应、潜在的关怀行为，空间相遇、关怀关系和关怀行为构成关怀自然实践，塑造城市空间的关怀特质；动物园借助关怀关系养成以及关怀行为示范，推动社会关注和关怀实践的流动。本文推动关怀从自然管理理念转向日常生活实践，在人与自然关系建构中发挥更大潜力。

Abstract

The construction of ecological civilisation requires reflection on the human view of nature and the ethical connection between humans and nature. Urban nature is a space of possibilities for human-nonhuman relationships. Given this, this paper constructs a ternary analytical framework of space, relationship and action to explore the concrete manifestations of multidimensional human-animal relationships in the urban zoo and the forming mechanisms of caring practices from the perspective of care. Using the example of Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo, and based on qualitative methods including semi-structured interviews, participant observation and NVivo text analysis, two main findings emerged. First, human-nature interactions and caring relationships need to be conditioned by spatial encounters, and the zoo provides multi-situational encounters. Second, caring relationships lead to demonstrative, responsive and potential caring acts; the spatial encounters, relational connections and caring acts between humans, animals and other natural substances constitute the caring practices for urban nature, thereby further shaping urban natural spaces. In addition, through the cultivation of caring relationships and the demonstration of caring acts, the zoo contributes to the flow of broader social concerns and caring nature practices. This paper reveals the conditions, mechanisms and influences of residents' caring practices for urban nature, infiltrating caring from a nature-managementoriented concept into the everyday practice of individuals, and making caring practices for nature the type of practice that can be more potential in the construction of human-nature relations.

导出引用

黄惠珠, 张敏, 陈培培. 城市自然的关怀实践：动物园的空间、关系与行为[J]. 人文地理. 2023, 38(5): 98-106 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.05.012

HUANG Hui-zhu, ZHANG Min, CHEN Pei-pei. CARING PRACTICES FOR URBAN NATURE: SPACE, RELATIONSHIPS AND ACTS OF THE ZOO[J]. HUMAN GEOGRAPHY. 2023, 38(5): 98-106 https://doi.org/10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2023.05.012

中图分类号： K901

参考文献

[1] 郇庆治,刘琦.大疫情之后社会主义生态文明建设的愿景、进路难题及其挑战[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版), 2021,21(3):1-17.[Huan Qingzhi, Liu Qi. Vision, approach dilemmas and challenges of construction of socialist Eco-civilization theory after the COVID- 19 pandemic[J]. Journal of China University of Geosciences(Social Sciences Edition), 2021,21(3):1-17.]
[2] 保罗·罗宾斯.政治生态学:批判性导论[M].裴文,译.南京:江苏人民出版社, 2019:51-70.[Robbins P. Political Ecology:A Critical Introduction[M]. Pei Wen, trans. Nanjing:Jiangsu People's Publishing House, 2019:51-70.]
[3] Adams S. The pragmatic holism of social-ecological systems theory:Explaining adaptive capacity in a changing climate[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2021,45(6):1580-1600.
[4] Finewood M H. Green infrastructure, grey epistemologies, and the urban political ecology of pittsburgh's water governance[J]. Antipode, 2016,48(4):1000-1021.
[5] Moragues-Faus A, Carroll B. Reshaping urban political ecologies:an analysis of policy trajectories to deliver food security[J]. Food Security, 2018,10(6):1337-1351.
[6] Thompson B S. The political ecology of mangrove forest restoration in Thailand:Institutional arrangements and power dynamics[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018,78:503-514.
[7] Neimark B, Childs J, Nightingale A J, et al. Speaking power to "post-truth":Critical political ecology and the new authoritarianism[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2019, 109(2):613-623.
[8] Svarstad H, Benjaminsen T A. Reading radical environmental justice through a political ecology lens[J]. Geoforum, 2020,108:1-11.
[9] 王莉莉,陈浩.基于后人类思想的国际城市研究:理论溯源与概念辨析[J].人文地理,2021,36(1):1-10,93.[Wang Lili, Chen Hao. Global urban studies based on post-human thoughts:Theoretical foundations and relevant concepts[J]. Human Geography, 2021,36(1):1-10,93.]
[10] 段义孚.恋地情结[M].志丞,刘苏,译.北京:商务印书馆, 2019:378- 383.[Yi-fu Tuan.Topophilia[M]. Zhi Cheng, Liu Su, trans. Beijing:The Commercial Press, 2019:378-383.]
[11] 滕菲.人类世的到来与生态现代主义的后自然思想[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(5):106-115,170.[Teng Fei. Anthropocene and the post-natural thought of eco-modernism[J]. Journal of Fujian Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2019(5):106-115,170.]
[12] 诺埃尔·卡斯特利.自然[M].相欣奕,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2020:260-262.[Castree N. Nature[M]. Xiang Xinyi, trans. Beijing:Beijing Normal University Press, 2020:260-262.]
[13] Whatmore S. Materialist returns:Practising cultural geography in and for amore-than-human world[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2006, 13(5):600-609.
[14] Arcari P, Probyn-Rapsey F, Singer H. Where species don't meet:Invisibilized animals, urban nature and city limits[J]. Environment and Planning E:Nature and Space, 2020,4(3):940-965.
[15] Instone L. Making the geologic with urban naturecultures:Life and nonlife on the Victorian Volcanic Plains grasslands of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia[J]. Geoforum, 2019,106:363-369.
[16] Srinivasan K. Remaking more-than-human society:Thought experiments on street dogs as "nature"[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2019,44(2):376-391.
[17] Gandy M. The fly that tried to save the world:Saproxylic geographies and other-than-human ecologies[J]. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2019,44(2):392-406.
[18] Ernwein M. Bringing urban parks to life:The more-than-human politics of urban ecological work[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2020,111(2):559-576.
[19] Wachsmuth D, Angelo H. Green and gray:New ideologies of nature in urban sustainability policy[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2018,108(4):1038-1056.
[20] Laage-Thomsen J, Blok A. Varieties of green:On aesthetic contestations over urban sustainability pathways in a Copenhagen community garden[J]. Environment and Planning E:Nature and Space, 2020,4(2):275-295.
[21] Horton J. Disabilities, urban natures and children's outdoor play[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2016,18(8):1152-1174.
[22] Jones R. Navigating norman creek:Engaging art in geographies of plants and urban natures[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2017,24(3):497- 504.
[23] Wallace A, Wright K. The post-industrial English canalscape:From enclosure to enlacement[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2021,29(2):185- 202.
[24] 王敏,赵美婷,朱竑.广州河涌的自然社会构建与城市记忆[J].地理学报,2019,74(2):353-365.[Wang Min, Zhao Meiting, Zhu Hong. The construction and memory of urban nature:A cultural geographic analysis of urban rivers in Guangzhou[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(2):353-365.]
[25] Gandy M. Marginalia:Aesthetics, ecology, and urban wastelands[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2013,103(6):1301-1316.
[26] Draus P, Haase D, Napieralski J, et al. Lurking in the bushes:Informality, illicit activity and transitional green space in Berlin and Detroit[J]. Cultural Geographies, 2020,28(2):319-339.
[27] Jax K, Calestani M, Chan K M A, et al. Caring for nature matters:A relational approach for understanding nature's contributions to human well being[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018,35:22-29.
[28] Buser M, Payne T, Edizel O, et al. Blue space as caring space water and the cultivation of care in social and environmental practice[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2020,21(8):1039-1059.
[29] Tronto J C, Fisher B. Toward a feminist theory of caring[M]//Abel E, Nelson M. Circles of Care:Work and Identity in Women's Lives. New York:State University of New York Press, 1990:35-62.
[30] Fine M, Glendinning C. Dependence, independence or interdependence? Revisiting the concepts of 'care' and 'dependency'[J]. Ageing and Society, 2005,25(4):601-621.
[31] Milligan C, Wiles J. Landscapes of care[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2010,34(6):736-754.
[32] Kullman K. Children, urban care, and everyday pavements[J]. Environment and Planning A, 2014,46(12):2864-2880.
[33] Williams M J. Care-full justice in the city[J]. Antipode, 2017,49(3):821-839.
[34] Power E R, Bergan T L. Care and resistance to neoliberal reform in social housing[J]. Housing Theory & Society, 2019,36(4):426-447.
[35] Wolch J. Anima urbis[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 2002, 26(6):721-742.
[36] Freeman C, Dickinson K J M, Porter S, et al. "My garden is an expression of me":Exploring householders' relationships with their gardens[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2012,32(2):135- 143.
[37] Perkins H E. Measuring love and care for nature[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2010,30(4):455-463.
[38] Ngurra D, Dadd L, Glass P, et al. Yanama budyari gumada:Reframing the urban to care as Darug Country in western Sydney[J]. Australian Geographer, 2019,50(3):279-293.
[39] Restall B, Conrad E. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015,159:264-278.
[40] Munro E. "People just need to feel important, like someone is listening":Recognising museums' community engagement programmes as spaces of care[J]. Geoforum, 2013,48:54-62.
[41] Tronto J C. Moral Boundaries:A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care[M]. New York:Routledge, 1993:102-137.
[42] West S, Haider L J, Masterson V, et al. Stewardship, care and relational values[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018,35:30-38.
[43] Thomas C. De-constructing concepts of care[J]. Sociology, 1993, 27(4):649-669.
[44] O'flynn T, Geoghegan H, Dyke A, et al. Attending to nature:Understanding care and caring relations in forest management in the UK[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2021,86:226-235.
[45] Conradson D. Spaces of care in the city:The place of a community drop-in centre[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2003,4(4):507-525.
[46] Mee K. A space to care, a space of care:Public housing, belonging, and care in inner Newcastle, Australia[J]. Environment and Planning a-Economy and Space, 2009,41(4):842-858.
[47] Power E R, Williams M J. Cities of care:A platform for urban geographical care research[J]. Geography Compass, 2020,14(1):e12474. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12474.
[48] Bellacasa M P D L. Matters of Care:Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds[M]. Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press, 2017:5-149.
[49] Lin Z X, Yang L. Smartphones as actors:A new digital disability care actor-network in China[J]. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2021,24(4):673-688.
[50] Woods O, Kong L. New cultures of care? The spatio-temporal modalities of home-based smart eldercare technologies in Singapore[J]. Social & Cultural Geography, 2018,21(9):1307-1327.
[51] Kellert S R. Experiencing Nature:Affective, Cognitive, and Evaluative Development in Children[M]//Peter H K J, Kellert S R. Children and Nature:Psychological, Sociocultural, and Evolutionary Investigations. Massachusetts:MIT Press, 2002:118-120.
[52] Williams M J. The possibility of care-full cities[J]. Cities, 2020,98:102591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102591.